logo
Hitting on Mary Tyler Moore Launched Charlie Day's Career

Hitting on Mary Tyler Moore Launched Charlie Day's Career

Yahoo9 hours ago
Charlie Day is obviously best known for playing beloved degenerate Charlie Kelly on It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia. But the actor has appeared in a number of other notable movies and TV shows, including Horrible Bosses, Fool's Paradise and one episode of Law & Order — although he only had a very small part as a helpful witness, unlike Mac, who somehow landed a juicy teen murderer role.
But Day's first ever on-screen acting job was in Mary & Rhoda. The 2000 TV movie began as a pilot for a planned reboot of The Mary Tyler Moore Show, but CBS ultimately passed on the 'updated' version. 'If you loved The Mary Tyler Moore Show, stay away from Mary & Rhoda,' one review read.
During a recent appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live!, Day recalled that the role was limited to just one line. His character, named 'Mailroom Kid,' simply had to tell Moore's Mary Richards that she's 'looking fine.'
But Day clearly misunderstood the assignment. 'I thought it was supposed to be done sort of sarcastically, cause I'm 20 years old,' Day explained. 'Something like, 'Eh, looking fine, lady.'' When asked how old Moore was at the time, Day replied, 'Seventy… thousand. I don't know.'
'I get down to set, and the director's like, 'So you're really kind of hitting on her,'' Day continued. 'And so I had to do it completely differently.' Clearly pretending to come onto a TV legend in a failed pilot no one remembers worked out great. 'It launched my whole career. I took off!' Day proudly declared.
While Day has since become a famous, tuxedo-owning actor, he did entertain taking a similarly minuscule role after being asked to audition for an acclaimed filmmaker. 'It was for something David Fincher was making,' Day told Kimmel. 'But the part was one line. And I was thinking, 'I'm past this.''
But he decided to read for the part anyway, even though the whole job was just to say, 'Heads. No tails!' while someone else flipped a coin. According to Day, the casting director was surprised to see a familiar face trying out for a job that ranked only slightly above 'background extra.'
Based on Day's description, the project was likely Mank, Fincher's 2020 biopic about Citizen Kane screenwriter Herman Mankiewicz. And the character was probably legendary Hollywood comedian and singer Eddie Cantor. So, even though the part was small, casting a well-known comic actor would have actually made sense.
Unfortunately, Day didn't get the gig that he thought was beneath him. Maybe he can return the favor and invite Fincher to apply to guest-direct an episode of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia.
Get more Cracked directly to your inbox. Sign up for Cracked newsletters at Cracked News Letters Signup.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Spokesperson' for AI ‘Band' Velvet Sundown Now Says He's a Hoaxer
‘Spokesperson' for AI ‘Band' Velvet Sundown Now Says He's a Hoaxer

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Spokesperson' for AI ‘Band' Velvet Sundown Now Says He's a Hoaxer

The pseudonymous Andrew Frelon, who spoke to Rolling Stone on Wednesday as a spokesperson for the viral AI band The Velvet Sundown, and runs a Twitter account that purports to represent the band, was running an elaborate hoax aimed at the media, he now says in a Medium post. The band's official Spotify page also posted a notice insisting that Frelon — who 'confirmed' that the band created music with the AI tool Suno — is unaffiliated with the band. Velvet Sundown currently have more than 700,000 listeners on Spotify. A Velvet Sundown X account that's linked to from the band's Spotify page messaged Rolling Stone early Thursday morning asking for a correction and reiterating their disavowal of Frelon. 'We understand the intrigue our project inspires — and we're not here to dispel mystery,' the Spotify-linked account Twitter said in a DM early Thursday morning. 'But we are here to correct the record….The Velvet Sundown is a multidisciplinary artistic project blending music, analog aesthetics, and speculative storytelling. While we embrace ambiguity as part of our narrative design, we ask that reporting on us be based on verifiable sources — not fabricated accounts or synthetic media.' (The 'band' have not yet responded to a request for further comment.) More from Rolling Stone AI 'Band' the Velvet Sundown Used Suno, Is an 'Art Hoax,' Spokesperson Admits ABBA's Björn Ulvaeus Working on an AI-Assisted Musical A Bullet Killed Him. AI Brought Him Back to Life in Court In his lengthy Medium post, Frelon claims that he took advantage of the Velvet Sundown's lack of social-media presence and transformed another account he had started in March into what purported to be the band's 'official account.' From there, he claims, he used a long list of 'social engineering' tricks, including interactions with the media, to make it appear to be the band's actual account — with the supposed aim of testing journalists. 'Knowing from past projects something about the dynamics of journalistic news coverage,' he writes, 'I thought it would be funny to start calling out journalists in a general way about not having reached out to 'us' for commentary.' Frelon also told Rolling Stone on Wednesday that he had a strong interest in 'art hoaxes.' (The phone number Frelon called from, with a 514 area code, now has a 'not in service' message.) Despite the obvious AI origins of its photos and music, Velvet Sundown has been picked up on numerous Spotify playlists, attaining substantial listenership that led to widespread media coverage. Glenn McDonald, a former 'data alchemist' at Spotify, told Rolling Stone that their prominence on the streaming service is emblematic of a move 'away from understandable algorithms with strong grounding in actual human listening and communities' and toward AI-driven systems that 'can pick songs for recommendations based on characteristics of their audio.' Best of Rolling Stone Sly and the Family Stone: 20 Essential Songs The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked

