Locations chosen for three Welsh government-backed wind farms
Trydan Gwyrdd Cymru, which means Green Electricity Wales in Welsh, was launched in 2024, with the aim of developing 1 GW worth of new renewable energy schemes on government-owned land by 2040.Ministers had been inspired by similar state-backed firms such as Sweden's Vattenfall, which owns Wales' largest onshore windfarm - Pen-y-Cymoedd.Having the country's own renewable energy developer means profits generated by Wales' wind can be retained and reinvested locally in communities and public services, the government argues.
The company has now unveiled its first three proposed wind farms, in north, south and west Wales.Clocaenog Dau wind farm will see 67 turbines built near Llyn Brenig, along the border between Conwy and Denbighshire.Glyn Cothi wind farm, near Brechfa in Carmarthenshire, will have 27 turbines.Carreg Wen wind farm, between Aberdare and Maerdy in Rhondda Cynon Taf, will be made up of 18 turbines.Should all three make it through the planning process as well as securing connection to the grid, they will generate enough electricity to power the average needs of 350,000 homes.The building work is anticipated to cost £500m, creating about 650 construction jobs.Forty direct and 55 indirect jobs are also promised over the wind farms' 35-year operational lifetime.
Ministers said the schemes would help meet the growing need for clean energy in Wales.Electricity demand is projected to nearly triple by 2050, fuelling the switch to electric vehicles, heat pumps and other low carbon technologies.The Welsh government has set a target for Wales to generate enough renewable electricity to meet 70% of what's used in Wales by 2030, rising to 100% by 2035.
What about pylons?
Two of the projects already have an offer of connection to the grid network.There are plans for a wooden pole line to connect the Glyn Cothi wind farm to a proposed new substation in Llandyfaelog, Carmarthenshire.Similarly a wooden pole line would run from the Carreg Wen wind farm to a planned new substation near Hirwaun, Rhondda Cynon Taf.Both substation projects – as well as the prospect of more overhead transmission lines - have already proved controversial locally.Trydan Gwyrdd Cymru says it will begin a series of public information and engagement events later this year, with the aim of submitting planning applications in 2027."Communities will be involved and funding will support local priorities," said chief executive Richard Evans."With Trydan driving development, and with the profits from this investment retained in Wales, we have a unique opportunity to optimise the projects and the multiple benefits they bring."Energy Secretary Rebecca Evans added: "By developing these projects on the Welsh government woodland estate, we're making best use of our public land to tackle the climate emergency and create sustainable economic opportunities."Natural Resources Wales (NRW), which manages the land where the turbines will be built, said it would ensure all infrastructure was "integrated carefully into the working forest".Tree clearance will be kept to a minimum, environmentally sensitive features will be protected, and any areas cleared of trees will be replaced through our Compensatory Planting Programme," explained Elsie Grace of NRW."Vital timber production and environmental protection can continue, while additional revenues are generated by the wind farm projects," she said.
Jonathan Dean from the CPRW warned there would be local opposition."I think the local communities will have problems with them, because they will be of an unprecedented scale," he said."The biggest wind turbine in Wales is currently under 150m (tall), these will be at least 200m - it's another step up."He said the group was supportive of green energy and not against the use of wind turbines, but that there was "enormous potential" to site these out at sea."We really don't see that there is any need to put them in as many places onshore as is being planned."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
21 minutes ago
- Sky News
Who will take the fall for the Afghan cover-up?
👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne's on your podcast app👈 Now details of the enormous accidental data breach by a British soldier that put thousands of Afghans' lives at risk can be discussed publicly - Sky News' Sam Coates and Politico's Anne McElvoy try to address some of the biggest questions on this episode. Why did the government break the glass on using a super-injunction? Has anyone been sacked? Why did the Labour government keep the super-injunction in place for so long?
