Diet soda shockingly linked to devastating disease that kills 100,000 Americans each year
A new study found people who regularly drink the diet alternatives have more than double the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes compared to people who reach for full-sugar beverages.
And artificial sweeteners may be to blame.
The scientists found that high intake of saccharin - a common zero-calorie artificial sweetener found in diet drinks - could be the main risk factor for the chronic illness, which is suffered by 37 million Americans.
The FDA approved the use of saccharin as a zero-calorie alternative to sugar in various foods and beverages in 1977.
But saccharin is at least 300 times sweeter than regular sugar and researchers now believe excess consumption may interfere with the body's natural process of utilizing glucose - a sugar the body uses for energy.
Based on their findings, study author Lyn Steffen recommended 'limiting the use of any sweetener' and suggested choosing 'unsweetened water, coffee, tea, milk or a small amount of 100 percent fruit juice' for beverages.
The researchers examined the diets of 4,654 adults between 1985 to 2015.
The participants' average intake of artificial sweeteners, diet beverages, aspartame (a low-calorie artificial sweetener) and sucralose (a synthetic artificial sweetener) were measured in the first year, seventh year and Year 20.
The study did not include people who regularly or occasionally drink full sugar sodas.
Based on their results, the participants were divided into groups to determine their probability of developing Type 2 diabetes.
During this 30-year period, 691 participants developed diabetes.
Results showed that the participants who consumed the most diet sodas in the 30 year period had a 129 percent greater chance of developing diabetes than those who barely drank any diet beverages.
Additionally, the researchers also found that those who drank sodas loaded with saccharin such as fountain Diet Coca Cola, Diet Dr Pepper and Tab had a 110 percent increased risk of diabetes.
No link was found between diabetes and aspartame or sucralose.
The observational study did not determine the reason why artificial sweeteners may lead to Type 2 diabetes.
However, the researchers believe that consuming excessive diet sodas with artificial sweeteners that are overall much sweeter than real sugar may interfere with the body's metabolism process and lead to excess sugar in the bloodstream.
According to the American Heart Association, men should consume no more than 36 grams or 150 calories of sugar per day while women should consume no more than 25 grams or 100 calories of sugar per day.
However, an 8oz can of Sprite Zero contains 50 mg artificial sweeteners, Coke Zero contains 58 mg and Pepsi Max has 77 mg.
Along with this, Diet Pepsi and Caffeine-Free Diet Pepsi both contain 111 mg and 118 mg, respectively while Diet Dr Pepper has a shocking 123 mg of artificial sweeteners.
Both Diet Coke and Caffeine-Free Coke have 125 mg of artificial sweeteners too.
Excess sugar consumption can pave the way for weight gain, high blood pressure, heart disease and insulin resistance, which can cause Type 2 diabetes.
Type 2 diabetes is the most common form of the condition and over 37 million American adults suffer from this form of the chronic illness.
The CDC reports that over 100,000 Americans die of diabetes every year.
It is caused by either the pancreas not producing enough insulin - a hormone that regulates blood sugar levels - or the body's cells not responding properly to insulin.
When you eat sugar, your body breaks it down into glucose, which the enters your bloodstream for energy absorption.
To regulate blood sugar levels, the pancreas releases insulin, which helps glucose enter your cells for energy.
But consuming excessive amounts of sugar can make the body resistant to insulin, meaning it can't effectively use the insulin to lower blood sugar.
