Myanmar forms interim government before election but top general still in charge
's military on Thursday nominally transferred power to a civilian-led interim government in advance of a planned election, with the junta chief remaining in charge of the war-torn country in his other role as acting president.
An announcement in state media said a decree that granted power to the military after its 2021 coup had been cancelled and a caretaker administration had been formed alongside a special commission to oversee the election.
The move signals no change to the status quo in Myanmar, with coup leader
Min Aung Hlaing
holding on to all major levers of power as acting president while retaining his position as chief of the armed forces.
A nationwide state of emergency in place since the coup, which was due to expire on Thursday after seven extensions, has now been lifted, said Zaw Min Tun, a government spokesman.
READ MORE
'The interim president and commander in chief said this upcoming six months are the time to prepare and host the election,' he told state media.
Myanmar has been in chaos since the coup against
Aung San Suu Kyi
's elected civilian government plunged the Southeast Asian nation into civil war, with the military fighting to contain a rebellion and accused of widespread atrocities, which it denies.
The election has been dismissed by western governments as a sham to entrench the general's power and is expected to be dominated by proxies of the military, with opposition groups either barred from running or refusing to take part.
David Mathieson, an independent Myanmar-focused analyst, said the change in power was cosmetic and those in charge would continue to be abusive and repressive.
'They are just rearranging the same pieces and calling the regime a new name,' he said. 'This is part of preparations for an election which we don't know much about.'
The extent of the civil war's impact on the planned election remains unclear. In an effort to create voter rolls, the junta held a nationwide census last year but was only able to conduct it in 145 out of Myanmar's 330 townships – reflecting its lack of control over swathes of the country.
At a meeting of defence officials on Thursday, Min Aung Hlaing said voting in the election would be held in different areas in December and January due to security concerns, state-run MRTV reported in its nightly news bulletin.
Martial law and a state of emergency would be imposed in more than 60 townships across nine regions and states due to the threat of violence and insurgency, the report said, many in border areas where the military is facing unprecedented resistance from rebel groups.
China's foreign ministry on Thursday said it 'supports Myanmar's development path in line with its national conditions and Myanmar's steady advancement of its domestic political agenda'.
The military has killed more than 6,000 people and arbitrarily detained more than 20,000 since the coup, with more than 3.5 million people internally displaced, an Amnesty International report said in January.
Myanmar's military has dismissed allegations of abuses as western disinformation.
It justified its 2021 coup as a necessary intervention following what it said was widespread fraud in an election three months earlier that was won decisively by Ms Suu Kyi's now defunct ruling party.
Election monitors found no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome. – Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Atomic bombings anniversary: Japanese politicians consider a once-unthinkable question
In early August, Japan commemorates several wartime anniversaries, culminating mid-month with a sombre ceremony marking the nation's surrender in the second World War in 1945. It is a period of painful national reflection about what historian John Dower called a 'war without mercy'. That war reached its horrific denouement 80 years ago with the nuclear annihilation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. US footage of the destruction of those cities, first filmed in 1945 by Monaghan man Daniel A McGovern , was buried by military censors for decades. 'They didn't want the general public to know what their weapons had done at a time they were planning on more bomb tests,' said McGovern, an Air Force lieutenant colonel who had emigrated with his family to the US from Carrickmacross. The bombings created a new class of people called hibakusha. These were victims who often died in great pain in the days, months or years afterward. John Hershey, the American journalist who famously penetrated the censorship wall to profile six hibakusha, described Hiroshima's living dead: faces burned, eyesockets hollow, 'the fluid from their melted eyes had run down their cheeks'. This year, reflection on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is tinged by controversy over a once-unthinkable question: should Japan possess The Bomb? During last month's House of Councillors election in Japan, several politicians talked publicly about joining the nuclear arms race. Saya , running for the far-right Sanseito party, said 'nuclear armament is one of the most inexpensive and effective measures to ensure safety.' READ MORE The party's leader, Sohei Kamiya, appeared to be open to the idea. 'I do not think we should immediately possess them,' he said. 'But we must not shy away from a discussion.' Saya and Kamiya were among 14 Sanseito politicians who won seats in the July 20th upper house election. A survey by The Mainichi newspaper subsequently found that half of them, along with three other lawmakers, now support possessing nuclear weapons. That's still a small fraction of the National Diet's membership. However, openly expressing such thoughts in the only country where the weapons were used lowers the bar to someday using them again, says Terumi Tanaka, co-chair of the Japanese Confederation of A-and H-bomb Sufferers Organisations. A politician who did more than most most to open up this path of public discussion in Japan was former prime minister Shinzo Abe. Survivors moving along a road after the atomic bombing of Nagasaki, Japan, on August 9th, 1945. Photograph: EPA/US National Archives In 2022, before his assassination , Abe said Japan should consider a Nato-style arrangement to share and host nuclear weapons. He urged the country not to avoid a discussion on security realities because of the 'nuclear taboo'. Always in the background during Abe's second term (2012 to 2020) was growing tension with China and the newest member of the world's nuclear club, North Korea. Abe sought and