Abbas Dahouk: Unconventional Path of Military Acumen, Diplomatic Vision
Born and raised in Lebanon, Col. Dahouk experienced the brutal realities of the Lebanese Civil War firsthand, before making the pivotal decision of moving to the US.
There, he enlisted in the US Army, establishing an esteemed career that saw him holding numerous senior roles. His contributions have been instrumental in shaping US defense strategy in the Middle East. Lebanon Civil War: A Defining Experience
Col. Abbas Dahouk was born in Bakline, a prominent Druze town located about 45 kilometers southeast of Beirut, Lebanon. Living through the horrors of the Lebanese Civil War during the late 1970s and 1980s, Col. Dahouk joined a local militia, known as the People's Liberation Army, at the age of 15. He also completed his unconventional military training in Crimea, in the former Soviet Union, at the age of 17.
However, the brutality of the war left him deeply frustrated, prompting him to seek a new path. At this critical juncture, Col. Dahouk decided to travel to the US to pursue his higher education. The American Dream
At the age of 21, Col. Dahouk moved to the US, seeking to enroll in a university for one year. 'I was born in Lebanon and when I came to the US, I could barely speak English. My plan was to have one year of university study,' he recounted in an interview.
'I was 20, almost 21, when I came to the US. And I grew up through the Civil War, so my chance to come and stay in the US was a dream. This American dream still captivates many across the world,' Col. Dahouk said.
In a turning point, he decided to enlist in the US Army, where he served for over 33 years. Col. Dahouk takes pride in his military service, as few Arabs could join the US Army in the 1980s. Remarkable Military Career
Col. Abbas Dahouk joined the US Army as an Airborne Cavalry Scout. Upon his graduation from the Officer Candidate School (OCS) in 1991, he was commissioned as a Field Artillery Officer.
He began his military career at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, serving as a Fire Support Officer with A Company, 3rd Battalion, 319th Airborne Field Artillery Regiment, part of the 82nd Airborne Division.
His key assignments included serving as Platoon Leader, and Battalion Intelligencer Officer with 3rd Battalion 319th Airborne Field Artillery Regiment, Fort Bragg, North Carolina.
Col. Dahouk's military career included holding several leadership roles in countries across the Middle East and Europe, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Oman, Afghanistan, and Germany. Military Expertise in Diplomatic Service
Building upon his distinguished military career, Col. Abbas Dahouk entered the realm of international relations where he drew upon his remarkable strategic acumen and operational insight.
Bridging uniform and diplomacy, Col. Dahouk played a pivotal role at the intersection of defense policy and foreign affairs, assuming key senior positions where his military expertise in diplomatic service proved invaluable.
Col. Dahouk served as a Senior Political-Military Advisor to the Bureau of the Near Eastern Affairs at the US Department of State, from July 2017 to December 2018, where he played a key role in supporting policy with CENTCOM, EUCOM, and AFRICOM.
Before that, he was the Defense and Army Attaché at the US Embassy in Riyadh, from December 2013 to July 2017.
From November 2010 to November 2013, Col. Dahouk served as a Senior Military Advisor on Pakistan and Afghanistan Security Assistance for the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs at the US Department of State.
He was also Military Programs Director at the US Embassy in Abu Dhabi, from June 2006 to June 2008, and Director of US- Saudi Mission Relations and Political-Military Affairs at the US Military Training Mission in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from April 2004 to June 2006. Academic Path
Beyond his military and diplomatic accomplishments, Col. Abbas Dahouk boasts an esteemed academic path which further solidified his expertise. He holds a BS in Mathematics and a BA in Near Eastern Studies from the University of Arizona. Moreover, he has a BA in Military Science from the Sultanate of Oman Joint Command and Staff College.
Col. Dahouk also holds an MA in Strategic Studies from the Army War College, and an MA in Near Eastern Studies from Princeton University. Furthermore, he worked as an Assistant Professor of Arabic and Persian (Farsi) at the US Military Academy in West Point, from June 2008 to October 2010. Bridging US-Arab Relations
Col. Abbas Dahouk has made great contributions to promoting US-Arab strategic ties, harnessing his unparalleled expertise and knowledge of both American and Middle Eastern affairs.
'The experiences of my key engagements from Washington DC to the Middle East have enabled me to hone my ability to describe, analyze, comprehend and assess a range of phenomena, factors, and forces that most Americans are seldom if ever exposed to,' Dahouk said.
