Guests died of organ failure after toxic mushroom lunch, Australian court hears
SYDNEY: Three Australians died of organ failure after eating a beef Wellington dish laced with toxic mushrooms, a medical specialist said Friday during a triple-murder trial sparked by the deaths.Erin Patterson, 50, is charged with murdering the parents and aunt of her estranged husband in 2023 by serving them a hearty lunch laced with lethal death cap mushrooms.She is also accused of attempting to murder her husband's uncle, who survived the meal after a long stay in hospital.Patterson has pleaded not guilty to all charges in a trial that has drawn intense interest from around the world.Intensive care specialist Stephen Warrillow told the high-profile trial on Friday how doctors had scrambled to save the lunch guests.But as the toxins coursed through their bodies, causing multiple organs to shut down, there was little they could do.'It was very apparent that this was not survivable,' Warrillow said, talking about one of the victims he treated.Another victim got 'relentlessly worse' even after receiving a liver transplant, he said.'We had no other treatments to offer, no other therapies. He was dying,' the doctor said.Warrillow was asked if the organ failure was caused by mushroom poisoning.'That's correct, yes,' he told the court.Patterson was estranged from her husband Simon, who turned down the invitation to the July 2023 lunch.But his parents, Don and Gail, died days after eating the beef-and-pastry dish.Simon's aunt Heather Wilkinson also died, while her husband Ian fell seriously ill but later recovered.The court earlier heard how Erin Patterson had sent messages to a Facebook group chat in December 2022, several months prior to the lunch, saying she wanted 'nothing to do' with her in-laws.Patterson and estranged husband Simon were at odds over finances and child support, the court heard, and she had sought help from his parents, who refused to intervene.'I'm sick of this shit I want nothing to do with them,' Patterson wrote in one message.The prosecution alleges Patterson deliberately poisoned her lunch guests and took care that she did not consume the deadly mushrooms herself.Her defense says it was 'a terrible accident' and that Patterson ate the same meal as the others but did not fall as sick.The trial is expected to last another two weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
2 days ago
- Al Arabiya
Idaho Judge Rejects Bryan Kohberger's Request to Delay Murder Trial in College Student Stabbings
An Idaho judge says he won't postpone the quadruple murder trial of a man accused in the stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students. Fourth District Judge Steven Hippler made the ruling Thursday, telling Bryan Kohberger's attorneys that jury selection will begin in August and opening arguments will likely be held around August 18. Hippler also rejected the defense team's request to present theories of four alternate perpetrators to the jury, writing that evidence presented by the defense is 'entirely irrelevant.' 'Nothing links these individuals to the homicides or otherwise gives rise to a reasonable inference that they committed the crime; indeed, it would take nothing short of rank speculation by the jury to make such a finding,' Hippler wrote in the order. Kohberger, 30, a former graduate student in criminal justice at Washington State University, is charged with four counts of murder. Prosecutors say he sneaked into a rental home in nearby Moscow, Idaho, not far from the University of Idaho campus, and fatally stabbed Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen, and Kaylee Goncalves on November 13, 2022. Kohberger stood silent at his arraignment, prompting a judge to enter a not guilty plea on his behalf. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. Defense attorney Anne Taylor had asked the judge to delay the proceedings. She said beginning the trial this summer would violate Kohberger's right to a fair trial, in part because his defense team was still reviewing evidence and struggling to get potential witnesses to agree to be interviewed. She also said extensive publicity could taint the proceedings and that a cooling-off period would help ensure an impartial jury. But Hippler noted that interest in the case has only grown and that previous delays have only given the media more time to provide coverage to a 'public audience which is clamoring for answers.' 'The longer the public is made to sit and wait for the facts to come out at trial, the more time there is for inflammatory, speculative stories, movies and books to circulate and more time for prior ones to be rebroadcast, purchased, viewed and consumed by the public,' he wrote. Hippler also denied the defense's request to present evidence of four alternate perpetrators to jurors after finding that evidence was flimsy at best and would lead to wild speculation, needlessly dragging out a trial that is already expected to last three months. The names of the four were redacted from the ruling, but Hippler briefly described them: Three of the people were socially connected to at least one of the victims and 'interacted with them socially in the hours before the killings,' lived within walking distance of the home, and had been to the home before. The fourth person had only a passing connection to one victim after noticing her at a store several weeks before the deaths, Hippler said. All four cooperated with investigators and their DNA didn't match samples taken at the crime scene, Hippler said, and 'there is no admissible or significant evidence that any one of them had a motive, was present at the crime scene or was otherwise connected to the crime.' 'There is not a scintilla of competent evidence connecting them to the crime,' Hippler said. Jury selection will begin August 4, Hippler said, with the trial starting about two weeks later.
