Taliban bans political debate in free speech crackdown
Under the rules, which will deepen the fears of a full return to the regime's repressive past, Afghan media organisations must obtain prior approval from the newly formed Political Program Oversight Committee to publish or air political content.
'Analysis must be approved by the official oversight committee before airing or publication,' the new policy says.
The committee will monitor all political content, conduct legal reviews, issue regular reports, and enforce sanctions against non-compliant media outlets, according to the framework issued by the Taliban's Ministry of Information and Culture.
The rules – framed as Management of Political Programs in Afghanistan – apply to all types of political content published in print, broadcast, digital or social media.
'Recommendations or critiques directed at officials must be respectful, within legal frameworks, and free from defamation or distortion. Analysis must be evidence-based and not rely on unofficial sources,' reads the latest guidelines.
The Taliban warned analysts against presenting views that go against the Taliban's official policies and said they will hold hosts and producers responsible for any content that does not align with them.
Analysts must also hold identification cards issued by the Taliban's Directorate of Broadcast Affairs and are barred from expressing any views that contradict official Taliban policy.
Guest speakers, even from a pre-approved list, require individual approval before every show.
'All analysis must be in accordance with Sharia law, the principles of the Islamic Emirate, and applicable national laws. No content should be anti-Islamic Emirate,' the Taliban said, warning the media that their licences will be revoked if they violate the new regulations.
'Deeply concerned by the Taliban's latest attempt to weaponise the media for political control,' said Lotfullah Najafizada, an Afghan journalist. 'This detailed, five-chapter policy leaves virtually no room for free press.'
The Taliban said the policy aims to improve the quality of political analysis, uphold sharia principles, promote national unity and prevent harmful propaganda.
'It will serve as an effective system for managing political media content in Afghanistan,' it said.
On Aug 17 2021, following the Taliban's shock takeover of Kabul, the regime's spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid, who had been a shadowy figure for years, sought to portray the group as more moderate and progressive than when they imposed a brutal rule in the late 1990s.
He said the Taliban had evolved and that there would be a 'difference when it comes to the actions we are going to take' compared with 20 years ago, while saying the new regime would protect the rights of women and the media.
In reality, the Taliban has regressed.
Since taken power, it has enforced a strict version of Sharia, severely curbing free speech and women's rights.
Public flogging and stoning to death for adultery are common. Women face strict dress codes, bans on education beyond sixth grade, and exclusion from work. The regime has steadily dismantled independent media by shutting media houses, banning women journalists, and detaining media workers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Wife of illegal migrant who's a climate change rioter scolds lawmakers for deporting spouse to his native Pakistan
The wife of a Pakistani climate activist who was deported back to his homeland after his visa was revoked says she couldn't stay with him because his native country is, 'not a comfortable place for women'. Sophia Papp lasted just a month living in Pakistan with her husband Zain Haq and is begging authorities to allow him to return home. Haq had his student visa revoked in 2022, after it was found that he had stopped studying for his university degree in Canada. He had also been hit with mischief charges related to acts of 'civil disobedience' during climate protests at the time. He was granted a six-month extension to apply for a spousal sponsorship with his Canadian citizen wife, but he missed the deadline and his application for an extension was never received by officials, reports Vancouver Sun. Haq's deportation was not directly due to the mischief charges, but on a claim that he had violated his student visa by stopping his studies. He was subsequently deported in January of this year. Canadian immigration authorities did not immediately respond to a request for clarification over what happened in the years between Haq missing the deadline and his deportation. Papp said she initially joined her husband and his parents and sister in Pakistan, but struggled with the culture of the South Asian country. 'For security and safety reasons, I was not able to go by myself outside of the home. I was stuck inside most of the time,' she said. Papp said that she and her husband have been stuck in limbo since he was deported, claiming that they applied for their spousal sponsorship extension but it was never received by Canadian officials. 'I did not have due process to appeal,' Papp said. 'The explanation was that there was an active removal order in place, but the only reason there was an active removal order was that they lost the (extension). It was a Catch-22.' The couple's predicament has attracted scrutiny in Canada, with filmmaker Aaron Gunn taking to X this week to voice his opposition to allowing the climate activist back into the country. 'A very good way to not get yourself deported from Canada is not to come here under false pretenses and then proceed to very publicly break our laws and cost hard-working taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars,' he wrote. A very good way to not get yourself deported from Canada is not to come here under false pretenses and then proceed to very publicly break our laws and cost hard-working taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars. — Aaron Gunn (@AaronGunn) July 2, 2025 Papp said she struggled to adjust to the restrictions placed on women in Pakistan. Canada has an active travel warning for female travelers to the country which warns them of rampant gender-based oppression and harassment. In Pakistan, Haq has continued his climate activism, and writes for The Express Tribune about climate change issues including the destruction of habitat and farmland in the port of Keti Bandar, per the Vancouver Sun. 'Regions in Pakistan and India are already experiencing some of the worst effects of this climate crisis — drought, or floods that have displaced millions of people,' Papp said. Papp said she is now waiting for her husband to be allowed back into Canada, but the process for applying for spousal sponsorship from outside the country can take years. 'My home is in Canada,' she said. 'He should be here with me.'