On 40th anniversary of ‘Back to the Future,' Allstate celebrates its role in creation of DeLorean time machine
On 40th anniversary of ‘Back to the Future,' Allstate celebrates its role in creation of DeLorean time machine

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

On 40th anniversary of ‘Back to the Future,' Allstate celebrates its role in creation of DeLorean time machine

On the 40th anniversary of the 'Back to the Future' movie premiere, Northbrook-based insurance giant Allstate is traveling back to the past to reveal its little-known role in developing the DeLorean, the futuristic but short-lived, gull-winged, stainless steel car that served as Doc Brown's time machine. Without Allstate, Marty McFly might never have left 1985 or perhaps he would have traveled back in time in a Buick, forever disrupting the space-time continuum of the seminal movie trilogy. 'The cars exist because of the partnership Allstate had with DeLorean,' said Sandee Lindorfer, vice president of auto claims for Allstate. In the words of Doc Brown, 'Great Scott!' 'Back to the Future' hit movie theaters on July 3, 1985. A customized 1981 DeLorean DMC-12, which took audiences on joyrides to 1955, 1885 and 2015 over the course of three films, was already relegated to the junkyard of automotive history by the time the movie premiered. In the mid-1970s, Allstate worked with John DeLorean, an automobile executive and engineer, who left GM to launch his own namesake vehicle. The insurance company invested a reported $500,000 in a safety car project, developing prototypes with advanced seatbelt restraints, airbags and improved bumpers. 'We sponsored three prototypes with the DeLorean-Allstate safety car agreement, and we brought one of the prototypes to Congress to show them what could be done around smaller vehicles being more safe and having better fuel economy,' Lindorfer said. One prototype evolved into the sleek DeLorean DMC-12, which went into limited but ill-timed production at a Northern Ireland factory during a recession in 1981, generating buzz but few sales. By 1982, the debt-ridden company was in bankruptcy and its founder in legal trouble, facing indictments on separate drug and fraud charges. John DeLorean was ultimately acquitted on both counts, but his car was seemingly no more than a flash in the pan. Three years later, the DeLorean was reborn as Doc Brown's time machine, and the rest is cinematic history. Initially, the time machine was envisioned as a refrigerator-like chamber that Doc Brown carried on the back of his truck. Then director Robert Zemeckis had the inspiration that the time machine should be mobile, and specifically chose the DeLorean for its futuristic design. 'The way I see it, if you're going to build a time machine into a car, why not do it with some style?' Doc Brown, played by Christopher Lloyd, explains in the movie. In the annals of 'Back to the Future' lore, a lot of similar nuggets have emerged since the film trilogy premiered. For example, the 1989 second installment predicted the Cubs would finally end their century-long World Series drought with a 2015 win over the fictional Miami Gators. The Cubs actually broke through in 2016, beating the Cleveland Indians, but the movie was pretty close. Also, the role of Marty McFly was initially given to Eric Stoltz, who participated in over a month of filming before he was replaced by Michael J. Fox, the more comedically gifted 'Family Ties' star. But Allstate's role in developing the car that begot the time machine and an enduring movie star remained buried in a dusty folder in the back of a corporate cabinet for decades. In 2019, an Allstate archivist found the mysterious DeLorean file and began exploring the mostly forgotten connection. Six years later, on the 40th anniversary of 'Back to the Future,' Allstate is finally ready to take a modest bow. On Tuesday, Allstate rented a pair of vintage DeLoreans to celebrate the movie, the car and the unlikely part the insurance company played in both. Tucked away in the back of an underground garage at Allstate's downsized Northbrook/Glenview headquarters, across the street from its former sprawling corporate campus, the vehicles were briefly on display for the media and a handful of executives. The cars, which included a stock 1981 DeLorean and a tricked-out version replicating the 'Back to the Future' time machine, were rented from an Orland Park company — DeLorean USA Rental — that leases the vehicles for parties and events. 'You can't drive it because the insurer doesn't allow it,' said Tom Sedor, who owns the cars and the rental company. The time machine, which includes a flux capacitor and a Mr. Fusion nuclear reactor in the back — replete with banana peel as fuel — is fully drivable, and the garage and adjacent parking lot offered enough room to get it up to the 88 mph threshold required to go back to the future. But Sedor, 57, who customized the movie mockup with a 3D printer and assorted parts from Menards and RockAuto, said the replica has yet to successfully make the time jump. 'Nothing happened, no sparks,' said Sedor. 'Everything drove normally. Actually, it's very, very impressive to drive.' rchannick@

Jurassic World Rebirth Chases Summer Movie Nostalgia (opinion)
Jurassic World Rebirth Chases Summer Movie Nostalgia (opinion)

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jurassic World Rebirth Chases Summer Movie Nostalgia (opinion)

