Alligator Alcatraz Is a 'Huge Step Backward,' Native Tribal Leader Warns
A tribal leader told Newsweek that he and members in the Big Cypress National Preserve of Florida, which is adjacent to the state's Alligator Alcatraz migrant detention center, are seeking legal remedies against officials because environmental efforts are taking "a huge step backward."
Why It Matters
On July 14, the Miccosukee Tribe in Florida filed a motion to join environmental groups in a lawsuit against state and federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Miami-Dade County and the Florida Division of Emergency Management.
The suit said the Miccosukee people, who compose 15 active tribal villages and reside within the Big Cypress National Preserve, have lived in and cared for the land "since time immemorial."
"The facility's proximity to the Tribe's villages, sacred and ceremonial sites, traditional hunting grounds, and other lands protected by the Tribe raises significant concerns about environmental degradation and potential impacts to same caused by the construction and operation of a detention facility at the TNT Site," the lawsuit said.
"TNT" refers to the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, which was constructed in the 1970s and opposed by tribal members, conservationists and others. The opposition eventually halted the grandiose project after one long runway was built.
Newsweek has contacted Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier for comment.
What To Know
Miccosukee Tribe Chairman Talbert Cypress spoke with Newsweek on Thursday on behalf of the tribe's 650 members, saying they had joined environmental groups in their legal action because of major environmental concerns that were conveyed prior to the facility's quick construction and use for illegal migrants.
"If they had listened to our concerns, they would realize that this is actually not a very good idea to put this place in," Cypress said. "There's no infrastructure there, and everything has to be brought in. Basically, they're bringing in generators and cellphone towers."
"And not to diminish what's going on there, but the cost of everything is going to be $450 million a year just to operate the place," he continued. "The governor [Ron DeSantis] as well as the Trump administration have put record amounts of money toward everybody's restoration and to put this project here flies in the face of that. It's a huge step backward for restoration."
Betty Osceola, a member of the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, standing in the Everglades a few yards from the front entrance of "Alligator Alcatraz" at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport in Ochopee,...
Betty Osceola, a member of the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, standing in the Everglades a few yards from the front entrance of "Alligator Alcatraz" at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport in Ochopee, Florida, on July 10. MoreCypress said that like most others, he and tribal members found out about Alligator Alcatraz through the news. By the time they voiced displeasure with state and federal lawmakers, the facility—which DeSantis said can house 3,000 to 4,000 migrants—had basically already opened.
Last month, DeSantis told reporters that the facility would have "zero impact" on the environment.
Following the First and Second Seminole Wars, the Miccosukee people were relocated to about 2.5 million acres of land at the southernmost point of their traditional range that was reserved as Indian Territory in or about 1845.
The "truce was broken," as the lawsuit said, and the U.S. attempted to remove the members from the reserved lands, ultimately forcing the Miccosukee people deeper into the Everglades, which they still inhabit to this day.
"We feel that there has not been any environmental impact study done, no consultation with the tribes that are present in that area," Cypress said. "The Miccosukee and Seminole Tribes, we both have residents that live in the area and traditional camps within the national preserve not too far from the detention facility."
He continued: "We are concerned about the daily lives of our members. We have a lot of members who live there. The increased traffic in that area is a big concern, safety-wise. We're going to have a lot of transported materials that are going to be going through that area now daily. Waste has to go out; supplies have to come in. We're very concerned about that."
The permanence of the structure and nefarious long-term effects on the surrounding wetlands provide additional worries, Cypress added.
In late June, nonprofit organizations Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity wrote in their complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief and a temporary restraining order that the facility "lies within the broader Everglades ecosystem restoration footprint, and any development at that site that disrupts hydrologic connectivity or degrades environmental conditions threatens to undermine the very objectives that these federal and state investments were intended to achieve."
What People Are Saying
Elise Bennett, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, told Newsweek on Thursday: "This is an incredibly ecologically sensitive system, and the impacts extend far beyond the site. Artificial lights are blazing into the once dark sky, evicting endangered Florida bonneted bats from dark, open night sky they need to hunt insects.
"It's also cutting into essential territory for the endangered Florida panther and increasing the risk of more of these big cats being struck by cars on roads. Contaminants on the site—fuels, wastewater and human refuse—threaten to pollute the sensitive waters surrounding the site on all sides. This place was meant to be a preserve for clean water and wildlife, and the federal and state government have turned it into a dystopian hellscape."
Eve Samples, the executive director of Friends of the Everglades, told Newsweek on Friday: "This mass detention center was ramrodded into the middle of our country's oldest national preserve with no public input, no environmental analysis—and no regard for the billions of dollars invested in Everglades restoration. Our government has gone rogue by ignoring cherished laws that protect our nation's water, wildlife and national parks."
