
You Could Receive COVID Vaccines via Dental Floss in Future
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Vaccines given via dental floss could one day allow people to immunize themselves from COVID in the comfort of their own homes without having to use needles.
This is the finding of North Carolina (NC) State University researchers who have demonstrated the new delivery method in an animal model—introducing a flu vaccine via the tissue between the teeth and gums.
The novel approach has potential for broad application, the team says.
"We expect the approach to work with COVID vaccine that uses mRNA, hepatitis and tetanus since they use subunit proteins as antigens, and other vaccines that use inactivated or attenuated viruses as antigens (such as MMR vaccine)," paper author and NC State nanomedicine professor Harvinder Singh Gill told Newsweek.
"In essence through proper formulation of the coating, the approach should work with any vaccine."
Woman holding a dental floss pick in her teeth.
Woman holding a dental floss pick in her teeth.
AndreyPopov/Getty Images
The researchers discovered the new method stimulates the production of antibodies in mucosal surfaces—the moist linings of various body cavities— like the nose and lungs.
"Mucosal surfaces are important, because they are a source of entry for pathogens, such as influenza and COVID," Gill said in a statement.
"However, if a vaccine is given by injection, antibodies are primarily produced in the bloodstream throughout the body, and relatively few antibodies are produced on mucosal surfaces.
"But we know that when a vaccine is given via the mucosal surface, antibodies are stimulated not only in the bloodstream, but also on mucosal surfaces.
"This improves the body's ability to prevent infection, because there is an additional line of antibody defense before a pathogen enters the body."
A health worker injects vaccine into patient's arm for Covid-19.
A health worker injects vaccine into patient's arm for Covid-19.
wisely/Getty Images
Something called the 'junctional epithelium'—a thin layer of tissue that lines the surface of body parts—also played an important role in the study.
While most epithelial tissues include robust barriers designed to keep 'bad' things like viruses and dirt from entering your blood stream, the junctional epithelium lacks such a barrier.
This allows the junctional epithelium to release immune cells to fight bacteria, typically found in saliva and between teeth and gums.
Gill explained, "The idea to use the junctional epithelium came through a chance reading in the literature that the 'junctional epithelium' is 'highly permeable'. The Gill lab has been working to develop mucosal vaccines for almost 20 years."
He said the words 'highly permeable' were "like nectar" to him and "sparked an aha moment" because the mucosal tissues such as those in the gut, lungs and reproductive services are 'highly impermeable', making vaccine delivery challenging. This left him excited to test the new method out.
"To our knowledge no one has ever used the junctional epithelium nor the floss for vaccine delivery," Gill added.
Two light microscope images representing the junctional epithelium.
Two light microscope images representing the junctional epithelium.
JOSE LUIS CALVO MARTIN & JOSE ENRIQUE GARCIA-To assess the viability of delivering vaccines through the junctional epithelium, the researchers applied the vaccine to unwaxed dental floss and then flossed the teeth of mice. They compared antibody production in mice that received a peptide flu vaccine "via flossing the junctional epithelium; via the nasal epithelium; or via placing vaccine on the mucosal tissue under the tongue."
"We found that applying vaccine via the junctional epithelium produces far superior antibody response on mucosal surfaces than the current gold standard for vaccinating via the oral cavity, which involves placing vaccine under the tongue," paper author Rohan Ingrole, who was a Ph.D. student under Gill at Texas Tech University, said in a statement.
"The flossing technique also provides comparable protection against flu virus as compared to the vaccine being given via the nasal epithelium."
"This is extremely promising, because most vaccine formulations cannot be given via the nasal epithelium—the barrier features in that mucosal surface prevent efficient uptake of the vaccine," added Gill.
"Intranasal delivery also has the potential to cause the vaccine to reach the brain, which can pose safety concerns. However, vaccination via the junctional epithelium offers no such risk.
"For this experiment, we chose one of the few vaccine formulations that actually works for nasal delivery because we wanted to see how junctional epithelium delivery compared to the best-case scenario for nasal delivery."
The researchers also tested whether the junctional epithelium delivery method worked for three other prominent classes of vaccines—proteins, inactivated viruses and mRNA (a type of single-stranded RNA involved in protein synthesis, RNA being a key molecule found in living cells and viruses).
The delivery technique produced "robust antibody responses" in the bloodstream and across mucosal surfaces in all three.
Evident at least in the animal model, it didn't matter whether food and water was consumed immediately flossing with the vaccine—the immune response was the same.
The researchers acknowledged, however, the impracticality of asking people to hold vaccine-coated floss in their fingers. This led them to introduce a floss pick with a handle, just like the one you might use for removing plaque and food particles.
They coated the floss with fluorescent food dye, recruited 27 study participants, explained the new floss-based vaccine concept and asked them to try to deposit the food dye in their epithelial junction with a floss pick.
Roughly 60 percent of the dye was deposited in the gum pocket, suggesting the floss pick may be a practical vaccine delivery method to the epithelial junction, according to the researchers.
"For accessibility the advantage is that the vaccine is coated as a solid and thus it can be more stable and may not need cold storage. A floss could be self-administered, is painless and may receive better acceptance as compared to shots," said Gill.
