Prince Harry to Potentially Extend Invictus Games Invite to Royal Family Members: Is Reunion on Cards?
The time window is said to be perfect to send out the invitations to the British royal family and for them to attend the event, as King Charles plans his schedule three years in advance.
The alleged move by the father of two will mark the reunion of the family members for the first time since Queen Elizabeth's funeral. However, some of the royal experts are skeptical of the monarch and the Prince of Wales attending the Invictus games.
Will King Charles and other family members attend the Invictus Games on Prince Harry's invitation?
Amid the reports of Prince Harry sending out the Invictus Games invitations to his family members, the royal experts predict whether the monarch and others will attend the event or not.
Ingrid Seward revealed to the media portal, 'The King might attend to show support for the Armed Forces and congratulate Harry on the most significant success in his life. The only reason the King is wary of associating with his son is that he no longer trusts him not to repeat their private conversations, as he has done in the past. This goes for all the working members of the family.'
Moreover, the royal commentator Katie Nicholl shared, 'The King absolutely wants a relationship with his youngest son and with his grandchildren. He has an incredible capacity for forgiveness and he wants to be magnanimous in all of this and therefore there's certainly a possibility that the King might consider attending Invictus.'
As for Harry's long association with the Invictus Games, the Duke has handled and supervised the event since the first year. In 2014, the prince was clicked at the 2014 event alongside King Charles, Queen Camila, and his brother, Prince William.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
Jake Paul Hires Elon Musk's Lawyer To Fight Claims Of Fixed Bouts
Jake Paul, the YouTuber-turned-professional boxer, has escalated his fight against critics by hiring powerhouse lawyer Alex Spiro – renowned for defending Elon Musk and Jay-Z – to pursue legal action against those alleging his headline bouts are choreographed spectacles rather than genuine contests. Spiro told the New York Post, 'Mr. Paul has retained me to seek legal remedies for the damage he has suffered," warning that anyone using their public platform to spread lies 'will face consequences." I've dedicated my life to boxing and I will no longer let those with a public profile harm me or the sport I love and respect, without consequences — Jake Paul (@jakepaul) August 4, 2025 Criticism of Paul's boxing credentials has become almost as competitive as the sport itself. The most recent uproar followed his bout with Julio César Chávez Jr., a fight notable for its light exchange of punches, which reignited questions about Paul's earlier unanimous-decision victory over Mike Tyson. Social media chatter around Paul's fights typically focuses less on his technique and more on suspicions that he manipulates outcomes to protect his brand. After facing Tyson, he remarked, 'I didn't want to hurt someone who didn't need to be hurt." Although intended as a gesture of respect, many interpreted it as an admission that he deliberately held back to avoid embarrassment – further muddying the waters between genuine competition and entertainment. Since debuting professionally in 2020, Paul has drawn millions of pay-per-view buys and sold-out arenas, attracting both boxing purists and his legion of YouTube fans. Yet, despite his commercial success, prominent figures in the sport remain unconvinced of his legitimacy. British broadcaster Piers Morgan condemned Paul for staging 'fights that clearly benefit him" and, after receiving a legal threat, doubled down, calling it 'ridiculous" to claim these events don't harm boxing's integrity. Even Sylvester Stallone quipped that Paul's performance was akin to 'one of the greatest Oscar-winning performances of all time" before issuing an apology and deleting the post. At 28, Paul holds a 12–1 professional record and runs a marketing machine rivaling those of veteran promoters. His high-profile opponents – former champions like Anderson Silva, Nate Diaz, and Tyron Woodley – were viewed by critics as past their primes when they faced him. Detractors argue Paul cherry-picks outdated or out-of-shape fighters, turning his matches into money-making spectacles that threaten to reduce boxing to parody. Defamation lawsuits in sports are on the rise, following precedents such as Brett Favre's suit against Shannon Sharpe and Pat McAfee. With Alex Spiro in his corner, Paul signals that he's prepared to defend his reputation in court if necessary – delivering a legal blow to critics who underestimate him. At this point, the only punch Paul hasn't thrown is the one he plans to land in the courtroom.
