
'Happy coincidence' or master plan: How Carney's team full of Quebecers wants to govern Canada
While some believe Carney has an electoral debt to pay to Quebec, Harder said it's important to look broadly at the key players in a government as a collective. 'Public service is a team sport,' he said.
Article content
National Post spoke with more than a dozen sources for this article to gain insight into Carney's new team, with a focus on the Quebec angle. Sabia did not comment for this story. Several suggested that the influx of senior officials from that province is largely a coincidence, that they got their jobs simply because of experience and talent.
Article content
If so, it's a happy coincidence for Carney, a prime minister who grew up mostly in Edmonton, has spent much of his career in Ottawa, and speaks French as a second language. But some academics and other Ottawa insiders suggest that the prime minister is well aware that his connections to Quebec are fragile.
Article content
Article content
'Quebec is important,' said a source in the prime minister's office that spoke on background. 'The prime minister is not from Quebec, and it is important that he have this perspective. Quebec has its own culture, its own identity, and its own language.'
Article content
The key question centres on the possible effects of this Quebec-heavy contingent in the Carney government, both in terms of policy and politics. Will it help, for example, earn support for pipelines or ports that require Quebec to be on board?
Article content
Or could it mean new models or ways of looking at these major projects, such as the use of pension funds as a financial tool?
Article content
Either way, the Quebec element in the Carney government is, perhaps surprisingly, a marked change from the previous regime. Former prime minister Justin Trudeau, despite being a bilingual Quebecer, was often criticized because people from his home province held a limited number of the top jobs in his government.
Article content
Article content
And so far, no matter the ingredients in the recipe or the motivations behind the government plan, it's clearly working. Carney is widely seen as the most popular politician in Quebec, despite his limited connections to the province. A recent Léger Poll placed him and Joly as the two most popular politicians in Quebec.
Article content
One of his first moves was to hire the Ontario-born Sabia, one of the best-known and most-respected business leaders in Quebec, to lead the government's swelling public service.
Article content
When Sabia was appointed head of the CDPQ in 2008, former business journalist Pierre Duhamel, who now advises business people at HEC Montréal, didn't like the hire. Like many other Quebecers at the time, Duhamel was unconvinced by the idea of appointing a 'Canadian' executive with a telecom background to lead Quebec's financial rock.
Article content
A few years later, Duhamel described Sabia's tenure at such a complex institution as 'remarkable.' After a difficult period in the 2000s, Sabia diversified investments, globalized the Caisse, and launched CDPQ Infra, an infrastructure arm that oversees major infrastructure projects such as Montreal's light rail network, and enabled the pension fund to achieve strong performance.
Article content
'But what I admire most are Mr. Sabia's management skills and political acumen,' he wrote in L'Actualité.
Article content
The Caisse is a public pension fund that has been enshrined in Quebec's economy, culture and politics since 1965. Today, it has 11 offices around the world and $473 billion in assets.
Article content
The Caisse is also the most recent employer of Carney's new chief of staff, Blanchard, who was a vice-president and head of CDPQ Global.
Article content
Duhamel said during an interview that he suspected that the two men had not been recruited because of their connections to Quebec, but rather to help facilitate new infrastructure projects that Carney would like to help finance through pension funds or private investors.
Article content
'I saw that he was looking for people who knew this world, who were able to assess its potential, but also its constraints,' he said.
Article content
Sabia has said recently at a public event, however, that the major pension funds — Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and the CDPQ — are likely not the best candidates to help finance most infrastructure projects because they can be too risky for pension funds and are unlikely to deliver strong returns in the early years.
Article content
Article content
Instead, early-stage capital mechanisms that aren't as risk averse need to be developed to get these projects started. Pension funds are more likely to get involved once a project is off the ground and producing returns.
Article content
Since pension funds are responsible for investing in ways that generate returns for their beneficiaries, which often means investing outside Canada, Trevor Tombe, a economics professor at the University of Calgary, believes they 'should not be seen as a vehicle for economic development.'
Article content
Quebec has a dual mandate within its public pension plan, he added, but the Canada Pension Plan is different.
Article content
'Whether or not the prime minister wants the CPP to invest more in Canada, he can't do it unilaterally,' he added. 'But I think he should ask himself what the underlying reasons are for why capital is sometimes deployed elsewhere.'
Article content
Article content
It all depends on the economic context in the country. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre recently told The Hub that he couldn't care less about the origins of Carney's aides, but said he fears the ideology of what he sees as a state-run economy.
Article content
'It's a central planning model that has failed every time it's been implemented around the world. It significantly enriches a small group of very influential insiders.'
