
'Mastermind' behind murder of man 'tortured to death' in his own home tells court he was 'watching Finding Nemo with his daughter' at the time of the killing
John Belfield - who is accused of being the 'mastermind' behind the brutal killing of Thomas Campbell - said his alleged 'right-hand man' told him afterwards that there had been an 'altercation' and 'things got a bit out of hand'.
The 38-year-old's bloodied body was found by worried neighbours in the hallway of his home in Mossley, Greater Manchester the following morning, a jury has been told.
His ankles had been bound with extra-strength duct tape and he had been burnt using a hot liquid before being left to die, naked apart from a pair of socks.
Belfield - a self-confessed drug dealer - 'fled' to South America after the killing in July 2022 but was later arrested and flown back to Britain to stand trial.
Giving evidence in his defence today, the 31-year-old insisted he had travelled in a Range Rover to his sister's house in nearby Ashton-under-Lyne that night.
He said he watched the 2003 animated comedy Finding Nemo with his daughter and niece before falling asleep on the couch.
Belfield said his associate Reece Steven - who has already been convicted of Mr Campbell's murder - had been using the Range Rover that night.
But he returned in the early hours of the morning to say there had been 'an altercation' with Mr Campbell and 'things got a bit out of hand', he told jurors at Manchester Crown Court.
'He did not really expand on that,' he said.
Belfield said he asked Steven 'Why are you involving me in this problem?' but agreed to let him use his sister's car.
'I should not have helped him,' he said.
'I should have turned him away.'
Prosecutors claim that Belfield was the 'driving force' behind the deadly ambush.
They allege he was fuelled by jealousy over the victim being in a relationship with his ex-girlfriend and a desire to steal from him.
Steven, Belfield and a third unknown man were all present when Mr Campbell was tortured to death, according to the prosecution.
Belfield has admitted he took part in alleged 'recces' before the killing and helped disguise the van used in the ambush afterwards.
But he denies being present when he was killed, or being involved in placing a tracking device on Mr Campbell's VW van or buying items used in his torture.
He admits speaking to the victim's ex-wife Coleen about the possibility of stealing drugs from Mr Campbell, who he described as 'higher up than me' in the criminal world.
But he says he did not want 'conflict' with him as he was 'a lot bigger and stronger than me'.
Today Belfield said it was not until two days later that he learnt Mr Campbell had died in the attack.
Asked by his barrister Richard Wright KC how he reacted, Belfield said: 'I was more scared about what would happen to me because of who Tom was.'
Mr Wright asked: 'Why? Did you kill him?'
Belfield replied: 'I did not kill him.
'I know now that some of my associates had done this crime.'
Belfield said he fled abroad fearing he would wrongly being blamed for the murder.
He caught a ferry to Ireland before travelling via Amsterdam, Spain and Brazil to the former Dutch colony of Suriname.
'I went there to keep myself safe,' he said.
'I did not want to put my family in danger by being in England.
'I knew people would attack me and maybe kill me in revenge.
'I did not want my daughter to get hurt and I did not want to be killed myself.'
Belfield admits he and another associate, Stephen Cleworth, were seen outside Mr Campbell's house while he was away from home on June 29 - three days before the murder on July 2.
He said that he was there as part of a plan to find Mr Campbell's drugs stash hidden in field and he had no intention of breaking in.
Belfield said Cleworth urged him to break in but he refused.
'He was calling me a s*** bag and saying "He is sleeping with your bird",' he said.
Belfield said he replied: 'I am not going into Thomas Campbell's house. I am not stupid.'
Jurors have been told that Steven was convicted of murder and conspiracy to rob at a 2023 trial.
Coleen Campbell was found guilty of manslaughter and conspiracy to rob after providing crucial details about his movements before the gang pounced.
Cleworth was convicted of manslaughter and conspiracy to rob for his role in surveillance in the run-up to the killing.
Belfield, of no fixed address, denies murder and conspiracy to rob.
