logo
Three little letters that could help transform the Irish economy: PhD

Three little letters that could help transform the Irish economy: PhD

Irish Times28-04-2025
There's a common misconception that all doctors wear white coats, carry stethoscopes, and have terrible handwriting. I'll admit to at least two of the three. But as someone who trained and practised as a medical doctor, I want to talk about a different kind of doctor: the PhD.
A quiet but important transformation is already under way. Census 2022 showed more than 38,000 people in the Republic held a doctoral degree, up 74 per cent since 2011.
In 2022, PhD enrolments increased by 5 per cent compared to the previous academic year, and 26 per cent since 2016. These numbers tell a story of progress, but they also hint at an untapped opportunity.
We need to build a culture in this State that sees the pursuit of a PhD not as a curiosity or a niche calling, but as a viable path for individuals and our national economy.
READ MORE
Too often, PhD students are imagined as solitary figures in lab coats, fiddling with beakers or analysing arcane data, locked away for years at university, while their peers begin to climb the corporate ladder.
The reality is far more exciting. Today's PhD graduates are fuelling the stburgeoning innovation ecosystem. They are solving real-world problems in industry, public policy, climate, and health. Unlocking a vast array of opportunities in emerging fields such as artificial intelligence. They are exactly the kind of minds we need to compete globally.
In a time of geopolitical uncertainty and economic upheaval, with US tariffs looming and their retreat from international scientific leadership, the State stands at a crossroads. As America turns inward, we have an opportunity to turn outward, to become a global hub for ideas. And ideas, as the economist Daniel Susskind puts it in his recent book, Growth: A Reckoning
,
are what power modern economies.
They can be reused and built upon without running out. It's these endlessly reusable ideas that have driven human progress and economic growth, and they come not from thin air, but from research, education, and, yes, from PhDs.
PhDs are the machines that generate ideas.
Patrick Guilbaud on bringing fine dining to Ireland, retirement plans, and not getting that third Michelin star
Listen |
47:51
But these ideas don't live in academic journals or university libraries alone. PhD researchers increasingly bring their skills into the heart of industry, working in R&D departments of leading companies, driving innovation, product development, and long-term strategic thinking. More than half of full-time researchers in the EU now work in the business sector.
Companies understand the value of this work. Take Apple, which spends more on research and development (R&D) in a year than the entire United Kingdom government. That's a recognition that investing in knowledge, creativity, and experimentation pays dividends in future products, competitiveness, and growth.
The International Monetary Fund 2024 Fiscal Monitor states that increasing R&D support by 0.5 percentage points of gross domestic product (GDP) annually, or about 50 per cent more than the current level in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development economies, could raise GDP by up to 2 per cent, and reduce a country's debt-to-GDP ratio for an average advanced economy over the following eight years.
That is a powerful return on investment, and one that starts with people. When we support PhDs, we're laying the groundwork for a more innovative, resilient Irish economy.
However, we are entering a more fragmented global economy, with rising protectionism, trade tensions, and tariffs. History shows that these kinds of measures often lead to a decline in international competition. When competition drops, so too does the incentive to innovate.
That's the danger for the Republic. A fall in global competition could trigger a slowdown in R&D investment here. This could create a ripple effect, dragging down productivity, increasing costs for Irish firms, and weakening the innovation spillovers we benefit from by being plugged into a competitive, globalised economy.
The State must go in the opposite direction. We need to double down on investment in knowledge, research, and people.
This Government understands what's at stake, it's right there in the programme for government. But in a time of growing economic uncertainty, we need to seize the initiative. Now is the moment to accelerate the delivery of these commitments.
We must ramp up science, technology, engineering, and mathematics participation across further and higher education, provide greater support for PhD and early-career researchers, and build stronger links between academia and industry.
That means formalising postdoctoral pathways, expanding graduate research funding, and sustaining growth through real collaboration.
We should also deepen EU research and innovation partnerships, especially for SMEs, because innovation shouldn't just happen in labs; it should power our entire economy.
This is how we transform our economy.
And while the benefits to the economy are compelling, we shouldn't overlook the personal upside.
PhD graduates enjoy a significant earnings premium, higher employment rates, and a diversity of career options. A recent Higher Education Authority analysis shows that doctoral graduates in the Republic enter the labour market successfully and maintain higher earnings for at least a decade post-graduation. Their skills are in demand both at home and abroad.
Roughly a third of Irish PhD graduates are working overseas seven years after graduation. While that might sound like brain drain, it's actually soft power. These graduates carry Irish research, values, and influence into global institutions.
And when they return, as many do, they enrich our research ecosystem with international experience, ideas, and networks.
It's time we recognised the true value of a doctorate. Not just as a title, but as a tool for building 's future.
Martin Daly is a Fianna Fáil TD for the Roscommon–Galway constituency
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trading principles for predictability — what the EU gave up to avoid a tariff war
Trading principles for predictability — what the EU gave up to avoid a tariff war