While more research is needed before the innovative method could be considered for clinical use, the researchers think the positives could extend beyond the improved antibody response—from ease of administration and easing vaccine concerns about needles to a comparable price.
The CDC recommends an updated 2024–2025 COVID-19 vaccine for most adults 18 and older, while parents of children aged six months to 17 years should discuss the benefits of vaccination with a healthcare provider. However, six in 10 Americans said they would probably not get an updated 2024–2025 COVID-19 vaccine, according to an October Pew Research Center survey.
Concern about side effects and feeling that the updated vaccine is personally unnecessary were the top two reasons why people were reluctant—regardless of age, party, or race and ethnicity. A smaller share of those not planning to get an updated vaccine said a major reason why is that they generally don't get vaccines. Very few cited cost as a major reason, according to the survey.
Some drawbacks of the potential floss-vaccine to consider include that it wouldn't work on infants and toddlers without teeth and whether it would work for people with gum disease or other oral infections.
What about side effects? "This requires more study. The anticipation is that the side effects may not be any greater than conventional shots," said Gill.
"Next, the approach should be tested on larger animals such as pigs. Additional engineering is also needed to improve upon the device itself so that it is more user friendly. In the long-term, our vision is that this could be a kit either used in the comfort of home, or a dentist's office, or pharmacies."
Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about vaccination? Let us know via health@newsweek.com.
Reference
Ingrole, R. S. J., Shakya, A. K., Joshi, G., Lee, C. H., Nesovic, L. D., Compans, R. W., & Gill, H. S. (2025). Floss-based vaccination targets the gingival sulcus for mucosal and systemic immunization. Nature Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-025-01451-3
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
CDC bars expert groups from advising on vaccines
Click in for more news from The Hill{beacon} Health Care Health Care The Big Story CDC bars expert groups from advising on vaccines The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) told some expert groups that they will no longer be able to help review scientific data used to issue vaccine recommendations. © APSome members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice's (ACIP) working groups, including physician groups and infectious disease specialists, were sent e-mails late Thursday notifying them that they will no longer serve on the subcommittees. The groups were removed from the subcommittees because they were deemed biased by the Trump administration, according to a copy of the email shared with The Hill. "By definition, Liason organizations are special interest groups and therefore are expected to have a 'bias' based on their constituency/and or population that they represent," the email reads. "It is important that the ACIP Workgroup activities remain free of influence from any special interest groups so ACIP workgroups will no longer include Liason organizations." Eight of the advisory groups released a joint statement Friday saying they are 'deeply disappointed' that they are now barred from informing the development of vaccine recommendations. 'For decades liaisons from our organizations have reviewed published and unpublished data and literature related to vaccine efficacy, effectiveness, and safety and provided unbiased input for ACIP's consideration,' the statement reads. 'To remove our deep medical expertise from this vital and once transparent process is irresponsible, dangerous to our nation's health, and will further undermine public and clinician trust in vaccines.' The groups, which include the American Medical Association, as well as the Infectious Diseases Society of America, called on the Trump administration to reconsider their exclusion from the vaccine review process. A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which oversees the CDC, said that experts will continue to be included in the review process based on 'relevant experience and expertise." 'Under the old ACIP, outside pressure to align with vaccine orthodoxy limited asking the hard questions,' the spokesperson wrote. 'The old ACIP members were plagued by conflicts of interest, influence and bias.' The notice is the latest move from the Trump administration to shake up the nation's vaccine policy and is another major change to the CDC's advisory panel on vaccines. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr abruptly fired all 17 sitting members of ACIP in early June, accusing them of having conflicts of interest and rubber-stamping decisions related to the COVID-19 vaccine. He then replaced the panel with eight hand-picked appointees, including some vaccine skeptics. Welcome to The Hill's Health Care newsletter, we're Nathaniel Weixel, Alejandra O'Connell-Domenech — every week we follow the latest moves on how Washington impacts your health. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will be impacting the health care sector this week and beyond: Most adults do not plan on getting COVID-19 shot amid vaccine policy changesMore than half of American adults — 59 percent — say they do not expect to get the COVID-19 booster shot this autumn, according to new poll findings from health care policy group KFF. Poll results show 23 percent of U.S. adult respondents said they will 'probably not' get the vaccine, while 37 percent said they will 'definitely not' get the shot. Americans who said they will 'probably' or 'definitely' not get the shot were … Full Story Blue states challenge Trump's restrictions on gender-affirming care More than a dozen Democratic attorneys general announced a lawsuit challenging recent moves by President Trump's administration to severely restrict access to gender-affirming health care for anyone under 19, including in states where treatment is legal and protected by law. Full Story Fired vaccine board members warn of fallout from RFK Jr. policiesRecently removed members of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine advisory panel warn that Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s move to replace them shows he is 'abandoning' rigorous scientific review and open deliberation. Kennedy fired all 17 sitting members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in early June, accusing members of having conflicts of … Full Story In Other News Branch out with a different read: Number of Texans receiving out-of-state abortions quadrupled between 2021 and 2023 AUSTIN (KXAN) — Texans who sought an abortion out of state more than quadrupled between 2021 and 2023 after a state law went into effect that bans the procedure in almost all cases. Data from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) shows at least 7,844 Texas residents received an abortion in a different state in 2023, up from 4,718 in 2022 and 1,712 in 2021. Still the total number of abortions for Texas residents … Full Story Around the Nation Local and state headlines on health care:More than 2,000 DACA recipients in California to lose health insurance (the San Francisco Chronicle) Some rural Texas seen THC as a lifeline for their health and economy (The Texas Tribune) Illinois becomes first state to require mental health screenings for students (ABC) What We're Reading Health news we've flagged from other outlets: Medicare, Medicaid plans to experiment with covering weight loss drugs (The Washington Post) Wildfire smoke and unhealthy air fill the Midwest before spreading to the East (The Washington Post) Remember running a mile in school? The Presidential Fitness Test is coming back (NPR) You're all caught up. See you next week! Close Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here The latest in politics and policy. Direct to your inbox. Sign up for the Health Care newsletter Subscribe

Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Most Americans Won't Get COVID-19 Booster This Fall, Survey Says
A majority of Americans said they will likely not receive a COVID-19 booster vaccine this fall, according to a poll released Friday. A survey from the health care organization KFF found that 59 percent of respondents said they either will not or likely will not receive the booster dose. Around 37 percent said they would 'definitely not' receive the shot, while 23 percent said they would 'probably not get' the shot.


Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Childhood vaccination rates have dropped again, CDC data shows
Advertisement The report comes at a time when public health experts are particularly concerned about childhood vaccinations because of increasing skepticism of the shots, including among top health officials. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health secretary, has questioned, without scientific basis, the safety of many childhood vaccines, including those for measles, hepatitis B, and polio. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In June, a panel of vaccine advisers installed by Kennedy announced that they would closely scrutinize the immunization schedules for children and adolescents. Kennedy's appointees have also restricted access to the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy pregnant women and children. The messaging from Kennedy's office seems 'specifically designed to sow distrust in vaccines,' said Dr. Sean O'Leary, chair of the infectious disease committee for the American Academy of Pediatrics. Advertisement 'The good news is the majority of parents are still vaccinating their kids,' he said. But it is concerning that rates have dropped, he said, 'because that really matters in terms of spread of disease.' In a statement, Andrew Nixon, a spokesperson for the federal health department, said the CDC was committed to making vaccines accessible and raising awareness about their efficacy, but also emphasized that 'the decision to vaccinate is a personal one.' Immunization rates for the vaccine that protects against measles had, for years, held steady at 95 percent, the level needed to stop the disease from spreading in a community. It dipped during the 2020-21 school year to 93.9 percent and has continued to decline each year. In 2024-25, 92.5 percent of kindergartners had received the shots. Vaccination rates for polio also fell to 92.5 percent last year from 95% at the start of the pandemic. The percentage changes may seem small, but they represent large numbers. During the last school year, about 286,000 children entered kindergarten without documentation of receiving the two measles shots required for full protection against the disease, according to the CDC. Vaccinations are not evenly spread across the country. There are many vulnerable parts of the country where coverage is far lower than 93 percent, including West Texas, where the large measles outbreak began. 'You can have a city that has a 98 percent vaccination rate but have a community in that city that has a 60 percent rate,' Ratner said. 'I think the fear is that we have more of those now.' Vaccinations against pertussis, or whooping cough, have also steadily declined since the pandemic, falling to just over 92 percent last year, from 94.9 percent in the 2019-20 school year. Advertisement There were more than 32,000 cases of whooping cough in 2024, the highest tally in a decade. In California alone, the disease struck 2,000 people, including an infant who died, between January and October 2024. The number of children granted medical exemptions for shots otherwise required to start public school in many states has remained flat over the years. But nonmedical exemptions nationwide have spiked to 3.6 percent in the last school year from 2 percent a decade ago. Exemptions increased in 36 states and Washington, D.C., with 17 states reporting exemptions exceeding 5 percent, according to the CDC. Disruptions during the pandemic derailed immunizations across the world. But vaccination rates have not recovered since then, as many public health experts had hoped they would. Globally, vaccination for measles fell to 68 percent during the pandemic. Intensive efforts have improved the coverage somewhat, but by the end of last year, only 76 percent of children worldwide had received two measles shots. Some vaccine skepticism long predates the pandemic. Anti-vaccine campaigns have often targeted the measles vaccine, falsely linking it to autism. That's especially concerning to public health experts, because the virus is extraordinarily contagious and can rapidly tear through pockets of low immunization, as it has in Texas and neighboring states. The United States endured the consequences of falling vaccination rates once before. In the late 1980s, public health budget cuts by the Reagan administration brought down vaccination rates, particularly among low-income Black and Hispanic children. From 1989 through 1991, measles infected more than 55,000 Americans and killed 166. Infection can cause long-term harms, making people more vulnerable to other infections. Advertisement A 2015 study estimated that before widespread vaccination, measles may have accounted for as many as half of all infectious disease deaths in children. This article originally appeared in