Shocking that well-placed educated persons ‘illegally' reside in Tardeo high-rise risking lives, BMC can't shut eyes: HC
The HC questioned BMC whether it was going to 'shut its eyes' to the violations and 'casually' consider the issue. It asked the civic body to file an affidavit detailing an action proposed by it against the violations and steps to be taken against such occupiers, after which it will pass an order which will set precedent for such buildings across the city.
A bench of Justices Girish S Kulkarni and Arif S Doctor was hearing a batch of pleas pertaining to the tower of Willingdon View Cooperative Housing Society, Tulsiwadi, Tardeo occupied by 50 flat purchasers of total 62 flats.
On June 30, the HC had noted that there were 'glaring illegalities' in the building as it did not have any fire NOC or any approval from the Chief Fire Officer (CFO) of the BMC and there was no Occupation Certificate (OC) granted for nearly half of the floors (from 17 to 34).
The HC had slammed the BMC for failing to take drastic action against 'daylight violations' and had said that prima facie the families were living 'illegally' at their own risk and consequences.
On Thursday, senior advocate S U Kamdar for BMC submitted that as far as fire NOC was concerned, there cannot be any 'compromise' or 'regularisation' and the society will have to remove the offending portions and correct the same as per fire requirement. He added that in case of OC, certain approvals are required to be availed from Commissioner, after which there can be a regularisation if permissible.
'If fire NOC is non-negotiable, then what would be the status of the present residents? It is a 'serious issue' on which we really want to pass appropriate orders. What would be the stand of the corporation on a building which is being occupied without fire NOC? What should be the status of all such occupiers and what steps should be taken? Can they continue to reside? This is going to set an example to all those buildings and high-rises across the city,' the bench orally remarked.
The judges added, 'We want to hear from the BMC whether it should consider this casually by saying that you (occupiers) please continue… Is BMC going to shut your eyes or are going to take some action? We want BMC to be impeccable in implementing rules and regulations.'
Kamdar said that BMC had taken action and had issued several notices to the society.
'We want a statement on affidavit as to what should be done as on date when the fire NOC is not there. If clear stand is not there, we will interpret that it is a tacit approval and this appears to be the general policy of the Municipal Corporation and all buildings which are occupied without fire NOC, they can continue to do so and lives of the people can be risked in this manner,' the bench said.
'They (occupiers) are a society of well-placed educated people who continue to reside in a building, which poses such a grave risk to the lives of their families…it is shocking. We are concerned with a larger issue…. We are not going to permit any illegality to happen in any building. Because, things ought not to be looking as if it is beyond a municipal corporation to handle this situation in the city. Every time it should give an impression that SRA, MHADA, BMC or other municipal corporations are least bothered about law and everything comes to the court,' the bench added.
It said it would not permit occupation without OC and suggested the flat owners make 'alternative arrangements for temporary residence.' The HC posted the matter to July 10.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC to decide validity of Madras HC stay on Tamil Nadu law on University VC appointments
NEW DELHI: The on Friday entertained Tamil Nadu's petition questioning reasonableness of Madras HC's order staying its legislation, which gave the state government, instead of the governor, the power to appoint University vice-chancellors, but refused M K Stalin government's plea for suspending the HC order to re-operationalize the law. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now TN fielded a team of senior advocates – A M Singhvi, Rakesh Dwivedi and P Wilson – to argue that the HC had without considering the urgency to appoint vice-chancellors to universities, recommendations to which effect has been put in cold-storage by the Governor, stayed the legislation. The law giving state govt the power to appoint VCs to universities was stayed along with nine other laws, Bills for which were reserved for the President's consideration by the governor but were regarded as deemed to have been approved by President in a controversial unprecedented ruling by a two-judge SC bench on Apr 8. Three days after the 'deemed to have been approved' ruling by the SC, which now is subject to a Constitution bench's opinion on a Presidential Reference questioning the use of Article 142 power of the SC to virtually obliterate roles assigned by the Constitution to President and Governors on Bills passed by Assemblies, the TN govt had notified the nine bills as laws. The bench refused to stay the HC order but asked the UGC and the public interest litigation petitioner before the HC to respond to TN's petition in four weeks. For UGC, solicitor general Tushar Mehta said the law is palpably contrary to the UGC Regulations which empower only governors to appoint VCs to the universities. When the senior advocates pleaded that they would argue before the HC for vacation of the stay, Mehta said that in that case the TN must withdraw its petition seeking transfer of the PIL from Madras HC to the SC. 'The state cannot have both options open at the same time and be permitted to argue before the HC that the SC is considering transfer of the PIL to itself,' he said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Wilson sought expunging of certain 'harsh remarks' against him by the HC merely because he was pointing out the SC's 2-J bench order. Justices Narasimha and Mahadevan said this request would be considered by the SC during the final hearing on the TN's petition. One of the Acts, notified on Apr 11 by the state related to vesting in the state govt the powers of the Governor, as Chancellor, to appoint vice-chancellors of universities in the state. A vacation bench of the HC on May 21 granted stay on this amending provision, holding that UGC Regulations, 2018, would prevail over the state legislation by virtue of doctrine of repugnancy. The state said it had raised the objection to the delay in filing of the PIL but the division bench of the HC 'did not even call for an explanation from the Registry of the HC or the Petitioner but proceeded to hear the case in a tearing hurry.' The HC 'showed undue haste', did not even give a week's time to the state to file its counter affidavit, and passed the stay order 'for extraneous reasons', it said, adding that the impugned order is replete with personal attacks on the senior counsel who appeared for the state.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Rivals No More? Raj, Uddhav Thackeray To Reunite In Rally For Marathi Identity
