How Tiger Woods became part of Trump's inner circle
Woods, in turn, stood proudly alongside the president wearing a Presidential Medal of Freedom he had received from Trump in 2019. 'It's an honour to be here with you, Mr President,' he said.
Meetings had been arranged in part because Trump had boasted before the election he could sort out golf's civil war in '10 to 15 minutes'. PGA tour commissioner Jay Monahan and player director Adam Scott joined the pair that day in key talks with Yasir Al-Rumayyan, governor of the Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia and the financial muscle behind LIV Golf.
But as golf now edges towards ending divisions, it is another union of relations – with Woods confirming he is dating Trump's former daughter-in-law – that underlines close-knit connections behind two American powerbroker families.
Woods has never overtly declared his political leanings, but ties with various Trump relatives in recent months have become impossible to miss. 'Love is in the air and life is better with you by my side,' Woods said on Sunday in a social media post of his relationship with Vanessa Trump, who is said to remain close with her former father-in-law.
Vanessa's eldest daughter Kai, 17, and Woods's children Charlie, 16, and Sam, 17, all attend the same school. Charlie and Kai, who recently committed to playing golf at the University of Miami, are both highly rated amateurs. In February, rumours first circulated of a potential relationship between Woods and Vanessa as he was seen arriving at the Genesis Invitational car park with Kai, just days after announcing he was grieving the death of his mother, Kultida.
Lengthy and ongoing Saudi PIF-PGA Tour negotiations have inevitably seen Woods also spend more time than ever with President Trump. The pair have been out on the golf course together privately in recent months while at the same time spearheading negotiations for a sporting peace deal.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Joe Clark (@joeplays_golf)
Both Woods and Trump have controversial histories in their personal lives. But for the president, there is a genuine love of golf that has undoubtedly fuelled his enthusiasm to welcome Woods to the extended family. White House records show he has played a round at his Mar-a-Lago mansion in Florida eight weekends in a row since returning to power.
There are, of course, also major business advantages to be gained. In April, Trump National Doral Miami will play host to a LIV tournament for the fourth consecutive year, while Trump-owned courses in Virginia and New Jersey have also served as venues for LIV events.
Golf has been Trump's staunchest supporter among sports, with combat sports like the Ultimate Fighting Championship and World Wrestling Entertainment equally vocal in their backing yet lacking the heritage and clout that golf brings.
It has not always been smooth sailing for Trump, though. In 2021, and in response to Trump's role in the Capitol Hill riots, the PGA stripped Trump Bedminster of the right to host the 2022 PGA Championship. Trump was infuriated by the decision – just as he has been with the R&A's refusal to take the Open back to Turnberry since he took ownership in 2014.
But that has done little to diminish his influence on the sport and inevitably, when leaders for the PGA and PIF announced a 'framework agreement' in June 2023 to merge the rival tours, Trump hailed it as a 'big, beautiful and glamorous deal for the wonderful world of golf'.
Should Keegan Bradley's Team USA regain the Ryder Cup this September at Bethpage, expect the White House invitation to go out to the 12 winning golfers for a reception with the president. That has not always gone to plan, with the Philadelphia Eagles yet to appear in Washington DC since winning the Super Bowl in February – having refused to attend when they last became NFL world champions during Trump's first term in office – and basketball team Golden State Warriors being disinvited when star player Steph Curry expressed reservations about accepting any invitation in 2017.
Woods, for his part, has been cautious about any major expressions of support for Trump and the Republican party. In August 2018, after Woods was pressed about his friendship with Trump, he said: 'You have to respect the office. No matter who is in the office, you may like, dislike personality or the politics, but we all must respect the office.'
Woods refused to be drawn, however, when asked to express a view on Trump's impact on race relations.
Trump at the time responded on X: 'The Fake News Media worked hard to get Tiger Woods to say something that he didn't want to say. Tiger wouldn't play the game – he is very smart.'
Now, however, Woods is far less risk-averse in expressing his commitment to another Trump. 'We look forward to our journey through life together,' he says of his blossoming relationship with Vanessa.
Donald Trump has always craved credibility in golf. With the Trump family connection with the biggest superstar the game has known now secured, the president's annoyance at his courses continually being denied a major will only intensify.