President Donald Trump told reporters when touring Alligator Alcatraz on July 1: "It's known as Alligator Alcatraz, which is very appropriate because I looked outside and that's not a place I want to go hiking. But very soon, this facility will house some of the most menacing migrants, some of the most vicious people on the planet."
Democratic Florida Representative Anna Eskamani wrote on Facebook on July 12: "The environmental impact of this facility cannot be overstated—there is new asphalt, thousands of gallons of water used everyday and gas tanks powering generators. No alligators seen but plenty of mosquitoes. No one should be working here let alone detained."
What Happens Next
After an expedited motion was filed on July 11, lawyers for state Emergency Management Director Kevin Guthrie told the court the groups did not have a right to tell judges how to proceed, E&E News reported.
On Wednesday, Judge Jose E. Martinez recused himself from the case, which was reassigned to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. The change could cause delays in the case, meaning any potential relief may not come soon.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Exclusive: Trump Cuts to Hit Rural America Like 'a Tsunami,' Democrat Warns
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Representative April McClain Delaney warned that President Donald Trump's cuts to programs like Medicaid, as well as NPR and PBS, are going to hit rural America like a "tsunami" in an interview with Newsweek. Delaney's Maryland congressional district contains some of the areas that could be hit hardest by Trump's policies. It spans from the state's rural western panhandle, which she says could bear the brunt of new rescission cuts, to the Washington, D.C., suburbs, home to federal workers who have lost their jobs amid the mass firings of federal workers. She first won election to the Sixth District last November, defeating Republican Neil Parrott by about 6 percentage points in a light-blue district that has been competitive in recent elections. Delaney spoke with Newsweek about how she believes cuts in the Republican rescission package and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would affect constituents in rural areas in the district and across the country. "When you look at all of these funding freezes on our government employees on our national parks, but also Medicaid, SNAP, and then start looking at some of the other rescissions that it's just a tsunami that's about to hit rural America," Delaney said. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Associated Press/Canva How PBS, NPR Cuts Will Affect Rural America Funding cuts for public media, such as PBS and NPR, which were included in a rescissions package passed by Congress earlier in July, could have devastating impacts on rural Americans, Delaney said. Republicans argued that funding for these programs was a waste of taxpayer dollars and have accused the networks of pushing left-leaning programming. Critics, however, say public funding was a lifeline to communities that relied on their local NPR affiliates for news or PBS for free children's programming. "When you look at the community that really relies on trusted news, one of the last trusted bastions of news is local news," Delaney said. These cuts may have an impact on Amber Alerts and Emergency Broadcast System alerts, she said. Recent flooding in Western Maryland's Allegany County—a rural, conservative county inside Delaney's district—underscores the importance of having robust local radio news, she said. "We had floods in Allegany County, and luckily, because of the emergency alerts, they kept the kids in the school. They didn't release them early. And as the rising waters went, I think, nine feet in 45 minutes, the kids went from the first floor, the second floor to the third floor, luckily were rescued and no one was hurt," she said. "When you think about how alerts are really facilitated by our broadcast stations, particularly these rural communities, it's a pretty big deal." Delaney, who spent much of her career advocating for children in media at nonprofits like Common Sense Media, said cuts to PBS will have consequences for children across the country. "I really look at how this funding will impact rural America in terms of broadcast stations and in particular educational programming for our kids. PBS is really the only free programming, educational programming that these kids receive," she said. "While you might hear some of my GOP colleagues [say] you can stream Sesame Street. Well, I hate to say this, our most disadvantaged kids in rural America, they can't afford to have a streaming Netflix account, much less have rural broadband." Delaney predicted there would be a "significant outcry" from rural Americans if their local stations go under as a result of the cuts and that Democrats would eye the restoration of this funding if they retake control of Congress in the midterms. The loss of these local stations would be a "loss of our community heart," she said, noting that they have historically had community obligations and public interest standards. "I still think there's that residue reporting on the games from the football game at the high school or talking about the local fairs or the rodeo that's going to be in town or what have you," she said. "There is something that's a big community builder. In these smaller stations in rural and even bigger suburban America." Cuts to Medicaid are another challenge facing rural America, she said, noting that one in seven families in her district relies on the program for health care. "What are you going to do in the long term in terms of rural health care and rural hospitals potentially closing? she said. "But also, you know, are all these premiums going to go up? Right, and what's the impact?" How Trump's Agenda Is Affecting Federal Workers Maryland's Sixth District also encompasses parts of the D.C. suburbs and is home to more than 35,000 government workers who may be affected by cuts to the federal bureaucracy as part of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). So far, at least 260,000 federal workers have left their jobs since Trump returned to office in January, whether they were fired, retired early, or took a buyout, according to Reuters. Delaney said many of them are still looking for jobs and have reached out to her office. Health care is a key concern for these federal workers, she said. "Many of them are concerned about the long-term, how they're going to have health care, in addition to being able to find new jobs," she said. There are concerns that these "well-educated