China urged to take bolder steps to tackle price wars, deflation
Beijing's latest push to curb price wars may help ease deflationary pressures, but analysts warn the current measures fall short of addressing deeper structural problems facing the world's second-largest economy.
China's GDP deflator – a broad measure of prices across goods and services – has been negative since the second quarter of 2023, while consumer prices have fallen for four straight months year-on-year. To stop the deflationary spiral, Chinese authorities should address the cause: weak domestic demand, analysts said.
'So far, attempts to revive inflation by trimming supply and reducing overcapacity have shown limited results,' Miao Yanliang, chief strategist at Beijing-based investment bank China International Capital Corporation (CICC), wrote in a research note.
'Weak demand remains the underlying problem.' Despite policymakers flagging cutthroat competition as a concern at the tone-setting Central Economic Work Conference last December, there are few signs of a rebound in prices, said Miao, who previously worked as a senior economist at the State Administration of Foreign Exchange for a decade.
Miao attributed the current deflationary spiral to downturns in the financial and property sectors as well as diminishing income expectations among Chinese households.
The warning came as the Chinese economy grapples with persistent structural challenges. Excess capacity across multiple sectors has suppressed both producer and consumer prices, while job insecurity and a prolonged property slump have made households reluctant to spend.
China's consumer price index (CPI), a key gauge of inflation, declined for a fourth straight month in May – falling 0.1 per cent year on year, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. The producer price index (PPI) has continued to contract since October 2022.
June price data is scheduled for release on Wednesday.Last week, China's top leadership addressed 'disorderly low-price competition' during a meeting of the Central Financial and Economic Affairs Commission, the Communist Party's highest economic policymaking body.
It pledged to cut production capacity in an 'orderly' fashion, though without naming specific industries or targets.
Compared to supply-side adjustments, analysts said demand-side stimulus remains the most effective lever for tackling deflation.
To break the cycle, the CICC note recommended repairing 'corporate balance sheets' through capital injections, interest subsidies and corporate restructuring. This would help revive investment sentiment and employment, paving the way for a recovery in household income and assets, it added.
Miao also called for raising household incomes by stabilising employment, increasing cash flow and strengthening the social safety net to ease consumer concerns and unlock spending potential.
Chinese authorities have doubled down on subsidies, including a 300 billion yuan central government trade-in programme this year, to stimulate domestic consumption amid external headwinds.
But there are fears the impact could be limited.
'When it comes to boosting consumption, there are few policy tools available to generate substantial traction on the demand side,' Mao Zhenhua, co-director of Renmin University's Institute of Economic Research, told a forum in Hong Kong on Friday.Deflationary risks have been exacerbated by falling investment returns and mounting pressure on income and employment, with external headwinds also weighing on prices, he warned.
The trade war with the United States would have 'a lasting impact on China's medium- to long-term economic fundamentals' and could further intensify the country's 'involutionary' dynamics, Mao added – a term used by officials to describe intense and self-defeating domestic competition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
11 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump set to announce 50 percent tariff on copper
United States President Donald Trump has said he will announce a 50 percent tariff on copper, hoping to boost domestic production of a metal critical to electric vehicles, military hardware, the power grid and many consumer goods. Trump told reporters at a White House cabinet meeting that he planned to make the copper tariff announcement later in the day, but did not say when the tariff would take effect. 'I believe the tariff on copper, we're going to make 50 percent,' Trump said. US Comex copper futures jumped more than 12 percent to a record high after Trump announced the planned tariff, which came earlier than the industry had expected, with the rate steeper. After Trump spoke, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said in an interview on CNBC that the tariff would likely be put in place by the end of July or August 1. He said Trump would post details on his Truth Social media account sometime on Tuesday. In February, the administration announced a so-called Section 232 investigation into US imports of the red metal. Such an investigation allows the US Department of Commerce to analyse the impact of an import on national security. The deadline for the investigation to conclude was November, but Lutnick said the review was already complete. 'The idea is to bring copper home, bring copper production home, bring the ability to make copper, which is key to the industrial sector, back home to America,' Lutnick said. The National Mining Association declined to comment, saying it preferred to wait until details were released. The American Critical Minerals Association did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Copper is used in construction, transportation, electronics and many other industries. The US imports roughly half of its copper needs each year. Copper supplies Major copper mining projects across the US have faced strong opposition in recent years due to a variety of reasons, including Rio Tinto and BHP's Resolution Copper project in Arizona and Northern Dynasty Minerals's Pebble Mine project in Alaska. Shares of the world's largest copper producer, Phoenix-based Freeport-McMoRan, shot up nearly 5 percent in Tuesday afternoon trading. The company, which produced 1.26 billion pounds of copper in the US last year, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Freeport, which would benefit from US copper tariffs but worries that the duties would hurt the global economy, has advised Trump to focus on boosting US copper production. Countries set to be most affected by any new US copper tariff would be Chile, Canada and Mexico, which were the top suppliers to the US of refined copper, copper alloys and copper products in 2024, according to US Census Bureau data. Chile, Canada and Peru, three of the largest copper suppliers to the US, have told the Trump administration that imports from their countries do not threaten US interests and should not face tariffs. All three have free trade deals with the US. Mexico's Secretariat of Economy, Chile's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Canada's Department of Finance did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Chile's Mining Ministry and Codelco, the country's leading copper miner, declined to comment. A 50 percent tariff on copper imports would affect US companies that use the metal because the country is years away from meeting its needs, said Ole Hansen, the head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank. 'The US has imported a whole year of demand over the past six months, so the local storage levels are ample,' Hansen said. 'I see a correction in copper prices following the initial jump.'
Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Deals made by Trump since pausing his ‘Liberation Day' tariffs remain sparse
Agencies Just over three months ago, President Donald Trump unveiled his most sweeping volley of tariffs yet — holding up large charts from the White House Rose Garden to outline new import taxes that the U.S. would soon slap on goods from nearly every country in the world. But in line with much of Trump's on-again, off-again trade policy playbook, the bulk of those 'Liberation Day' levies in April were postponed just hours after they took effectin a 90-day suspension that arrived in an apparent effort to quell global market panic and facilitate country-by-country negotiations. At that time, the administration set a lofty goal of reaching 90 trade deals in 90 days. Now, with the July 9 deadline looming, the U.S. has only announced pacts with the United Kingdom and Vietnam — as well as a 'framework″ agreement with China in a separate trade dispute. News of these deals often trickled through social media posts from the president and, even when countries on both sides of a negotiation table made more official announcements, many key details — including timing — were sparse. The Trump administration has since hinted that some trading partners might get more time for talks. Over the July 4th holiday weekend, Trump said that the U.S. would start sending letters to certain countries warning that higher tariffs could kick in Aug. 1. Trump took to Truth Social on Monday to share letters he sent to the leaders of Japan and South Korea, declaring that both countries would see 25% tariffs on goods entering the U.S. starting Aug. 1. Even with negotiations ongoing, most countries have still faced a minimum 10% levy on goods entering the U.S. over the past three months, on top of punishing new taxes targeting foreign steel and aluminum as well as auto imports. The 90-day pause pushed back additional steeper rates, which Trump calls 'reciprocal' tariffs, for dozens of nations. Here's what we know about the trade deals announced since April. On July 2, Trump announced a trade deal with Vietnam that he said would allow U.S. goods to enter the country duty-free. Vietnamese exports to the United States, by contrast, would face a 20% levy. That's less than half the 46% 'reciprocal' rate Trump proposed for Vietnamese goods back in April. But in addition to the new 20% tariff rate, Trump said the U.S. would impose a 40% tax on 'transshipping'' — targeting goods from another country that stop in Vietnam on their way to the United States. Washington complains that Chinese goods have been dodging higher U.S. tariffs by transiting through Vietnam. It wasn't immediately clear when these new rates would go into effect or whether they would come on top of any other previously-imposed levies. Like most other countries, Vietnam has faced Trump's 10% baseline tariff for the last three months. On May 8, Trump agreed to cut tariffs on British autos, steel and aluminum, among other trade pledges — while the U.K. promised to reduce levies on U.S. products like olive oil, wine and sports equipment. The deal was announced in grandiose terms by both countries, but some key details remained unknown for weeks. When the deal was announced, for example, the British government notably said that the U.S. agreed to exempt the U.K. from its then-universal 25% duties on foreign steel and aluminum — which would have effectively allowed both metals from the country to come into the U.S. duty-free. But the timing for when those cuts would actually take effect stayed up in the air for almost a month. It wasn't until early June, when Trump hiked his steel and aluminum tariffs to a punishing 50% worldwide, that the U.S. acknowledged it was time to implement the agreement. And even then, U.S. tariffs on British steel and aluminum did not go to zero. The U.K. was the only country spared from Trump's new 50% levies, but still faces 25% import taxes on the metals — and Trump said that rate could also go up on or after Wednesday. The U.K. did not receive a higher 'reciprocal' rate on April 2, but continues to face the 10% baseline its peak, Trump's new tariffs on Chinese goods totaled 145% — and China's countertariffs on American products reached 125%. But on May 12, the countries agreed to their own 90-day truce to roll back those levies to 30% and 10%, respectively. And last month, details began trickling in about a tentative trade agreement. On June 11, following talks in London, Trump announced a 'framework' for a deal. And late last month, the U.S. and China both acknowledged that some sort of agreement had been reached. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that China had agreed to make it easier for American firms to acquire Chinese magnets and rare earth minerals critical for manufacturing and microchip production. Meanwhile, without explicitly mentioning U.S. access to rare earths, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said that it would 'review and approve eligible export applications for controlled items' and that the U.S. would 'lift a series of restrictive measures it had imposed on China.' More specifics about those measures — and when they would actually go into effect — were not immediately clear. But on Friday, the Ministry of Commerce acknowledged that the U.S. was resuming exports of airplane parts, ethane and other items to China. And when Trump first announced the framework on June 11, the U.S. had said it agreed to stop seeking to revoke the visas of Chinese students on U.S. college campuses.
Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
China urged to take bolder steps to tackle price wars, deflation
Agencies Beijing's latest push to curb price wars may help ease deflationary pressures, but analysts warn the current measures fall short of addressing deeper structural problems facing the world's second-largest economy. China's GDP deflator – a broad measure of prices across goods and services – has been negative since the second quarter of 2023, while consumer prices have fallen for four straight months year-on-year. To stop the deflationary spiral, Chinese authorities should address the cause: weak domestic demand, analysts said. 'So far, attempts to revive inflation by trimming supply and reducing overcapacity have shown limited results,' Miao Yanliang, chief strategist at Beijing-based investment bank China International Capital Corporation (CICC), wrote in a research note. 'Weak demand remains the underlying problem.' Despite policymakers flagging cutthroat competition as a concern at the tone-setting Central Economic Work Conference last December, there are few signs of a rebound in prices, said Miao, who previously worked as a senior economist at the State Administration of Foreign Exchange for a decade. Miao attributed the current deflationary spiral to downturns in the financial and property sectors as well as diminishing income expectations among Chinese households. The warning came as the Chinese economy grapples with persistent structural challenges. Excess capacity across multiple sectors has suppressed both producer and consumer prices, while job insecurity and a prolonged property slump have made households reluctant to spend. China's consumer price index (CPI), a key gauge of inflation, declined for a fourth straight month in May – falling 0.1 per cent year on year, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. The producer price index (PPI) has continued to contract since October 2022. June price data is scheduled for release on week, China's top leadership addressed 'disorderly low-price competition' during a meeting of the Central Financial and Economic Affairs Commission, the Communist Party's highest economic policymaking body. It pledged to cut production capacity in an 'orderly' fashion, though without naming specific industries or targets. Compared to supply-side adjustments, analysts said demand-side stimulus remains the most effective lever for tackling deflation. To break the cycle, the CICC note recommended repairing 'corporate balance sheets' through capital injections, interest subsidies and corporate restructuring. This would help revive investment sentiment and employment, paving the way for a recovery in household income and assets, it added. Miao also called for raising household incomes by stabilising employment, increasing cash flow and strengthening the social safety net to ease consumer concerns and unlock spending potential. Chinese authorities have doubled down on subsidies, including a 300 billion yuan central government trade-in programme this year, to stimulate domestic consumption amid external headwinds. But there are fears the impact could be limited. 'When it comes to boosting consumption, there are few policy tools available to generate substantial traction on the demand side,' Mao Zhenhua, co-director of Renmin University's Institute of Economic Research, told a forum in Hong Kong on risks have been exacerbated by falling investment returns and mounting pressure on income and employment, with external headwinds also weighing on prices, he warned. The trade war with the United States would have 'a lasting impact on China's medium- to long-term economic fundamentals' and could further intensify the country's 'involutionary' dynamics, Mao added – a term used by officials to describe intense and self-defeating domestic competition.
