Commission should work on new AI Liability rules, civil society groups say
ADVERTISEMENT
The European Commission has been urged to work on new AI liability rules after it pulled out of an existing proposal, in a letter sent to the EU executive on Monday by civil society and consumer groups.
The signatories — which include consumer group BEUC, and privacy advocates Article 19 and Mozilla – said that the 'EU needs rules to address the legal gaps left by the AILD withdrawal and ensure a fairer, simpler path to compensation for all people affected by AI systems, including consumers in the EU, in case of harm by an AI system.'
In the Commission's 2025 work program, presented in February, the EU executive said it plans to
scrap
the AI Liability Directive because 'no foreseeable agreement' is expected on the proposal.
The rules were intended to offer consumers a harmonised means of redress when they experience harm arising from AI products or services. They were proposed in 2022 but no significant progress has been made since.
The joint letter – addressed to EU Tech Commissioner Henna Virkkunen and Michael McGrath, the commissioner for consumer affairs – argues that new EU AI liability rules would prevent fragmentation across the Bloc and enhance trust in AI.
'Certain national regimes might adequately protect consumers and individuals affected by AI, but not all do. This leads to an unfair scenario where people harmed by an AI system in one member state would have better chances at being compensated than those located in a different member state,' the letter said.
Other rules, like the revised Product Liability Directive (PLD) also apply to AI systems, but the letter argues that legal gaps remain.
EU Tech Commissioner Henna Virkkunen has been
invited
to the Legal Affairs Committee on 9 April for a discussion on the topic.
The file has not yet been officially withdrawn, but the Commission will aim to do so by August, when it publishes a final work program.
Lawmakers are divided on the issue, and member states have not officially decided on their position.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Russia launches biggest aerial strikes on Ukraine yet
Russia has launched its biggest aerial attack against Ukraine overnight, with a total of 537 aerial weapons fired, including 477 drones and decoys and 60 missiles, Ukraine's air force reported. Of these, 249 were shot down and 226 were lost, likely having been electronically jammed. Apart from the drones, the air force listed four Kh-47M2 Kinzhal missiles, seven Iskander-M/KN-23 ballistic missiles, one of which was shot down; 41 Kh-101/Iskander-K cruise missiles of which 33 were shot down and one disappeared from radar; five Kalibr cruise missiles (four shot down) and three S-300 anti-aircraft missiles. Yuriy Ihnat, head of communications for Ukraine's air force, told the Associated Press that the overnight onslaught was 'the most massive air strike' on the country, taking into account both drones and various types of missiles. The attack targeted regions across Ukraine, including western Ukraine, far from the frontline. In a statement on social media, the Ukrainian air force had earlier announced that an F-16 fighter jet has been lost, the third one so far in this war: "Sadly, we have suffered another painful loss. Last night, while repelling a large-scale enemy air attack, First Class pilot Lieutenant Colonel Maksym Ustymenko, 32, was killed while flying an F-16 aircraft. The pilot used the full range of onboard weapons and shot down seven aerial targets. While engaging the final target, his aircraft was damaged and began to lose altitude. Maksym Ustymenko did everything he could to steer the aircraft away from a populated area but did not manage to eject in time." EU warplanes scrambled to protect airspace Poland and allied countries scrambled aircraft to ensure the safety of Polish airspace, the Polish air force said on Sunday. As for the casualties, Kherson regional Governor Oleksandr Prokudin said one person died in a drone strike. Six people were wounded in Cherkasy, including a child, according to regional Governor Ihor Taburets. The fresh attacks follow a statement by Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday that Moscow is ready for a fresh round of direct peace talks in Istanbul. However, US-led international peace efforts have so far produced no breakthrough. Two recent round of talks between the Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul were brief and led to further exchanges of prisoners of war but yielded no progress on reaching a settlement.