and well-adjusted" workers may be taken to the private sector or even leave the country as they seek new employment, she said. "There are other big concerns about workforce development and how are we going to look at maybe figuring out ways that they can retool some of their skills. I do think that many of our state governments might be able to fill in the gap for some of these workers. But, their concerns are, of course affordability, figuring out their next step and interestingly enough, I've started hear more about AI," she said. Delaney Slams 'Foolish' Foreign Aid Cuts Foreign aid cuts have been "one of the most foolish acts" of the Trump administration, Delaney said. "Our world is on fire right now and we have traditionally always been the one that has stepped in to help, whether it's vaccinations, whether it is feeding women and children, whether it was displacement during times of war. But there is something in soft diplomacy," she said. "What that means is that you are a trusted beacon of light. You are a source that people can depend upon around the world. And you do have more stability and peace when you have that." She warned that there is a "lack of trust" in the United States on the global stage right now, and that other countries, such as China, are "zooming in to fill that void." She described this foreign aid as the "cheapest part of our defense budget." "It is probably some of the most foolish cuts I've ever seen in my life, and it's going to impact us globally, but that's going to come to haunt us domestically as well," she said. Delaney on Trust in Government Delaney also said her work in Congress is focused on restoring trust in the government amid a period of heightened "anger." "It's really impacting the trust that people have in if our country can function and if our county can feel like the people who are elected officials are trustworthy," she said. Elected officials need to take the time to "understand why there's anger" and why people feel like they have not been heard or met in the moment. "My biggest concern and my biggest priority in Congress is to find ways to reestablish that trust, that trust with the American people, that trust on a community level," she said. "And I don't think it is a top-down—I think it's going to be a bottom-up within our communities building back, you know, across our communities and understanding in our elected officials." She said she plans to ask her constituents for their views on the issues so that her vote can reflect their thoughts. "Our world is crazy, but the last thing I'm going to say is I believe that we're going be OK. It's going to be choppy, it's going to be hard, but that we are going to swim through this, but it's a difficult ride at the moment," she said.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Social Security COLA for 2026 and Beyond: What Seniors Want
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. American seniors are frustrated with how Social Security adjusts for inflation, and they want change. A new report from The Senior Citizens League (TSCL) shows a clear demand among retirees to improve the way the annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) is calculated. According to the group's latest survey of 1,92 individuals over the age of 62, 34 percent of respondents identified updating the COLA formula as their top policy priority for enhancing Social Security benefits. And when presented with specific policy options to raise future COLAs, seniors overwhelmingly supported a shift to a more targeted inflation measure. Currently, the Social Security Administration (SSA) calculates COLA based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). This index tracks inflation using the spending habits of younger, urban workers, not retirees. Since 1975, COLAs have been applied annually based on CPI-W data gathered during the third quarter of the year (July through September), with the goal of ensuring benefits rise in line with everyday costs, such as housing, food, and medical care. This year, benefits rose by 2.5 percent. The TSCL, based on current CPI-W readings, expects the 2026 COLA to increase slightly to 2.6 percent. However, regardless of the boost, for many retirees, that formula no longer works. According to the TSCL survey, 68 percent of seniors support replacing the current CPI-W model with the CPI-E, or Consumer Price Index for the Elderly. Developed by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the CPI-E is an index that tracks the spending habits of Americans aged 62 and older, focusing on the types of goods and services seniors typically use, such as health care, housing, and prescription drugs. "CPI-E is designed to better reflect the spending habits of people aged 62 and older," Colin Ruggiero, co-founder at told Newsweek. "It gives more weight to health care and housing costs which are two of the fastest-growing expenses for seniors. Switching to CPI-E would make COLAs more relevant and responsive to the real financial pressures seniors face." Chris Motola, a financial analyst at told Newsweek: "The main advantage of CPI-E would be to more heavily weight health care and housing costs in COLA calculations, both of which tend to disproportionately eat into seniors' budgets." Another popular idea is making up for what's already been lost. The TSCL survey found that 57 percent of respondents support a one-time "catch-up" COLA payment to compensate for years when benefits failed to keep pace with actual living costs. Composite image created by Newsweek. Composite image created by Newsweek. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva "A catch-up COLA would be a recognition that past adjustments haven't kept pace with reality," Ruggiero said. "While it's feasible, it would require congressional approval and carry a hefty budgetary cost. Politically, it could gain traction as a way to restore fairness, especially if framed as a correction rather than a new ongoing expense." Still, the limits of these proposals are clear. While COLA reforms could help stabilize seniors' purchasing power, experts caution that they won't fix everything. "Adjusting the COLA is a great start, but it's not the cure-all," said Ruggiero. "We also need broader reforms to strengthen the entire retirement system, including benefit adequacy, solvency, and support for low-income seniors." Motola agreed: "It would go a long way, but again, a major problem is that Social Security isn't really meant to carry the burden alone. We've made it very difficult for people to save money for retirement, and the loss of pensions has placed enormous stress on the system."
