Why Manila Isn't in the Top Cities to Live In—Yet
Manila has made some progress in recent years—but according to the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), it still ranks low in terms of livability when compared to other major Asian cities. The capital remains stuck in the mid-tier range, facing challenges in healthcare, safety, and public infrastructure.
Global Rankings Show Stalled Growth
The EIU's Global Livability Index evaluates 173 cities based on five key areas: healthcare, education, stability, culture and environment, and infrastructure. While cities in East Asia and Australasia continue to dominate the top spots, Manila has not kept pace.
Back in 2021, Manila scored 53.4, and while the score has improved slightly over time—reaching 60.9 in 2023—its overall ranking dropped to 136th due to stronger performances from other cities. For comparison, top Asian cities like Tokyo, Singapore, Seoul, and Osaka consistently rank among the best places to live.
The Biggest Weak Spot: Stability
Manila's lowest scores come from the stability category, which includes crime rates, safety perceptions, and risks of unrest. Improving public safety, boosting accountability in law enforcement, and addressing root causes of crime and insurgency are seen as urgent priorities.
Healthcare Still Lags Behind
The city also struggles with its healthcare system, scoring in the mid-50s to 60s— well behind its ASEAN neighbors like Kuala Lumpur or Bangkok. Expanding universal health coverage, increasing hospital capacity, and encouraging health workers to serve underserved communities are some of the key recommendations.
Infrastructure Needs Massive Upgrades
While Manila's infrastructure score sits in the mid-60s, it's still far from the regional leaders. Urban congestion, poor road conditions, and unreliable public transport are everyday issues. To move forward, experts say the city must invest heavily in metro systems, road networks, utilities, and digital infrastructure. Improved broadband, better waste management, and modernized ports and airports are also crucial.
Culture and Education: Small Wins, Big Potential
There has been progress in Manila's cultural and educational sectors. But despite rising scores, many students still struggle with access and quality. The city is encouraged to invest in cultural spaces, art districts, and tech-enabled learning environments that can help produce globally competitive graduates.
Environmental Concerns Still Unresolved
Air pollution and waste management remain big challenges. Vehicle emissions and poor enforcement of environmental laws contribute to the city's poor air quality. Garbage collection issues lead to clogged drains and frequent floods—basic issues that greatly affect the quality of life.
What Will It Take to Rise in the Rankings?
The highest tier in the livability index starts at a score of 80. Manila currently sits in the 60-70 range, where daily life is manageable but still comes with hurdles. The more realistic target: reach the 70–80 range, where life is generally good despite some setbacks.
Experts point out that global geopolitical tensions may affect overall urban progress, but Manila still has room to grow. With focused policy and bold investments, the city could climb the global ranks and offer a more livable environment for its people.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
a day ago
- The National
Rare earths and real risk: Why the global supply chain needs a rethink
They are buried in our smartphones, embedded in EV motors, and essential to jet engines and wind turbines. Yet most people could not name a single rare earth element. This quiet invisibility belies their strategic importance. As the world accelerates towards a more digital and electrified future, rare earths have become indispensable – and increasingly, a source of geopolitical friction. The global supply chain behind these elements is under pressure. China currently produces nearly 70 per cent of rare earth ores and holds more than 95 per cent of global refining and separation capacity. For heavy rare earths, that number is closer to total control. This concentration gives China significant influence over price, availability and access to materials that power the energy transition and advanced defence technologies. In short, it is not just an economic advantage. It is a position of systemic control. But the challenges do not end with geographic concentration. The industry also struggles with what is known as the 'balance problem'. Not all rare earths are created equal. High-demand elements like neodymium and praseodymium, crucial for permanent magnets in electric vehicles and wind turbines, are co-mined with lower-demand elements such as cerium and lanthanum. Producers must extract and process everything, regardless of market demand. That creates inefficiencies, price distortions and sustainability concerns. This imbalance has strategic consequences. Without careful co-ordination, demand for magnet rare earths could outpace supply within the next decade. That does not mean catastrophe, but it does mean rising costs, tighter margins, and a squeeze on industries that depend on long-term stability. Momentum is finally shifting. As the urgency to diversify supply chains intensifies, ion adsorption clay (IAC) deposits have come into focus – and not just in China and Myanmar, where they have long been tapped. Exploration efforts are under way in countries like Brazil, Uganda and South-east Asia, offering new access to heavy rare earths. Unlike traditional hard-rock mines, IAC operations can reach production in just four to seven years, giving them a distinct strategic and commercial advantage. Refining is the next major hurdle. Mining rare earths without the ability to refine them only shifts the bottleneck, it does not solve it. Today, the vast majority of REE concentrates – even those mined outside China – are still sent back for processing. But that is beginning to change. Companies like Lynas in Malaysia, MP Materials in the US, and Neo Performance Materials in Estonia are building local refining capacity. These efforts mark early steps towards a more regionally balanced and secure supply chain. Innovation is also reshaping what's possible across the value chain. Manufacturing techniques like grain boundary diffusion allow for the reduction of dysprosium and terbium usage without compromising performance – a potential game changer given their sensitivity to supply shocks. Meanwhile, magnet recycling and by-product recovery from sources like phosphogypsum offer alternative streams of material with lower environmental impact. A co-ordinated, multinational response is essential. The US, Japan and Australia have launched public-private initiatives to diversify rare earth supply chains and strengthen refining capabilities. It is not just about securing raw materials. It is about ensuring that economic resilience and national security are not tied to a single point of failure. For those deeply involved in the rare earth ecosystem, from miners and refiners to end users and policymakers, the issues at stake go well beyond geology or engineering. They are a test of foresight and preparedness. The companies and countries that invest, innovate, and collaborate today will be the ones best positioned to thrive in the next era of industrial transformation. The 20th century was powered by oil. The 21st will be driven by rare earths. Those who recognise this early and act decisively will shape the future.
