logo
Government demands investigation after Lindsey oil refinery owner collapses

Government demands investigation after Lindsey oil refinery owner collapses

Leader Livea day ago
State Oil – the parent company of Prax Group, which owns the Lindsey refinery in North Lincolnshire – appointed administrators on Monday.
A separate winding-up order has also been made against the Lindsey oil refinery and related businesses and a liquidator has been appointed.
More than 180 staff are employed by State Oil, while it is thought that around another 420 work at the Lindsey refinery.
Energy minister Michael Shanks called on the company's owner to 'put his hands in his pockets and deliver proper compensation for the workers'.
He said the Government is demanding an investigation into the conduct of the company's directors and the circumstances surrounding its failure.
The Lindsey site is one of only five large oil refineries remaining in the UK after the recent closure of the Grangemouth plant in Scotland.
Prax Group is led by majority owner and chairman and chief executive Sanjeev Kumar Soosaipillai, who bought the Lindsey oil refinery from French firm Total in 2021.
Mr Shanks vowed to 'ensure supplies are maintained, protect our energy security' and said Energy Secretary Ed Miliband 'is today writing to the Insolvency Service to demand an immediate investigation into the conduct of the directors and the circumstances surrounding this insolvency'.
He later told the Commons: 'The Government believes the business's leadership have a responsibility to the workers and the local community, and we are calling on them to do the right thing and provide support to the workers through this difficult period.
'The wealthy owner cannot wash his hands of his obligations to the workers and their families, and that's why we are calling on him to put his hands in his pockets and deliver proper compensation for the workers.'
Mr Shanks added the Government was told about commercial difficulties 'at the end of April', with the refinery having 'recorded a total of around £75 million worth of losses between its acquisition in 2021 and the financial year ending in February 2024'.
He said: 'The Secretary of State was reassured by the company that there was no immediate closure risk to the refinery. A week ago, the business changed their position and said they feared it could no longer be a going concern.
'We repeatedly asked them at official and ministerial level what the financial gap was, to work out whether the Government could help bridge that gap, but the company were unable to share that basic information.'
Trade union Unite said the Government needed to urgently intervene to help protect UK fuel supplies and jobs.
Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: 'The Lindsey oil refinery is strategically important and the Government must intervene immediately to protect workers and fuel supplies.
'Unite has constantly warned the Government that its policies have placed the oil and gas industry on a cliff edge.'
Built in 1968, the Lindsey refinery can process around 113,000 barrels of oil a day.
Clare Boardman, joint administrator of State Oil and Prax, said: 'We appreciate that this is a very difficult and uncertain time for the employees and everyone involved and we will be on site to support them during this challenging period.
'We will be considering all options for the group, including the prospect of a sale for the group's upstream business and retail operations in the UK and Europe, all of which remain outside of insolvency.
'We thank the group's team members and other stakeholders for their continued support.'
Prax Group was not immediately available for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Employment Rights Timeline 'Provides Clarity But Cost Concerns Remain'
Employment Rights Timeline 'Provides Clarity But Cost Concerns Remain'

Business News Wales

time7 minutes ago

  • Business News Wales

Employment Rights Timeline 'Provides Clarity But Cost Concerns Remain'

UKHospitality has called on the UK Government to work with businesses to provide clear guidance on the Employment Rights Bill. The Department for Business and Trade has published the timeline regarding the implementation of the Employment Rights Bill. The measures, and when they are set to be introduced, include: April 2026: Changes to statutory sick pay, changes to paternity and parental leave, and trade union recognition. October 2026: Tipping laws tightened, strengthened employers' duty to prevent sexual harassment. 2027: Introducing rights to guaranteed hours, strengthen existing rights to request flexible working, changes to an employees' right to claim unfair dismissal. UKHospitality emphasised the need to use these timelines to constructively engage with businesses on the policy detail. Some of the first changes to come into force in April 2026, particularly Statutory Sick Pay, could be a significant cost for businesses, the organisation said. It added that the UK Government must take into consideration the cumulative cost burden facing the sector during consultation periods, particularly on the back of the £3.4 billion additional annual cost that hit the sector in April. Kate Nicholls, Chief Executive of UKHospitality, said: 'Clear and precise timelines on when aspects of this legislation, and the processes to deliver them, will come into force is essential, and it was important that the Government embark on providing clarity. 'There are substantial and expensive changes for businesses in the Employment Rights Bill and it's right that the Government is using the appropriate implementation periods for the most complex issues for hospitality, in order to get the details right for both businesses and workers. 'We have been clear with the Government that the changes regarding guaranteed hours and predictability of shifts will be the most complex for hospitality businesses, and therefore necessitates a significant implementation period. It must now use this time to work with businesses on an appropriate policy framework and clear guidance. 'Businesses are understandably wary about the cost and complexity of the more immediate changes in the Employment Rights Bill, particularly alongside increases to NICs, employment costs and business rates. 'Hospitality businesses have absolutely no more capacity to absorb costs and the Government must not increase the sector's cost burden once again.'

