‘Piastri, Norris perform better when they're the hunter, not hunted'
But come qualifying, Norris edged Piastri to take pole for the main race. On Sunday though, it was Piastri again who topped his teammate to take the race win and extend his championship lead to 16 points.
This has been the story of not just the last Grand Prix weekend but the entire topsy turvy season with the dominant hand shifting from one McLaren driver to the other.
By now — after 13 of 24 races — it is quite clear that one of the two drivers of the Woking-based squad is likely to win the championship unless something untoward happens. Despite Max Verstappen's sheer brilliance, which has earned him two wins this season, the Dutchman is unlikely to challenge for the title which will bring an end to the Red Bull driver's run of four successive championships. But which McLaren driver is going to end the run?
'It is a fight between the two McLaren drivers unless something goes wrong. The whole season has been going one time in favour of one of them and then the other and they both seem to react to each other in different ways,' former world champion Jacques Villeneuve, who beat 7-time champion Michael Schumacher in an epic fight to win the title in 1997, told HT in an interaction.
'It is really hard to judge. I feel that Norris still has the edge on speed but Piastri has a cooler head. So, it balances out. Both drivers seem to perform better when they are not leading the championship, when they are the hunters and not the hunted. Leading the championship has a huge effect on your mind, the weight you carry on your shoulders.'
Norris, 25, led the championship for the first four races before Piastri overtook him after the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix. Though the 24-year-old has led the title fight since then, the battle has been extremely close with the two coming together in Montreal, which led to Norris's only DNF (did not finish) of the season.
Had the Briton not crashed into his teammate while chasing him, the gap — 16 points currently — could have been negligible or even seen Norris in the championship lead.
'Lando seems to have recovered a bit (from a 22-point deficit after the Canada crash). He seems to be more emotional than Piastri. When you take the two into account, it's really hard to know which one has the better shot at winning,' said Villeneuve in a call facilitated by FanCode, the official broadcaster of F1 in India.
'You can tell the effect on both drivers. The minute Piastri became the championship leader, it had an effect on him that doesn't look like it was super positive. The same thing with Lando. Once he wasn't the championship leader, he started driving a little bit harder like he did last year. So, it does have a big psychological effect.'
It seemed in the initial part of the season that Verstappen, who on Thursday confirmed he will stay with Red Bull in 2026, was also in the title fight. Former race winner Jean Alesi had in fact told HT that the Dutch reigning world champion will steal the title from the two McLaren drivers as they keep taking points from each other.
But the last few races have changed the dynamics. Verstappen has gone three races without a podium, the first time it has happened in six years.
'Max is a different beast. He's a pure racer. He doesn't get too affected. It doesn't matter whether he's leading or running 10th, he will fight as hard. He's always out there giving his 100%, taking the risks, trying to always get that extra 10th of a second or that extra position, whether he's leading or not,' said the 54-year-old Canadian.
'You could see a little bit of frustration, because he doesn't like not winning. You can see that the team is going in the wrong direction. So that is a little bit frustrating. But he recovered very quickly from that. He seems to be the same Max now that he was when he was winning every race. He's one of the rare drivers that doesn't seem to be too affected.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
36 minutes ago
- News18
Liam Paro Calls Out Manny Pacquiao As Latest Ranking Sparks Debate
Pacquiao, 46, returned to welterweight after a four-year break, exciting fans and inspiring challengers like Paro. His No. 9 ranking by The Ring has sparked debate. Manny Pacquiao, the eight-division world champion, stunned the boxing world by stepping back into the welterweight spotlight after a four-year hiatus. At 46 years old, 'PacMan" delivered a gritty performance in a WBC title challenge that, while falling short of gold, reminded everyone why he remains a global force. Pacquiao's comeback didn't just reignite fan fervor—it also inspired a new crowd of challengers eager to test themselves against a living legend. Among the first to sound the trumpet was Australian contender Liam Paro. Fresh off regaining his footing in the super-lightweight ranks, the 29-year-old announced he was ditching the 140-pound class. 