logo
5 major reasons behind Team India's defeat in Lord's Test vs England

5 major reasons behind Team India's defeat in Lord's Test vs England

First Post4 days ago
Much like their defeat in the series opener at Headingley, India ended up on the losing side at Lord's despite finding themselves in a commanding position at multiple stages of the match. Only this time, the loss was a lot narrower and more heart-breaking. read more
The English players celebrate Shoaib Bashir's dismissal of Mohammed Siraj that seals their 22-run victory in the third Test at Lord's. AP
Team India are set to play catch-up with England once again in the ongoing Test series in England, having conceded the series lead once again to the Ben Stokes-led hosts with a 22-run defeat at Lord's on Monday. India had leveled the five-match series in style with a 336-run thrashing of England at Edgbaston after losing the series opener by five wickets.
England, however, bounced back from the hiding that they received in the second Test in some style, prevailing over Gill and his men despite getting bundled out for less than 200 on the penultimate day after both teams finished level on scores earlier in the match.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With the third of five Tests witnessing a , ending on a rather heart-breaking note from the perspective of the Gill-led team and their supporters, we take a look at five key reasons behind India's defeat at Lord's.
Batting collapses return to haunt India
It was India's solid performance with the bat that had headlined their lopsided victory in the second Test at Edgbaston. A little over a week after the triumph, the visitors found themselves falling short in a chase of target under 200. Collapses in both innings was a key reason behind India's loss in Leeds, and the problem returned to haunt captain Gill, head coach Gautam Gambhir and the rest of the visiting team in London.
Rishabh Pant is cleaned up by Jofra Archer on the final day of the third Test between India and England at Lord's. Reuters
India were staring at the prospect of a handy first innings lead, or going past the 400-mark at the very least, at 376/6 after bowling England out for 387 – only to lose their next four wickets for just 11 runs to finish level on scores with the hosts.
Two days later, KL Rahul and Karun Nair had steadied the ship with a 36-run partnership for the second wicket that was filled with some delightful strokes, only for India to end the day at 58/4 after losing three wickets for 17 runs. The procession continued on the following day, with India losing three more wickets for just 24 runs. Which adds up to six wickets list for just 41 runs across two days.
Pant's run-out turns out to be a game-changing moment
It wasn't just batting collapses that defined India's defeat at Lord's; Rahul and wicketkeeper-batter Rishabh Pant had batted superbly in the morning session of the third day after resuming from their overnight score of 145/3. And the two seniors looked set to bat till lunch and resume their charge against the England attack on the other side of the interval.
RUN OUT! 🙌
Ben Stokes aims and fires at the stumps and Rishabh Pant is out! ❌ pic.twitter.com/Z9JWwV9aS4 — England Cricket (@englandcricket) July 12, 2025
Pant decided to collect a quick single off Shoaib Bashir in the final over before lunch, but stuttered after taking a couple of steps forward. Unfortunately for him, it was England captain Stokes who collected the ball near cover and not only judged which end to target, but hit bull's eye.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
One wicket would lead to another as Rahul would depart right after lunch, but not before completing his century – his second at Lord's. India, however, found themselves on the backfoot once again at 254/5, and it was left to the trio of Ravindra Jadeja, Nitish Kumar Reddy and Washington Sundar to try and steer India towards the English total. Who knows how far India would have gone in their first innings had Pant not been run-out.
Questionable shot selection
India's shot selection also came under the scanner, especially during their run chase on Sunday evening and on Monday. Yashasvi Jaiswal should have known better than to go for a wild heave off a short delivery from Jofra Archer early in innings, that too when he was yet to open his account with just five runs on the board against his team's name. The ball went sky high, only to land safely in keeper Jamie Smith's gloves as England got rid of the southpaw early in the innings.
And though he might not come under as much scrunity as opener Jaiswal given batting is not his primary job, Bumrah will be regretting his decision to go for a similar shot during his eighth-wicket partnership with Jadeja at a stage where India were beginning to fight back from a hopeless situation.
Bumrah had faced more than 50 deliveries for his five runs, but succumbed to his instinct while attempting to pull a short ball outside off from Stokes. As he made his slow walk back to the pavilion, Bumrah was seen hitting himself on the helmet in regret.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Inability to clean up the tail once again
It isn't just batting collapses that's common between India's defeats at Headingley and at Lord's. The team's age-old problem of failing to bowl out the lower order without causing much damage returned to haunt them at the 'Home of Cricket', and would go on to impact the final result of the game.
England tail-ender Brydon Carse raises his bat after completing his half-century on Day 2 of the third Test against India at Lord's. Reuters
With Bumrah back in the attack after being rested at Edgbaston and Mohammed Siraj and Akash Deep breathing fire after starring in the victory in the second Test, one would have expected India to dish out an even more clinical performance at Lord's. Though they did struggle for wickets initially, the Bumrah-led attack managed to reduce the hosts to 271/7 despite Joe Root's 104 – his 37th Test hundred.
The in-form Smith and tail-ender Brydon Carse, however, struck half-centuries and added 84 for the eighth wicket to take the hosts past 350, with the latter hanging around long enough to nearly guide England past 400. Had they suffered a collapse the way India did in their first innings, England might have been bundled out in the range of 300. Bumrah finished with 5/74, his second five-for in as many games, but the inability to polish off the tail took some sheen off it.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Conceding a barrage of extras on Day 4
The Indian bowling unit was a lot more clinical on the fourth day, bundling England out for 192 with off-spinner Sundar proving his worth with figures of 4/22 and Siraj (2/31) and Bumrah (2/38) collecting a couple of wickets each.
However, it's worth noting that 32 of the runs that England had managed on the second day had come in the form of extras, including 25 byes. And that's where the spotlight falls on reserve keeper Dhruv Jurel, who filled in for an injured Pant ever since the latter copped a painful blow on his left index finger on Day 1.
Jurel, in his defence, could state that the exaggerated late movement produced by Bumrah and Siraj, especially when bowled down the leg stump, made it difficult for him to stop the ball, requiring precision in timing his jump. Then again, he's not as used to keeping in these conditions as Pant, and will learn with the passage of time, provided he keeps getting opportunities.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