Zawya
2 days ago
- Zawya
South Africa is a prime target for ransomware attacks: How to safeguard your system?
Ransomware attacks have become a significant threat to South African businesses, with the country emerging as a top target in Africa. The prevalence of these attacks is driven by a combination of factors, including the rapid digital transformation of businesses, the increasing sophistication of cybercriminals, and the economic incentives for attackers. South Africa's relatively strong economy and high levels of digital adoption make it an attractive target for ransomware operators, who know that businesses and institutions here are more likely to pay ransoms to recover critical data. Why South Africa is a hotspot for ransomware South Africa's position as a regional economic hub means that its businesses and government institutions store vast amounts of sensitive data online. Cybercriminals are well aware of this, and they exploit vulnerabilities in outdated systems, weak passwords, and human error to infiltrate networks. For instance, a healthcare provider could fall victim to a ransomware attack if its systems are not updated with the latest security patches, allowing attackers to encrypt patient records and demand a hefty ransom. Similarly, a financial institution might be targeted if employees click on a phishing email, granting attackers access to the network. Common tactics used by ransomware operators Ransomware attacks often begin with phishing emails, where attackers use social engineering to trick employees into clicking malicious links or downloading infected attachments. Once inside the network, the ransomware spreads rapidly, encrypting files and rendering them inaccessible. Attackers then demand payment in exchange for decryption keys. In some cases, they also steal sensitive data and threaten to leak it if the ransom is not paid. Another common tactic is using exploit kits, which scan systems for vulnerabilities and deploy ransomware payloads without the need for user interaction. For example, a manufacturing company could be targeted through a compromised website, where an exploit kit silently installs ransomware on its systems. The cost of ransomware attacks The financial impact of ransomware attacks can be devastating. Beyond the ransom itself, businesses face costs related to downtime, lost revenue, and reputational damage. A retail chain might lose millions of rands in sales during a ransomware-induced shutdown, while a logistics company could suffer delays in delivering goods, leading to customer dissatisfaction. Moreover, the recovery process could take weeks or months, compounding the financial losses. Prevention is key: building resilient infrastructure Businesses must adopt a proactive approach to cybersecurity to protect themselves from ransomware. This starts with regular employee training to recognise phishing attempts and other social engineering tactics. Companies should also implement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the risk of unauthorised access. Keeping software and systems up to date is crucial, as outdated systems are a common entry point for ransomware. Partnering with an experienced IT security provider can make a significant difference in preventing ransomware attacks. An expert partner can help businesses identify vulnerabilities, implement advanced monitoring tools, and develop a comprehensive incident response plan. For example, a small business might work with an IT partner to deploy endpoint protection software that detects and blocks ransomware before it can encrypt files. Additionally, regular backups of critical data, stored securely offsite, can ensure businesses recover quickly without paying a ransom. A multi-layered defence strategy A multi-layered approach to cybersecurity is essential for safeguarding against ransomware. This means having multiple layers of security measures in place, each one adding a different level of protection, such as firewalls, email security, and intrusion detection systems, which can be used to block attacks at the perimeter. Inside the network, businesses should use tools that monitor for suspicious activity and automatically respond to potential threats. For example, a financial institution might use machine learning algorithms to analyse network traffic and detect anomalies that could indicate a ransomware attack. While prevention is the best defence, cyber insurance can provide additional protection. Policies that cover ransomware attacks can help businesses recover financially from the costs of downtime, data recovery, and ransom payments. However, insurers are increasingly scrutinising the cybersecurity measures of their clients, meaning businesses with stronger defences might benefit from lower premiums. Ransomware attacks are a growing threat to South African businesses but are not inevitable. By investing in robust cybersecurity measures, training employees, and working with expert IT partners, businesses can significantly reduce their risk of becoming a target. Prevention is key, and a proactive approach to cybersecurity can help ensure that businesses remain resilient in this evolving threat.
