logo
When power picks the people: How redistricting in Texas works

When power picks the people: How redistricting in Texas works

Yahooa day ago
Ordinary voters can be forgiven if their eyes don't well up over the possibility of a few Congress members losing their seats. Beginning Monday, the Legislature convenes a special session, and one of the agenda items is to tackle the unusual mid-decade redrawing of Texas' district boundaries — a move aimed at boosting Republican clout in Washington.
It's true that much of the media coverage leading into the special session has centered on the horse-race aspect of perhaps one of the most political activities lawmakers engage in. The coverage tends to focus on which members might be drawn out of office, protected, or newly positioned to win reconfigured districts.
As interesting as all that might be for political junkies and politicians whose necks are on the line, the real-world implications go deeper. Let's start with the basic school civics question: What difference does it make which politician goes to Washington to represent which part of Texas?
The answer might sound more than a bit naive, though it shouldn't be. The federal government is intrusive, demanding, too opaque to most Americans and very, very expensive to operate. For every Texan — actually for every American — who's not actually working in the federal government, their most accountable point of contact in the nation's capital is their Congress member.
Your aging parent needs help with Social Security or Medicare, call your congressman's office. Your graduating senior wants to go to West Point, the Naval Academy or any of the other service academies, a nomination from your congressman will go a long way. You're getting jacked around trying to apply for some sort of federal assistance, or you want to complain that any federal assistance is a black hole for wasted money, show up at the next town hall your member of Congress hosts.
READ MORE: Why a walkout on GOP redistricting could be very risky for Texas Democrats
Now, here's where the politics get even more political, and more than a little bit complicated. The makeup of congressional districts is not random. And even though Texas has 38 U.S. House members, each individual Texan has exactly one. U.S. senators are a different matter, so let's put a pin in that topic for now.
Congressional districts, in a perfect world, are drawn once a decade to align with the latest figures from the U.S. Census. They are supposed to be made up of what are called "communities of interest." That should mean that families in the High Plains aren't matched up in a congressional district with residents of downtown condos in places like Austin, Houston or San Antonio.
The districts are also supposed to be as geographically compact as possible, giving constituents at least some sense of community. And they're not supposed to be drawn so that communities of color are effectively shut out when it comes to representation.
But the world is not perfect. And Texas' diversity — whether it be geographic, economic, commercial, climate, demographic or political — means that many of the lofty goals laid out in the previous paragraph have to be set aside or outright ignored.
Now let's mix in population imperatives. A district covering vast expanses of cotton farms and cattle ranches has to have about the same number of actual people as one where most people live just a couple of feet, or just a couple of floors, from their neighbors.
READ MORE: In wake of Texas floods, questions seek not blame but accountability
Adding another layer of complexity, let's consider that in the 1970s, each of the 435 members of the U.S. House represented about 470,000 people. In the half-century since, the U.S. population has grown by approximately 130 million. However, the number of Congress members — 435 — has remained the same as it was when disco topped the charts. That means each member has roughly 785,000 constituents.
So, all that means that getting the attention of your member of Congress is about twice as hard as it was for your grandparents when they were your age.
Finally, here's the uncomfortable truth: you don't truly choose your representative — your Congress member, in effect, chooses you. And that's how redistricting actually works.
The map drawers have highly sophisticated computer programs that tell them which neighborhoods tend to vote for one party or the other. The programs let them know the area's racial composition, about how much money families make, how those families spend that money, whether they have kids or whether they prefer pets, whether they're still working, whether they're looking for work, or whether they're retired.
And some neighborhoods get randomly assigned to one district or another because they'll balance out the population but will have no real influence on election day.
All that information gets dissected, bisected and digested, and members of Congress and wannabe members of Congress will decide which neighborhoods, not which individuals, are most likely to vote for them. So if you get swept into a district that's likely to elect someone of your political persuasion, good for you. If you're in the opposite camp, better luck when they do it all again in 2031. Or maybe sooner, depending on the mood of whoever's in charge at the time.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Texas redistricting is all about the politicians, it's never about you
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Does Jaylen Brown's future lie away from the Boston Celtics?
Does Jaylen Brown's future lie away from the Boston Celtics?

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Does Jaylen Brown's future lie away from the Boston Celtics?

Every summer, Jaylen Brown's name is floated in trade talks. The 2024 NBA Finals MVP is often viewed as a dispensable member of the Boston Celtics' rotation, despite being one of the top forwards in the NBA and a key player in Joe Mazzulla's rotation. This summer has been no different, despite the fact that Brown is set to embrace a leading role on the Celtics roster due to Jayson Tatum's injury-induced absence. Recently, Brown sat down for an interview with Noa Dalzell of Celtics Blog. During the discussion, he noted how he hasn't always felt capable of being his true self around the city, noting politics as a potential reason. 'It's been a long journey here in Boston,' Brown said. 'I've had to deal with a lot. I feel like I haven't been able to be myself in certain capacities — because of the politics, and because maybe people feel uncomfortable with who I am.' Those comments were quickly used to create a new wave of potential trade talk surrounding Brown. In a recent episode of "WEEI Afternoons," the concept of Brown potentially being traded, either this season or next, was a primary discussion point among the two hosts. You can watch the full discussion by clicking on the embedded video above. Watch the "Taylor Talks Celtics" podcast on: YouTube: Website: This article originally appeared on Celtics Wire: Does Jaylen Brown's future lie away from the Celtics?