He is the founder and President of HyphenPoint LLC, an advisory firm that helps in developing partnerships between US security and private sectors and their counterparts in the MENA region.
Moreover, Col. Dahouk is a member of the Board of Directors at the National Council on US-Arab Relations, a non-profit, non-governmental, educational organization that aims to improve American awareness, knowledge, and understanding of the Arab countries, the Middle East, and the Islamic world.
He is also a member of the Advisory Board at the Arab-American Business and Professional Association, and a founding member of the Princeton Veterans Alumni Association. Honors and Recognition
Col. Dahouk's impressive achievements have earned him multiple accolades and awards. His dedication and exceptional service culminated in his induction in the OCS Hall of Fame in 2019.
Furthermore, he received numerous medals and honors, including the Defense Superior Service Medal; the Legion of Merit Medal; and National Intelligence Meritorious Unit Citation.
He also earned the King Salman of Saudi Arabia Military Appreciation Medal-First Class; Global War on Terrorism Medal –Expeditionary and Service; South West Asia Medal (2 BS); Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia); Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait); Multinational Forces and Observers Medal; German Sportsman Badge; and Master Parachutist Badge and the Ranger Tab. Visionary Insights
Col. Abbas Dahouk is a frequent political and military commentator for reputable media outlets. He offers far-sighted views and anticipatory analyses on current geopolitical issues, which have repeatedly proven to be correct.
Just right before the Israeli attack on Iran, which took place on June 13, 2025, Col. Dahouk rightly predicted that the US movements in the Middle East signaled a preparation for a strike against Iran and at the same time a way to pressure the Iranian regime to reach a diplomatic solution.
He said that the readiness level was high as 'both the US and Israel are preparing the region for either a unilateral action by Israel or an action supported by the US.'
Once again, Col. Dahouk anticipated that the US would strike Iran's nuclear facilities. 'The military preparations seem to be at its peak,' he said, adding that the US military movements in the region aimed to 'prepare for what could be a major strike on specific targets inside Iran.'
He precisely said that the US intervention 'will be very specific and will target certain nuclear facilities, namely the Fordo nuclear compound, which requires US assets to destroy it.'
Moreover, when the US President, Donald Trump, assumed office in January 2025, Col. Dahouk foresaw a strong US military action against the Houthis. 'Trump will not tolerate any other threats to the US navy in the region and the near-daily Houthi attacks by Iranian missiles and drones,' he said.
'He will likely respond forcefully to prevent future attacks. He may also hold Iran responsible for any damage caused to the US military personnel,' Col. Dahouk predicted.
Then, in March 2025, Trump ordered a 'decisive and powerful' military action against the Houthis in Yemen, in response to their attacks against US ships, aircraft and drones.
Short link :
Post Views: 19
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
3 days ago
- Al Arabiya
Hundreds of Myanmar troops, civilians flee across Thai border
More than 500 civilians and soldiers fled conflict in Myanmar and crossed into Thailand on Saturday after an assault by ethnic fighters on a military base, the Thai army said. Myanmar has been mired in civil conflict since a military coup in 2021, with the junta battling a coalition of ethnic armed groups and pro-democracy resistance forces. Saturday's attack by the Karen National Liberation Army (KNLA) targeted a military base in Kayin state at around 3 pm local time (0800 GMT), Thailand's military said in a statement. 'The Myanmar soldiers attempted to resist and called for supporting firepower to defend their position but were ultimately unable to hold the line,' it said. One hundred Myanmar soldiers and 467 civilians had crossed into Thailand on Saturday, where Thai military and police disarmed them and provided treatment and humanitarian aid, officials said. Thai forces have ramped up patrols along the border in western Tak province to prevent what officials described as a potential 'violation of sovereignty by foreign armed forces.' Saw Thamain Tun, a leader of the KNLA's political wing, confirmed there had been fighting near the border and said that joint forces had 'seized some front posts' from the army. 'Some (Myanmar troops) defected to our joint forces, but some of them ran into Thailand,' he told AFP. Armed groups from the Karen ethnic minority have long challenged the military and now play a key role in resisting junta control over border zones. Myanmar's civil war has caused huge waves of population displacement, with 81,000 refugees or asylum seekers from the country currently living in Thailand, according to United Nations figures. The KNLA has been fighting for decades to establish greater autonomy for the Karen people living along Myanmar's southeastern flank.