Zawya
2 days ago
- Zawya
China fashion retailer Shein to file confidentially for Hong Kong IPO in rare move, sources say
China-founded fast-fashion retailer Shein plans to file a draft prospectus confidentially for its Hong Kong listing, marking a rare departure from the usual practice of companies making public filings of IPO documents, three sources with knowledge of the matter said. Shein aims to submit the filing confidentially as soon as this week, one of the sources said. A second source said the filing was expected to be made by Monday. Shein's confidential filing, if approved, would represent a waiver of one of the main listing rules by the Hong Kong exchange for one of the world's most closely-watched IPO candidates, and possibly the largest in the city this year, two of the sources said. The filing will come as the company, which sells low-priced apparel such as $5 dresses and $10 jeans in around 150 countries, makes its third attempt to go public, more than 18 months after it first filed for a U.S. IPO in late 2023. Confidential filings enable companies to keep vital operational and financial information under wraps for longer and allow them to go through the regulatory review process without public disclosure. Hong Kong's listing rules permit confidential filings for secondary listings by companies already listed on recognised overseas exchanges, such as the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq. The exchange could also waive or modify the publication requirements in a spinoff from an overseas listed parent upon application by a new applicant, the listing rules show. While this practice is common for IPO applicants in the U.S., it remains relatively rare in Hong Kong, where high-profile IPOs have included Chinese tech giants Xiaomi and Meituan, which both filed publicly for their floats. The sources spoke to Reuters on the condition of anonymity as they were not authorised to speak to the media. Shein, founded by China-born entrepreneur Sky Xu, did not reply to a request for comment. The Hong Kong stock exchange declined to comment on individual companies. Documents, including financials, related to Shein's IPO will remain undisclosed until the company passes a hearing with the Hong Kong stock exchange, which is the final step in the city's regulatory approval process. Prior to that final step, Shein must secure an approval from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) to go ahead with the Hong Kong IPO. It is not known if Shein has already secured a verbal nod from the Chinese securities regulator. The CSRC did not respond to Reuters request for comment. Reuters first reported last month, citing sources, that Shein was working towards a listing in Hong Kong after its proposed London IPO failed to secure the green light from Chinese regulators. The New York attempt also did not receive CSRC approval, Reuters previously reported. REGULATORY APPROVAL Shein's confidential submission of the prospectus enables Hong Kong and mainland Chinese regulators to assess the IPO application, raise their questions to Shein and prepare it for regulatory approval privately, the sources said. The regulators would be able to do that before public, including potential institutional investors', scrutiny of its application materials, including risk factors, they added. The filing would come against the backdrop of Shein grappling with the knock-on impacts of the Sino-U.S. trade war after U.S. President Donald Trump ended duty-free treatment of ecommerce parcels and hiked tariffs on Chinese goods, hurting its business in the U.S., its biggest market. Shein was valued at $66 billion during its pre-IPO fundraising round in 2023, down by a third from a funding round one year earlier. Its eventual IPO valuation will hinge on the impact of the tariff changes, sources have said. RISK DISCLOSURES A Shein listing would help Hong Kong, which saw $12.8 billion worth of IPOs and second listings in the first half, re-establish its credibility as a global fundraising centre at a time of major volatility stoked by U.S. trade policy changes. Shein, founded in mainland China in 2012, is hoping to succeed in Hong Kong after failed attempts to list in New York and then London, where Britain's financial regulator approved the listing. Shein will have to file with the CSRC within three working days after submitting its IPO application in Hong Kong, in line with Beijing's rules for Chinese firms seeking offshore listings. Shein shifted headquarters from China to Singapore in 2022 and does not own or operate any factories, but remains subject to Chinese IPO rules because its products are mostly made by a network of 7,000 third-party suppliers in China, sources have said. The CSRC applies the rules on a "substance over form" basis, granting it discretion on when and how to implement them. A draft prospectus would normally disclose key risks to a company including those linked to its supply chain. Shein has faced allegations from politicians and campaigners that its supply chain in China is linked to forced labour of Uyghur minorities in Xinjiang, a highly contentious issue for Beijing, which denies any abuses in the cotton-producing province. The U.S. has a ban in place on imports of products made using forced labour from Xinjiang, and Shein has said it does not allow its suppliers to use Chinese cotton in U.S.-bound products. Shein has said its supplier code of conduct prohibiting forced labour applies worldwide.