Ford Foundation's outgoing president joins the board of Obama Foundation
Ford Foundation's outgoing president joins the board of Obama Foundation

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ford Foundation's outgoing president joins the board of Obama Foundation

Darren Walker's post-Ford Foundation future is starting to take shape, as the outgoing president is now set to join The Obama Foundation's board of directors. The Obama Foundation, the Chicago-based nonprofit of former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama focused on encouraging active involvement in democracy through initiatives like the My Brother's Keeper Alliance and the Obama Youth Jobs Corps, announced Monday that Walker would join the board on Nov. 1. 'Darren Walker is an outstanding example of what it means to lead with purpose in philanthropy,' President Obama said in a statement. 'Darren's work to challenge long-held assumptions, stand up to injustice, and build unlikely partnerships aligns perfectly with the mission of the Obama Foundation. His experience and insight will sharpen our thinking and deepen our impact as we help the next generation of leaders change their world for the better.' Walker, 65, who has led the Ford Foundation since 2013 and oversaw major investments in gender equity and disability rights, is one of philanthropy's best-known leaders. He has been one of Rolling Stone's '25 People Shaping the Future' and Time's '100 Most Influential People.' 'Joining The Obama Foundation Board feels like coming home to everything I believe about leadership and change,' Walker said in a statement. 'I believe deeply in the power of individuals to change the world, and I'm honored to work with President and Mrs. Obama to help empower and support the next generation of changemakers.' In addition to his new role at the Obama Foundation, Walker has already been named president of the National Gallery of Art. In September, 'The Idea of America: Reflections on Inequality, Democracy, and the Values We Share,' a collection of his essays, will be published. The Ford Foundation has selected Yale Law School Dean Heather Gerken, a leading expert on constitutional law and democracy, to succeed Darren Walker as its president. Marty Nesbitt, chairman of the Obama Foundation's board of directors, said Walker will help the nonprofit stick to its mission. 'Darren brings a rare combination of visionary thinking and practical know-how that will strengthen our governance and sharpen our impact,' he said. 'His deep experience leading through complexity and bringing diverse voices to the table will be an invaluable asset as we guide the foundation into its next chapter and open the Obama Presidential Center next year.' _____ Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit Glenn Gamboa, The Associated Press

Republican tax law leaves experts searching for words
Republican tax law leaves experts searching for words

Politico

time9 minutes ago

  • Politico

Republican tax law leaves experts searching for words

At the same time, it remains to be seen whether Republicans' decision to dub their new savings accounts for children 'Trump accounts' will prove a marketing misstep that will blunt its appeal to the 75 million Americans who voted for Kamala Harris. The overall legislation was christened by Trump, but the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' was scrubbed from the legislation once it got to the Senate, after Democratic leader Chuck Schumer had it struck as a violation of the chamber's internal rules — the latest shot in a long-running feud in which the two parties take turns deleting the names of each other's reconciliation bills. 'I just forced Republicans to delete their ridiculous bill name,' Schumer wrote shortly thereafter on X. 'Nothing about this bill is beautiful.' Technically the legislation is now called 'An act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.' Of course, that isn't stopping many from still using the now-unofficial name. 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' was the winner in a recent EY survey of 10,000 tax pros asking how they referred to the tax law. 'OB3" came in a close second. A similar survey by Grant Thornton also had those names going one-two. Over at the Tax Policy Center, senior fellow Howard Gleckman prefers the colloquial '2025 budget act' or, simply, 'the big budget bill.' The studiously nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, meanwhile, uses the extremely neutral 'H.R. 1.' Some of the individual provisions have been renamed to reflect substantive changes made by the legislation. 'GILTI' was made obsolete by Senate Republicans' revisions to how multinationals will be taxed. The original tax was intended to target profits from things like patents that businesses squirreled away in tax havens. Republicans had trouble coming up with a way of legally defining those earnings, so in the 2017 law they essentially said GILTI was everything except profits resulting from tangible assets like factories. The idea was to distinguish between the money companies made from their actual operations abroad from things that were just accounting maneuvers. Naturally, the tangible stuff got its own acronym — QBAI, or Qualified Business Asset Investment. But the new law dumps QBAI, and so the distinction made by GILTI no longer matters, leaving the tax world with 'Net CFC Tested Income.' Something similar is happening with FDII, or Foreign Derived Intangible Income, another provision that originated in 2017. It's a deduction for companies with overseas profits from intellectual property held in the U.S. — although it's probably best known for inspiring a years-long dispute about whether it should be called 'Fiddy' or 'F-D-I-I.' QBAI was part of the calculations that went into FDII, so, with QBAI now going away, FDII is also renamed in the new law, as the Foreign Derived Deduction Eligible Income, or FDDEI. But if anything, it's even less clear how to shorthand that. Warren Payne, a former Republican tax aide now at the firm Mayer Brown, says he's heard it called 'Fa-Day' — though he's not going there. 'I haven't figured out how to pronounce it,' he said. 'I just spell it out.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store