Elon Musk's America Party Is Dead on Arrival
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Billionaire Elon Musk's announcement of the America Party following his split with President Donald Trump over the fiscally ruinous One Big Beautiful Bill reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of American political mechanics. While Musk's frustration with Republican fiscal hypocrisy is entirely justified—the legislation adds over $3 trillion to the national debt while gutting programs working families depend on—his proposed solution ignores both the structural realities governing our electoral system and the unprecedented opportunity currently before him.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump listen to a question from reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025, in Washington, D.C.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump listen to a question from reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025, in Washington, D.C.The problem with Musk's third-party approach lies in what political scientist call Duverger's Law, which tells us why some countries, like America, only have two political parties. Devastating to Musk's plans is the fact that this isn't a matter of voter preference or campaign financing—it's a mathematical inevitability built into our electoral system's structure. When electoral districts only have one seat for the taking and it goes to the candidate with a plurality of votes, a stable two-party system is all but guaranteed.
More fundamentally, American political parties are remarkably durable institutions precisely because they serve essential functions within our electoral system. The Democratic and Republican parties have weathered civil wars, depressions, world wars, and countless scandals not through accident but because they provide organizational infrastructure, fundraising networks, and voter identification systems that third parties cannot replicate. Attempting to replace these institutional frameworks represents a decades-long project with vanishingly small chances of success no matter how much money is thrown at it.
Yet Musk's frustration reflects a real crisis within the Republican Party that creates extraordinary opportunities for internal disruption. The passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill represents a systematic betrayal of the working-class coalition that brought Republicans to power. The legislation strips health care from millions through Medicaid cuts while providing massive tax breaks to the wealthy, forcing working families to fund benefits they'll never see. This makes traditional Republican incumbents uniquely vulnerable to primary challenges from candidates offering authentic economic populism.
The timing for a hostile takeover of the GOP couldn't be better. Trump's constitutional inability to seek another presidential term creates an impending leadership vacuum within the party just as his signature legislation begins harming many of its most loyal voters. Without Trump's unique personal loyalty among working-class supporters, other Republicans will struggle to maintain a coalition built on contradictions between populist messaging and plutocratic governance.
History demonstrates that successful party transformation occurs through internal disruption, not external competition. The Tea Party movement proved that well-funded primary challenges could reshape party priorities within a single election cycle. Trump himself provided the ultimate template by seizing control of the Republican Party from within, completely remaking it around his vision and priorities.
This approach succeeds because primary elections operate under different dynamics than general elections. Lower turnout means motivated activists can have outsized influence. Incumbent advantages are also weaker there. Moreover, voters willing to participate in primaries are often more ideologically committed than general election voters. A well-funded operation targeting Republican incumbents who supported fiscal irresponsibility could achieve dramatic results with relatively modest investments.
Musk's business background should make this approach intuitive. The corporate world offers countless examples of activist investors who acquired relatively small stakes in companies and used them to force dramatic changes in strategy and leadership. Republican primaries represent the political equivalent—low-cost, high-impact opportunities to reshape institutional priorities through targeted intervention.
The alternative—attempting to build a third party from scratch—reflects the same kind of political naïveté Musk has displayed throughout his brief involvement in government. His belief that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) could cut a trillion dollars in federal spending demonstrated a fundamental misunderstanding of budget realities, just as his third-party proposal reveals ignorance of electoral mechanics.
Instead of wasting resources on a venture doomed by structural realities, Musk should pursue a strategy that actually works in American politics: identifying vulnerable Republican incumbents who voted for fiscal irresponsibility and funding primary challengers committed to genuine conservatism. This approach offers immediate impact, requires far less capital than third-party construction, and takes advantage of a party that is headed for significant disarray.
Nicholas Creel is an associate professor of business law at Georgia College & State University.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
12 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
SoftBank-Backed Ola in Crisis Mode A Year After Blockbuster IPO in India
Three years ago, when Ola Electric Mobility Ltd. 's scooters were in high demand as an affordable new offering for India's vast two-wheeler market, co-founder and billionaire Bhavish Aggarwal was spending weeks away in the UK. He set up a sleek R&D outpost in Coventry — the UK's historic automotive heartland — and staffed it with expensive industry stars who had previously sketched Jaguars and Aston Martins. The goal: an electric car of Ola's own, another step in Aggarwal's dream of becoming the Asian nation's Elon Musk.