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ben Wallace takes ‘complete responsibility' for Afghan leak - but refuses to apologise for injunction
Sir Ben Wallace has said he takes complete responsibility for the catastrophic data breach which put the lives of up to 100,000 Afghans at risk. After the secret evacuation scheme, costing the taxpayer £7bn, was revealed, the former defence secretary said he makes 'no apology' for seeking the injunction which resulted in it being kept secret for almost two years. But, asked why the official responsible for the leak, in February 2022, Sir Ben said 'I take complete responsibility for the mistake that was made by that person... I was secretary of state for defence'. The leak exposed the details of thousands of Afghans who said they were in danger from the Taliban because of their links to UK forces and now wanted to escape to Britain. The blunder triggered a top secret government operation, codenamed Operation Rubific, which involved 16,000 Afghans being brought to the UK as part of Britain's largest covert peacetime evacuation, with some 8,000 still to come. The whole operation was kept secret from MPs and the public, with ministers even deciding to hide the true reason for the evacuation from parliament. Sir Ben said the decision to apply for the gagging order was 'not a cover-up' and that if the leak had been reported it would have 'put in peril those we needed to help out'. Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, he said his government did not initially apply for a superinjunction to block reporting about the leak. Sir Ben said: "When we applied in August 2023, when I was secretary of state, we didn't apply for superinjunction. We applied for a four-month injunction, a normal injunction. 'I can't speak for the subsequent two years, why a four month injunction became a two-year superinjunction.' Sir Ben was defence secretary from Juny 2019 to August 2023. He defended his initial application for an injunction, adding: "But nevertheless, I think the point here is I took a decision that the most important priority was to protect those people who could have been or were exposed by this data leak in Afghanistan, living amongst the Taliban who had no regard for their safety, or indeed potentially could torture them or murder them. "That was my priority." It came as Defence Secretary John Healey said the person involved in the leak was 'no longer doing the same job'. A dataset containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) was released 'in error' in February 2022 by a defence official. The Ministry of Defence only became aware of the breach when excerpts from the dataset were posted anonymously on a Facebook group in August 2023, and a superinjunction was granted at the High Court in an attempt to prevent the Taliban finding out about the leak. Writing in the Telegraph, Sir Ben said that when he was informed of the 'error' he was 'determined that the first priority was to protect all those that might be at risk'. 'I make no apology for applying to the court for an injunction at the time. It was not, as some are childishly trying to claim, a cover-up,' he said. 'I took the view that if this leak was reported at the time, the existence of the list would put in peril those we needed to help out. 'Some may disagree but imagine if the Taliban had been alerted to the existence of this list. I would dread to think what would have happened.' Sir Ben left office shortly after the then-government became aware of the breach, having announced some time earlier that he intended to step down as defence secretary. The leak led to the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in April 2024. The scheme is understood to have cost around £400 million so far, with a projected final cost of about £850 million. A total of around 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme. It is understood that the unnamed official emailed the data outside a secure government system while attempting to verify information, believing the dataset to only have around 150 rows. However, more than 33,000 rows of information were inadvertently sent. Downing Street declined to say on Tuesday whether the official involved had faced disciplinary action or was still employed by the Government. Mr Healey later told the News Agents podcast that 'they are no longer doing the same job on the Afghan brief' and 'this is bigger than the actions of a single individual'. Pushed on whether anybody had lost their job, Mr Healey said: 'I'm actually not going to get into the personnel matters.' The injunction was in place for almost two years, covering Labour and Conservative governments. Mr Healey offered a 'sincere apology' on behalf of the Government in the Commons on Tuesday, and said he had been 'deeply uncomfortable' being unable to speak about it in Parliament. Kemi Badenoch said sorry on behalf of the Conservatives. Speaking to LBC on Tuesday evening, the Tory leader was asked whether she would apologise on behalf of the Conservatives who were in office at the time of the breach. She said: 'On behalf of the government and on behalf of the British people yes, because somebody made a terrible mistake and names were put out there… and we are sorry for that. 'That should not happen. And this is one of the tough things about, you know, being a minister, which is why even the Government – the Labour Government, now this didn't happen when they were in power – they are apologising as well.' Between 80,000 and 100,000 people, including the estimated number of family members of the Arap applicants, were affected by the breach and could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data, judges said in June 2024. However an independent review, commissioned by the Government in January 2025, concluded last month that the dataset is 'unlikely to significantly shift Taliban understanding of individuals who may be of interest to them'.
North Wales Live
26 minutes ago
- North Wales Live
Senedd passes legislation to protect Welsh communties from disused tips
A Bill that provides a "crucial step forward' in protecting Welsh communities from disused tips, both coal and non-coal, has been passed by the Senedd. The Disused Mine and Quarry Tips (Wales) Bill, the first legislation of its kind in the UK, will create the Disused Tips Authority for Wales to address safety risks posed by Wales's industrial past. The new Authority will become a Welsh Government sponsored body with powers to: Ensure disused coal and non-coal tips no longer pose a threat to communities through instability Establish a comprehensive system for assessment, registration, monitoring and management of all disused tips Following the successful vote in the Senedd, Deputy First Minister Huw Irranca-Davies said: "This legislation represents a crucial step forward in protecting Welsh communities. 'We've seen the impact of tip instability following extreme weather events, including the major landslide at Tylorstown during storms Ciara and Dennis in February 2020, and more recently at Cwmtillery in 2024 after storm Bert. 'We now have robust legislation in place and a structured approach to managing disused coal and non-coal tips to ensure they are not a threat to our communities. 'Wales is leading the way in addressing these challenges and ensuring our communities are safe for generations to come." The Welsh Government said: "Wales has a proud mining heritage, and its legacy is visible across our landscape. There are 2,573 disused coal tips in Wales, and whilst they are predominantly in the South Wales valleys, this issue impacts both West and North Wales, as well as there being an estimated 20,000 other disused tips (i.e. not coal) in Wales. "Work is already underway towards setting up the Authority, and consideration is being given to its location, systems and governance to ensure all aspects of the Bill are captured and delivered on. "The appointment process for a Chair and Chief Executive will commence shortly and both will be in post before the Authority is formally established on 1 April 2027. "In the interim, the Welsh Government's coal tip safety programme of work carries on and continues to work closely with local authorities, Natural Resources Wales and the Mining Remediation Authority to deliver an effective inspection and maintenance regime across Wales." The Welsh Government said it provides funding to local authorities and Natural Resources Wales to undertake works on disused tips, through the Coal Tip Safety Grant scheme. This includes funding work which the local authority might undertake on privately owned tips. On March 20 2025, the Deputy First Minister confirmed in 2025-26, the Welsh Government is providing £34 million for public partners to undertake works on 130 coal tips across Wales – to take investment beyond £100m in this Senedd term. The recently confirmed additional allocation from the UK Government will mean over £220m will have been invested in coal tip safety.
