Stephen ‘Wonderboy' Thompson is the oldest fighter in the UFC, yet still a babyface
With his boyish good looks, you might think Thompson is around 30 or so. But the reality is he's 42 years old. He's fought 21 times in the UFC over the course of 13 years. When he debuted at UFC 143 against a Midwestern slugger named Dan Stittgen, he was already 29.
Advertisement
To put that into perspective, multi-division UFC champion Ilia Topuria is only 28 years old right now.
"Wonderboy" has heard plenty about his anachronistic nickname over the past few years, yet he's not about to switch things up in the twilight of his career.
'People ask me sometimes, when are you going to change it to 'Wonderman?'' he says. 'It's funny because, when I met Jack Black, I was like, 'I'm not changing my name until you come out with a song called 'Wonderman.' So until then, I'm still the 'Wonderboy' because I'm still walking out to that Tenacious D 'Wonderboy' song.'
To take it a step further, when Thompson makes that walk at Nashville's Bridgestone Arena on Saturday, he will also hold the distinction of being the UFC's oldest fighter. Jan Blachowicz was born on February 24, 1983, 13 days after Wonderboy came into this world. It's both a badge of honor to outlast the field and a somewhat dubious reminder that the clock is ticking.
Advertisement
Toward what exactly? That's a question even Thompson doesn't have the answer to yet. Between his family's gym in South Carolina, coaching kids, his burgeoning analyst gig on UFC broadcasts and — if he may be so bold — the possibility of a late title run, life is still very much a choose your own adventure.
'To be honest with you, what I think is pretty cool about making it this far is not only am I the oldest guy in the UFC, but I've been literally in the top five, top 10 since 2013, 2014 I think,' he says. 'So, I hadn't really dropped below that since then. I think right now I finally did after getting beat by [Joaquin] Buckley. Yet I had some injuries, I was out for almost a year, so I've kind of dipped down in the rank [for the moment]. This is the first time since 2014 that that's happened, though.'
It's been a solid career for Thompson even if he were to hang up the gloves tomorrow. He fought for the welterweight title twice. He has a dozen victories in the UFC, with former champions like Johny Hendricks and Robert Whittaker on his hit list. He has accumulated eight post-night bonuses, scored some of the best knockouts on record (poor Jake Ellenberger), all while staying near the top.
'I've been in the mix and fighting the elite guys in the UFC for a very long time,' he says, as fresh faced as ever.
Advertisement
'I went back and watched my last fight [against Buckley], and — even though I got knocked out in the third round — I felt just as fast as I always have. I felt precise, I felt accurate. I mean, just the guys that I'm facing are just super tough guys, and that's especially true with Gabriel. He's an up-and-coming guy who was undefeated until [Nicolas] Dalby beat him. He's a stud. He's coming up, and I'm kind of one of the guys that give back to those guys that are coming up.
Stephen Thompson is still fighting top-tier opposition at age 42.
(USA TODAY Sports via Reuters Connect / Reuters)
'If it wasn't for Jake Ellenberger or Rory MacDonald, Johny Hendricks, those guys giving me those opportunities when I was working my way up, I couldn't have done it. Now in the UFC, you get a lot of these guys who are holding onto their spots. You don't want to give it up to these young studs, but that's the only way to give back to these guys — give them a test, give them a chance to work their way up just like I was given that chance. So we're doing it.'
The 27-year-old Bonfim has been a very dangerous out since breaking through on the Contender Series back in 2022. He has four overall finishes, all of them coming by way of submission. His latest, a late second-round D'arce choke that finished off Khaos Williams, catapulted him toward the big names of the division.
Advertisement
Meaning Thompson.
'He's a very aggressive striker, and he's kind of like a counter wrestler,' Thompson says. 'He's got great submissions. He's a great submission artist with his guillotine and D'arce. I mean, the guy must have a really tight squeeze, but he's dangerous everywhere. You try to take him down, he's looking for a D'arce or a guillotine. He's coming forward and throwing bombs. So I'm not taking this guy lightly whatsoever, because if you're in the UFC, you're a dangerous dude.'