won from Washington a renewed and unwavering commitment 'to defend Japan through the full range of US military capabilities, both nuclear and conventional'. A year later, in 2018, his government unequivocally welcomed the Nuclear Posture Review of the Donald Trump administration. Among other things, it proposed diversifying America's nuclear stock and creating new, smaller atomic bombs. A senior Japanese foreign ministry official, speaking anonymously, explained that: 'While the belief in nuclear abolition is important as an ideal, this is not the time for it . . . It is a fact that during the eight years of the administration of president Barack Obama, China and Russia increased their military capabilities and nuclear and missile threats by North Korea grew.' Underlying the ambivalence about nuclear weapons among the Japanese political class, Abe's Nato suggestion was immediately shot down by his successor, prime minister Fumio Kishida, whose family is from Hiroshima and who grew up listening to hibakusha stories. In 2022, Kishida became the first Japanese leader to address a conference of the United Nations' nuclear non-proliferation treaty review. [ 'Such a cruel sight': A visit to Hiroshima lives long in the memory Opens in new window ] Shigeru Ishiba, the current prime minister, is more on the fence, announcing in February, for example, that Japan would not attend the third meeting of the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The vast majority of Japanese people – 75 per cent – want him to join the treaty, which Japan has so far neither signed nor ratified. That anti-nuclear sentiment could be shaken in the coming years, however, by two factors. One is the growing fear that Japan's long-standing security treaty with the US is increasingly hollow. Just 15 per cent of Japanese people believe Washington under Donald Trump will protect Japan in the event of a military emergency, according to a poll published in April . This makes it easier for politicians to stoke the fear that Japan will be on its own in a war with China or Russia, and therefore needs a strong deterrent. The second factor is the passage of time and with it, the fading of direct memories of the bombings. The average age of hibakusha is 86. Their experiences imbued the anti-nuclear movement with a unique moral authority. What happens when they are gone?
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
Presidential election: How much does it cost to run for the Áras?
With the presidential election looming, just how much does it cost to run a successful campaign or otherwise? It is a question that parties and candidates are considering as they either enter the race or think about doing so. National poster campaigns, online advertising and campaign teams cost money and a lot of it. The six candidates in 2018 declared a total spend of €1.36 million in the race for the Áras. The 2011 election cost even more, with more than €2.3 million in spending across seven candidates. Fine Gael has decided to go for it and run a candidate – former European commissioner Mairead McGuinness – for an office the party has never held, and having been burned by presidential elections in the past. Independent left-wing Galway West TD Catherine Connolly is also in the race with the backing of smaller parties and Independents to get on the ballot paper. Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin have yet to decide if they will enter the fray. Labour backs Connolly, and Flatley jumps the shark Listen | 50:26 Presidential elections are fraught with risks for candidates and political parties. Professor of politics at University College Dublin David Farrell says these risks are 'not just financial', but 'reputational' also. 'There have been plenty of examples of campaigns that have completely come unstuck in all sorts of ways that couldn't have been anticipated,' he says. 'It's a courageous person who puts themselves forward and I think particularly if they're representing one of the larger parties, that in itself could come home to bite them if they don't do particularly well.' Farrell suggests that Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin may face embarrassment if they do not enter the race, but could also look bad, temporarily at least, if they do and their candidates do not perform well. Independent TD Catherine Connolly has held a press conference outside Leinster House where she spoke about her plans to run for president. Video: Bryan O'Brien It may be a case of 'they're damned if they do and they're damned if they don't', he says. There is some State support when it comes to the costs, but only if a candidate wins or reaches more than 25 per cent of the quota. Under those circumstances, they are entitled to a reimbursement of election expenses up to a maximum of €250,000. However, there is no guarantee of getting any money back, as recent elections have shown. Just two of the six candidates in the 2018 election got refunds – the winner, President Michael D Higgins and the Independent candidate who came second, Peter Casey. Mr Higgins's re-election campaign cost just over €367,000, the most spent that year, and it was reimbursed up to the then-maximum sum of €200,000. Mr Casey, meanwhile, was refunded the full amount of his expenses, which amounted to €119,911. Sinn Féin spent some €209,716 on its 2018 candidate Liadh Ní Riada's campaign, but lost out on any reimbursement as her vote share was too low. The most expensive campaign of recent times was Fine Gael's unsuccessful attempt to get former MEP Gay Mitchell elected in 2011. Mitchell's campaign – which cost €527,152 – did not qualify for any reimbursement after he secured only 6.4 per cent of the first preference votes. It was a disastrous result and one that Fine Gael – and the other two large parties deliberating on entering the upcoming election – will want to avoid. Two names in the race for the Áras: early-mover advantage or risky tactic? Listen | 28:04 Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin all had considerable costs last year as they fought local, European and Limerick mayoral elections in June and the general election in November. All three parties recorded deficits for 2024, according to financial statements. Fine Gael and Sinn Féin reported more cash reserves than Fianna Fáil. But this comes with the proviso that any of this that comes from State funding cannot be used for election purposes. Fine Gael remortgaged its Dublin headquarters last September to raise money in advance of the general election. The party did not offer an