logo
EU's $750 Billion Energy Deal With Trump Looks Hard to Reach

EU's $750 Billion Energy Deal With Trump Looks Hard to Reach

Yahoo28-07-2025
(Bloomberg) -- The European Union's promise to buy $750 billion of American energy imports over three years was pivotal to securing a trade deal with President Donald Trump, but it's a pledge it will struggle to keep.
The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction
Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship?
Budapest's Most Historic Site Gets a Controversial Rebuild
Trump Administration Sues NYC Over Sanctuary City Policy
The deal would require annual purchases of $250 billion of natural gas, oil and nuclear technology, including small modular reactors, according to EU officials. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the bloc's estimates were based on the existing plan to shift away from remaining Russian fossil fuel supplies and purchasing 'more affordable and better' liquefied natural gas from US producers.
Yet it's hard to see how the EU attains such ambitious flows over such a short time frame. Total energy imports from the US accounted for less than $80 billion last year, far short of the promise made by von der Leyen to Trump. Total US energy exports were just over $330 billion in 2024.
The huge figure for energy imports 'is meaningless, as it's unachievable not only because EU demand cannot grow that much, but also because US exporters cannot supply that much either!' said Davide Oneglia, an economist at TS Lombard.
The lack of detail underlines that the deal finalized by von der Leyen and Trump in Scotland is a pragmatic, political agreement, rather than a legally binding pact.
The EU has yet to provide a breakdown of the figures, and it remains unclear how private companies can be convinced to purchase or sell US oil and gas. There's also uncertainty around how European investment in the US energy sector might count toward the EU's pledge.
Deals on nuclear, particularly for so-called small modular reactors, may be one way the EU sees to spur billions of dollars of trade, yet the first ones are not expected to be commercially viable before 2030 at the earliest. Encouraging such investment may also be seen at odds with trying to promote its domestic nuclear industry.
'We believe these numbers are achievable,' Maros Sefcovic, EU trade commissioner, said at a press conference in Brussels, where he also highlighted the 'nuclear renaissance' taking place in Europe. 'That's the offer. We are ready to go for those purchases.'
Europe has become a major buyer of US barrels since the region began dialing back its purchases from Russia after the invasion of Ukraine. At times, flows from the US Gulf to the continent have reached more than 2 million barrels a day, about half of total American crude export volumes.
Any further increase in purchases could prove problematic for the region's oil refineries which need a mix of supplies to make a enough of the right kind refined fuels like gasoline and diesel.
In the first half of 2025, EU countries imported about 1.53 million barrels a day of oil from the US, of which 86% was in the form of crude, according to data from analytics firm Kpler. Those imports were worth about $19 billion.
That represented about 14% of total EU oil consumption, which averaged 10.66 million barrels a day last year, according to data from the Energy Institute Statistical Review of World Energy.
EU officials have long seen energy purchases as a way to win favor with the Trump administration, and it's not the first time the EU and the US have made such a commitment. During the height of the EU energy crisis in 2022 following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, von der Leyen agreed with former President Joe Biden to boost short-term supplies of LNG.
'The EU-US agreement on higher energy purchases — including LNG — will make no difference to the market balance unless the US administration decides to sell the LNG itself or unless the EU decided to purchase LNG itself at a higher rate to other market participants in Asia,' Rabobank Energy Strategist Florence Schmit said.
Even if this agreement leads to more EU spending on US LNG projects, flows are unlikely to materialize before the end of Trump's term, she said.
The 27-nation bloc's own modeling suggests that gas demand will weaken as it accelerates the transition to a greener economy over the course of this decade.
The US, already the world's biggest LNG producer, is about to unleash a fresh wave of supply in the next few years. There are further projects being planned and those would need new buyers and financing to materialize, and Trump may be eager to get new deals done even if not all the supply ultimately ends up in Europe.
Investment Boost
'What the Trump administration cares the most is new supply agreements with European buyers for supply from new projects, which will help them secure financing,' said Han Wei, an analyst at BloombergNEF.
US LNG is also typically destination-free, meaning that even European buyers of the fuel can ship it wherever the best priced market is at any given point. The continent has been the biggest recipient of US LNG since the 2022 crisis, but it would still be competing in a global market against buyers from Asia.
A joint purchase platform — designed to aggregate EU demand and match buyers with sellers — has seen only limited buy-in, and the details on what concrete deals have been made as a result of it remain scarce.
'I have a hard time seeing this as a victory for the EU,' said Jean-Christian Heintz, a former energy-trading executive who is now an independent consultant at Wideangle LNG. 'It will remain each state's decision to move on with Trump.'
Energy commissioner Dan Jorgensen has said that the EU is willing to work with the Trump administration and US energy suppliers to help them conform to the bloc's strict rules on methane emissions, but any tweaks are likely to be technical in nature.
The EU's ambition to scale up nuclear energy as part of its 2050 climate neutrality goal will cost €241 billion ($280 billion). Von der Leyen's deal with Trump includes so-called SMRs that are still under development in both the US and Europe.
--With assistance from Elena Mazneva, Ewa Krukowska, Eamon Akil Farhat and Sherry Su.
(Updates with comment from Sefcovic in seventh paragraph)
Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash
It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan
Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk
Confessions of a Laptop Farmer: How an American Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme
Scottish Wind Farms Show How to Counter Nimby Opposition
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watch These Novo Nordisk Stock Price Levels After Last Week's 33% Drop
Watch These Novo Nordisk Stock Price Levels After Last Week's 33% Drop