Article content
Another possible policy implication from the strong Quebec voices is that the proposed high-speed rail project from Windsor to Quebec City could get stronger support. It could also mean greater advocacy for the province's energy sector, government procurement that could bolster Montreal-area aerospace companies, and prioritizing the health of the aluminum industry in trade talks with the U.S.
Article content
For Sandra Aubé, Joly's former chief of staff at Foreign Affairs and a former Trudeau advisor, if Carney really wants to make Canada the G7's strongest economy, he has no choice but to create a more unified economy that includes Quebec.
Article content
'We must not delude ourselves that Canada's biggest challenge in achieving all this is having energy. If we don't have the necessary electricity, for example, we won't be able to carry out any transformation whatsoever,' said Aubé, now a vice-president at TACT Conseil.
Article content
Another possible effect is that the high-ranking Quebecers may also be asked to play a unique role in advancing the government's agenda if the government needs to 'sell' the notion of some of the government's proposed big infrastructure projects in that province, according to Lori Turnbull, a political science professor at Dalhousie University in Halifax.
Article content
Beyond the policy, there are also no doubt political implications of the strong Quebec voice in the Carney government, a wide range of sources say.
Article content
Article content
Firstly, many in Quebec expect that these senior figures, in conjunction with a Quebec caucus of 44 Liberal MPs — more than one quarter of the total Liberal contingent in the House of Commons — will be able to take good care of their home province over the next few years.
Article content
Quebec Premier Francois Legault stated the case clearly. 'Mark Carney owes one to Quebecers,' he said after the Liberals claimed their best result in a federal election there since 1980.
Article content
But the flip side, that Carney expects these Quebecers to also help execute the government's agenda in their home province, is likely also true.
Article content
Beyond who will be best able to deliver for whom, there's also the intangible sense of understanding a part of a country or region. In an interview, Legault's intergovernmental affairs minister Simon Jolin-Barrette said in Carney's government 'there really is a positive change in attitude' and an 'openness toward Quebec' that wasn't always the case with the Trudeau government.
Article content
Article content
Both in Quebec City and Ottawa, there is, at least for now, a feeling that having people from Quebec around the prime minister who know the province, its particularities and positions on language, culture, state secularism and immigration will facilitate a relationship that has often been rocky.
Article content
The province wants Ottawa to understand its sense of autonomy, but also the need for investments in the province that 'Quebec has its share,' said Jolin-Barrette. 'We sense a greater openness. There is an openness in Ottawa. There is a better understanding of Quebec's issues now, with Mr. Carney.'
Article content
Turnbull said Carney is clearly trying to show that Quebec is not at a disadvantage because he's from elsewhere.
Article content
'There's some politics behind those parts of it,' she said.
Article content
The Joly and Champagne appointments may have in part been rewards for supporting Carney during the Liberal leadership race, Turnbull said, when either could have been legitimate candidates themselves.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
16 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
Drimonis: CAQ's zero-sum politics add up to a loss for Quebec
Quebec Politics This week's news that McGill University is eyeing a 'rebrand' — which followed recent headlines about the Legault government's $30-million fine against LaSalle College for exceeding quotas on English-language students — left me feeling exhausted. Over the last few years, I've grown increasingly tired of watching Quebec's English-language institutions spend so much energy, time and money fending off attacks by the Coalition Avenir Québec instead of focusing on what they do best: educating students. Why would a nationally and internationally renowned university like McGill feel the need to rebrand if not for a government seemingly determined to undermine it by imposing measures that create chaos, confusion and financial uncertainty? And why is LaSalle College — a successful bilingual school (founded by a francophone) — now having to fight for its survival over student quotas supposedly aimed at strengthening the French language, but for which no evidence exists that they achieve any such thing? It's been demoralizing to watch English-language institutions that have benefited, shaped and promoted Montreal and Quebec around the world be treated in a consistently aggressive and underhanded way by this government. And for what? Political points? Time and again, the CAQ has chosen division over real investments in the French language, perhaps hoping to distract from its own disastrous record. In attacking these vital establishments the government seems to be trying to convince Quebecers that any loss for English-language institutions is a gain for French. Does anyone actually believe that? When I hear the antiquated rhetoric of those who refer to McGill as a bastion of anglo supremacy, disconnected from Quebec's francophone majority, I can't help but think these critics are the ones disconnected from today's Quebec. Are they aware of the number of francophones who are employed by, teach or study at English-language institutions? Or the extent to which these institutions help fill labour shortages elsewhere in the workforce? It's absurd to treat them as something separate and apart from the rest of Quebec. They are