Anas Sarwar backs Labour welfare cuts but insists they wouldn't do same Scotland
Anas Sarwar backs Labour welfare cuts but insists they wouldn't do same Scotland

The National

time13 minutes ago

  • The National

Anas Sarwar backs Labour welfare cuts but insists they wouldn't do same Scotland

The Scottish Labour leader claimed it is 'factually wrong' to say people will have their benefits 'cut' under measures proposed by Keir Starmer's government, because the overall welfare budget is still set to rise. Sarwar added that Labour are now in a 'much better place on welfare reform than a week ago', before they scaled back proposals to avoid a defeat in the House of Commons on Tuesday evening. Last week, more than 120 Labour MPs signed a 'reasoned amendment' to the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill after it was revealed it would cut around £5 billion per year from disability benefits. READ MORE: Scots back independence as Keir Starmer's popularity at record low, new poll finds Ministers hope a partial U-turn by Starmer on the plans, which will protect existing claimants of personal independence payments (Pip) and the health element of Universal Credit, will be enough to win over Labour rebels. However, not all of the changes will directly impact people in Scotland as Pip is being replaced by the Adult Disability Payment. The Scottish Government has promised not to make similar cuts in Scotland, with the Social Justice Secretary warning that even the Prime Minister's concessions do not go far enough. Shirley-Anne Somerville called on Labour to scrap all of their proposals, pointing to the UK Government's own analysis which shows they could plunge 150,000 people into poverty. Sarwar has argued that the figure did not take into account other Labour measures to help people get back into work, or economic policies. Asked if he would cut benefits for disabled people in Scotland if he wins next year's Holyrood election, he told the PA news agency: 'No, absolutely not'. The Scottish Labour leader insisted his party is 'on the same wavelength' and agrees that reforms to the welfare system are needed. But he said claims that benefits are being cut are not true, as the welfare bill is still set to grow. 'We all accept the principle of reform,' Sarwar said. He added: 'We all accept that we have to prioritise work, and that work is the best route of poverty. 'We all accept that. Those that can work should work. 'We also all accept that those who can't work should get the support they need, and also accept those that need support to get into work should get that support too.' Responding to Sarwar's claims SNP MSP Colette Stevenson said the Scottish Labour leader wouldn't stand up for Scotland and would "rubber stamp anything his Westminster bosses tell him to". She said: "When Keir Starmer proposes cutting support for disabled people, it's Anas Sarwar who stands by him every step of the way. "From the Winter Fuel debacle, to failing the WASPI women, to supporting the two-child cap, to backing cuts to disability payments, Labour's record in one short year says it all. "SNP-run Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is going down rather than up, we're scrapping the two-child cap, and we're protecting disabled people by maintaining the Adult Disability Payment here in Scotland, rather than passing on Labour's proposed cuts in England. "Anas Sarwar has proven he won't stand up to Starmer - he'll rubber stamp anything his Westminster bosses tell him to."

Canadian patriotism surges amid Trump's taunts of tariffs, statehood
Canadian patriotism surges amid Trump's taunts of tariffs, statehood

The Herald Scotland

time38 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Canadian patriotism surges amid Trump's taunts of tariffs, statehood