Saudi Gazette
5 days ago
- Saudi Gazette
Row over language turns violent in India's richest state
MUMBAI — For weeks, a battle over language and identity has been raging in India's richest state, Maharashtra. The row began in April after the Maharashtra government made it compulsory for state-run primary schools to teach Hindi as a third language, apart from English and Marathi (the state's dominant language). This, it said, was in line with a federal policy which mandates that children be taught three languages in school. The National Education Policy (NEP), introduced in 1968, aims to promote and regulate education in India and the government updates it occasionally. The latest iteration of the policy, introduced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government five years ago, is being implemented in stages and has run into controversy earlier. The Maharashtra government's decision met fierce opposition from civil society groups, language activists and opposition leaders who accused it of trying to impose Hindi - predominantly spoken in northern and central Indian states - in the state. Language is a sensitive issue in India where many states, including Maharashtra, were formed on linguistic lines after independence. The local language is often intrinsically linked to regional pride and identity, and any change to the status quo can be perceived as a threat. For instance, last year, Kannada-language activists in Bengaluru, often called India's Silicon Valley, held protests demanding that billboards be written in the local language and not just English. But the uneasiness is especially high when it comes to Hindi, the most-spoken language in India. Over the years, steps by various federal governments to promote Hindi have fuelled fears within non-Hindi speaking states that the local culture will be diluted. These worries have been exacerbated by high migration from less-developed Hindi-speaking states to other parts of India, especially the south, in search of jobs. Abhay Deshpande, a political analyst, says that these anxieties have increased after the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) came to power in 2014. Top leaders of the BJP - the party is stronger in Hindi-speaking states - have often courted controversy by making remarks about privileging Hindi. As tensions rose in Maharashtra, the state government - ruled by a BJP-led coalition - revoked its decision and appointed a committee to re-examine the three-language policy. But the controversy refuses to die down. The row comes months ahead of the long-overdue municipal polls which are set to be held in the state, including in Mumbai city, home to India's richest municipal corporation. It has sparked a political slugfest between the ruling coalition and opposition parties, with each side accusing the other of playing political games. There have also been reports of violence against non-Marathi speakers in the state. In April, two women in Thane district were allegedly assaulted in their residential complex after they said "excuse me" to a man who insisted they speak to him in Marathi. The same month, a security guard in Mumbai was allegedly beaten up by workers from the opposition Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) - a nativist party known for its aggressive brand of politics - after he said that he did not know Marathi. In May, a couple in Mumbai reportedly refused to pay a delivery agent after he declined to speak in Marathi. Last week, a shocking video showing a shop owner being assaulted, allegedly by MNS workers, for not speaking Marathi went viral on social media, sparking outrage. While the issue seems to have increased societal divisions, it has also brought together two political rivals almost two decades after they parted ways. Last week, Uddhav Thackeray, chief of the local opposition Shiv Sena (UBT) party and Raj Thackeray, leader of the MNS - the son and nephew, respectively, of Bal Thackeray, patriarch of the erstwhile Shiv Sena, a Hindu nationalist party that gained popularity in Maharashtra in the 1960s with its nativist politics - held a joint rally to oppose alleged Hindi imposition. While the strength of the truce remains to be seen, experts say that the optics of the cousins putting aside differences to "protect Marathi pride" could help their prospects in the upcoming municipal elections. "The issue of Marathi language and culture is close to peoples' hearts," says Prashant Dixit, a former political journalist who has reported on the state for over two decades. "It is an emotive issue, especially for people living in Mumbai, and it has been so since the 1960s," he adds. In the 1960s and 1970s, the erstwhile Shiv Sena, under the leadership of Bal Thackeray, conducted aggressive campaigns against people who had migrated to Mumbai from southern states, accusing them of taking up jobs that should have gone to locals. In the decades after that, migration patterns changed and the party turned its ire towards people from northern states who were migrating to the city in search of economic opportunities. The party blamed migrants from states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar for taking away jobs. These tensions look set to continue. According to data from India's last census, there was a 40% increase in Mumbai city's Hindi-speaking population between 2001 and 2011. These Marathi-centric agitations have earlier resonated with voters, especially in Mumbai, and some believe that it could help the Thackeray cousins in the municipal elections as well. However, many have criticised this approach. An editorial in the Indian Express newspaper titled 'Slap In Mumbai's Face' argued that politics centred around linguistic identity was "deeply troubling" and that its parochialism lent itself to violence, something that "should have no place in India's most industrialised state". Mr Dixit agrees - he thinks that any support garnered by aggressive language agitations is likely to be short-lived. "People want their leaders to deliver on their promises and focus on real progress, in the form of better jobs and policies, so that life is better for everyone," he says. — BBC