Irish Examiner

time4 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Trading principles for predictability — what the EU gave up to avoid a tariff war

In the hours following the announcement that the US and EU had struck a deal last weekend on tariffs, European reaction was mixed. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the deal, which imposes 15% tariffs on most items going both ways, "creates certainty in uncertain times" and "delivers stability and predictability, for citizens and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic" as she tried to sell the deal to the 27 EU member states. But if Ms von der Leyen expected a lap of honour to ease her troubled start to her second term, one was not coming. "It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission," French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou wrote on X of what he called the "von der Leyen-Trump deal". German Chancellor Friedrich Merz himself initially appeared satisfied, saying that the agreement "succeeded in averting a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard". But by Monday, amid cross-party criticism, Mr Merz said the deal would "substantially damage" his nation's finances, but acknowledged that the negotiating team "couldn't expect to achieve any more" as Mr Trump's willingness to enter into a 30% trade war was apparent. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, an ally of Mr Trump, said the US president "ate von der Leyen for breakfast" while Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said he would support it "without any enthusiasm". Across the bloc, there has been criticism of Europe's perceived capitulation, with many echoing Mr Bayrou's sentiments that it poses fundamental questions about the cohesiveness of the project. German Green MP Sandra Detzer told her parliament that the EU "has agreed to a deal that abandons fundamental principles of rules-based global trade, instead of long-term stability". Ms Detzer's alarm is representative of a particular sharp end of the deal. According to one think tank, the deal will cost the German economy around €6.5bn in terms of its GDP in the first year, while experts have slashed the country's growth forecasts in recent months. Fabio de Masi, a German MEP, told EuroNews this week that not only was the deal bad, it was "a betrayal" for which Ms von der Leyen should resign. The bloc is set to face 15% tariffs on most of its goods including cars, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals entering the US, and 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth €643bn over three years. But as the tariffs were set to kick in on Friday, the two sides had not agreed on all of the details, which Ms von der Leyen's commission has stressed will be a "set of principles" and not a trade deal. On Thursday, commission spokesperson Olof Gill said that "from there will flow the additional negotiated exemptions that we're looking to bake into our agreement with the US". Drinks tariffs What shape those carveouts take is still to be decided, with a 15% tariff applying until they are. That is of particular concern to the drinks industry across the continent. From Irish whiskey to French and Spanish wines, exporters across Europe have been arguing for a carveout on their products. The US tariff on European spirits is currently 10%. Brussels is keen to reduce that to zero or, for wine at least, to the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) rates that are set on a fixed cost per litre basis, rather than in percentage terms. Until recently, spirits had benefited from zero tariffs between the US and EU following an agreement in 1997 that also included other countries such as Canada and Japan. That lasted until 2018, when the EU response to US steel and aluminium tariffs included increased duties on US bourbon and other spirits. These were suspended in 2021. From Irish whiskey to French and Spanish wines, exporters across Europe have been arguing for a carveout on their products. File photo US most-favoured-nation rates for wine are 19.8c per litre for sparkling and 6.3c per litre for most other wine, which equates to very low rates in most cases. But as Mr Trump signed an executive order overnight into Friday, there was no movement on the exemption and the drinks industry will, for now at least, pay the 15% rate. With EU officials privately briefing Reuters that negotiations could run into late autumn, that will mean financial pain for those businesses in the short-term, at least. Speaking to journalists at a press conference on Thursday, commission spokesperson Olof Gill said: 'The commission remains determined to achieve and secure the maximum number of carve-outs, including for traditional EU products such as wine and spirits. 'It is not our expectation that wine and spirits would be included as an exemption in the first group announced by the US tomorrow, and therefore that sector, as with all other economic sectors, will be captured by the 15% ceiling.' Motor tariffs In Germany, a number of car manufacturers revised down profit guidance on the back of the tariffs, which will face a 15% tariff as well, but for BMW, the impact of the agreement was "exaggerated". 'I think this tariff discussion is way exaggerated and also its effects on the industry,' chief executive Oliver Zipse told the Financial Times. 'What's more important is the question, are the products attractive?' Carveouts At Tuesday's Cabinet meeting, enterprise minister Peter Burke updated ministers on the detail of the weekend's agreement, telling journalists that there will be exemptions to the tariff regime, with aviation one for which Ireland had successfully argued alongside others. 'The key thing is that there will be a number of carveouts. Obviously, aviation has been cited as zero-for-zero, but also in relation to agri-foods and potentially spirits.' Ireland, like many other countries, is banking on the carveouts agreed protecting key sectors like agri-foods and that the rate for pharmaceuticals would not exceed 15%. Like many countries across Europe, ministers here are privately saying that the deal is far from ideal, but also query what else is to be done. By Friday, they could point to Mr Trump's executive order, which imposed tariffs on many countries with whom he had not negotiated. But there is also acceptance that the tariff regime brings with it a new reality, one with which the EU needs to grapple. If countries are arguing for exceptions, how does the European negotiating team balance those interests? And what will the reaction be when the final deal is reached?