If this was a love ignited by the school gates then be sure that the relationship announced on Sunday by Tiger Woods and Vanessa Trump was forged at the country club.
Two divorced adults, with two talented golfing children, this meeting of two famous, if not infamous, families will clearly give the 15-time major winner more focus on the golf course.
Not on his own game, however. Woods, 49, is in the midst of a long and depressingly familiar recovery from injury after an operation on his snapped Achilles earlier this month. He is all but written off for the season and instead faces exhaustive recuperative sessions on the physio table and in the gym and on the range. Yet in the meantime he has another role to fulfil.
Of course, with his son, Charlie, Woods's summer was always going to centre around following the 16-year-old around Florida and beyond as he tries to carve his own name in US junior golf and so escape what is, perhaps, the biggest paternal shadow ever cast in the game.
Charlie is at a critical time of his development to see if he has the wherewithal to make a living out of his maddening sport and it is fair to say that he would be stretched to find a better mentor. Yet will his father now also provide fairway guidance to his partner's offspring? The Trump clan will certainly be praying for this to be part of the deal.
It was surely nothing more than a coincidence that on the Sunday the thoroughly un-Tiger-like statement dropped on to his social media channels – it actually began 'love is in the air' – Charlie and Kai Trump, Vanessa's daughter and the president's granddaughter – had both been competing at the Sage Valley Invitational, maybe the most prestigious junior tournament in the world.
Alas, these were not the most rousing results for the Woods-Trump brigade, an alliance already coined the 'Axis of Eagle'. Kai finished 24th in a field of 24, while Charlie was tied 25th out of 36. Kai, 17, is signed up for Miami University next year, but stands at 815th in the American Junior Golf Association rankings. In the boys division, Charlie ranks 838th.
In truth, this pair of students at Benjamin School – the £29,000-a-year establishment close by the respective family homes in the southern Florida enclave of Palm Beach and Jupiter where Charlie's sister, Sam, also attends, as do Kai's four siblings – have a long, long way to travel even to approach their lifelong dreams.
Yet with the red-shirted one in their corner, they have all the necessary motivation and nous to give it the best crack. It will be fascinating to chart their progress over the weeks and months, particularly with Woods at the helm.
Except this could be a double-sided wedge, as it has the potential for Woods to achieve his competitive rush during the down months. And with the stability that has for such long periods been missing from his private life, this added purpose must surely be good news for the fans praying for another comeback.
Who knows, this could yet turn out to be a marriage made in Jupiter – if not quite heaven.
Inevitably, the industry will frantically delve further into the meaning of the Tiger-Trump amalgamation. Vanessa and Don Jnr, her former husband, are said to enjoy an amicable relationship and this will calm fears that any acrimony could impact the ongoing negotiations between the Saudi Public Investment Fund and the PGA Tour.
Woods is a key figure as far as the Tour is concerned and President Trump has placed himself at the centre of those discussions, because of his affinity with the sport and the kingdom and because of his own business interests, naturally. Woods has played golf with Trump recently and also visited the White House, and the denizen of the Oval Office will be thrilled to have the icon on his side and, just about, in his tribe.