'I've been doing this for 10 years. It's time for a change," Paro admitted to Main Event. The grind of weight cuts had grown unbearable—and the prospect of two-division glory proved too tempting to resist. Yet Paro's decision isn't purely strategic. It's personal. 'My favorite boxer, Manny Pacquiao, is back—and I want that fight," he declared. Paro envisions capturing a welterweight belt and rolling out the red carpet in Australia for an epic showdown with his idol. With Pacquiao slotting into the world's top 10 welterweights, Paro knows the clock is ticking: to earn Pacquiao's attention, every step must accelerate toward the title. The Ring magazine slid him in at No. 9 despite just one fight in four years. 'Manny Pacquiao, 46, enters at #9 following his return in July to challenge for the WBC title," the publication posted on Instagram. Critics pointed out that Mario Barrios, the reigning champion, sits at No. 8, while rising stars like Brian Norman Jr. and Eimantas Stanionis occupy the spots above. Rolly Romero's conspicuous absence as WBA titlist only added fuel: is Pacquiao's ranking a nod to his storied legacy, or a fair reflection of current form? For boxing aficionados, the debate is half the fun. Does a one-off return justify a top-10 spot? Can Pacquiao—now in his late 40s—still stand toe-to-toe with the division's hungry contenders? The questions only amplify the excitement. After all, the name Manny Pacquiao still moves mountains, and the prospect of Liam Paro's challenge hints at an unforgettable encounter down under. One thing's for sure: the welterweight division is feeling more electric. view comments First Published: August 02, 2025, 10:07 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Ricky Ponting admits he would have punched Akash Deep if he would have given him a send-off: 'Probably yeah'
Akash Deep celebrates after dismissing Ben Duckett on Day Two of the 5th Test match between England and India at The Oval. (Getty Images) Former Australian cricket captain Ricky Ponting criticised Indian pacer Akash Deep for his post-wicket gesture towards England's Ben Duckett during the fifth Test match at The Oval, stating he would have responded with physical aggression if faced with similar behaviour during his playing career. The incident occurred in the 13th over of England's innings when Akash Deep dismissed Duckett and subsequently wrapped his arm around the batter's shoulder with a smile. Prasidh Krishna press confefence: On sledging Joe Root, special chat with Mohammed Siraj and more The dismissal came after Duckett had scored an aggressive 43 runs off 38 balls, including four boundaries and a six against Akash Deep. This was the fourth time Akash Deep had claimed Duckett's wicket in the series, but the first instance followed a period where the English batter had dominated the bowler. During a Sky Sports Lunch break show, presenter Ian Ward questioned Ponting about the incident, asking, "I can think of a few batsmen down the years that would take umbrage at this, and I'm looking very much in your direction. That would have been a Ponting right hook, wouldn't it?" Ponting responded affirmatively, stating, "Probably yeah, probably." The former Australian captain later softened his stance, acknowledging Duckett's composed reaction to the incident. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brain tumor has left my son feeling miserable; please help! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo "Although I mean, when I saw it, I just thought they must have been mates or played against each other somewhere or together. I would like to have something like that. I mean, you don't see that every day, maybe in a local park game or not in a test match that's been played as fiercely as this series has been played. I love the way that Ben Duckett plays his cricket. I think I like him more now to not to be able to react to that," Ponting said. The incident was part of a dramatic second day at The Oval, where 16 wickets fell on a pitch with unpredictable bounce. India, starting at 204/6, were bowled out for 224. England's innings began explosively, reaching 92 runs in just 13 overs. However, they eventually collapsed to 247 all out, securing a narrow 23-run lead. By the end of the day's play, which was cut short due to bad light, India had reached 75-2, with Yashasvi Jaiswal scoring an unbeaten 51 off 49 balls despite being dropped twice. This gave India a lead of 52 runs. The match remains closely contested with England leading the series 2-1, making this final Test crucial for both teams. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HT Archives: Laker's mark: Eng off-spinner takes out 10 in 1 innings