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows Region Leading 2050 Global Population Increase
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Almost every country in the world has seen fertility rates decline over the past few decades, but one region's birth rates are still so high that it is expected to provide more than half the global population increase until 2050—sub-Saharan Africa. The global fertility rate was 2.2 births per woman last year, down from five in the 1960s and 3.3 in 1990, according to the United Nations World Fertility 2024 report. It is set to hit the replacement level of 2.1 (required to maintain a stable population without immigration) in 2050 and drop below the replacement rate to 1.8 in 2100. America's fertility rate is already below the replacement rate, at 1.6 births per woman, according to the Congressional Budget Office's latest forecast released this year. But sub-Saharan Africa's fertility numbers are the highest of any major world region, at 4.3 children per woman. This high figure is despite the fact that the region, made up of 49 separate African nations, has also seen declines—from 6.5 in the 1960s, to 5.3 in 2000. The UN Commission on Population and Development estimates that over the coming decades, more than half of all new people added to the planet will be in Sub‑Saharan Africa. "Generally, countries in sub-Saharan Africa are in an earlier stage of the demographic transition, characterized by a relatively large share of children and youth," Patrick Gerland, chief of the Population Estimates and Projection Section, told Newsweek. In other words, while countries in the Sahara have followed the rest of the world in lowering death rates, meaning there are more elderly people than there have been before, their higher birth rates mean their populations are mostly children and teenagers. This means that, unlike wealthy countries, which are facing a workforce crisis (not enough working-aged people to support the growing elderly population), nations in sub-Saharan Africa have a growing working-age population. But "investments in areas like education and infrastructure will be crucial" for this to be as beneficial as it could be, Gerland said. "Many African countries are currently experiencing a 'window of opportunity' for economic growth," he said. Could This Be Tomorrow's Workforce? Professor Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California, spoke this dynamic - a growing workforce in sub-Saharan Africa with "demographic pressures increasing in rich countries as they age, have fewer workers and higher dependency ratios." "From an economic point of view, it would make sense to think this would generate change in attitude towards migration," he told Newsweek. "So far it has not, and it seems unlikely in the next two decades, at least to me." "From an economist point of view, any reasonable policy that would plan migration in an orderly way from south-Saharan Africa, to jobs and universities in Europe, enforced and implemented well would generate huge economic gains," he said. "I just do not see this happening." Similarly, William Frey, a demographer and senior fellow at The Brookings Institution, told Newsweek: "It is clear that most developed countries, including the US, will need to rely on immigration to counter advanced population aging and declines in their labor force populations." "In the years ahead, the U.S. will require even higher immigration than it currently receives in order to avoid this scenario," said Frey. But "the issues of safety, culture will predominate on the economic rationale," Professor Peri said. Why Does Sub-Saharan Africa Have Such High Birth Rates? "Fertility transitions in sub-Saharan Africa exhibit distinctive characteristics compared to other low- and middle-income countries," the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs said in its report. "The fertility decline started later, and the pace of fertility decline has been markedly slower in sub-Saharan Africa than in Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean," it said. There are many practical reasons for high fertility rates in sub-Saharan Africa, including limited access to contraception, lower levels of education for girls and women and high rates of child marriages. But there are also significant cultural reasons, with children seen as important contributors to household livelihoods and carers of parents in old age. Both men and women in sub-Saharan Africa express a preference for larger families—in Burundi, Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda and Zimbabwe, the ideal family size is 3.5 and four, according to the latest Demographic and Health Surveys (conducted between 2010 and 2022). Meanwhile, in Chad, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mali, Niger and Nigeria, the ideal family size is more than six. Conversely, families in wealthier countries are having fewer children while cultural traditions are shifting away from the prioritization of parenthood in general, according to a new study Newsweek reported on here.
