logo
Trump's attempt to terminate Musk's contracts backfires as review reveals NASA's reliance on SpaceX

Trump's attempt to terminate Musk's contracts backfires as review reveals NASA's reliance on SpaceX

Daily Mail​16 hours ago
At the height of President Trump's public feud with Elon Musk, the administration reviewed SpaceX government contracts in an effort to cut ties with the billionaire's business.
Trump suggested on Truth Social the government could save money by 'terminating' government contracts with Musk's companies, which would force him to 'head back home to South Africa.'
The relationship had spectacularly combusted over Musk's criticism of Trump's Big Beautiful Bill and personal attacks about the president's former relationship with child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.
Days later, a senior official at the General Services Administration ordered the Defense Department to fill out a form detailing every current SpaceX contract and transaction agreement, The Wall Street Journal revealed.
The official said the data they collated would be shared with the White House to await further instruction.
He also made similar requests to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in an effort to establish whether a competitor could run the same contracts more effectively.
But the Defense Department's review instead established that most of the deals with SpaceX were vital to the missions of the department and NASA, insiders claimed.
It also further highlighted how the government relies on Musk's companies to remain leaders in space exploration, and how little competition there is in the market.
Musk has somewhat of a monopoly on rocket launches and low Earth orbit satellite services, as competitors like Boeing face setbacks in their race to catch up with SpaceX technology.
In amidst the drama between Musk and Trump, the SpaceX founder had threatened to decommission his Crew Dragon - which is the only US certified vehicle able to fly people to and from the space station.
The threats sparked concern within NASA, particularly after the Crew Dragon was recently involved in a mission to save two astronauts who had been stranded at the International Space Station for 286 days.
SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell met with White House officials as the review was ongoing, insiders told the publication.
Despite Musk's feud with Trump, SpaceX has continued to win contracts in 2025, including a deal worth $5.9billion to conduct 28 national security flights.
It also launched an upgraded GPS satellite for the Space Force in May, and NASA expects SpaceX to fly a new crew to the International Space Station within weeks.
This has not improved relations between Trump and Musk, who remain divided on several key administration issues - primarily the Big Beautiful Bill and Trump's more recent decision not to release any new information about Epstein.
Musk pledged to launch his own political party in protest of the spending bill, which he warned could 'bankrupt America' and add an estimated 3.3 billion to 4.5 billion to the national debt.
Trump immediately hit back, writing: 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa.
'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!'
More recently, Musk weighed in on Trump's comments that the highly sought after Epstein client list is no more than a 'hoax' created by Democrats.
'Wow, amazing that Epstein "killed himself" and Ghislaine is in federal prison for a hoax,' the SpaceX CEO posted on his X account.
'He should just release the files and point out which part is the hoax,' he added in another post.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New independent watchdog signed into law in watershed moment for English football
New independent watchdog signed into law in watershed moment for English football

The Independent

timea few seconds ago

  • The Independent

New independent watchdog signed into law in watershed moment for English football

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

It wasn't hackers: Alaska Airlines reveals IT outage was caused by a critical piece of hardware failing
It wasn't hackers: Alaska Airlines reveals IT outage was caused by a critical piece of hardware failing

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

It wasn't hackers: Alaska Airlines reveals IT outage was caused by a critical piece of hardware failing

Alaska Airlines has revealed that its "significant" IT outage on Sunday night was not caused by hackers, but by hardware at one of its data centers failing. As a result of the system paralysis, the carrier requested a system-wide ground stop for its aircraft and that of its subsidiary, Horizon Air, on Sunday evening, with services resuming about three hours later. The airline said in a statement issued to The Independen t: "A critical piece of multi-redundant hardware at one of our data centers, manufactured by a third-party, experienced an unexpected failure. "When that happened, it impacted several of our key systems that enable us to run various operations, necessitating the implementation of a ground stop to keep aircraft in position." It continued: "The IT outage is not related to any other current events, and it's not connected to the recent cybersecurity incident at Hawaiian Airlines. "We are currently working with our vendor to replace the hardware equipment at the data center." The airline revealed that since Sunday evening, it had cancelled more than 150 flights, including 64 on Monday. It added: "We're working to get our operations back on track today at Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air. [But] additional flight disruptions are likely as we reposition aircraft and crews throughout our network. "We appreciate the patience of our guests whose travel plans have been disrupted. We're working to get them to their destinations as quickly as we can. Before heading to the airport, we encourage flyers to check their flight status." In the aftermath of the disruption, passengers took to social media to complain about delays and a lack of customer service. X user Jack Gillin wrote: "Why haven't you answered my customer care calls? It's been more than four hours since I made my inquiry." Another complained: "Been on the phone on hold with your customer services for almost three hours and no one has picked up." Another revealed that after waiting for a flight for five hours, it was cancelled, with the airline unable to help with booking local accommodation. Passengers who experienced a delay are entitled to a rebooking on the same airline or a partner carrier at no additional cost. If the delay is longer than three hours, they are entitled to a meal or meal voucher and complimentary hotel stays for overnight delays.