It's like a proverb, but "Wonderboy" doesn't like to think that he's 42 years old. He prefers 42 years young. And he still has a dream of capturing the flag late in his career. After all, Randy Couture was 45 years old when he won the heavyweight title at UFC 68. That's the mindset he says he has to carry to compete at the highest level.
The one major difference from the version of Thompson who stepped into the Octagon for the first time at UFC 143 and the UFC's eldest statesman who will make the walk Saturday?
Advertisement
Perspective. He says that these days he soaks up every moment, because they're fleeting.
'More now than ever, because I've got two fights left in my contract and we want to see those through,' he says. 'I'm kind of going that [television] analyst route — which is a lot better than getting punched and kicked in the face, for sure, but still be a part of the game.
'But I got two fights left. I want to honor those, and depending on how well they go, we'll determine whether or not I continue to go. I think more now than ever, I'm kind of soaking everything up. Just trying to remember everything and take everything in, the crowd going crazy, the hype behind it all, you know what I'm saying?
'Just taking it all in.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
College sports leaders shouldn't get too excited about Trump NIL executive order
It's not a great sign for President Trump's potential involvement in college sports when people who work in college sports are caught off-guard after word of a forthcoming executive order leaks out of the White House. And yet that was the case Wednesday after CBS reported the night before that Trump intended to sign one 'establishing national standards for the NCAA's Name, Image and Likeness program' in the coming days. What does that mean exactly? People who are generally informed on the interplay between college sports and the federal government didn't seem to know an executive order was imminent or what exactly would be in it – even folks with a direct line to Trump and who have engaged with about potential federal action that would bail college sports out of its current dysfunction. So now we wait. For something – or maybe nothing. With the Trump Administration, you can never quite tell. What we do know, however, is that the White House has, in fact, been working on something in the form of a likely executive order since Trump met with former Alabama coach Nick Saban at the school's graduation ceremony in May. Regardless of what's ultimately in it, however, coaches and administrators should resist the temptation to get excited about the possibility of Trump saving the day for a few simple, but important reasons. An executive order isn't a law. College sports and the NCAA do not operate under the purview of the executive branch of the federal government, thus any executive order compelling them to do anything would be legally questionable at best. And finally, any so-called 'fix' for college sports made with the stroke of one man's pen can be undone by the next one who occupies that office. UNWANTED TALK: Nick Saban rumor is last thing Alabama needs Sorry, college sports executives. You're going to have to actually do the work on this one. We know that's not easy, which makes the temptation to rely on Trump more tempting. It's been nearly six years since the NCAA pivoted toward begging Congress for relief from its never-ending string of lawsuits, and so far they've gotten no reward for their effort. Unless, of course, you consider it a reward to be dragged into more committee hearings to answer ridiculous, superficial questions from legislators who know as much about college sports as they do about the Finnish language. Oh sure, there's another bill on the way. And this one apparently has bipartisan support in the House. But then there's the Senate, where the top Democrat on the Senate Commerce Committee, Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., last week called it 'the National Championship of all heists' because it is too favorable to the NCAA's interests. Remember, any bill must get 60 votes due to filibuster rules in the Senate, which means a minimum of seven Democrats will need to sign off on it. That's not going to be easy, especially if it puts hard caps on how much college athletes can earn and eliminates the potential to bargain collectively for their rights in the future. Purely from a political standpoint, I'm not sure why Senate Democrats would cooperate at all here. If a bill finally passes that fixes some issues with the NCAA, they won't get credit – because Trump will take it. And he'll play it to the hilt, which doesn't seem particularly helpful to their electoral goals heading into the midterms next year. That's just how stuff works in Washington, and both parties play that game on issues far more serious and important than the NCAA's ability to regulate the transfer portal. It's part of why the NCAA's 'let Congress fix our mess' strategy has been a complete failure thus far and may never pay off. At the end of the day, there's a lot more upside for Congress to use college sports as a political plaything than to make a law that will only impact a relatively small number of people and isn't an urgent matter of national interest. But a 'let Trump fix it' strategy could be worse, particularly right now as institutions are scrambling to implement terms of the House vs. NCAA settlement that allow athletic departments to pay their athletes directly. At the moment, the House