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Musk-Trump fallout means stronger EU Tech enforcement, experts say
ADVERTISEMENT The fallout between US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, along with the expansion of the Digital Services Act (DSA) on July 1st, could make the law easier for the European Commission to enforce. Experts told Euronews Next that while Musk worked as a special employee at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it is possible that he was perceived as an official voice of the administration. Musk's former position could have made it harder for the Commission to put penalties on Musk's social media network X because they were worried about a larger 'spillover effect' with the Trump administration, said Oreste Pollicino, professor of digital constitutionalism and artificial intelligence at Bocconi University in Italy. 'Musk was seen not only as the owner of X but as a part of the US administration; this will not be the case anymore,' he said, adding that 'the political cost of targeting Musk could decrease'. 'They worry about the fallout' The DSA is a piece of legislation that regulates the spread of illegal and harmful online activities on platforms such as marketplaces, social media sites and app stores. On July 1st, a voluntary code of practice on disinformation will be folded into the DSA, which means platforms will have to abide by it going forward. (Twitter had signed the code in 2018 under previous leadership but withdrew in 2023 after Elon Musk bought the platform and renamed it X.) There's no proof that the Commission is avoiding taking action against X due to Musk's ties with Trump at the time because that would make it look 'very bad, ' said Jan Penfrat, senior policy advisor with European Digital Rights. However, he said that one of the major indicators that the Commission was worried about the Trump-Musk relationship is the fact that there is not yet a decision in its initial investigation into X, which was launched over 500 days ago. Last July, preliminary findings from the Commission found that X was in violation of the DSA in areas of 'dark patterns, advertising transparency, and data access for researchers'. 'There's tonnes of evidence. The Commission said so themselves. So why are we still waiting on [a] binding decision against X?' Penfrat told Euronews Next. 'One good explanation would be that yes, they are hesitant because they worry about the fallout … so if Trump and Musk aren't getting along anymore, [it could] lead to stronger and more decisions [under the legislation]'. How could the Commission prevent future enforcement issues? In the wake of the Trump-Musk fallout, Pollicino said there could be additional appetite from EU lawmakers to introduce complementary 'instruments' to close certain enforcement gaps. One of the things these instruments could focus on is refining a 'more precise criteria' for what might constitute a 'systemic risk' for harmful content, he added. The DSA currently evaluates four categories of systemic risks: the dissemination of illegal content, negative effects for the exercise of fundamental rights, negative effects on civic discourse, and negative effects on the protection of minors, gender-based violence and public health. 'If X is no longer perceived as an ideological instrument for a powerful United States political actor, it might recalibrate how systemic risks are assessed vis-a-vis … platforms like Meta, TikTok, [and] YouTube,' Pollicino said. The instrument could potentially address platform capture risk, Pollicino added, when a service becomes 'functionally aligned with a political actor or agenda [to] undermine democratic discourse.' Penfrat said that while the DSA is a 'solid' piece of legislation, more investment needs to be made into how to enforce it at the national level. What's next for the DSA investigation into X? The most recent update of the X investigation is that the Commission asked for more information about the algorithms the platform uses to push some content over others. Euronews Next reached out to the Commission to see if there have been any additional steps taken on the DSA investigation but did not receive an immediate reply. Pollicino said he believes the scope of the investigation that the European Commission already launched under the DSA into X should be expanded to include any harmful commentary or content that Musk would've perpetrated on the platform during his time as DOGE special government employee. 'For sure, there was a bigger impact when there was this alliance between Musk and Trump,' Pollicino said. Musk could eventually be charged with up to six per cent of X's profits in Europe under the DSA, but Penfrat argued that the penalty should be applied to Musk's entire net worth instead. 'If you limit it to X, then there's not much to fine,' he said. 'X doesn't have a huge revenue compared to how rich Elon Musk is … you'll end up with a fine that's, you know, less than pocket money [for him],' he said. Euronews Next reached out to X but didn't get an immediate reply.
Euronews
5 hours ago
- Euronews
GenAI job postings rise across Europe: Which countries lead the way?