The Latest: Harvard heads to court in $2.6B lawsuit against Trump administration
The Latest: Harvard heads to court in $2.6B lawsuit against Trump administration

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

The Latest: Harvard heads to court in $2.6B lawsuit against Trump administration

Harvard University is in federal court Monday to make the case that President Donald Trump's administration illegally cut $2.6 billion from the storied college. It's a pivotal moment in the school's battle against the federal government. If U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs decides in the university's favor, the ruling would reverse a series of funding freezes that later became outright cuts as the administration escalated its fight with the nation's oldest and wealthiest university. Such a ruling, if it stands, would revive Harvard's sprawling scientific and medical research operation and hundreds of projects. Harvard's lawsuit accuses the administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university after it rejected a series of demands in an April 11 letter from a federal antisemitism task force. Here's the latest: However, even with the nation's largest endowment at $53 billion, the university has warned it can't absorb the full cost of the federal cuts. Federal agencies say grants can be scrapped if they no longer align with government policies In court filings, Harvard has said the government 'fails to explain how the termination of funding for research to treat cancer, support veterans, and improve national security addresses antisemitism.' The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the April demand letter was sent. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel contracts for policy reasons. Hearing begins in Harvard's lawsuit over funding cuts A lawyer for Harvard opened the hearing by saying the Trump administration violated the university's First Amendment rights by cutting more than $2.6 billion in federal funding. Steven Lehotsky said the government conditioned research grants on Harvard, 'ceding control' to the government over what is appropriate for students and faculty to say. US envoy doubles down on support for Syria's government and criticizes Israel's intervention A U.S. envoy doubled down on Washington's support for Syria's new government, saying Monday there is 'no Plan B' to working with it to unite the country still reeling from years of civil war and wracked by new sectarian violence. In an exclusive interview with The Associated Press, Tom Barrack also criticized Israel's recent intervention in Syria, calling it poorly timed and saying it complicated efforts to stabilize the region. Barrack is ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria, with a short-term mandate in Lebanon. He spoke in Beirut following more than a week of clashes in Syria's southern province of Sweida between militias of the Druze religious minority and Sunni Muslim Bedouin tribes. Tom Barrack, who is ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria and also has a short-term mandate in Lebanon, told The Associated Press that Israel's intervention in the latest round of conflict in Syria had further complicated matters. (AP Video shot by Fadi Tawil; Production by Abby Sewell) Syrian government forces intervened, ostensibly to restore order, but ended up siding with the Bedouins before withdrawing under a ceasefire agreement with Druze factions. Hundreds have been killed in the fighting, and some government fighters allegedly shot dead Druze civilians and burned and looted homes. Neighboring Israel intervened last week on behalf of the Druze, who are seen as a loyal minority within Israel and often serve in its military. Israel launched dozens of strikes on convoys of government forces in Sweida and struck the Ministry of Defense headquarters in central Damascus. Over the weekend, Barrack announced a ceasefire between Syria and Israel. Syrian government forces have redeployed in Sweida to halt renewed clashes between the Druze and Bedouins, and civilians from both sides were set to be evacuated Monday. ▶ Read more about the U.S. support for Syria's new government Trump threatens to hold up stadium deal if Washington Commanders don't switch back to Redskins Trump is threatening to hold up a new stadium deal for Washington's NFL team if it does not restore its old name of the Redskins, which was considered offensive to Native Americans. Trump also said Sunday that he wants Cleveland's baseball team to revert to its former name, the Indians, saying there was a 'big clamoring for this' as well. The Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians have had their current names since the 2022 seasons, and both have said they have no plans to change them back. Trump said the Washington football team would be 'much more valuable' if it restored its old name. His latest interest in changing the name reflects his broader effort to roll back changes that followed a national debate on cultural sensitivity and racial justice. The Commanders and the District of Columbia government announced a deal earlier this year to build a new home for the football team at the site of the old RFK Stadium, the place the franchise called home for more than three decades. ▶ Read more about Trump's attempt to strongarm the NFL team

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store