Trump has always craved respect in the professional game and, forever with an eye on the bottom time, will be hoping that with a rich golf club portfolio boasting courses such as Turnberry and Doral, this connection will prove fruitful. However, in a time of great uncertainty, what this could mean to the sport at large remains unknown. Intrigue is in the air.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada holds out hope of trade deal as US talks tough on tariffs
Canada said it was hopeful it can still strike a deal with the US to bring down its tariff rate even as the Trump administration denied Sign in to access your portfolio
Time Business News
21 minutes ago
- Time Business News
India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination: MEA Bold Response to White House Peace Claims
Source – LegalPress New Delhi – The official India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination response emerged on Friday when the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) diplomatically sidestepped questions regarding the White House's aggressive campaign for President Donald Trump to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. This measured diplomatic response reflects India's careful approach to addressing American claims about conflict resolution. During a press briefing, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal was directly questioned about the India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination issue, specifically regarding White House assertions that Trump had ended several global conflicts, including the dispute between India and Pakistan. The spokesperson's response demonstrated India's preference for avoiding direct engagement with controversial American political narratives. Diplomatic Deflection Strategy The India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination query received a characteristically diplomatic response from Jaiswal, who stated, 'It is better to take this question to the White House.' This carefully crafted deflection avoids both endorsement and criticism of American claims while maintaining India's traditional non-interference stance in foreign political processes. This approach to the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination reflects New Delhi's broader strategy of avoiding entanglement in American domestic political debates, particularly those involving disputed claims about international diplomatic achievements. The MEA's response maintains diplomatic neutrality while neither validating nor challenging White House assertions. White House Claims and International Conflict Resolution The context surrounding the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination stems from White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's comprehensive advocacy for Trump's Nobel Peace Prize candidacy. Leavitt claimed that Trump had 'ended conflicts between Thailand and Cambodia, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia.' The India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination campaign specifically highlights alleged American mediation in the India-Pakistan conflict as evidence of Trump's peace-making credentials. According to White House calculations, Trump brokered approximately one peace deal monthly during his six months in office, making him deserving of international recognition. Leavitt's statement that 'It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize' directly incorporates the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination narrative as supporting evidence for this assertion. This claim positions the alleged India-Pakistan ceasefire as a significant diplomatic achievement worthy of Nobel recognition. India's Historical Position on Bilateral Negotiations The India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination issue highlights a fundamental disagreement between New Delhi and Washington regarding the nature of India-Pakistan conflict resolution. India has consistently maintained that the cessation of hostilities between the two nations was achieved through bilateral negotiations rather than external mediation. New Delhi's rejection of Trump's mediation claims creates complications for the India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination narrative promoted by the White House. This disagreement represents a significant diplomatic challenge, as India's official position directly contradicts the foundation of American Nobel Prize advocacy. Despite repeated assertions from Trump linking trade deals to conflict resolution, India's stance on the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination remains unchanged. The government continues to emphasize bilateral diplomatic processes rather than acknowledging American intervention in regional peace initiatives. Pakistan's Contrasting Position While India maintains diplomatic distance from the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination campaign, Pakistan has embraced and actively supported Trump's candidacy. Islamabad has publicly thanked Trump for allegedly brokering the India-Pakistan deal, creating a stark contrast with India's position. In June, Pakistan formally nominated Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, specifically citing his 'diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership' during the India-Pakistan crisis. This Pakistani endorsement adds complexity to the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination debate by providing official support from one of the alleged beneficiaries. The Pakistani government's statement declared: 'Government of Pakistan Recommends President Donald J. Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. The Government of Pakistan has decided to formally recommend President Donald J. Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis.' International Recognition and Norwegian Nobel Committee The India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination campaign faces the ultimate test of international legitimacy through the Norwegian Nobel Committee's evaluation process. Despite various endorsements and advocacy efforts, the Committee has maintained its traditional silence regarding Trump's candidacy. The Norwegian Nobel Committee's approach to the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination reflects their standard practice of avoiding public commentary on potential candidates. This institutional discretion means that public advocacy campaigns, regardless of their intensity or political backing, do not necessarily influence final selection decisions. Geopolitical Implications and Diplomatic Complexities The India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination issue illustrates broader challenges in contemporary international diplomacy, where domestic political narratives intersect with complex international relationships. India's careful response demonstrates the delicate balance required when addressing claims that involve multiple stakeholders with differing perspectives. The ongoing debate surrounding the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination reflects deeper questions about conflict resolution attribution, the role of external mediation in bilateral disputes, and the intersection of international recognition with domestic political objectives. Future Diplomatic Considerations As the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination campaign continues, India's diplomatic strategy will likely maintain its current trajectory of non-engagement with American political narratives while preserving bilateral relationship stability. This approach allows India to protect its sovereignty over conflict resolution narratives while avoiding unnecessary diplomatic friction with the United States. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Los Angeles Times