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
I'm no fan of Elon Musk. But Trump's threat to deport him is sickening
Elon Musk is an utterly deplorable human being. He has unashamedly flashed an apparent Nazi salute; encouraged rightwing extremists in Germany and elsewhere; falsely claimed there is a 'genocide' in South Africa against white farmers; callously celebrated the dismantling of USAID, whose shuttering will lead to the deaths of millions, according to a study published in the Lancet this week; and increased misinformation and empowered extremists on his Twitter/X platform while advancing his sham 'I am a free speech absolutist' claims. And so much more. So the news that Donald Trump 'will take a look' at deporting his billionaire former 'first buddy' Musk has many smirking and shrugging: 'Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.' I like a good comeuppance, but this doesn't please me at all. It sends a chill down the spine. It is the use of law enforcement agencies as a tool to chill debate, to silence disagreement and dissent, and to punish political opposition. Democracy is dimming fast in the United States, but threats to deport US citizens for disagreeing with the governing administration's policies are the domain of authoritarian regimes such as Belarus or Cameroon. Coming just hours after his officials raised the possibility of stripping Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic mayoral candidate for New York who was naturalised in 2018, of his US citizenship, Trump's threat should have all of America – a country of immigrants – appalled, afraid and up in arms. As the Guardian reported on Tuesday, the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, appeared to pave the way for an investigation into Mamdani's status after Andy Ogles, a rightwing Republican congressman for Tennessee, called for his citizenship to be revoked on the grounds that he might have concealed his support for 'terrorism' during the naturalization process. Trump has branded Mamdani 'a pure communist' and said 'we don't need a communist in this country'. Mamdani has not broken any laws. His sin? Running for office. In his threats against Mamdani and Musk, the president comes across like the notorious Republican senator Joseph McCarthy in the 1950s. McCarthy was, according to the Harvard law dean Ervin Griswold, 'judge, jury, prosecutor, castigator, and press agent, all in one'. Trump's threats to Musk and Mamdani are a departure from the administration's modus operandi of targeting foreign students involved in pro-Palestinian organizing on US college campuses. It is now targeting people it disagrees with on any issue. The threats are not based on any generally applicable laws but on the whim of the president or other administration leaders. It is an escalation of the assault on civil liberties using government entities to arbitrarily investigate and potentially punish critics. Over the past four weeks Musk's sin has been to vehemently oppose Trump's sweeping spending bill, calling it a 'disgusting abomination'. Musk is of course not concerned about the bill's slashing of health insurance, food stamps and other aid for the poor, but that it does not slash enough and that its cuts to green energy tax credits may cost his company, Tesla, about $1.2bn. But Musk is a US citizen with the right to oppose a piece of legislation without threats from the highest office in the land and the fear of deportation. When Musk poured $288m of his money into Trump and other Republicans' 2024 candidacies, no one raised a hand to question his credentials as an American. Instead, the administration gave him the run of the White House including midnight ice cream binges and a job as a glorified bean counter at DOGE. The hypocrisy and the corruption embedded within Trump's deportation threats is mind-boggling but unsurprising given his track record. The consequence, like the McCarthyism of the 1950s, is a climate of fear and a chilling of political discourse and action. Proud Americans who arrived here recently, such as Mamdani, are fearful of running for office, of speaking their minds in true American tradition, despite having the same responsibilities and privileges as every other American conferred on them. Trump's threat does to Musk what it does to every immigrant: it shuts them up, it holds over their head the possibility of made-up charges and deportation to El Salvador or some other country. Musk and his like were chortling when the Columbia University activist Mahmoud Khalil was cruelly detained for months. It is in the nature of those who like to tweet about freedom but do not think about it deeply enough, such as Musk, to not realize that their silence when the rights of a Khalil or a Mamdani are trampled upon will come back to haunt them. The Republican rump is silent today as Musk is threatened with deportation, just as it has been when masked men have come for Khalil and others who dared exercise their first amendment rights. There will be silence when they come for the Republicans. That's because we will all be gone by then, after no one else said a thing. Justice Malala is a political commentator and author of The Plot To Save South Africa: The Week Mandela Averted Civil War and Forged a New Nation
