logo
‘Going to happen anyway': Labor is blinded by green ideology

‘Going to happen anyway': Labor is blinded by green ideology

Sky News AU19-06-2025

Shadow Minister for Regional Development Anne Webster recounts Victorian Minister for Energy Lily D'Ambrosio's meeting in Wycheproof and Labor's obsession with green ideology.
'Lily D'Ambrosio, the Minister for Energy in Victoria travelled to Wycheproof … to meet with local community,' Ms Webster told Sky News host Chris Kenny.
'They tried to explain to her how damaging this whole renewable's rollout, the railroading of their communities, the dividing up of their communities, the impact it is having on mental health and on people's sense of wellbeing.
'At the end, she said, it's going to happen anyway.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Slap in the face': Allan government accused of defying voters with push to create Victorian Voice to Parliament
‘Slap in the face': Allan government accused of defying voters with push to create Victorian Voice to Parliament

Sky News AU

time44 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

‘Slap in the face': Allan government accused of defying voters with push to create Victorian Voice to Parliament

The Victorian government has been slammed for moving to create a state-based Indigenous Voice to Parliament, despite voters rejecting a federal Voice at the 2023 referendum. Plans revealed in the Herald Sun on Monday show the Allan government is planning to turn an Indigenous representative body set up as part of the state's Treaty process into a permanent Voice to Parliament. The 33-member First Peoples' Assembly of Victoria was set up by Labor in 2018 to represent the state's Indigenous population during treaty negotiations with the state government. However the Allan government is planning to beef up its powers and make the body permanent, creating what both advocates and opponents agree would be the equivalent of a state-based Voice to Parliament. The move has been condemned as a 'slap in the face' to voters, with more than 54 per cent of the Victorian public having voted 'No' at the 2023 Voice to Parliament referendum. 'Victorians have already voted No to a Voice to Parliament by a significant margin. The Allan government's proposal is a slap in the face to this democratic vote,' Institute of Public Affairs Research Fellow Margaret Chambers told The government has refused to say what powers it will give the body, but it is expected to be able to provide advice to government on all laws affecting Indigenous people. This is despite only 4,200 people having voted to elect 22 of the 33 members – each of whom earns $96,946. Ms Chambers said the proposal would 'enshrine two-tiered, racially-based political system in Victoria', with Indigenous Victorians being given a representative body separate to the Parliament of Victoria. 'The announcement today is straight from the Victorian government's playbook of seeking to divide the community to deliver political favours to allies at the expense of mainstream Victorians,' she said. Victorian Opposition Leader Brad Battin has also condemned the move, stating that the Liberal and National parties would 'back the Victorian people'. 'This has already been put to a vote throughout the state, and Victoria has said that they overwhelmingly don't want a Voice to Parliament,' Mr Battin said, adding voters were not just rejecting a federal Voice but a state-based Voice as well. 'Unlike Jacinta Allan, I am listening. While the Premier pushes ahead with her ideological agenda, families are battling a cost-of-living crisis, surging crime, and a health system at breaking point. Premier Jacinta Allan dismissed the suggestion Victorians had rejected a state-based Voice to Parliament. 'The key difference to the referendum that was put nationwide a couple of years ago is that was changing the constitution,' the Labor Premier said. 'This is not changing the Victorian constitution. It's simply taking a common-sense approach – sitting the First People's Assembly, an ongoing representative body, into our existing parliamentary structures.' 'But the significant change is it'll be a body where we will be listening and taking on their advice. 'It goes back to that very simple common-sense premise that when you listen to people who are directly impacted by policies and programs of the government you get better outcomes. 'That's the approach that I take, and the government I lead takes: We listen to people because we know to our core that that's how you get better outcomes for the people directly affected, but also a fair and better society is better for all of us and I don't know who would want to argue against that.' Mr Battin agreed that governments need to consult with those affected by laws, but this does not require the creation of a separate representative body. 'Every government should consult; like if you're going to build a high rise in a new suburb, then you should be consulting with local community to see the impact,' the Liberal leader said. 'If we go out there and we are going to be looking at a new Justice Program, we'd consult with the experts in the system. 'We'd also even go through some of the aspects of lived experience, and we speak to people who are former drug users to put drug programs in place. 'So you can consult without having a Voice to Parliament for all those groups as well.' Indigenous elder Aunty Jill Gallagher said Victoria's Indigenous population needed to have an 'independent voice' so they could 'start making and monitoring government policies and hold them to account." The Indigenous elder also rejected the claim that the Voice referendum had decided the issue, claiming it been politicised and voters were misled by 'misinformation'. 'If Victorians fully understood what we were asking for, I think they would have supported it,' she told the Herald Sun.