estimate on how much it will spend on McGuinness's election campaign. A statement indicated it will run 'a vigorous' campaign, which will be 'funded from the party's fundraising activities, the vast majority of which comes from the Fine Gael Superdraw'. It said all campaign spending 'will be in line with electoral guidelines and published with Sipo [Standards in Public Office Commission] after the election'. Fianna Fáil's financial statements for last year indicated 'net expenditure on election activity of €1,600,112 in 2024, contributing to a debt position at the end of the year of €1,527,288 which was in line with our projections at this point of the Dáil cycle'. The party said it will clear this debt and 'build an election fund for the future election cycles in this Dáil period'. It is understood that Fianna Fáil held a fundraising draw earlier this year that raised about €600,000. There are mixed views within Fianna Fáil on whether the cost of the presidential election will influence the decision on whether or not to contest it. One source suggested the party's finances will be a 'huge factor' and it is a reason 'not to run someone for the sake of running someone'. A different Fianna Fáil source said the identity of the candidate and strategy, not costs, will be what is taken into account in the decision-making. Another source said there is a strong view within the parliamentary party that Fianna Fáil should field a candidate, but it has to be the right one. 'There's no point in having a candidate and spending half a million euro and getting no positive result,' said the source. A separate source said the cost of the election 'is a factor' in Fianna Fáil's decision, but added: 'Is it a dominating factor? I don't believe it is. The party will want to see a viable candidate, one that can compete, and that will be the dominating factor.' There has been speculation about potential Fianna Fáil candidates, including former taoiseach Bertie Ahern, to ex-ministers Mary Hanafin and Éamon Ó Cuív. None appear to have been met with much enthusiasm within the party. Taoiseach Micheál Martin has ruled himself out and is consulting with the party on its approach to the election. It could be September before he makes a final decision on running a candidate. Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald, meanwhile, surprised many recently by not ruling herself out as a candidate as her party continues its deliberations. The Irish Times previously reported there is little appetite within Sinn Féin for her to run, with sources saying they would prefer her to stay in the Dáil, leading efforts to get into government. Sinn Féin may yet join other left-wing parties in backing Connolly. On the extent to which the cost of a campaign is influencing its deliberations, a Sinn Féin source said: 'The internal party discussion on the approach to contesting the upcoming presidential elections are primarily political. Financing a campaign is not the determining factor.' At her campaign launch last month, Connolly said she self-funded her last two Dáil election campaigns, and it will be 'big shift for me to move up and look at a national campaign with a serious amount of money'. [ Fine Gael says Mairead McGuinness 'acted in full accordance' with medical advice after being injured in crash Opens in new window ] She said she would be asking for contributions and the parties backing her are also 'open to providing funds in whatever way they see fit'. The Social Democrats said they are 'proud' to be supporting Connolly, adding: 'While we envisage there will be a financial contribution from the party, the bulk of donations will come from individuals and fundraising efforts around the country.' The Labour Party – also supporting Connolly – said it is 'finalising our approach to the upcoming presidential campaign'. A statement noted: 'As is standard practice, a separate fundraising stream will be established specifically for the purposes of the presidential campaign.' [ Labour Party backs Catherine Connolly's bid for Áras Opens in new window ] The Connolly campaign has been fundraising through its website and a spokeswoman said: 'We're very encouraged by the support Catherine Connolly is getting from around the country. It's really going to be a grassroots campaign.' As of Monday afternoon, the campaign has raised almost €35,000 in less than three weeks. On the evidence of previous presidential elections, Connolly's campaign, and those of any rivals in the race, will need a lot more.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Israeli government dismisses attorney general who opposed radical judicial overhaul
Israel 's government has voted unanimously to dismiss attorney general Gali Baharav-Miara after she opposed the efforts of the right-wing government to implement a radical judicial overhaul, shifting the balance of power away from the judicial branch, and blocked moves to grant the ultra-Orthodox an exemption from military service. She also serves as chief prosecutor in the ongoing corruption trial against prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu and opponents of the government say the real aim is to replace her with a 'yes-man' who may end the proceedings. Mr Netanyahu claims he is innocent of the charges of fraud, breach of trust and accepting bribes. Ministers, led by justice minister Yariv Levin, have accused her of pushing a progressive agenda aimed at undermining the policies of the democratically elected right-wing government. Ms Baharav-Miara refused to attend Monday's cabinet meeting, instead sending a letter to ministers accusing the government of acting illegally by not following accepted procedure required for such a dismissal. READ MORE 'The attorney general's participation in a process that contradicts the law, whose outcome is known in advance, would create an appearance of proper procedure and give it validity,' she wrote. 'We will continue to perform our work with statesmanship, objectivity and without fear.' The unprecedented dismissal was described by the opposition as a 'constitutional earthquake'. It will only go into effect after the high court of justice rules on a number of petitions against the move and legal experts believe the court is likely to strike it down, leaving Israel in unchartered constitutional waters. Ministers say they will boycott Ms Baharav-Miara, not inviting her to key government meetings and not seeking her legal opinion. However, she enjoys strong support from judges, senior civil servants and the security establishment – both past and present