When Jim Laker produced a 'perfect 10' England's Jim Laker (second from right) walks off the field at Old Trafford after taking all ten Australian wickets for just 53 runs in the second innings to win England the match and increase his personal haul for the match to a world-record 19 wickets. (PA Images via Getty Images) Great achievements that magnify human endeavour have a timeless quality — climbing Mount Everest for the first time or running the first sub-four minute mile, for instance. Test cricket's greatest single performance came in the summer of 1956, when England off-spinner Jim Laker made history by becoming the first bowler to capture all 10 wickets in an innings. Laker's magnificent 10/53 came in the Australian second innings of the fourth Ashes Test at Old Trafford, after a near-perfect storm had hit their first innings where he captured 9/37. Laker's match haul of 19/90 remains the greatest bowling feat in Test cricket by some distance. No one else has claimed more than 17 wickets even in the history of first-class cricket. 'An astonishing performance' was how Australia legend Richie Benaud, one of those swept up in the wake of Laker's relentless performance, would recall that performance at a 50th year anniversary in London. It had been 12 years since Don Bradman's retirement and Australia were a weak side. England had won the previous two Ashes series in 1953 and 1954. Laker, a medium-pacer and batsman to start with, was advised while serving in the British army that he switch to bowling off-spin to get into the strong Army team. The Yorkshire-born who would dazzle on Lancashire turf, rose to prominence after joining Surrey county. At The Oval, he and left-arm spinner Tony Lock proved a great combination on turning pitches. Although there was an 8/21 for England versus Rest in 1950, and a 11-wicket Test haul the next year to beat South Africa, he wasn't a regular yet. Laker though made his presence felt in the county scene. In 1952, he took 100 wickets for Surrey alone and was named one of the five Cricketers of the Year by Wisden. His first brush with Australia was against Bradman's 1948 side, but his impact wasn't great. However, the Laker of 1956 was a different deal. Armed with a slightly round-arm action with a nice flight, he was tellingly accurate too. And the Laker lightning did strike twice that summer. Earlier on the tour, playing for Surrey at the Oval, he captured 10/88 in the visitors' first innings. It would thus be the only time a bowler would take a 10-for twice in a season. Lock was in step, capturing 7/49 in the second innings to dismiss the Aussies for 107. The first Test was drawn and the visitors won the next at Lord's by 185 runs. England won the third Test at Leeds as Australia struggled against the two finger spinners of different qualities. 'They could both play, it wasn't disruptive,' recalled former England batsman Peter Richardson, who made his Test debut in that series, in a 2006 get-together, in comments compiled in a Grandstand cricket podcast. A powder-dry Old Trafford pitch was bad enough, and when England skipper Peter May won the toss and the hosts amassed 459, Australia were clearly struggling. Lock removed one of the openers, but it was Laker all the way after that. Australia batsmen were more comfortable playing the orthodox left-arm spinner, dealing with him as they would a leg-break bowler to the right-hander. Laker claimed 9/37 in the first innings as Australia were shot out for 84. Australia leg-spin great, Bill O'Reilly, in his special report of the Test for Hindustan Times, describes it thus: 'From the time that May switched his spinners round to let Laker bowl with the gentle breeze from the same end as (Australian off-spinner Ian) Johnson had collected four wickets, the procession began and nine victims fell foul of the off-spinner's accurate bowling. 'Lock gave an outstanding example of the manner in which a bowler can bowl too well to get wickets. Time and again, he got orthodox leg-breaks to jump and turn away so quickly that no batsman except (opener Jim) Burke was quick enough to get the bat to the ball.' Asked to follow-on, Australia lost the first wicket to Laker by stumps on third day. Only rain could save Australia and though Day 4 was washed out, the pitch only became more unplayable. Neil Harvey bagged a pair and the great all-rounder Keith Miller was out for zero and 6. Harvey recalled the sharp turner that bowled him in the first innings, 50 years later. 'Much has been said about the Warne-Gatting ball (at Old Trafford in 1992). That ball that Jimmy bowled to me at Old Trafford in 1956 was just as good as Shane Warne bowled to Mike Gatting.' The perfect 10 was sealed on July 31 when Laker trapped last man Len Maddock leg before. A simple handshake with Australia skipper Ian Johnson, the non-striker, and the umpire followed before Laker collected and threw on his flannel over the left shoulder and walked off, carrying a big chunk of cricket history as he led his team off the field. It would take another 33 years for Anil Kumble to emulate Laker with another 10-for (10/74), against Pakistan at Delhi in 1999, New Zealand left-arm spinner Ajaz Patel joining that elite two with his 10/119, versus India in Mumbai in 2021.