‘Fast enough?': Ex-spy chief's key question
‘Fast enough?': Ex-spy chief's key question

Perth Now

time2 hours ago

  • Perth Now

‘Fast enough?': Ex-spy chief's key question

The 'real issue' with Australia's defence spending is not if the Albanese government is splashing more cash but whether it is 'enough' and flowing 'fast enough', an ex-spy chief says. Duncan Lewis headed the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) from 2014 to 2019. Since departing the country's domestic spy service, he has become chair of the European Australian Business Council and the Australian arm of weapons maker Thales. Mr Lewis said on Monday there was no doubt Labor had increased the defence budget since coming to power. Ex-ASIO chief Duncan Lewis says the 'real issue' with Australia's defence spending is if Labor is spending 'enough' and 'fast enough'. Kym Smith Credit: News Corp Australia 'The government has increased defence expenditure and spending over the last couple of years, and the projections going forward continue that increase,' he told the ABC. 'The real issue is whether it is enough and whether it is fast enough.' Mr Lewis noted that the defence budget was sitting about 2 per cent of GDP or $59bn. Under Labor's spending commitments, that would increase to about 2.35 per cent of GDP by 2034 – the same year the Albanese government has warned a major conflict could break out. At roughly $100bn in the space of a decade, Mr Lewis said 2.35 per cent was 'a sizeable increase'. 'But the question is, is it enough to have the kind of defence force that we might require in the future?' he said. Anthony Albanese is facing domestic and international calls to boost the defence budget, with the US warning of a potentially 'imminent' threat from China in the Indo Pacific. But the Prime Minister has resisted, making Australia an outlier in the West – a position highlighted by NATO's decision last week to dramatically hike military spending to 5 per cent of GDP. The Trump administration has asked Australia to lift spending to 3.5 per cent. Both Labor and the opposition have pushed back on that target, with the Coalition proposing 3 per cent instead. The Albanese government is aiming to spend 2.35 per cent of GDP on defence by 2034. Jeremy Piper / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Asked point blank if 2.35 per cent of GDP was enough, Mr Lewis said he thought Australia would need to front up more. 'I'm of the view that if we are going to run a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, together with an effective defence force that's capable of doing the kind of things that we expect might be required in the future, there will have to be an increase in due course,' he said. 'But look, I'm cognisant of the fact that there are competing challenges for the public purse, and it's up to the government to get their balance right. 'But I think there is a sense of urgency in this matter, which is not universally being exhibited, and I think that needs to be something that we should pay more attention to.' Mr Lewis also said defence companies were not getting the 'certainty' needed to do business in Australia. 'There is a concern that we are unable to get into long-term, reliable partnerships with government,' he said. 'The defence industry in Australia requires long term, regular contractual arrangements if we are to develop sovereign defence capability, and that is a stated objective of the government. 'You can't have just episodic buys and expect defence companies to continue operating in Australia.'

‘He doesn't like Rudd': Kevin Rudd deemed ‘biggest issue' blocking Anthony Albanese meeting with President Donald Trump
‘He doesn't like Rudd': Kevin Rudd deemed ‘biggest issue' blocking Anthony Albanese meeting with President Donald Trump

Sky News AU

time3 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

‘He doesn't like Rudd': Kevin Rudd deemed ‘biggest issue' blocking Anthony Albanese meeting with President Donald Trump

Donald Trump's former pollster has urged Australia to dump Kevin Rudd as its US Ambassador, telling Sky News Australia he is a major barrier to Anthony Albanese securing a meeting with the US President. Renowned US pollster Brent Buchanan told Sky News Australia that Mr Rudd's role as Australia's representative was a key reason Mr Albanese had been unable to schedule a face-to-face meeting with the US President. 'I think he doesn't like the current ambassador, and that's one of the biggest issues,' Mr Buchanan told Sky News host Laura Jayes. 'Donald Trump needs to find an Australian that he likes - or Australia needs to find an Australian that Donald Trump likes and let that person take point - because so much with Donald Trump is personal relationships.' The pollster said an Ambassador was critical in opening doors to the Trump administration for "certain countries", flagging Australia was struggling to establish a direct line with the President due to Rudd's previous scathing commentary. 'But Donald Trump's a deal maker, and so if you bring a deal, he's going to talk through it,' he said. Mr Buchanan said that the one positive for Rudd was that he's a China expert, which was 'a great opportunity to build relationships with our Congress ... which is anti-China'. The former Australian Prime Minister has a long history of anti-Trump comments, having previously called him a 'village idiot', a 'traitor to the West" and the "most destructive president in history." When asked about Mr Rudd's comments during an interview with Nigel Farage last year, Trump said he didn't know much about the former Australian prime minister, but if he was "hostile" he wouldn't be in the role for long. 'I don't know much about him. I heard he was a little bit nasty. I hear he's not the brightest bulb. But I don't know much about him," Trump said. 'But if he's at all hostile, he will not be there long.' However Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who is a long-time ally and supporter of Mr Rudd, has refused to replace him as ambassador to the US.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store