Not anymore. So hundreds of Canadians flocked to Montreal's Place d'Armes, a square in the city's Old Montreal neighborhood across from the Notre-Dame Basilica, on July 1 to kick off Canada Day, a time to celebrate the 158th anniversary of their country's birth and all things Canadian. Volunteers wandered through the crowd and handed out miniature Canadian flags, which people waved while posing for selfies. Others affixed the red-and-white drapeaux to shirts, shorts and hats, turning them into a fashion statement as much as a political one. From a park bench, Filippa Contarini watched the flag-waving crowd and counted all the things she loves about being Canadian. "Our beautiful country, our very open, very free, liberal country - I love it," said Contarini, a small Canadian flag tucked into the back strap of her hat. "I love the French. I love the English. I love it all." One thing she doesn't love? Donald Trump. "He's like a big bully - that's how I see him. And he's very ignorant," she said. "He keeps saying Canada should be the 51st state. No, no, no. That's never going to happen. This is him being an idiotic child." Across the Great White North, Canadians marked Canada Day with parades, festivals, pledges of national unity and uncharacteristic displays of patriotism. Canadians are usually known more for their friendliness and hospitality than for showy demonstrations of pride. That is associated more with their bigger, boisterous neighbors to the south. But Canada Day has taken on new significance to many Canadians this year, given Trump's unwelcome suggestion that Canada should become the 51st state, his threat to slap punitive tariffs on Canadian products and his dismissive attitude toward their leaders, especially former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, whom he repeatedly mocked as "governor." "The world is changing. Old friendships are fraying," Trudeau's successor, Prime Minister Mark Carney, said in a Canada Day message posted on social media. Carney never mentioned Trump by name, but there was little doubt who he was talking about when he said Canada's economy has been impacted "by a trade war we didn't start." But "as the world becomes more divided and dangerous," he said, "Canadians are uniting." More: Canada scraps digital services tax to advance stalled US trade talks Swell of Canadian pride Recent polls back him up. Canadian pride surged after Trump took office in January and opened his war of words and tariffs. A survey in March by the Harris Poll Canada, in partnership with Petro-Canda, reported a major shift across the country and noted that Canadians were rallying together with a renewed sense of unity and pride that seemed to be growing every week. Seven in 10 Canadians said they were proud to be Canadian, up from 63% a month earlier. Eight in 10 said it is important to buy Canadian products and support Canadian companies. Ninety-two percent said regardless of what happens with Trump's tariffs, they intend to give more support to Canadian companies in the future. Patriotism surged even in French-speaking Quebec, where for decades a separatist movement has pushed for independence from Canada. Flag makers have reported a boost in sales of the Canadian Maple Leaf. Businesses have embraced a "Buy Canada" movement and removed U.S.-made products from their shelves. T-shirts warning that Canada is not for sale have appeared in souvenir shop windows. A poll taken in May by the Association for Canadian Studies suggested that Canadian pride dipped in Quebec after the federal elections in April, when Carney was chosen to succeed Trudeau as prime minister. Even so, 76% of people in Quebec said they were proud to be Canadian. Timeline: A look at key moments in Trump's feud with Canada There's no real mystery what's behind the swell of patriotism, Beland said. "The timing of this is quite clearly in sync with the rhetoric about the 51st state and the return of Donald Trump to the White House," he said. Canada Day celebrations across Montreal From Place d'Armes, the Canada Day crowd marched through the streets of Old Montreal, a brass band leading the way. Elderly couples held hands. Parents pushed strollers down the streets and hoisted young children on their shoulders so they would get a better view. A woman in a wheelchair rolled through the crowd, a Maple Leaf windmill attached to the back of her chair, twirling furiously in the breeze. Down brick streets, past art galleries, souvenir shops and restaurants, the procession marched for nearly a mile to the Old Port of Montreal, along the St. Lawrence River. There, thousands of people attended the official festival, which kicked off with a 21-gun salute, followed by the raising of the Canadian flag and a swearing-in ceremony for two dozen new Canadian citizens. Dozens of booths offered family-friendly activities, such as drawing and face painting. Shirley Desserud, a high school teacher who was born in Niagara Falls, Canada, but is spending the summer in Montreal, wore a white T-shirt that announced, "I Am Canadian." It's no longer enough for Canadians just to be proud of their heritage, she said. Because of Trump, they have to stand up and proclaim it. "We're friendly, we're polite," she said, "but we're really pissed off at your president." Canada is larger than the United States in terms of total land area, but the U.S. has a lot more people and power. Desserud recalled former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, father of Justin Trudeau, once saying that being neighbors with the United States is like sleeping next to an elephant. No matter how friendly and even-tempered the beast might be, Trudeau said, everyone is affected by its every twitch and grunt. "Now," Desserud said, "the elephant is on crack." Kirk Anderson from Denver, who was visiting Montreal with his family, said he decided to attend the Canada Day festivities to show solidarity with America's northern neighbors. "I would like to tell Canadians that there are a lot of us in the United States who do not want Trump to be president and who love Canada as it is," he said. More: Trump is the 'X factor' as Canada elects a prime minister Ida Degano, who was with her husband Benny, said Trump's suggestion that Canada become part of the United States is offensive. "It hurts my heart," she said, adding that Trump should watch his mouth "because he cannot rule the world." Degano, who lives outside of Toronto, came to Canada from Italy in 1953, her husband came four years later, and together they have been able to build a good life in their adopted country, she said. To Americans whose views about Canada may be shaped by Trump's remarks, Degano offers a suggestion. "Come and visit Canada and see how we live," she said. Follow Michael Collins on X @mcollinsNEWS.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store