What is the history of the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan?
Here is a look at the history of the conflict and the latest developments as Armenian and Azerbaijani officials said on Thursday that they had agreed the text of a peace agreement.
WHAT IS NAGORNO-KARABAKH?
Nagorno-Karabakh, known as Artsakh by Armenians, is a mountainous region at the southern end of the Karabakh mountain range, within Azerbaijan. It is internationally recognised as part of Azerbaijan, but until 2023 its 100,000 inhabitants were predominantly ethnic Armenians.
Armenians, who are Christian, claim a long presence in the area, dating back to several centuries before Christ. Azerbaijan, whose inhabitants are mostly Turkic Muslims, also claims deep historical ties to the region, which over the centuries has come under the sway of Persians, Turks and Russians. Bloody conflict between the two peoples goes back more than a century.
Under the Soviet Union, Nagorno-Karabakh became an autonomous region within the republic of Azerbaijan.
FIRST KARABAKH WAR
As the Soviet Union crumbled, the First Karabakh War (1988-1994) erupted between Armenians and their Azeri neighbours. About 30,000 people were killed and more than a million displaced. Most of those were Azeris driven from their homes when the Armenian side ended up in control of Nagorno-Karabakh itself and swathes of seven surrounding districts.
44-DAY WAR IN 2020
In 2020, after decades of intermittent skirmishes, Azerbaijan began a military operation that became the Second Karabakh War, swiftly breaking through Armenian defences. It won a resounding victory in 44 days, taking back the seven districts and about a third of Nagorno-Karabakh itself.
The deal provided for 1,960 Russian peacekeepers to guard the territory's lifeline to Armenia: the road through the "Lachin corridor", which Armenian forces no longer controlled.
BLOCKADE AND EXODUS
In 2022, Azerbaijani personnel blocked the one remaining road into Karabakh, causing acute shortages of food and fuel in the territory.
In September 2023, Azerbaijani forces launched an offensive against what remained of Karabakh, which quickly agreed a ceasefire and capitulated to Baku.
Almost all of the remaining 100,000 or so Armenians in the region fled to Armenia as refugees.
PEACE TALKS
After the exodus from Karabakh, Armenia and Azerbaijan both said that they wanted to sign a treaty to end the conflict between them.
Though Armenia in 2024 handed back some disputed territory, progress towards a final deal was slow and fitful, with both sides blaming each other for the stalled talks.
Azerbaijan demanded that Armenia rewrite its constitution, which Baku says makes implicit claims to Azerbaijani territory. Armenia denied that it made any such claim, but has recently signalled openness to changing its constitution.
Azerbaijan also asked for a transport corridor through Armenia, linking the bulk of its territory to Nakhchivan, an Azerbaijani enclave that borders Baku's ally Turkey.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
36 minutes ago
- Reuters
Europe's defence boom
Follow on Apple or Spotify. Listen on the Reuters app. The region's decision to spend more on guns has helped make it an investor darling despite an economy still in the doldrums. But will the promised spending splurge give Europe's economy a big boost or just stretch its weak finances even further? Host Carmel Crimmins talks to European Economics Editor Mark John about the potential implications. Sign up for the Reuters Econ World newsletter here. Listen to the Drone Wars podcast here. For information on our privacy and data protection practices visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement. You may also visit to opt out of targeted advertising. Further Listening Drone Wars Japan's debt War Economy
Reuters
36 minutes ago
- Reuters
US EPA to withdraw foundation of greenhouse gas rules, sources say
WASHINGTON, July 23 (Reuters) - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency plans to reverse its scientific determination that greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health, removing the legal foundation that underpins all major climate regulations, two sources familiar with the discussions told Reuters. Reversal of the "endangerment finding" would gut one of the most consequential federal standards that had enabled the U.S. to tackle climate change by regulating vehicles, industries, and energy-producing facilities that emit heat-trapping greenhouse gases. Without the finding, the EPA could more easily undo major regulations limiting greenhouse gas emissions, the sources said. An EPA spokesperson said the agency sent its proposal for reconsidering the endangerment finding to the White House Office of Management and Budget for review on June 30 and it is being reviewed by other federal agencies. "The proposal will be published for public notice and comment once it has completed interagency review and been signed by the Administrator,' an EPA spokesperson said in an email. The Washington Post first reported on the decision. The International Court of Justice on Wednesday issued a landmark advisory opinion saying greenhouse gas emissions pose an "existential threat" to the world and countries must cooperate on concrete emission reduction targets. One source said the proposal would focus on EPA's legal authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, not the scientific basis for it. Lawyers have said that challenging the scientific basis of the finding would be difficult because the body of evidence that humans are causing climate change is 'unequivocal.' "It would be a shocking dereliction of a clear statutory duty to protect the public and an indefensible denial of overwhelming science. Also a national embarrassment," said Sean Donahue, a lawyer with Donahue, Goldberg & Herzog, who has represented environmental groups in cases before the Supreme Court. The U.S. is the largest historical greenhouse gas emitter and currently the No. 2 emitter after China. The U.S. Supreme Court, in its landmark Massachusetts vs. EPA case in 2007, said the EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and required the agency to make a scientific finding on whether they endanger public health. In 2009, the EPA under former President Barack Obama issued a finding that emissions from new motor vehicles contribute to pollution and endanger public health and welfare. It was upheld in several legal challenges and underpinned subsequent greenhouse gas regulations. The EPA declined to take action on the endangerment finding during President Donald Trump's first term as industry raised concerns. The current Trump administration set its sights early on the endangerment finding. In January, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin told his confirmation hearing the agency has authority but not an obligation to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In March, the EPA launched a review of the finding, obeying a day-one executive order by Trump. White House budget director Ross Vought said the review was "long overdue" because the finding had led to regulations that he said harmed the economy. Zeldin announced over two-dozen de-regulatory actions aimed at "driving a dagger straight into the heart of the climate change religion."
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
EPA to withdraw foundation of greenhouse gas rules, sources say
WASHINGTON, July 23 (Reuters) - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is planning to reverse a key scientific determination that greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health, removing the legal foundation that underpins all major climate regulations, two sources familiar with the action told Reuters. The proposal to reverse the "endangerment finding" guts one of the most consequential federal standards that had enabled the United States to tackle climate change by regulating vehicles, industrial and energy-producing facilities that emit heat-trapping greenhouse gases. A reversal would allow the EPA to easily undo major regulations that tackled greenhouse gas emissions that were based on the finding, the sources said. An EPA spokesperson said that the agency sent its proposal for reconsidering the endangerment finding to the White House Office of Management and Budget for review on June 30 and is being reviewed by other federal agencies. "The proposal will be published for public notice and comment once it has completed interagency review and been signed by the Administrator,' an EPA spokesperson said in an email. The Washington Post first reported on the decision.