New York Post
12 minutes ago
- New York Post
EPA chief Lee Zeldin unveils Trump admin plan to give jolt to nuclear power plants, zap wind power
The Trump administration is aggressively paving the way to open more nuclear power plants while pulling back on wind power as expensive hot air, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin said Sunday. 'President Trump wants [nuclear plants] approved as quickly as possible … It just requires an agency like the EPA to get out of the way,' Zeldin said Sunday on WABC 770 the 'Cats Roundtable' program. He criticized his own agency for examples of 'gumming up the works' in ways that unnecessarily slowed energy projects including nuclear power. Advertisement 4 'President Trump wants [nuclear plants] approved as quickly as possible … It just requires an agency like the EPA to get out of the way,' Zeldin said Sunday. Zeldin said he wants to see Congress approve a law making it easier to license zero emissions nuke power plants, regardless of which political party is in charge of the White House in the future. 'That it's going to require less time, have less cost, and have more certainty. Nuclear is certainly a key part of the future … President Trump is all in. His team is all in. The National Energy Dominance Council is all in,' he said. Advertisement Meanwhile, New York is planning to build the nation's first new major nuclear power plant in more than 15 years, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul said recently. By comparison, he said the government has been propping up wind power projects with costly taxpayer subsidies. 4 Zeldin said he wants to see Congress approve a law making it easier to license zero emissions nuke power plants. AP 'Without the government propping up wind, that it becomes even less feasible, it becomes even less economical,' Zeldin said. Advertisement 'If you're not sure which way to go… you look at the map and you look at the economics, well, that should convince you against wind.' 4 New York is planning to build the nation's first new major nuclear power plant in more than 15 years, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul said recently. REUTERS 4 'Without the government propping up wind, that it becomes even less feasible, it becomes even less economical,' Zeldin said. Getty Images Advertisement Zeldin recently visited Alaska and was also bullish that new natural gas power plants will open or expand. The former Long Island Republican congressman ran for governor in 2022, losing narrowly to Gov. Kathy Hochul.
New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
Take a political time-out, Elon Musk: ‘America Party' rant proves even your genius has its limits
Uncharacteristically, Elon Musk is doing a dumb thing. His threat this weekend to launch a third national party, based on his disappointment at President Donald Trump's failure to eliminate the deficit, is likely to be a disaster — for him, and for America. To be sure, it's risky to bet against Elon. Advertisement He's a once-in-a-millennium human talent, combining genius-level performance in engineering, in business and even in politics. (Leonardo da Vinci was a similarly all-around talent, but how many of his inventions actually got built?) Musk was politically savvy enough to see that a Democratic Party win in 2024 would have doomed his business, his plans for humanity and possibly the United States. He went all-in with his money and his fame to help prevent that calamity, for which he deserves our gratitude. Advertisement But. Musk's disappointment that Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act doesn't cut enough spending has him flirting with the idea of creating the independent 'America Party.' And that's pure foolishness. Advertisement Third parties in America have pretty much always been failures, and ruinous for those looking to rein in government. Teddy Roosevelt's Bull Moose Party handed the White House to Democrat Woodrow Wilson, with disastrous results. Ross Perot's on-again-off-again campaign — like Musk's, focused on the national debt — ushered in Bill Clinton. Musk's effort is likely to do the same, splitting the votes of Americans who want reform in Washington. Advertisement And it runs the risk of losing the midterms to the Democrats, which will guarantee no action on spending cuts, likely followed by a White House loss for the GOP in 2028. Elon and his fans are right that the debt is an existential threat. But we can't attack it without first taking apart the coalitions that created the problem. That's what Trump is doing. The old establishment GOP of Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan is gone. The new MAGA party has only a slim majority in Congress — but it was enough to pass Trump's budget bill last week. And while the OBBBA doesn't directly slash the debt, it contains several provisions making it easier to do so. Capping federal student loans will force university tuitions down, which will both cut federal spending and throttle the cash that higher education — a money laundry and employment farm for Democrats — has to play politics with. Massive deportations will decrease the illegal population in time for the 2030 census, costing Democratic states seats in the House and helping to cement a GOP majority, while improving the lives of working-class Americans and boosting tax receipts. Advertisement Even Trump's much-maligned tariffs are returning more revenue than predicted, further reducing future deficits. His policies are already spurring faster economic growth, which (see: Argentina) will help, too. Musk wanted more cuts, and I too would have been happy to get them. But as a technology guy, he must know that major advances require first developing the tools needed to do what you want to do. Advertisement Politics isn't all that different, really. A bigger majority in the House and Senate will free the GOP to go after spending more aggressively. With the Republicans' current razor-thin majorities, passing the OBBBA at all was something of a miracle. And yes, it required them to buy crucial votes with provisions that are basically pork. That's how Congress works, especially with a narrow majority. Advertisement Add 20 or 30 seats in the House, and even as few as two or three in the Senate, and serious change will be much, much easier. There's another cost to Musk's involvement in politics, given his stature as a once-in-a-millennium talent. As someone who's long backed his space-exploration goals — I was policy chair for the National Space Society when many of the legal changes that made companies like SpaceX feasible were put into place — I believe his support for human settlement of the solar system should be his primary focus. That's the place where Musk is literally irreplaceable. Advertisement Putting down your tools to pick up a hose when the house is on fire makes sense, even if you're Leonardo da Vinci. But once the fire's out, it's best to let someone else rebuild the house while you focus on your true calling. Others can hammer a roof together. No one else can paint the Mona Lisa or the Last Supper. I think Musk has enjoyed his political work, which brought him unaccustomed adulation and a break from his grueling routine. But when you have a vocation that matches your unique talents, it's best to focus on that. (Look at Elvis Presley, who wasted many years on acting — at which he was not uniquely talented). Take a vacation from politics, Elon. We desperately need you elsewhere. Glenn Harlan Reynolds is a professor of law at the University of Tennessee and founder of the blog.