Recent figures reveal a sharp rise in the share of job postings mentioning generative AI (GenAI) over the past two years across Europe, North America, and Australia. 'Nearly every job will be impacted by AI (artificial intelligence) at some point,' said Pawel Adrjan, Director of Economic Research at Indeed. In major European economies, the share of GenAI-related job postings more than doubled in the 12 months to March 2025, according to the global hiring platform Indeed. What are GenAI jobs? GenAI jobs refer to roles involving the development, implementation, or oversight of generative artificial intelligence technologies. This could include positions building GenAI features, or roles leveraging this tech to create more efficient processes such as reviewing data, summarising reports, or drafting written or creative materials. Ireland is leading the way by a significant extent in Europe when it comes to these kinds of jobs. Indeed data shows that, as of 31 March 2025, more than 0.7% of Irish job postings include terms related to GenAI. This is an increase of 204%, with the share more than tripling in just one year. The figure was only 0.02% in the same period in 2023, highlighting a tremendous rise over the past two years. For comparison, job openings in Ireland for chefs currently represent 1.1% of total postings. Opportunities for lorry drivers and bartenders represent 0.8% and 0.6% respectively. These figures highlight Ireland's position at the forefront of digital innovation in the European labour market. How has Ireland become a hub for GenAI jobs? "Ireland's leading presence in GenAI job postings reflects the country's well-established technology sector and its role as a European base for many global firms,' Pawel Adrjan told Euronews Business. 'With a high concentration of tech employers, including major multinationals and a number of start-ups, it's natural we would see a proportionate increase in GenAI roles there too,' he added. Globally recognised names such as Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Oracle, Salesforce, and Tencent, among many others, have established significant European operations in Ireland. Adrjan of Indeed also noted that the steady growth in AI-related roles is also indicative of Ireland's focus on industries like software, financial services, and life sciences, which are increasingly integrating AI tools into their operations. GenAI job postings surge in Germany, the UK, and France Several major EU and international markets — including Germany, France, Australia, the US, the UK, and Canada — lag behind Ireland in incorporating GenAI into job roles. In each of these countries, the share of job postings mentioning GenAI remains at or below 0.3% as of late March 2025. However, the share has risen by around 100% or more in these European countries over the past year. This highlights how the job market is evolving, even if still well behind Ireland's 204% increase. The UK has the highest share of GenAI-related job postings among the three largest European economies, at 0.33% as of 31 March 2025. That's up 120% from 0.15% the previous year. Germany follows with 0.23% (a 109% annual increase), and France at 0.21% (a 91% increase). Which jobs most commonly mention GenAI? GenAI jobs appear across a range of categories. Among the top occupations in Ireland where job postings mention GenAI, mathematics leads by a wide margin. As of March 2025, 14.7% of advertised roles in mathematics referenced GenAI, significantly higher than any other category. This was followed by software development (4.9%), media & communications (3.9%), architecture (2.4%), and scientific research & development (2.1%). Other fields showing notable GenAI activity include industrial engineering (1.8%), legal (1.7%), marketing (1.6%), medical information (1.5%), and production & manufacturing (0.9%). Human intelligence remains a strong requirement Pawel Adrjan explained that in many developed markets, ageing populations are contributing to labour shortages and widening skills gaps. As a result, employers face growing competition for talent and are increasingly turning to skills-first hiring approaches, including the use of AI to expand and enhance their workforce. While nearly every job will be impacted by AI at some point, Adrjan emphasised that human intelligence remains a key requirement. 'We know that GenAI tools are an excellent resource to enhance efficiencies, but they are currently limited in comparison to human expertise,' he said. To what extent can GenAI replace jobs? Joint research by Indeed and the World Economic Forum earlier this year showed that humans will remain an essential part of the global workforce as AI continues to evolve. Indeed analysed over 2,800 work-related skills to assess GenAI's potential to substitute employees. The findings show that around two-thirds (69%) are unlikely to be replaced by GenAI, underscoring the continued importance of human expertise in the workplace. The chart above shows the likelihood of certain skills to be replaced or substituted by GenAI. They are ranked from 'very low capacity' (hard to replace) to 'high capacity' (easy to replace). AI and Big Data, as well as reading, writing, and mathematics are on the 'high capacity' side of the scale. On the 'very low capacity' side of the scale, we can see sensory-processing abilities, along with empathy and active listening.