In a striking turn in Maharashtra's ever-evolving political landscape, estranged cousins Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray will share the stage on Saturday, July 5, after nearly two decades of political rivalry, leading a high-profile rally to defend the Marathi language. The event will take place at 10 a.m. at the NSCI Dome in Worli, marking a potential turning point in both cultural and political spheres. The rally, organized by the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) and the Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray faction), follows their successful opposition to the state's proposed three-language policy, which prompted the Mahayuti government to put the policy on hold. Dubbed a 'victory rally,' the event is being held to celebrate what both parties are calling a triumph for Marathi unity. In an important public update, Raj Thackeray announced the revised date of the rally via a tweet, stating: "With warm regards, Jai Maharashtra. This morning, for our Marathi language, for Maharashtra, and for the Marathi people, a march was announced for the upcoming 6th of July. There is a slight change in that plan; the march will now take place on Saturday, 5th July, at 10 AM instead of Sunday, 6th July. The location and all other details remain unchanged. Therefore, the media and the people of Maharashtra should take note of this change." … — Raj Thackeray (@RajThackeray) June 26, 2025 According to media reports, the rally is expected to draw a wide and diverse audience, ranging from Marathi writers, poets, and educators to editors, artists, and enthusiastic citizens. The Worli Dome, with a capacity of 7,000 to 8,000 people, will feature LED screens inside, outside, and along surrounding roads to accommodate overflow crowds and ensure maximum visibility. While the reunion has energized sections of the public and Marathi cultural groups, it has also drawn criticism from political rivals. BJP MP Narayan Rane dismissed the event as a strategic move ahead of the crucial Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections, stating, 'It is not about Marathi pride. It is about saving their political future ahead of the BMC polls.' Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde faction) leader Ramdas Kadam also questioned the credibility of Uddhav Thackeray's leadership, saying, 'Most of the Marathi people were compelled to leave Mumbai during the 30-year tenure of Uddhav Thackeray's Shiv Sena rule in the BMC.' Nevertheless, MNS leader Prakash Mahajan expressed optimism about the joint effort: 'This could be a positive sign for the unity of Marathi people.' Invitations were extended to Sharad Pawar, founder of the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), and Congress leader Harshavardhan Sapkal, though neither is expected to attend. MNS sources said they were unable to reach Sapkal, while Pawar, although present in Mumbai, is not likely to join the rally. As speculation swirls about whether this reunion signals a deeper political alignment, all eyes will be on Worli this morning. The event could become more than just a cultural statement, it may shape the course of Maharashtra's political future.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
NGT: Better river flow mgmt required to prevent fish kills
Kochi: The (NGT) has stated that preventing future fish kills requires better management of river flow, strict industrial waste regulation and control of any kind of pollution from industrial sources. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Disposing of a batch of petitions, including three suo motu cases filed by the principal bench and the southern bench on the mass fish kill that occurred downstream of the Periyar River on May 21-22, 2024, it directed the Kerala state pollution control board (KSPCB) to submit all the detailed reports filed before the bench to the Kerala High Court. "Since the High Court of Kerala is already seized of the matter, which addresses the same issues involved in the Original Applications (OA) pending before us, it would be appropriate to leave it to the decision of the HC to pass appropriate orders," the bench said. The PCB, in its report to the NGT, stated that a HC-appointed committee of officials, comprising (i) the secretary, Directorate of Environment and Climate Change, (ii) the regional director, Central Pollution Control Board, Bangalore, and (iii) the chairman, PCB, along with the amicus curiae, visited all the affected places and the petitioners and submitted a report. The committee's report before the NGT recommended curbing the Periyar pollution in two folds. One set of recommendations was directed to the departments concerned, namely the industries department, irrigation department and PCB. Remediation of Kuzhikandam Thodu has to be initiated as per the detailed project report (DPR) prepared and recommended for administrative sanction, the bench said. The NGT noted that the Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (Kufos), which is a party respondent in all the above petitions, constituted an expert committee to prepare a report on the fish kill incident in the Periyar River and downstream of Pathalam regulator bridge. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The expert committee also provided a report with recommendations, including an AI-assisted system for displaying and alerting stakeholders downstream before opening the shutters. These are also to be submitted before the HC along with all the other reports filed in the case. The tribunal stated that since the HC is already seized of the matter and further orders are awaited, based on the recommendations given by the committee to the industries situated in the Eloor–Edayar Industrial area and the various departments, the bench was disposing of the petitions.