England vs Pakistan, World Championship of Legends Live Streaming: When and where to watch ENG vs PAK, full squads
England vs Pakistan, World Championship of Legends Live Streaming: When and where to watch ENG vs PAK, full squads

Mint

time28 minutes ago

  • Mint

England vs Pakistan, World Championship of Legends Live Streaming: When and where to watch ENG vs PAK, full squads

Runners-up in the previous edition, PakISTan will aim to go the extra mile in their quest for first-ever World Championship of Legends title when the Men in Green take on England in the 2025 season opener on Friday (July 18) at Edgbaston in Birmingham. While England will be led by 2019 World Cup-winning captain Eoin Morgan, Shahid Afridi has been appointed as the skipper of Pakistan side which has several new faces this year. The tournament will see the return of former England captain Sir Alastair Cook for the first time in competitive cricket after seven years, after the left-hander bid farewell to international cricket in 2018. The England vs Pakistan clash in WCL 2025 will be played on July 18 at Edgbaston in Birmingham, Starting at 9 PM IST. The England Champions vs Pakistan Champions WCL 2025 clash will be televised on Star Sports Network channels - Star Sports 1 and Star Sports 1 (Hindi). Live streaming of England Champions vs Pakistan Champions in WCL 2025 will be available on FanCode app and website. England: Phil Mustard (wk), Alastair Cook, James Vince, Ian Bell, Eoin Morgan (c), Moeen Ali, Ravi Bopara, Samit Patel, Liam Plunkett, Chris Tremlett, Ryan Sidebottom Pakistan: Mohammad Hafeez,, Younis Khan, Shoaib Malik, Misbah-ul-Haq, Shahid Afridi (c), Abdul Razzaq, Imad Wasim, Sarfaraz Ahmed (wk), Sohail Tanvir, Wahab Riaz, Saeed Ajmal The two sides met only once in World Championship of Legends in 2024. Batting first, Pakistan rode on half-centuries of Sohaib Maqsood and Shoaib Malik to post 196/4 in 20 overs. In reply, England were all out for 117 in 17 overs, with Phil Mustard (30) top scoring. For Pakistan, Saeed Ajmal and Abdul Razzaq took three and two wickets respectively. Pakistan: Sharjeel Khan, Kamran Akmal, Younis Khan, Misbah-ul-Haq, Sarfaraz Ahmed(w), Shoaib Malik, Shahid Afridi (c), Abdul Razzaq, Wahab Riaz, Saeed Ajmal, Sohail Tanvir, Sohail Khan, Asif Ali, Sohaib Maqsood, Aamer Yamin England: Sir Alastair Cook, Ian Bell, Eoin Morgan (c), Moeen Ali, Ravi Bopara, Phil Mustard (w), Usman Afzaal, Chris Tremlett, Dimitri Mascarenhas, Liam Plunkett, Ryan Sidebottom, Tim Ambrose, Ajmal Shahzad, Stuart Meaker

Yuvraj Singh wasn't a certainty for selectors in India's 2011 World Cup squad, reveals Gary Kirsten: ‘Thank goodness we picked him'
Yuvraj Singh wasn't a certainty for selectors in India's 2011 World Cup squad, reveals Gary Kirsten: ‘Thank goodness we picked him'

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Yuvraj Singh wasn't a certainty for selectors in India's 2011 World Cup squad, reveals Gary Kirsten: ‘Thank goodness we picked him'