settlement and the College Sports Commission – a regulatory body created by the power conferences to enforce the settlement rules – hold the key to how college sports will operate over the next several years. Will the CSC get sued by athletes and booster collectives whose deals get denied because they aren't considered true NIL? Of course, but they already knew that. Unless Congress quickly grants college sports some type of antitrust exemption, the CSC will have to go in front of a judge and show that it follows the law to continue having regulatory power over college athletes' paychecks. That's really the only issue worth talking about right now, regardless of what Trump may write in an executive order. And what can he possibly do anyway? Maybe he can decree that college athletes can't be made employees through some type of National Labor Relations Board policy -- but they already aren't. So unless the NCAA is going to become a federal agency, where the president would have significant legal authority to regulate it, anything in an executive order is mostly going to be performative. And anything that touches actual NCAA business like the transfer portal or limiting how athletes earn money stands on far shakier legal ground than the guardrails that were already installed through the House settlement. Regardless of which direction a president wants to take college sports – any president, for the record – the fundamental problem will not change no matter who's in the office or how many executive orders they write. By refusing to engage in a true collective bargaining effort that mimics the relationship between the NFL/NBA/NHL/MLB and their respective players associations, the college sports industry left itself in a vulnerable position where any attempt to enforce its rules will face legal scrutiny. For better or worse, that's the American Way. And at this point, the focus of college sports should be long-term stability through the appropriate legal and legislative means instead of a flimsy proclamation. Colleges need to be especially careful right now. We've seen how the Trump Administration strongarms schools it has ideological disagreements with: Withholding federal grants, deporting international students, pressuring university presidents to resign. His involvement in college sports issues on behalf of the NCAA's immediate interests is going to inevitably create the appearance of long-term leverage. As frustrated as college sports executives might be with Jeffrey Kessler and other sports attorneys who keep them in court, creating space for tussles with this White House might not be the best tradeoff. Keep all that in mind when Trump issues his mysterious executive order. Because at the end of the day, only the people in charge of college sports can truly save it – no matter how much a president is itching to claim credit for doing so. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Donald Trump NIL executive order shouldn't excited college leaders
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Are the Knicks still a move away?
Yahoo Sports senior NBA analyst Kevin O'Connor is joined by ESPN's Bobby Marks to discuss if New York still needs to make another addition to its roster to help new head coach Mike Brown get his team over the hump this season. Hear the full conversation on 'The Kevin O'Connor Show' and subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever you listen. View more Video Transcript You mentioned the Knicks earlier. They're one of the teams that's trying to take that next step. They add Gerhaw Yelle, they add Jordan Clarkson. And other than that, pretty much the same roster just with a new head coach. Are they still one move away or are they already there as a contender? I think they're still another move away with their bench. When you bring your starting five and your two best reserves in, um, in Robinson and Deuce, like, you've already, you already have a head start compared to some of these other teams. It is such a rarity when you go to an Eastern Conference Finals and you fire your head coach and you had a little bit, you kind of knew who they were. And now you have Mike Brown coming in and no offense in Sacramento, and this isn't even like Cleveland back in 2008 or 2009. Uh, and I think he's a really good coach, but basically trying to instill, you know, who, what are they gonna be? Are they going to be the Sacramento team from three years ago, or they're going to be that Cleveland team, that was really good defensively when LeBron was around? Like, who are you going to, who are you gonna be? And I think that's gonna be probably the biggest unknown as far as, you know, maybe not outside of the roster. Close
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Josh Hart undergoes procedure on ring finger, expected to return to Knicks basketball activities this summer
New York Knicks wing Josh Hart needed surgery for a finger injury he suffered during the playoffs, the team announced Wednesday. Hart underwent a procedure on his right ring finger, but the Knicks expect him to resume basketball activities later this summer. Hart just completed his second full season with the Knicks. Before eventually coming off the bench for New York in the Eastern Conference finals, Hart was an everyday Knicks starter last season. He got the nod for the team's starting five in all 77 of his regular-season games, averaging 13.6 points, 9.6 rebounds, 5.9 assists and 1.5 steals in a league-leading 37.6 minutes per game. This story is being updated.
