10 Years Of Probe, 7 In Trial, 17 For Verdict: A Timeline Of The 2008 Malegaon Blast Case
The trial, which started in 2018, got over on April 19, 2025, with the verdict set to be delivered today 17 years after the incident took place in September 2008
Seventeen years after a blast rocked Maharashtra's communally sensitive Malegaon, an NIA court is likely to deliver its verdict in the highly polarising case – complete with its own set of twists and turns – on Thursday.
Six persons were killed and more than 100 injured when an explosive device strapped to a motorcycle went off near a mosque in the town, located about 200 km from Mumbai, on September 29, 2008.
The trial, which started in 2018, got over on April 19, 2025, and the case was reserved for judgement. The case was initially probed by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) before being transferred to the NIA in 2011.
Seven accused, including BJP leader and former MP Pragya Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, faced trial in the case for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, or UAPA, and the Indian Penal Code.
Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi, Sudhakar Chaturvedi and Sameer Kulkarni are the other accused.
2008-2009: THE BIG TWIST
The Maharashtra ATS, led by Hemant Karkare, takes over the investigation and, for the first time in India, it is alleged that the blast was carried out by individuals linked to Hindu right-wing groups.
October 2008: Now a BJP leader, Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Shrikant Purohit of the Indian Army are arrested. The two are alleged to have links to Abhinav Bharat, a Hindu right-wing group, and suspected of carrying out a 'revenge attack" on the Muslim community.
November 2008: Evidence, including the motorcycle used in the blast allegedly owned by Thakur, is recovered. Chief investigator and special IGP Hemant Karkare is martyred in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack.
2009-2011: THE POLITICS OF IT
The ATS widens its net and makes more arrests, including other right-wing activists like Dayanand Pandey, Sameer Kulkarni, and Ajay Rahirkar. But there is massive political backlash as Hindutva outfits accuse the probe of being politically motivated.
January 2009: The ATS files its first chargesheet naming 11 accused and three wanted persons, with Thakur and Lt Col Purohit as key conspirators. Charges include provisions of the UAPA, IPC, and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA).
July 31, 2009: MCOCA charges are dropped by a special court citing lack of evidence related to other cases against the accused.
July 19, 2010: The Bombay High Court reinstates MCOCA charges.
April 13, 2011: The case is transferred to the National Investigation Agency (NIA).
2016-2017: NIA ALLEGATIONS, KEY ACCUSED GRANTED BAIL
In a significant development, the NIA drops MCOCA charges from its supplementary chargesheet and accuses the ATS of planting evidence and forced confessions. In 2017, the key accused in the case – Thakur and Lt Col Purohit – are granted bail.
May 13, 2016: The NIA files a supplementary chargesheet, dropping MCOCA charges stating that the application of the law by the ATS is questionable. It alleges that the ATS planted evidence and used coercive tactics during questioning.
April 25, 2017: The Bombay High Court grants bail to Thakur on health grounds.
August 21, 2017: The Supreme Court grants bail to Lt Col Purohit after nine years in jail.
December 27, 2017: MCOCA charges are dropped but a special court refuses to discharge Thakur and six other accused, ordering them to face trial under the UAPA, IPC, and the Explosive Substances Act.
2018 TO PRESENT: TRIAL & VERDICT
The trial in the case began 10 years after the tragic incident with the verdict now set to be delivered 17 years later.
October 30, 2018: Charges are framed against seven accused, including Thakur and Lt Col Purohit.
December 2018: Trial formally begins.
September 2023: Prosecution closes its evidence, having examined 323 witnesses with 37 turning hostile.
April 19, 2025: Final arguments conclude, and the court reserves its judgment.
July 31, 2025: Verdict awaited.