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Watch These Novo Nordisk Stock Price Levels After Last Week's 33% Drop

Key Takeaways Novo Nordisk's U.S.-listed shares were slightly higher in recent trading after shedding a third of their value last week, when the company cut its full-year outlook and named a new CEO. The shares had resumed their steep downtrend last week on above-average volume, indicating selling conviction from larger market participants. Investors should watch major support levels on Novo Nordisk's chart around $36 and $29, while also monitoring key overhead areas near $60 and $ Nordisk's (NVO) U.S.-listed shares were up about 2% in recent trading after shedding about a third of their value last week, when the company cut its full-year outlook and named a new CEO, leading Wall Street analysts to downgrade the stock. Since hitting a record high in June last year, Novo Nordisk shares have lost roughly two-thirds of their value, pressured by increasing competition from rival Eli Lilly's (LLY) weight-loss drugs and challenges during trials of the company's next-generation obesity drugs. Below, we take a closer look at Novo Nordisk's weekly chart and use technical analysis to identify major price levels that investors will likely be watching after last week's dramatic sell-off. An Extended Downtrend With last week's drop, Novo Nordisk shares resumed their steep downtrend on above-average trading volume, indicating selling conviction from larger market participants. The sell-off coincided with the relative strength index (RSI) falling to its lowest levels since early May, signaling weakening price momentum, though the indicator neared its oversold threshold, increasing the chances for short-term bounces. It's also worth noting that the 50-week moving average continues to converge toward the 200-week MA, potentially setting the stage for an ominous death cross, a bearish pattern that forecasts lower prices. Let's identify two major support levels on Novo Nordisk's chart worth watching if selling resumes this week and also point out several key overhead areas to monitor during potential recovery efforts. Major Support Levels Worth Watching The first major lower level to watch sits around $36. This area would likely provide support near the upper range of a consolidation period that formed on the chart between October 2020 and April 2021. A more significant move lower could see the shares test lower support at the $29 level. Investors may look for buying opportunities in this area near a horizontal line that connects a range of corresponding price action on the chart between January 2018 and April 2020. Key Overhead Areas to Monitor An initial recovery effort could see the shares climb to overhead resistance around $60. The price may encounter selling pressure in this area near the prominent April trough and April 2022 peak. A more bullish upswing opens the door for a rally toward $78. Investors who have bought Novo Nordisk shares at lower levels may decide to lock in profits in this location near the June peak, which closely aligns with the completion of a pullback in July 2023. The comments, opinions, and analyses expressed on Investopedia are for informational purposes only. Read our warranty and liability disclaimer for more info. As of the date this article was written, the author does not own any of the above securities. Read the original article on Investopedia Sign in to access your portfolio

NCAA Tournament fields to remain at 68 teams in 2026, but future growth is possible
NCAA Tournament fields to remain at 68 teams in 2026, but future growth is possible

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NCAA Tournament fields to remain at 68 teams in 2026, but future growth is possible

The NCAA men's and women's basketball tournaments will not expand beyond 68 teams in 2026, but future growth remains on the radar. 'Expanding the tournament fields is no longer being contemplated for the 2026 men's and women's basketball championships," Dan Gavitt, NCAA senior vice president of basketball, said in a statement on Monday. "However, the committees will continue conversations on whether to recommend expanding to 72 or 76 teams in advance of the 2027 championships.' NCAA President Charlie Baker has said adding teams could add value to the tournament, and he said the NCAA already has had 'good conversations' with TV partners CBS and Warner Bros., whose deal runs through 2032 at the cost of around $1.1 billion a year. ___ AP college basketball: and

RGTI: Rigetti Shares Jump after Needham hikes target on U.S. quantum momentum
RGTI: Rigetti Shares Jump after Needham hikes target on U.S. quantum momentum

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

RGTI: Rigetti Shares Jump after Needham hikes target on U.S. quantum momentum

Aug 4 - Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ:RGTI) jumped more than 5% on Monday shortly after Needham raised its price target by $3, signaling fresh momentum in quantum computing. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with RGTI. Analyst Quinn Bolton sees growing buzz around federal programs like DARPA's Quantum Benchmark Initiative (QBI) and the proposed Department of Energy Quantum Leadership Act. He believes those efforts could unlock new research funding and commercial opportunities. Rigetti leads a pack of startups racing to prove quantum machines can outperform classical systems. QBI aims to assess whether quantum devices deliver more value than their cost by 2033. Meanwhile, the DOE bill would allocate $2.5 billion over five years to boost quantum research. Investors weigh the promise of those programs against current realities: most quantum firms still run R&D losses and generate modest revenue. Bolton urges a cautious stance, recommending smaller, speculative positions. Yet his buy rating on Rigetti reflects confidence that government backing could pave the way for breakthroughs and higher stock gains. With Washington pulling out all the stops to keep the U.S. on the leading edge of high-tech, Rigetti advocacy demonstrates the crossroad of policy and private money. This is the place to keep an eye on future legislative actions and DARPA milestones to get new startup catalysts. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store