21 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
‘They roll right over': Many Democratic voters call their party weak and ineffective, poll finds
WASHINGTON — Many Democrats see their political party as 'weak' or 'ineffective,' while Republicans are more complimentary of their party, although a small but significant share describe the GOP as 'greedy' or say it is generally 'bad,' according to a new poll. The poll conducted by the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research in July reveals warning signs for both major U.S. parties as the political focus shifts to elections in New Jersey and Virginia this fall and the midterm contests next year. Respondents were asked to share the first word or phrase that came to mind when they thought of the Republican and Democratic parties. Answers were then sorted into broad categories, including negative and positive attributes. Overall, U.S. adults held a dim view of both parties, with about 4 in 10 using negative attributes, including words such as 'dishonest' or 'stupid.' But nearly nine months after Republican Donald Trump won a second presidential term, Democrats appear to be harboring more resentment about the state of their party than do Republicans. Democrats were likelier to describe their own party negatively than Republicans. Republicans were about twice as likely to describe their own party positively. 'They're spineless,' Cathia Krehbiel, a 48-year-old Democrat from Indianola, Iowa, said of her party. She believes the party's response to the Trump administration has been 'scattershot.' 'I just feel like there's so much recently that's just going abhorrently wrong,' Krehbiel said. 'And they speak up a little bit and they roll right over.' Overall, roughly one-third of Democrats described their party negatively in the open-ended question. About 15% described the Democratic Party using such words as 'weak' or 'apathetic,' while an additional 10% believe it is broadly 'ineffective' or 'disorganized.' Only about 2 in 10 Democrats described their party positively, with roughly 1 in 10 saying it is 'empathetic' or 'inclusive.' An additional 1 in 10 used more general positive descriptors. It is unclear what effect the Democrats' unease may have on upcoming elections or the political debate in Washington, but no political organization wants to be plagued by internal divisions. Still, the Democrats' frustration appears to reflect their concern that party leaders are not doing enough to stop Trump's GOP, which controls Washington. There is little sign that such voters would abandon their party in favor of Trump's allies in upcoming elections, and the vast majority of Democrats described the GOP negatively. But disaffected Democrats might decide not to vote at all. That could undermine their party's push to reclaim at least one chamber of Congress in 2026. Jim Williams, a 78-year-old retiree from Harper Woods, Mich., is a self-described political independent who said he typically supports Democrats, but he is 'disappointed' with the party and its murky message. He views the Republican Party as much worse, saying it 'has lost it' under Trump's leadership. 'All he does is bully and call names. They've got no morals, no ethics. And the more they back him, the less I like them,' he said of Trump. Republicans are about twice as likely as Democrats to describe their party positively, with many also using straightforward ideological descriptors like 'conservative.' About 4 in 10 Republicans used positive attributes to characterize the GOP, making general mentions of words such as 'patriotic' or 'hardworking,' or offering associations with the word 'freedom.' Samuel Washington, 65, of Chicago, said he typically votes Republican. He praised Trump's leadership, even while acknowledging that the president's policies on trade and spending might be creating short-term economic hardship. 'There's a lot of pain, but the pain is the result of 12 years of misuse and misguided leadership from the Democratic Party,' he said. 'I'm feeling really good about Republicans and the direction that they're going.' But views were not uniformly good. About 2 in 10 Republicans said something negative about the party, including phrases such as 'greedy,' 'for the rich' or 'corrupt.' Republican Dick Grayson, an 83-year-old veteran from Trade, Tenn., said he is 'disappointed' by his party's fealty to Trump. Among other things, he pointed to the price tag of Trump's tax-and-spend package, which will add nearly $3.3 trillion to the nation's debt over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. 'I've always been a Republican, but I'm disillusioned about both parties,' Grayson said. Among all Americans, the poll finds that the Republican Party is viewed slightly more negatively than the Democratic Party. The different is not large: 43% used negative words to describe the Republicans, compared with 39% for the Democrats. Much of the negativity is driven by the opposing party — and nonaligned voters' distaste for both. So-called political independents are much likelier to describe both parties with negative attributes rather than positive descriptors, though a significant share did not offer an opinion. Curtis Musser, a 60-year-old unaffiliated voter from Beverly Hills, Fla., said both parties have shifted too far toward the extreme for his liking. He said he is ready for a serious third party to emerge before the next presidential election, pointing to Elon Musk's new America Party, which has been slow to launch. 'Maybe he would get us headed in the right direction,' the retired schoolteacher said. The AP-NORC poll of 1,437 adults was conducted July 10-14, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.6 percentage points. Peoples, Sanders and Yoo write for the Associated Press. Peoples reported from New York, Sanders and Yoo from Washington.