About the Author
News Desk
The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk d...Read More
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
2008 Malegaon Blast
view comments
Location :
Mumbai, India, India
First Published:
July 31, 2025, 01:48 IST
News india 10 Years Of Probe, 7 In Trial, 17 For Verdict: A Timeline Of The 2008 Malegaon Blast Case
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
28 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
BJP's cultural outreach in Tamil Nadu continues to hit Dravidian roadblock
Modi's act not merely mirrored Emperor Rajendra Chola's achievement — Around 1,000 years ago, the mighty emperor had brought the Ganga water to consecrate Gangaikonda Cholapuram after conquering the Gangetic plains — but was also intended to deliver messages of unity and that Tamil Nadu's glory and its people's identity are deeply rooted in Hindu traditions.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Purohit has indulged in acts never permitted by his office: NIA court
Mumbai: Observing that the prosecution had failed to prove its case because of lapses by police officers, hostile witnesses, and lack of material evidence, a special NIA court that acquitted Lt Col Prasad Purohit in the 2008 Malegaon blast case rejected his defence that his actions were part of his official military intelligence duties and therefore did not require prosecution sanction. It held that "he has done those acts which were never permitted by his office", reports Rebecca Samervel. Special judge A K Lahoti said serious charges of murder and criminal conspiracy were also levelled against Purohit along with other charges, showing his involvement, and hence his own officer had handed over his custody to the ATS. "On going through the papers, it is sufficient to hold that the act done by him was not in discharge of his official duty. He has done those acts which were never permitted by his office. Those acts could not be covered or protected under the garb of section 197 CrPC," the judge said in his order. He also clarified that a sanction under Section 197 of CrPC was not necessary to prosecute Purohit, a govt servant, under the circumstances of the case. Section 197 speaks about obtaining prior sanction for prosecuting public servants for offence committed while discharging official duty. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Do you have a mouse? Play this for 1 minute and see why everyone is crazy about it. Play Game Undo The NIA special court judge noted that the prosecuting agency in the 2008 Malegaon blast case had collected incriminating evidence against Purohit showing his direct involvement in the alleged offence which included the charge of murder and criminal conspiracy. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai "Those charges never require a sanction. On the other hand, the authorised officer of the military submitted the decision given by their Competent Military Authority as per Military Rules to institute the proceeding against A9 (accused 9, Purohit) before criminal court. His custody was given by military officers to ATS. In such peculiar facts, the defence taken by A9 pertaining to sanction u/s 197 of CrPC does not survive," the judge said. Part of the case against Purohit who was in the military intelligence at the time revolved around his alleged involvement with a group called Abhinav Bharat. The organisation was at the centre of the alleged conspiracy. While Purohit's lawyer submitted he was permitted to collect information from ISI or SIMI or other terrorist organizations, the judge pointed out it was not his claim that he was also member of those organizations. "Becoming a member of a selective organization without express permission is nothing but an act done out of the purview of discharge of duty," the judge said. The judge also observed that under circumstances of the case, charges of ATS and NIA against Purohit were serious and based on evidence investigating agencies collected during the course of their respective probes. The judge noted that his association with Abhinav Bharat Trust or Abhinav Bharat organisation would not be per se illegal and was part of his duty. However, the court said the charges against him show that he floated the Abhinav Bharat organisation and was founder member of Abhinav Bharat, collected huge funds and had control over financial transactions. He has accepted thousands of rupees from co-accused and utilized those amounts for private use, the judge noted. "Nothing material came on record to show that all those allegations or charges were fake, baseless and all those acts were done by A-9 with the permission of his superior officer. Merely the prosecution failed to prove the charges levelled against the accused in the absence of cogent evidence doesn't mean that all the charges were baseless or without foundation," the judge said. Seven defence witnesses, all related to Purohit, had deposed during trial. The judge said the (military) officers examined as defence witnesses or those who were working in the SCLU (Southern Command Liaison Unit) at the relevant time had not shown any interest in saving Purohit. "They had kept mum for several years. Their own inaction shows they might have noticed the action taken by ATS was proper, as their senior officers had also not shown any interest to protect their own officer considering the allegations and charges levelled. It shows that they had accepted the fact of arrest at the hands of ATS was proper," the judge said. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Bihar polls: INDIA bloc leaders to meet in Delhi on Aug 7, says Farooq
NC president Farooq Abdullah on Saturday said the Congress has convened a meeting of the Opposition leaders in New Delhi on August 7 to deliberate on Bihar Assembly polls to be held in October-November. He also expressed confidence over the restoration of J&K statehood. 'We have faith in the one who is the master of all. We will get our rights,' he said. Responding to a question on LS Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi claiming that his party has an 'atom bomb' of an evidence to prove 'vote chori', Abdullah said Gandhi 'has said that they have made such an arrangement that they will win the Bihar elections'. 'I am going to meet him. All the leaders (of INDIA bloc) have been called for a meeting on August 7 and I will find out (the truth),' he said. On BJP's claim about development post-Article 370 abrogation, Abdullah said, 'I will not say anything. Whatever the BJP says, it keeps on saying.' 'Trump also keeps on shouting that I got peace done. Today they have imposed 25% tariff on us… The material for our destruction is being prepared. All our industrialists are running away,' he said.