Ireland fined €1.54m by ECJ for delay in writing Work-Life Balance directive into Irish law
Ireland fined €1.54m by ECJ for delay in writing Work-Life Balance directive into Irish law

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Ireland fined €1.54m by ECJ for delay in writing Work-Life Balance directive into Irish law

The European Union's highest court has fined Ireland €1.54 million for delays in fully transposing the EU's 2019 directive on Work-Life Balance for Parents and Carers. The directive was due to have been fully transposed by the middle of 2022 but the legislation required to complete the process was not enacted until last year. The fine imposed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) is the fourth imposed on Ireland since 2020 for failing to transpose a directive in the anticipated timeframe following similar issues with regard to recent directives on anti-money laundering measures, audio visual services and electronic communications. The total fines imposed during the period now comes to just over €13 million. READ MORE The Work-Life Balance directive was intended to extend a number of entitlements to carers and parents with regard to time off work to allow them meet caring or support obligations, mainly to family members. Laura Bambrick, head of social policy and employment at the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, said part of the problem in this instance was that the government sought to go beyond what was required of it in its legislation and this, combined with complications associated with the pandemic, helped to prolong the process. 'The directive had a number of elements to it,' she says. 'It introduced paternity leave, paid parents' leave, it gave all workers the right of five days unpaid care leave for serious medical reasons, if a close relative or friend fell ill. It also allowed parents and carers to request flexible working and it was those last two that were late being transposed. 'Ireland has tended to be bad at transposing,' she continued. 'Being late, blocking, diluting the transposition. In this case, though, the period for transposition largely coincided with Covid and Ireland was one of the dozen countries given warnings about late transposition. 'What was specific to Ireland was that our Work Life Balance Bill became a miscellaneous piece of legislation, a lot of other bits including improvements to breastfeeding breaks, the introduction of domestic violence leave and the right to request remote working for all workers were all added.' In a statement, the Department for Children, Disability and Equality said it takes its responsibilities seriously regarding transposition of EU directives but that 'there were particular circumstances which delayed transposition of this directive, leading ultimately to today's penalty' It said many of the provisions required by the directive had been introduced before this deadline. Among other factors, it pointed to the pandemic as having contributed to delays and said the decision to attempt to deal with the issue of remote working had added to the time required to pass the required legislation. 'Ireland has made progress on reducing delays in transposing EU directives and is currently ranked second best overall in the EU, alongside Finland, in terms of timely transposition of EU Single Market Directives,' it said.