This leads to high blood sugar levels and a buildup of glucose in the bloodstream, which can damage the eyes, kidneys, nerves and heart.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
39 minutes ago
- Metro
Urgent recall for mushrooms over fears they can cause 'fatal infections'
Several types of mushrooms have been recalled in the US because they could be contaminated with bacteria that could cause deadly infections. Enoki mushrooms and a few kinds of sliced mushrooms sold in three states could be tainted with Listeria monocytogenes. LLK Trading Inc on Sunday recalled 200-gram packages of its Needle Mushrooms, also known as Enoki mushrooms, that were sent to Bally Produce Corp in Maspeth, New York, and sold to Datang Supermarket Inc. They are in plastic packaging that is clear on the top and blue at the bottom. The nation's agency responsible for protecting the public health found listeria after doing routine testing of some packages. Product sales have stopped as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the company investigate how the contamination started. There have not been any reports of customers becoming sick from eating the Enoki mushrooms, according to the announcement published by the FDA. Customers should not eat them and return them for a full refund. Anyone with questions is urged to contact the company, which is based in Linden, New Jersey. And on Friday, Wiet Peeters Farm Products Limited recalled its 227-gram packages of Aunt Mid's Fresh Sliced Mushrooms and Peeters Mushroom Farm Cremini Sliced Mushrooms, and 10-pound cardboard packages of Peeters Mushroom Farm Thick Slice Mushrooms. Canadian Food Inspection Agency inspectors discovered listeria in the Fresh Sliced Mushrooms packages while testing the item, according to the FDA announcement. The two other products were manufactured on the same line. More Trending The company based in Charing Cross Ontario, Canada, distributed the mushrooms to Michigan and Ohio. There have not been reports of people becoming ill, and customers with questions should contact Wiet Peeters Farm Products. Listeria monocytogenes is 'an organism which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems', according to the FDA. It can cause pregnant women to have miscarriages or stillbirths. Healthy people can experience symptoms including diarrhoea, strong headaches, high fever, abdominal pain, nausea and stiffness. The recalls come a couple of weeks after pre-made salads sold in eight US stated were recalled because they could contain cucumbers with salmonella. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Teddy bear 'made of human skin' sparks police investigation MORE: Angry Trump fans burn their MAGA hats over Epstein files mystery MORE: Trump gives Putin a 50-day deadline to stop war in Ukraine
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
US ice cream makers say they'll stop using artificial dyes by 2028
Ice cream makers representing about 90% of the U.S. supply of the frozen treat have pledged to remove artificial dyes from their products in less than three years, federal health officials said Monday. The move is the latest voluntary effort by food manufacturers to heed calls from the Trump administration to remove synthetic dyes over concerns about potential health effects. In recent weeks, companies including Nestle, Kraft Heinz and General Mills said they would pull artificial colors from their foods, too. 'This is a Renaissance moment for health in America," U.S. Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary said at a news conference. About 40 makers of ice cream and frozen dairy desserts said they would remove seven petroleum-based dyes from their products by 2028, according to Michael Dykes, president of the International Dairy Foods Association. The colors are Red 3, Red 40, Green 3, Blue 1, Blue 2, Yellow 5 and Yellow 6. The trade group wouldn't identify the firms, although Turkey Hill Dairy chief executive Andy Jacobs joined the gathering. The national focus on artificial food dyes is 'a good step to take," but officials should not ignore larger known contributors to chronic disease, including the added sugars and saturated fat commonly found in ice cream, said Deanna Hoelscher, a University of Texas nutrition expert. 'Just taking out or changing the food dye source is not necessarily going to make it a healthy option,' she said. 'It still is a food that should be consumed in moderation.' However, Makary also hinted that new federal dietary guidelines, expected later this year, would challenge established links between saturated fat and heart disease, ending what he called 'a 70-year demonization of natural saturated fat.' The average American eats about 4 gallons of ice cream a year, the IDFA said. Health advocates have long called for the removal of artificial dyes from foods, citing mixed studies showing that they may cause some neurobehavioral problems, such as hyperactivity and attention problems, in some children. The Food and Drug Administration has maintained that approved dyes are safe and that 'most children have no adverse effects' when consuming foods made with them. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has criticized the dyes and pressured manufacturers to remove them from foods. In their place, manufacturers should use dyes made from fruit juices, plant extracts and other sources, federal officials said. The FDA has approved new natural color additives in recent months, including a new blue color made from the fruit of the gardenia announced Monday. Gardenia (genipin) blue is approved for use in sports drinks, candies and certain other products, the agency said. Makary also sent a letter to food manufacturers on Monday that 'encourages' them to speed up removal of the dye known as Red 3, which was banned in January. Food makers have until 2027 to remove the dye, which was found to cause cancer in laboratory rats, but not humans. Some food companies have said they will stop using artificial dyes, but relying on voluntary action rather than regulatory requirements won't guarantee compliance, said Thomas Galligan, a scientist with the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a consumer advocacy group. 'Talk is cheap,' Galligan said. 'It's easy for companies to make promises to look like they're being compliant and generate goodwill among consumers and the Trump administration, but it remains to be seen if they will actually follow through.' ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
NBC News
3 hours ago
- NBC News
More elderly Americans are choking to death. Are these devices the answer?