Quebec. Post-Bill-101 Quebec is no longer a place where francophones, anglophones and allophones walk separately. Most of us want to move forward, side by side, speaking each others' languages. Quebec society benefits daily from the skills, research and innovations of its institutions of higher learning — English and French — from artificial intelligence to public health and beyond. It's tiring to see this government repeatedly use language as a weapon and treat politics as a zero-sum game between two opponents. Are we not all on the same team? It's been said before: a Quebec institution is a Quebec institution. Their success is the bedrock of our collective success. We all lose when one of us takes a hit. English-language institutions are assets that contribute to Quebec's educated workforce and economic development. They deserve as much respect and protection as their French-language counterparts. We shouldn't have to argue this. Yet this government would have us believe that when one of us is cut down, the other becomes taller. In truth, zero-sum politics are increasingly being recognized as outdated and harmful, hindering co-operation, stifling economic growth and innovation, and contributing to political divides. Positive-sum policies, on the other hand, create better outcomes for everyone. That's what we need — governments that amplify our strengths, not chip away at them. In a place that understandably will always worry about the protection of what makes it unique and different, it's lazy and cynical to use language as a political weapon — especially when English-speakers who are bilingual or multilingual are a fundamental part of Quebec's success, too. The Legault government seems stubbornly stuck in the Quebec of yesteryear, fighting enemies that no longer exist. Language is a tool for communication and success, not for exclusion and suppression. We either succeed together, or we fail while pointing fingers at one another. I know which I prefer.


Ottawa Citizen
16 minutes ago
- Ottawa Citizen
MacDougall: Carney's cuts won't be able to hide behind Trump forever
Article content In another time, Prime Minister Mark Carney's talk of steep government spending cuts would be the talk of the town. But these aren't other times. Article content We now live in the age of Trump, and the U.S. President's ongoing trade war with the world is a story that is able to erase much of most other country's domestic news agenda. And so it is with Canada and its need to reduce spending after years of Trudeau-era bloat. Article content Article content Article content Make no mistake; Carney's cuts are major news. Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne has told his colleagues around the cabinet table that the Liberal government must cut operational spending by 7.5 per cent for the 2026-27 fiscal year, 10 per cent the following year and 15 per cent in 2028-29. Carney has already ruled out cuts to provincial transfers and pensions and other old age supports. Article content The Liberal government has also ruled out cuts to programs like child care, pharmacare and dental care, while also committing to increased spending on defence. There is either a magic money tree in Carney's garden or pain on the way for Ottawa's army of public servants, as their salaries and benefits are a key part of 'operational spending.' Article content I'm old enough to remember the furore around the Harper government's proposed cuts to return to a balanced budget in the wake of the 2008-09 financial crisis. Indeed, I was the man who had to answer the many, many media questions about said cuts. And so it's astonishing to see how little coverage is being generated by what will be, in absolute terms, much bigger cuts. Article content Article content Of course, it helps that Trudeau grew the size of the federal public service so much that achieving a similar quantum to the Harper era would be child's play. Senior Liberals say they will achieve much of the reduction by eliminating vacant positions and 'reallocating' staff rather than giving public servants the boot. Unions like PSAC are skeptical about those promises, as well they should be. Article content Article content Enter that other great media attention hog: artificial intelligence. Everyone is now talking about AI, holding it up to be either a demon or a saviour. Carney and Evan Solomon, his new AI minister, are promising the latter, at least with respect to achieving efficiencies in program delivery without compromising service levels. But you should never trust anyone who says tough goals can be achieved without pain. Article content What's more, the kinds of improvements Canadians are looking for in their lives will not be achieved without a federal public service that's fit and firing on all cylinders. Taking a scythe through the fields of bureaucrats at the same time as they are being called on to deliver will be difficult on morale. And so it is incumbent on Carney and his ministers to be as specific as they can on what is required, and what is surplus to requirements. It is not enough to hide behind the promise of technology and operational efficiencies.


Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Rep. Ralph Norman, among House's most conservative, set to enter South Carolina governor's race
Carney condemns Israel for failing to prevent humanitarian crisis in Gaza Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, speaks to reporters following his White House meeting as Republicans work to push President Donald Trump's signature bill of tax breaks and spending cuts across the finish line even as conservative and moderate GOP holdouts slow that effort, at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, July 2, 2025. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) flag wire: true flag sponsored: false article_type: : sWebsitePrimaryPublication : publications/toronto_star bHasMigratedAvatar : false :