Before you ask, they keep making Jurassic Park movies because you keep paying to see them. Maybe not you, specifically. But people, who drove the last three films in the franchise to billions in combined box office revenue. Dinosaurs, or at least dinosaur movies, are big business. So the existence of Jurassic World Rebirth—or as I prefer to think of it, Jurassic Park: Another One, because that's all it really is—owes something to market forces. This is just supply responding to demand. But what, exactly, is that demand for? At the most basic level, it's for big-budget cinematic events with dinosaurs created via movie magic, which these days mostly means computer-generated effects. Those dinosaurs should romp around creating general mayhem of some sort, as humans scream and scurry in terror. In genre terms, the Jurassic Park films are monster movies, designed to thrill and instill terror. But I think the demand that props up this series is actually for something deeper, something more expansive. In part, it's for scientific awe—at dinosaurs themselves, at the idea of giant bird-lizards that actually roamed the earth, at the literal smallness of humanity in comparison. But even more than that, it's for cinematic awe, for the sense that through the prestidigitation of Tinseltown, we can resurrect these ancient terrors and set them loose in our world. Science itself may not be able to bring dinosaurs back from extinction, at least not yet, but Industrial Light and Magic can. Steven Spielberg's original wasn't just a tightly paced monster adventure—though it was—it was also a technical marvel, a movie that showed viewers things they'd never seen before. It relied on what were, at the time, advanced and novel computer effects to show dinosaurs running, leaping, and chasing. But what people forget is that most of the dinosaur shots in the film were created using practical effects—a giant T-Rex puppet head, a life-sized animatronic stegosaurus, a poison-spitting menace with painted rubber skin. Jurassic Park arrived at exactly the moment when computer effects became good enough that they could do some things that practical effects couldn't, but when it still made sense to use real, physical effects where possible. Spielberg had practically invented the idea of the summer movie two decades prior with Jaws. And Jurassic Park was in so many ways an evolution of the ideas, story structure, and techniques he pioneered in that film. When the movie came out in the early 90s, he was at the peak of his Hollywood dominance; somehow he released Schindler's List later the same year. The result was not just a nifty technical exercise, or even a superior blockbuster ride. No, Jurassic Park was the best summer movie ever, the ideal of the form, the flawless diamond to which all other summer movies since have aspired. And it's never been surpassed. There's a moment almost exactly one hour into the original Jurassic Park, when the Tyrannosaurus rex finally appears, roaring its signature Dolby roar, and begins terrorizing an unsuspecting group of park preview guests. What follows is the single greatest summer movie set piece of all time, as Spielberg sets his big bad dinosaur loose against a couple of kids in a jeep and their adult overseers. I was 11 during the summer of 1993, and that probably explains some of my fondness for the film, but I cannot stress how effectively this scene played in movie theaters at the time, even weeks after opening weekend. People screamed and gasped, cackling with a mix of fear and surprise. It's a cliche to say that the tension was palpable, but it really was. You could feel it in the air. Every movie makes a promise, some bigger than others. And Jurassic Park had been hyped, advertised, and marketed as a cultural mega-event. Its promises were extravagantly impossible. But here, finally, in the summer of 1993, was a movie that fully delivered on every single one of its enormous promises, a spectacle that actually lived up to the hype. It was awesome. That's what every Jurassic Park movie since has been chasing—that joyous, rapturous, almost silly sense of terror and wonder at some totally imaginary event projected in light on a screen. And that's why every movie since has recycled and remixed bits from the original, with winks and callbacks and nostalgia-tinged 'member berries for all those who remember, or heard the legend, of the one summer movie against which all others are measured. Jurassic Park: Another One—sorry, Jurassic World: Rebirth—goes through the motions, checking off the franchise's boxes while nodding to some of the original's most memorable moments. But it doesn't measure up. At times it even seems to know it. As with 2015's Jurassic World, which pitted genetically engineered super dinosaurs against the old school dinos of the original, nodding to the expansionary demand for bigger and more terrifying beasts, it sometimes acts as a commentary on its own dismal existence. The movie's non-dinosaur villain is a pharma company moneyman who seeks to make trillions off a drug that might mitigate cardiovascular disease, giving people decades of extra life. The heroes reject his grubby profit-seeking, preferring an open-source solution in which no one owns the cure. Setting aside the stupidity of the premise—pharmaceuticals are among the most effective and cost-efficient ways to save and extend lives—it is funny, as always, that this series pretends to hate rank capitalism, even as the endless chain of sequels is a direct product of it. And even this is just a dutiful nod to the original, a parable about the dangers of arrogant science and unchecked technology that was, itself, an exemplar of the benefits of boundary-pushing technological innovation. In this painfully mediocre Jurassic Park franchise placeholder, even the hypocrisy is nostalgic. Rebirth is set in a world in which dinosaurs are commonplace, and most people have become bored with them. As the inevitable snarky but charming scientist character laments early in the film, "Nobody cares about these animals anymore. They deserve better." They surely do. Sadly, in Jurassic Park: Another One, they don't get it. I doubt they will in the next one either. The post Jurassic World Rebirth Chases Summer Movie Nostalgia appeared first on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store