It was the scariest choking incident David Palumbo had ever seen. The 88-year-old man had been dining at a Providence, Rhode Island, Italian restaurant in September 2019. Now he was unconscious, with a piece of bread lodged in his windpipe. Precious minutes went by as first responders were unable to help him with CPR or the Heimlich maneuver. In an ambulance on the way to the hospital, the elderly man's skin was blue, and firefighters worried he was going to die. Palumbo — a fire department captain — used a scissors-like device called Magill forceps to pull the bread from the man's throat. 'We get a lot of calls in the city for choking,' many of which are resolved before emergency responders even get there, Palumbo added. 'This was by far the worst one I've been on in my career.' Fortunately, the man survived and made a full recovery, he said. But many elderly people do not. Each year, choking claims the lives of more than 4,100 Americans who are 65 or older. It's the most vulnerable age group, accounting for about three-quarters of U.S. choking deaths, according to federal health statistics. The death rate has been relatively steady, but the number has risen, as the size of the nation's retirement-age population grows. In response, a number of companies are marketing antichoking devices to the elderly. Medical professionals have been debating whether to endorse the products, sold under the names LifeVac, SaveLix, VitalVac and the Dechoker. Dr. Nathan Charlton, a University of Virginia professor of emergency medicine who advises the American Red Cross on first aid, said there is limited evidence for the products and that the Red Cross is still evaluating them. Here's a look at choking and the best ways to prevent choking deaths. Choking is a danger to older adults Choking occurs when food or some other object partially or totally blocks the windpipe, preventing oxygen from reaching the lungs. Telltale signs include someone reaching for their neck and losing the ability to speak normally. Brain damage can occur after four minutes, and death can come just a few minutes later. Older adults are at higher risk for a number of reasons. As people get older, mouth and throat muscles can weaken. Older people also make less saliva. Some chronic diseases and medications can make swallowing even harder. Dentures can be a choking risk. The best ways to stop choking Choking risk can be reduced by cutting food into small pieces, chewing food slowly, drinking plenty of liquids with meals, and not laughing or talking at the same time you are chewing and swallowing. When someone is choking, you can try perhaps the oldest form of first aid: back slaps. There's also the Heimlich maneuver, named after the doctor credited with devising it in the 1970s. It involves standing behind the choking person, wrapping your arms around their abdomen and — with a balled fist — thrusting inward and upward. The idea is that it forces air out of the lungs, and the obstruction with it. The American Red Cross recommends alternating back blows and abdominal thrusts in sets of five. That's for situations in which someone is around to help a choking victim. But what if they are alone? It is possible for someone try to self-administer a Heimlich by thrusting their abdomen against the back of a chair, Charlton said. Makers of some the newer anti-choking devices say that's where their products can make a difference. 'Elderly people probably are not capable of diving on a chair or counter,' said Arthur Lih, the founder and chief executive of LifeVac. Antichoking devices aren't always risk-free They vary in design, but generally the devices look like a face mask attached to a tube or bellows, with a handle at the end. They typically sell for around $30 to $100. A choking person dons the mask, pushes down on the handle and then pulls up. That is supposed to create a suction that would pull out the blockage. Some research suggests at least certain devices can injure the tongue or cause bleeding and swelling in the throat. And the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has reports that some products did not generate enough suction and left people with bruising around the face, lips, and mouth. An injury report led the FDA to do an inspection and issue a warning letter to Dechoker in 2021. Manufacturers note their products are registered with the FDA, but that's not the same as an endorsement. Indeed, the agency last year issued a notice to consumers that said it has not approved antichoking devices sold over the counter, because their safety and effectiveness haven't been established. Lih said the FDA action was in response to the proliferation of antichoking devices entering the market that vary in design and quality. More research is needed, choking expert says Right now, the consensus — even among antichoking device manufacturers — is that back blows and abdominal thrusts should always be tried first. (The forceps that Palumbo used are not recommended for the general public.) Lih said thousands of nursing homes and emergency response agencies have purchased the newer antichoking devices. One example: The police department in Acworth, Georgia, bought about 75 LifeVac devices after an officer last year used her personal device to save an elderly woman. They are now in every patrol car, said Sgt. Eric Mistretta. Manufacturers claim the products have saved thousands of lives across multiple countries, but it's tricky to document how well they actually work, said Dr. Cody Dunne, a University of Calgary researcher who has tried. The early evidence has come from case reports or small studies that used mannequins and cadavers. 'I think the case is definitely being built,' he said, but more rigorous research is needed. For example, a larger study could compare what happened during choking incidents at nursing homes that stock the devices with those that don't. Dunne noted, however, that evidence for the Heimlich maneuver and back slaps is evolving, too. He co-authored a study last year that found back blows worked better than the Heimlich or chest compressions. 'We're only now getting good evidence on the old choking techniques, let alone these new ones,' he said.