Imagine how India would have coped without Yuvraj Singh in the 2011 ODI World Cup. Then-India head coach Gary Kirsten has now revealed that the national selectors weren't exactly certain of marking a spot for Yuvraj for the marquee home World Cup, that he would eventually dominate to become the Player of the Tournament. Speaking to Kirsten revealed that if it were not for his and then skipper MS Dhoni's insistence, the script could indeed have been a lot different. 'Thank goodness we picked him because it was flipping close, he was. It was not a slam-dunk selection. The selectors kind of debated around the 15 players. I was very keen to have him in the team as was Dhoni, because of the experience that he brought to the group. And look at the World Cup he ended up having,' revealed Kirsten. 'I was always very fond of Yuvraj. We had this kind of great relationship where like, he used to frustrate the hell out of me sometimes, but I just loved him. He was good. I just want him to be scoring runs all the time because when I watch him bat, it's just like amazing to watch. But there was a journey he had to walk and credit to Paddy (Upton),' added Kirsten. Kirsten added that Upton (mental conditioning and strategic leadership coach) was integral to get Yuvraj in prime shape for the tournament, his last major event before a life-threatening cancer hampered the next phase of his international career. 'Paddy did a lot of work with Yuvi to get him ready for that World Cup. Yuvi himself made some key decisions around getting himself prepared and ready for the World Cup,' the former India coach added. After a lull in 2010, Yuvraj turned up in full force in the World Cup, racking 362 runs with a strike rate above 86 besides 15 wickets in the tournament. Yuvraj scored a century against the West Indies in sultry Chennai while also claiming a five-wicket haul and a half-century in a league game against Ireland. However, Yuvraj's special knock came against defending champs Australia, who were knocked out with his match-winning half-century in the quarter-final match in Ahmedabad. The star all-rounder also turned up with two wickets each in every knockout game and was memorably at the non-striker's end when his captain Dhoni added the finishing touches with an iconic six in the final against Sri Lanka in Mumbai.

Donald Trump jokes about passing executive order to relabel ‘soccer' to ‘football' in USA; Soccer is an Oxford University British coinage
Donald Trump jokes about passing executive order to relabel ‘soccer' to ‘football' in USA; Soccer is an Oxford University British coinage

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Donald Trump jokes about passing executive order to relabel ‘soccer' to ‘football' in USA; Soccer is an Oxford University British coinage

It's not exactly a real war, settling which can get anyone a peace prize. But US President joked he would try. As the Club World Cup wound up, DAZN reporter Emily Austin on Sunday (13 July) following Trump's presence on the pitch after Chelsea's win at the MetLife stadium, drew Trump into a discussion over difference between the British (football) and American (soccer) terms for the popular game. 'They call it football, we call it soccer. I'm not sure if that change can be made very easily,' Trump told her first up. After Ms Austin wondered if he could issue an executive order instead so only the word football is used, the US president guffawed and replied: 'I think we could do that.' USA has a few slightly more urgent matters to attend to, so 'soccer' might yet survive. But it drew attention to the serendipitous route the words have taken – always influenced by the presence of a more popular rival sport. Encyclopedia Britannica notes that the term 'soccer' originated in England as a slang abbreviation of 'association football.' After the formation of the Football Association in late 1800s, the rules of football, were slotted in stone by 'Association Football.' However, not the most interesting variety of kicking the ball with the foot, it faced jostles from other football codes, like rugby. That's when Oxford University students coined the term 'soccer' as a casual, shortened version, using the 'soc' from 'association' and adding the '-er' suffix common in Oxford campus slang. So, soccer set itself apart from rugger. Britannica writes, 'Although football-type games have been around for centuries, the sport we know today is often said to have begun in 1863, when England's newly formed Football Association wrote down a set of rules. At the time, it was the most widely played game of its kind in the country, but it wasn't the only one. Rugby football, named after an English boarding school, was a rebellious variation that allowed players to carry and run with the ball to advance it toward the goal.' So, the football of Pirlo, Canavaro, Gigi Buffon, Big Brazilian Ronaldo, Gatusso, del Piero, Gerrard, Raul Gonzalez Blanco, Miroslav Klose and the great Juan Roman Riquelme was called by the Football Association's as association football. Britannica further mentions that linguistically creative students at the University of Oxford in the 1880s distinguished between the sports of 'rugger' (rugby football) and 'assoccer' (association football). 'The latter term was further shortened to 'soccer' (sometimes spelled 'socker'), and the name quickly spread beyond the campus. However, 'soccer' never became much more than a nickname in Great Britain. By the 20th century, rugby football was more commonly called rugby, while association football had earned the right to be known as just plain football.' Onto the United States where the womens team salvages ineptness of the men, and actually wins World Cups. Another sport, Britannica says, emerged in the late 19th century that borrowed elements of both rugby and association football. 'Before long, it had proved more popular than either of them. In full, it was known as gridiron football, but most people never bothered with the first word.' So Anerican football came into being. Cornered by yet another mire popular sport, American association-football players defiantly adopted soccer to refer to their sport. 'The United States Football Association, which had formed in the 1910s as the official organizing body of American soccer, changed its name to the United States Soccer Football Association in 1945, and it later dispensed with the 'Football' altogether. No longer just a nickname, soccer had stuck,' Britannica writes. Football, of the Buffon kinds, also faced competition from gridiron football in Canada, Gaelic football in Ireland and Australian rules football (which is derived from rugby). 'In places where football can be ambiguous, soccer is usefully precise,' Britannica writes. Thus was sulkingly born soccer. Which might need a presidential decree to lose its British slang name in the lead up to next year's World Cup. The real issues facing football in US however are quality of playing turf, humid hot temperatures and American general disinterest.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store