India Today
5 hours ago
- India Today
Mr. Angry Mohammed Siraj a bit like Shane Warne: Nasser Hussain on India's Oval hero
Nasser Hussain claimed that India's Oval hero Mohammed Siraj is more than the nickname the England team has given him and compared the pacer to the legendary Shane Warne in terms of being a competitor. Siraj was the star of the show for India in the final match of the series as he picked three out of the final four wickets to help India seal a dramatic six-run win on Monday, August 4. advertisementThe Indian pacer picked up 23 wickets across the course of the series and bowled more than 185 overs in the five matches he played. The 31-year-old stepped up for India as Jasprit Bumrah played just three matches in the series. During the matches that India won, where Bumrah was absent, it was Siraj who led the way. Hussain, in his column for the Daily Mail, said that the pacer was the reason why India won both games. "Of course, they ended up winning the two games that Bumrah didn't play, and the reason for that was because of one man, really - Mohammed Siraj," said Hussain. Siraj did have a couple of rough moments, especially being the last man to get out in the Lord's Test loss and when he misjudged a catch when Harry Brook was batting on 19. Hussain compared it to Warne's moment in the 2005 Ashes when he dropped the catch of Kevin Pietersen. However, the former England skipper said that Siraj has the fitness and a strong will to succeed. Hussain said that Siraj can play the pantomime villain, like Warne, at times but said he is a born entertainer with all the attributes to succeed at the highest level. "Siraj is a cricketer that always gives it everything. Yes, he plays the pantomime villain at times, a bit like Warney did, and so people love to hate him, but he regularly has that massive smile on his face too.""He's fiery, the England boys call him Mr. Angry, and he has the longest follow through in the history of the game, but he demands your attention. You could do a montage of the histrionics - down on his knees in despair at Lord's, the celebrations and dejection when DRS decisions go one way or another.""He's a born entertainer, but crucially he's got all the other attributes you need at the highest level: heart, passion, and ultimately skill," said Hussain. 'Perfect execution from champion Siraj'Hussain said that had Siraj had a rough outing in England, then India would have lost the series, and it was perfect execution from him in the series. "If Siraj gets it wrong, India lose the series, so it was perfect execution from a champion cricketer that has unfairly courted controversy over the past month," said Hussain. Siraj picked up a total of nine wickets across both innings in the Oval Test. - Ends
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Karisma Kapoor's daughter Samaira steps out in stylish black outfit amid family feud over Sunjay Kapur's Rs 30,000 crore fortune
Samaira Kapur, the daughter of Bollywood actress Karisma Kapoor and late businessman Sunjay Kapur, was recently spotted stepping out in Mumbai for an evening outing with her friends. The young star kid grabbed attention with her chic fashion choice, a sleek black outfit that looked both trendy and elegant. According to a video shared by InstantBollywood, Samaira was seen quickly getting into her car along with her friend. She styled her hair in a sleek back ponytail, letting a few strands fall freely. Her look was completed with a pair of dainty earrings, a stylish watch, and a few delicate bracelets. Samaira visits Delhi with her mum Just last week, Samaira was seen visiting Delhi, along with her mother Karisma Kapoor and brother Kiaan. While this might seem like a usual family trip, the timing has raised a few eyebrows. Karisma's visit comes in the middle of a reported legal feud over the enormous fortune left behind by her ex-husband Sunjay Kapur. Sunjay passed away in June this year, reportedly due to a cardiac arrest caused by accidentally swallowing a bee during a polo match. His last rites were performed in Delhi. Karisma has no stake in fortune With rumours flying around that Karisma might be involved in matters linked to Sunjay's Rs 30,000 crore estate, a source close to the family has now set the record straight. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How to Ease Knee Pain Without Injections or Side Effects Learn More Undo The source told ETimes, Karisma is not part of any property-related talks. 'Karisma Kapoor is not involved in any inheritance or property-related matters,' said a source close to the family. 'She has no claim, nor is she seeking any share in the estate. Her only concern is the well-being and future of her children.' Children are rightful heirs to the estate Karisma and Sunjay were married in 2003 and got divorced in 2016 after a rocky relationship. They have two children together, Samaira and Kiaan. The same source confirmed that the children are the rightful heirs to their father's wealth. 'The children will receive what is due to them,' the source added. 'Karisma's focus remains entirely on them.' Sunjay's mother seeks police probe Meanwhile, the drama surrounding the estate has taken a serious turn. Rani Kapur, Sunjay's mother and former chairperson of Sona Comstar, has formally reached out to the UK authorities. She has asked for a full investigation into what she describes as the 'unexplained circumstances' surrounding her son's death. According to ANI, Rani Kapur filed an official criminal complaint with British police and stressed the urgency of a proper probe. Media reports also suggest that she believes something more serious may have happened. Rani claims to have 'credible and concerning evidence… that suggests his (Sunjay Kapur's) death may not have been accidental or natural, but may have involved foul play, including possibility of murder, abetment, conspiracy, fraud, and forgery. '