Arab News
5 days ago
- Arab News
Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte seeks dismissal of impeachment case
MANILA: Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte responded Monday to her Senate impeachment trial summons, demanding the case against her be dropped. The House of Representatives impeached Duterte in early February on charges of graft, corruption and an alleged assassination plot against one-time ally and former running mate President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. A guilty verdict in the Senate would result in her removal from office and permanent disqualification from politics. A copy of Duterte's reply to the summons delivered by messenger to House prosecutors on Monday afternoon called the complaint against her an abuse of the impeachment process. 'There are no statements of ultimate facts in the (impeachment complaint). Stripped of its 'factual' and legal conclusions, it is nothing more than a scrap of paper,' the response read. It goes on to deny the allegations made against her as 'false' and state that the Senate's decision to remand the case to the House earlier this month removed her responsibility to answer them. Duterte is currently on a trip to Australia where she is meeting with Filipino supporters. Her summons was issued on June 10 after an hours-long Senate session that saw lawmakers convene as an impeachment court only to send the case back to the House, a decision one lawmaker called a 'functional dismissal.'
Al Arabiya
20-06-2025
- Al Arabiya
Investigator and Jurors Speak Out About Karen Read Murder Trial in Aftermath of Not Guilty Verdict
Two jurors and the lead investigator in the murder trial of Karen Read have come forward to comment about the case since a jury returned a not guilty verdict earlier this week. Read, 45, was charged with second-degree murder by authorities who said she intentionally hit Boston police officer John O'Keefe with her car after a night of drinking in the suburbs. The high-profile case culminated in a not guilty verdict on murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene charges Wednesday. The jury found Read guilty of operating a vehicle while under the influence. The trial has centered in part on lead investigator Michael Proctor, who defense attorneys described as biased against Read from the beginning. The State Police Trial Board found Proctor guilty of sending crude and defamatory text messages about Read while leading the investigation into her. He was fired and has drawn ire from Read supporters who believe he played a key role in a cover-up to frame her. Proctor told NBC's Dateline that the idea he is corrupt and framed Read is 'a ridiculous accusation.' He specifically said an accusation that he cracked Read's taillight to make it look like she backed into O'Keefe is 'absolutely not true.' 'I laugh because it's such a ridiculous accusation,' Proctor told the program. 'There's not one piece of evidence or fact to support that because it did not happen.' The judge in the case announced via court papers Wednesday that the jurors' names would be sealed from public view due to safety concerns. But one of the jurors, who identified himself only as Jason in an interview with TMZ, said he did not believe Read collided with O'Keefe. He also said he did not think investigators planted taillight pieces at the scene to frame Read. 'I don't really know if there was a cover-up or not. I know that's the big conspiracy about it, but I don't really know. All I know is there were a lot of holes in their investigation,' the juror said. Another juror, Paula Prado, told local news stations her mind changed about the case over the course of the last three weeks. At first she thought Read was guilty of manslaughter, but her opinion changed as the case progressed. 'As the weeks passed by, I just realized there were too many holes that we couldn't fill. And there's nothing that put her at the scene in our opinion, despite just dropping John O'Keefe off,' Prado told media. Massachusetts State Police said in a statement that it 'extends its sincerest condolences to the loved ones of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe.' The statement said the 'events of the last three years have challenged the department to review its actions and improve accountability and oversight. Under my direction as colonel, the state police has and will continue to improve in these regards. Our focus remains on delivering excellent police services that reflect the value of professionalism and maintain public trust,' Colonel Geoffrey Noble said in the statement. The jurors, state police, and Proctor are not the first to speak out about the verdict. Some of the key witnesses in the trial released a joint statement Wednesday in which they called the not guilty ruling 'a devastating miscarriage of justice.' The joint statement was issued by several people, including Brian Albert, who owned the home where the party took place, and Jennifer McCabe, Albert's sister-in-law, who was with Read and O'Keefe on the night of O'Keefe's death. Norfolk County District Attorney Michael Morrissey said only: 'The jury has spoken.'