Time of Sampling May Affect Eu Soil Health Monitoring Study
Time of Sampling May Affect Eu Soil Health Monitoring Study

Agriland

time3 hours ago

  • Agriland

Time of Sampling May Affect Eu Soil Health Monitoring Study

An organisation that is building a comprehensive map of European soils and their condition is warning that the EU's Soil Monitoring Law may be omitting a vital factor in assessing soil health in the bloc. The EU plans to record and map the various soil types and soil health throughout the bloc, as envisaged through its proposed Soil Monitoring Law. The law will make the monitoring of soil health mandatory, as part of efforts to have all soils in a healthy condition by 2050, in line with the EU Zero Pollution ambition. Article 31 of the draft law states: "It is therefore appropriate to lay down criteria for sampling points that are representative of the soil condition under different soil types, climatic conditions, and land use." The three variables mentioned will play a vital role in deciding where soils should be sampled in the vast area that the EU covers. However, evidence is now emerging that a fourth variable should also be included and that is the time of sampling, which could significantly affect the results and render the overall picture inaccurate if not included. The warning comes from an article published by AI 4 Soil Health, an organisation which is building a comprehensive map of European soils and their condition. Soil sampling is the only way to really get to know a soil. Image: Petrol Post Driver The author, Dr. Peter Lehmann of ETH University Zurich, makes reference to a study carried out in Switzerland which notes how water-absorbing capabilities of soils can very throughout the year, depending on weather patterns. Although the research was carried out in natural forest, the findings indicate that all soils - wherever their location and use - will be subject to similar influences. If these factors are not included in the final analysis for monitoring soil health, then the AI $ Soil Health map will likely fail to be within the 5% margin of error required by the EU. The research demonstrated that the health of the soil can change significantly during dry summer months. A water repellent layer can form at the surface as the organic chemistry of this zone changes in response to prolonged drought. Soil can appear less healthy when dry Those tending the land are well aware of this affect, as a summer shower will often not be absorbed by the soil, it takes a good soak for the soil to start absorbing the water. It is the top 2cm that are responsible for this, which can give healthy, well-structured soil a water-resistant cap that adversely affects essential soil functions further on down the soil profile. A further aspect of the soil function studied was the action of two extracellular soil enzymes that play an important role in the decomposition of organic carbon compounds and how they might be affected by soil conditions. The study showed that one enzyme was more affected by the soil moisture while the other responded more to soil temperature,. This reinforced the notion that weather patterns can distort our present assessments of soil health, and may have been doing so for some time. The depth and type of cultivation may alter the soil's response to drought and so effect its apparent health Dr. Lehmann concluded that the timing of measurements is crucial and depends on which specific soil functions are being assessed. He also notes that another key lesson is the importance of where measurements are taken. "The top surface layer plays a critical role in determining whether a soil can provide essential services like water storage and support for plant growth, or whether it should be considered unhealthy." he notes. Just on this last point, the sun wheel-type implements that are sold as mechanical weeders here in Ireland are marketed as crust-breaking tools on the continent and said to work well as such when used in dry periods. Sun wheel implements will keep the layer of soil open for rain to penetrate. It is perhaps the disturbance of this water-repellent top layer of soil that is the secret to their success in drier areas of the EU, making them generally superfluous here in damper conditions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store