The trial continues.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pressure grows on Yvette Cooper to abandon plans to ban Palestine Action
The home secretary is coming under increasing pressure to abandon plans to ban Palestine Action, as UN experts and hundreds of lawyers warned that proscribing the group would conflate protest and terrorism. In two separate letters to Yvette Cooper, the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) lawyers' group and the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers said that proscribing the group would set a dangerous precedent. Additionally, several UN special rapporteurs, including those for protecting human rights while countering terrorism and for promoting freedom of expression, said they had contacted the UK government to say that 'acts of protest that damage property, but are not intended to kill or injure people, should not be treated as terrorism'. On Tuesday two people were arrested after Palestine Action claimed to have blockaded the entrance of an Israeli defence company's UK headquarters. Avon and Somerset police said a 30-year-old woman and a 36-year-old man, both from London, were arrested on suspicion of criminal damage, unauthorised entry to a prohibited place and locking on to a person, object or land to cause serious disruption. Earlier, a Palestine Action spokesperson said activists had blocked the entrance to Elbit Systems in Bristol and covered it in red paint 'to symbolise Palestinian bloodshed'. The Netpol lawyers' group letter, shared exclusively with the Guardian, was signed by 266 solicitors, barristers and legal academics, including 11 KCs and 11 law professors. 'Proscription of a direct-action protest group is an unprecedented and extremely regressive step for civil liberties,' they write. 'The conflation of protest and terrorism is the hallmark of authoritarian regimes. Our government has stated that it is committed to respecting the rule of law: this must include the right to protest. 'To use the Terrorism Act to ban Palestine Action from direct action would be an abuse of this legislation and an interference with the right to protest. Misusing terrorism legislation in this way against a protest group sets a dangerous precedent, threatens our democratic freedoms, and would be a terrifying blow to our civil liberties.' Signatories of the Haldane Society letter, which will be handed to Cooper before MPs vote on Wednesday, include Michael Mansfield KC and Imran Khan KC – who represented the family of Stephen Lawrence and victims of the Grenfell Tower fire – and the Labour peer John Hendy KC. It has been signed by thousands of people including the politicians Caroline Lucas, Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell, the actors Adeel Akhtar and Juliet Stevenson, teachers and vicars. The letter says: 'It [a ban] would leave many ordinary members of the public vulnerable – for example, simply wearing a T-shirt saying 'I support Palestine Action' would be seen as violating the proscription and action would need to be taken. 'There are many dangers to proscribing peaceful direct action groups, even if their objectives are those some of us may disagree with. Current and future governments may misuse this precedent to attack other interest groups in future, offering no avenues for peacefully venting dissent.' The prime minister, Keir Starmer, was a member of the Haldane Society but left when he became director of public prosecutions in 2008. The UN experts said: 'Mere property damage, without endangering life, is not sufficiently serious to qualify as terrorism … Protest actions that are not genuinely 'terrorist', but which involve alleged property damage, should be properly investigated as ordinary crimes or other security offences.' The Home Office referred the Guardian to Cooper's statement last week announcing the proposed ban, and comments in a press release issued on Monday in which she said that Palestine Action's acts 'do not represent legitimate acts of protest and the level of seriousness of Palestine Action's activity has met the test for proscription under the Terrorism Act 2000'.


Sky News
20 minutes ago
- Sky News
Man charged with murdering pregnant mother-of-two in County Down
A man has been charged with murder and child destruction after the death of a pregnant woman in Northern Ireland. Sarah Montgomery - a 27-year-old mother-of-two - died at a house in Donaghadee, County Down, on Saturday. The 28-year-old man is due to appear before Newtownards Magistrates' Court on Wednesday, the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) said. Please refresh the page for the latest version.


Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Schoolboy, 15, stabbed Harvey Willgoose with a five-inch hunting knife before declaring 'I'm not right in the head', court hears
A 15-year-old schoolboy fatally stabbed a fellow pupil with a five-inch hunting knife before telling a teacher 'I'm not right in the head', a court has heard. Harvey Willgoose, also 15, collapsed less than a minute after he was knifed in the heart at All Saints Catholic High School in Sheffield on February 3. Shocking CCTV footage of the attack was played to a jury as the teenager accused of murdering Harvey went on trial at Sheffield Crown Court today. Harvey's relatives wept and covered their eyes as the video showed the boys squaring up, before the defendant produced a knife and lunged at him twice. The Sheffield United fan could be seen running away before collapsing nearby while the defendant waved the knife in the air. The teenager, who cannot be named, is expected to argue his actions were a loss of control following a long period of bullying, poor treatment and violence. He has admitted Harvey's manslaughter, but denies murder. He has also admitted possession of a bladed article. Richard Thyne KC, opening the case for the prosecution today, said the stab wound that killed Harvey 'was inflicted with such force that the knife cut the bone of one of his ribs'. He added: 'It was just five minutes into the school lunch break when Harvey Willgoose was stabbed to death. It was quarter past twelve in the afternoon on Monday, February 3 this year. 'Harvey was standing in the courtyard at All Saints Catholic High School in Sheffield, when a knife was thrust into his chest, penetrating his heart. In less than a minute he had collapsed on to the ground, where he lost consciousness and died. He was 15 years old.' After being stabbed and retreating, Harvey was seen attempting to run at the defendant, but again backed away when the pupil moved forward with the knife for a second time. Teachers rushed to the scene and told him to hand over the weapon. One heard him say 'you know I can't control it', which he took to be a reference to his anger issues given the pupil's history of violent behaviour at school. The defendant then handed the knife over and told a teacher: 'I'm not right in the head. My mum doesn't look after me right. I've stabbed him.' It was claimed he had brought the knife to school 'for protection' because he was 'followed over the weekend' and scared of being 'jumped outside school', the prosecutor said. But Mr Thyne revealed the defendant's phone had photos of him posing with weapons and his internet search history included terms such as 'zombie killer knife', 'dagger, pocket knife', and 'machete'. He also told the jurors how, in December 2024, the boy's mother contacted the school about finding what she described as a sword in his bag, which turned out to be an axe. Police then visited his home and gave him advice about the dangers of carrying weapons. Harvey and the accused were said to have become embroiled in a dispute on the weekend before the attack, relating to a row between pupils including the defendant on January 29. On that occasion, he insisted he saw another boy in possession of a knife and the school was put into lockdown. The police were called but no blade was found. The defendant was said to be 'scared of going to school' because of the lockdown. Harvey had not regularly attended school at the time – showing up for only 20 days since the start of term. On the morning of the fatal attack, they exchanged Snapchat messages in which Harvey asked if there was 'beef' between them. The defendant replied at 7.51am: 'Nah but if u (want) beef we can hav it.' Assistant headteacher Morgan Davis that morning spoke to the defendant about the confrontation the previous week and 'specifically asked' if he had brought a weapon to school. He said he had not. CCTV footage was then played to the court of the boys passing each other outside Mr Davis's room, which the prosecutor said showed the defendant 'physically pushing' Harvey, who kept his hands behind his back. The boys were later in the same science lesson and squared up to each other, with teacher Sophie Heath-Whyte recalling them saying: 'Come on, let's take this outside.' When Harvey left the classroom, he was heard by another teacher saying 'something was about to happen'. At 12.10pm, he was stabbed. Moments earlier the accused told another pupil he was 'mad' at Harvey, before mentioning he had a knife. Harvey was declared dead from his injuries at 1.24pm. Gul Nawaz Hussain KC, for the defence, said: '[The defendant] accepts what he did that day. 'That is why he's pleaded guilty to manslaughter. [He] did not set out to kill or seriously hurt anyone. 'The defence say [his] actions that day were the end result of a long period of bullying, poor treatment and violence – things that built one upon another until he lost control and did tragically what we've all seen.'