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
I'm no fan of Elon Musk. But Trump's threat to deport him is sickening
Elon Musk is an utterly deplorable human being. He has unashamedly flashed an apparent Nazi salute; encouraged rightwing extremists in Germany and elsewhere; falsely claimed there is a 'genocide' in South Africa against white farmers; callously celebrated the dismantling of USAID, whose shuttering will lead to the deaths of millions, according to a study published in the Lancet this week; and increased misinformation and empowered extremists on his Twitter/X platform while advancing his sham 'I am a free speech absolutist' claims. And so much more. So the news that Donald Trump 'will take a look' at deporting his billionaire former 'first buddy' Musk has many smirking and shrugging: 'Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.' I like a good comeuppance, but this doesn't please me at all. It sends a chill down the spine. It is the use of law enforcement agencies as a tool to chill debate, to silence disagreement and dissent, and to punish political opposition. Democracy is dimming fast in the United States, but threats to deport US citizens for disagreeing with the governing administration's policies are the domain of authoritarian regimes such as Belarus or Cameroon. Coming just hours after his officials raised the possibility of stripping Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic mayoral candidate for New York who was naturalised in 2018, of his US citizenship, Trump's threat should have all of America – a country of immigrants – appalled, afraid and up in arms. As the Guardian reported on Tuesday, the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, appeared to pave the way for an investigation into Mamdani's status after Andy Ogles, a rightwing Republican congressman for Tennessee, called for his citizenship to be revoked on the grounds that he might have concealed his support for 'terrorism' during the naturalization process. Trump has branded Mamdani 'a pure communist' and said 'we don't need a communist in this country'. Mamdani has not broken any laws. His sin? Running for office. In his threats against Mamdani and Musk, the president comes across like the notorious Republican senator Joseph McCarthy in the 1950s. McCarthy was, according to the Harvard law dean Ervin Griswold, 'judge, jury, prosecutor, castigator, and press agent, all in one'. Trump's threats to Musk and Mamdani are a departure from the administration's modus operandi of targeting foreign students involved in pro-Palestinian organizing on US college campuses. It is now targeting people it disagrees with on any issue. The threats are not based on any generally applicable laws but on the whim of the president or other administration leaders. It is an escalation of the assault on civil liberties using government entities to arbitrarily investigate and potentially punish critics. Over the past four weeks Musk's sin has been to vehemently oppose Trump's sweeping spending bill, calling it a 'disgusting abomination'. Musk is of course not concerned about the bill's slashing of health insurance, food stamps and other aid for the poor, but that it does not slash enough and that its cuts to green energy tax credits may cost his company, Tesla, about $1.2bn. But Musk is a US citizen with the right to oppose a piece of legislation without threats from the highest office in the land and the fear of deportation. When Musk poured $288m of his money into Trump and other Republicans' 2024 candidacies, no one raised a hand to question his credentials as an American. Instead, the administration gave him the run of the White House including midnight ice cream binges and a job as a glorified bean counter at DOGE. The hypocrisy and the corruption embedded within Trump's deportation threats is mind-boggling but unsurprising given his track record. The consequence, like the McCarthyism of the 1950s, is a climate of fear and a chilling of political discourse and action. Proud Americans who arrived here recently, such as Mamdani, are fearful of running for office, of speaking their minds in true American tradition, despite having the same responsibilities and privileges as every other American conferred on them. Trump's threat does to Musk what it does to every immigrant: it shuts them up, it holds over their head the possibility of made-up charges and deportation to El Salvador or some other country. Musk and his like were chortling when the Columbia University activist Mahmoud Khalil was cruelly detained for months. It is in the nature of those who like to tweet about freedom but do not think about it deeply enough, such as Musk, to not realize that their silence when the rights of a Khalil or a Mamdani are trampled upon will come back to haunt them. The Republican rump is silent today as Musk is threatened with deportation, just as it has been when masked men have come for Khalil and others who dared exercise their first amendment rights. There will be silence when they come for the Republicans. That's because we will all be gone by then, after no one else said a thing. Justice Malala is a political commentator and author of The Plot To Save South Africa: The Week Mandela Averted Civil War and Forged a New Nation