Arab News
5 days ago
- Arab News
Many Liberians take offense after Trump praises their president's English
MONROVIA, Liberia: US President Donald Trump's praise of the 'beautiful' English of Liberia's President Joseph Boakai drew confusion Thursday in the English-speaking African country and umbrage over what many considered condescending remarks. 'Such good English,' Trump said to Boakai during an event at the White House, with visible surprise. 'Such beautiful English.' Although English has been the official language of Liberia since the country's founding in the 1800s, Trump asked Boakai where he had learned to speak the language 'so beautifully,' and continued as Boakai murmured a response. 'Where were you educated? Where? In Liberia?' The exchange took place Wednesday during a meeting in the White House between Trump and five West African leaders, amid a pivot from aid to trade in US foreign policy. Boakai's government said it took no offense at Trump's remarks, but other groups in Liberia described the remarks as an insult. The White House declined to comment on whether Trump was aware that English was Liberia's official language. Massad Boulos, the president's senior adviser for Africa, stressed that Trump 'actually complimented the language skills of the Liberian president,' and that everyone at the meeting was 'deeply appreciative' of the president's time and effort. Trump's comments draw mixed reaction Liberia has had deep ties with the United States for two centuries, stemming from the drive to relocate freed slaves from the United States. It started in the 1820s when the Congress- and slaveholder-funded American Colonization Society began sending freed slaves to its shores. In 1847, the growing Americo-Liberian settlers declared themselves independent, setting up a government to rule over a native African majority. Liberian Foreign Minister Sara Beysolow Nyanti said on X that 'President Trump's comment on Boakai's 'beautiful English' simply acknowledged Liberia's familiar American-rooted accent and no offense was taken.' 'Our linguistic heritage is deeply American‑influenced, & this was simply recognized by @realDonaldTrump. We remain committed to strengthening Liberia‑US ties, built on mutual respect, shared values, and meaningful partnership,' the minister said. Foday Massaquio, chairman of Liberia's opposition Congress for Democratic Change-Council of Patriots, said the remarks exemplified Trump's lack of respect for foreign leaders, particularly African ones. 'President Trump was condescending, he was very disrespectful to the African leader,' Massaquio said, adding that it 'proves that the West is not taking us seriously as Africans.' Comments add to alarm over aid cuts For many observers, Trump's comments added to the sense of alarm and even betrayal over cuts in US aid to the African country. The decision by US authorities earlier this month to dissolve the US Agency for International Development sent shockwaves across Liberia. American support previously had made up almost 2.6 percent of the gross national income, the highest percentage anywhere in the world, according to the Center for Global Development. Liberians thought they would be spared from Trump's cuts because of the countries' close relationship. Their political system is modeled on that of the US, along with its flag. Liberians often refer to the US as their 'big brother.' Liberia was one of the first countries to receive USAID support, starting in 1961. The street signs, taxis and school buses resemble those in New York. 'Liberia is a long standing friend of the USA, therefore Trump should have understood that we speak English as an official language,' said Moses Dennis, 37, a businessman from Monrovia. Condescension or praise? Siokin Civicus Barsi-Giah, a close associate of former President George Weah, echoed the notion that Trump should have known that Liberians speak English. 'Liberia is an English speaking country,' he said. 'Former slaves and slave owners decided to organize themselves to let go of many people who were in slavery in the United States of America, and they landed on these shores now called the Republic of Liberia.' For him, the exchange was 'condescending and ridiculing,' and he said: 'Joseph Boakai was not praised. He was mocked by the greatest president in the world.' Some observers, however, said that they believed Trump's remarks genuinely were intended as praise. 'To some, the comment may carry a whiff of condescension, echoing a long-standing Western tendency to express surprise when African leaders display intellectual fluency,' said Abraham Julian Wennah, a researcher at the African Methodist Episcopal University. But if one looks at 'Trump's rhetorical style,' the remarks were 'an acknowledgment of Boakai's polish, intellect, and readiness for global engagement,' he said.
