Might cuts reduce RTÉ to a newsdesk with a few commissioning editors attached?
RTÉ
Radio 1 on Wednesday over a controversy at a State-funded body under his charge, for once it wasn't about RTÉ itself. This time it was
An Post
and the
alleged leak of confidential material
that the Minister,
Patrick O'Donovan
, had presented to Cabinet.
Inevitably, however, talk soon turned to the national broadcaster and the programme of reforms that management had signed up to in the aftermath of the 2023 scandal over payments to top talent. RTÉ is on a 'journey of transformation', the Fine Gael TD said. Asked about the pace of change at the broadcaster, O'Donovan said many of his 'responsibilities' to put the reforms into motion are contained in the Broadcasting (Amendment) Bill, currently before the Dáil.
Over a flurry of meetings in recent weeks, the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Media has been scrutinising the general scheme of the Bill. What is clear now on the eve of the summer Dáil recess is that the finalised legislation will have to feed a lot of mouths, and not everyone is going to be satiated.
Members of the committee have heard evidence from an array of executives, from RTÉ, TG4 and Virgin Media Television to domestic streaming platforms such as LOITV and GAA+, each with their particular asks and additions. Represented by
Screen Producers Ireland (SPI)
, independent or commercial television production companies – which stand to gain a lot from the legislation – have also made contributions.
READ MORE
RTÉ and its funding are central to the Bill, but its reach extends far beyond Dublin 4. One of the most important and potentially transformative planks of the legislation is its transposition into law of the
Future of Media Commission
's (FOMC's) recommendation that RTÉ should be legally required to spend 25 per cent of its public funding on programming commissioned from private production companies.
[
Dozens of reforms recommended to RTÉ in wake of pay controversy have been delayed
Opens in new window
]
Naturally, the sector has been full-throated in its support for this 'most welcome' measure, as SPI chief Susan Kirby told the committee last month. RTÉ itself flagged the recommendation in its transformation strategy, dubbed A New Direction, published last summer. It said it wanted to be spending 27 per cent of its public funding, about €70 million, on commissioned programming by 2027, compared to something like €40 million this year.
At best, this now appears to have been overly ambitious. In his opening submission to the committee, RTÉ director of video Steve Carson reiterated the organisation's commitment to the 25 per cent. However, he said that reaching that target is ultimately 'contingent' on completion of the broadcaster's transformation plan.
David McWilliams on how 'big incentives' to build could save Dublin city
Listen |
36:51
In particular, Carson said the 'ambitious voluntary exit' scheme currently under way at Montrose – through which RTÉ wants to shed 400 jobs – is 'central' to the turnaround programme. Against that backdrop, the final legislation should give RTÉ 'sufficient latitude' for a 'transition period' of five years, he said, something the FOMC recommended in its 2022 report. In other words, the broadcaster now says it will be 2030 before it can reach the 25 per cent target.
What changed between the publication of A New Direction in the summer of 2024 and June 2025, when Carson appeared before the committee? In a statement this week, a spokesman for RTÉ said the proposed change in the timeline is due to the 'significant delay in the approval of RTÉ's voluntary exit programme'. Ministerial delays, described last year as frustrating by RTÉ director general
Kevin Bakhurst
, meant the scheme only received approval in March and then opened in April.
[
Numbers prosecuted for not having TV licence down despite wave of evasion set off by RTÉ scandal
Opens in new window
]
Additionally, the spokesman said the level of 'agreed public funding' for the broadcaster is 'lower than funding sought by RTÉ to deliver its five-year strategy', which 'has an impact on the number of exits that RTÉ can afford to deliver each year'. RTÉ remains 'fully committed' to increasing spending on commissioned programming, he said, but the timing is contingent on the transformation strategy.
Still, television production companies are deeply concerned about this surprising development.
Asked for comment this week, Kirby of the SPI said the sector is 'very grateful' that the Minister put this FOMC recommendation into the legislation, but is aware that 'due to fixed costs and other challenges', RTÉ is seeking flexibility in the 'time frame' for adoption. She said: 'This is enormously challenging for the independent production sector to accept, given that RTÉ not reaching this 25 per cent would mean significantly reduced investment for a growing sector.'
According to SPI's estimates, 'reduced investment' in the sector could amount to between €50 million and €60 million over five years, Kirby said, if implementation is pushed out to 2030. 'For RTÉ to be successful in achieving its own strategy, 25 per cent should be maintained as the legislative requirement for it to invest in the independent production sector,' she warned.
While RTÉ management backs the move, there is a great deal of trepidation among journalists, technicians and creative workers at the broadcaster that it could be an attempt at backdoor privatisation. The committee's scrutiny of the Broadcasting Bill was book-ended by appearances from Bakhurst and other senior managers in May, and trade unions representing workers at the broadcaster last week. In a late-evening session, the organisation's trade union group (TUG) told TDs and Senators that morale is 'awful' and 'horrific' amid what they have characterised as swingeing cuts across several areas, from religious affairs programming to current affairs, that have resulted in the cancellation of Upfront with Katie Hannon and the farming out of The Late Late Show and Fair City to the private sector.
Workers are 'blue in the face' asking for consultations with management, said Sorcha Vaughan, secretary of the TUG, which comprises the National Union of Journalists (NUJ), Siptu, Connect and Unite. Vaughan added that the 25 per cent mandate is being used as a battering ram of sorts for cuts at the broadcaster, with workers being told 'we need to become smaller, the shows will be going'.
It's worth noting that RTÉ at least has secure and predictable funding until 2027, under the multiannual funding agreement reached with the Government last year - the first such arrangement of its type
Trevor Keegan, co-chair of the union group, also raised questions about the broadcaster's plans for studio space in Montrose. Much of this appears to have hit home with committee members, one of whom said this week they were concerned that RTÉ will turn into a newsdesk, with a few commissioning editors attached to it.
Overarching all of this is a much bigger question about whether the legislation creates the type of certainty around funding for RTÉ that the broadcaster, its workers and the independent production sector all want. The Broadcasting Bill is, among other things, the Government's effort to establish the European Media Freedom Act in Irish law. The European Act says that member states should make sure that all funding procedures for public service media platforms are based on 'transparent and objective criteria laid down in advance'.
Public service media organisations should also have 'adequate, sustainable and predictable financial resources corresponding to the fulfilment of and the capacity to develop within their public service remit'. However, having baulked at the FOMC's recommendations around funding, the Coalition's Bill stops well short of scrapping the licence fee and funding RTÉ from the exchequer on a multiyear basis.
Instead, it proposes to reform the
Coimisiún na Meán
-led review processes for public service media provision, which will now take place every three rather than every five years. There will also be half-yearly rather than annual reviews. Based on these processes, the regulator will make recommendations to the Minister about funding levels for RTÉ and TG4.
RTÉ commended the strengthening of the regulator's role but told the committee that the general scheme of the Bill does not set out a timeline for the Government's response to the recommendations. This 'puts the viability of the contingent deliverables at risk', the broadcaster's director of video Steve Carson said in June. It's worth noting that RTÉ at least has secure and predictable funding until 2027, under the multiannual funding agreement reached with the Government last year – the first such arrangement of its type. Meanwhile, TG4 has no such certainty, an issue raised by the broadcaster's chief executive Deirdre Ní Choistín and others at the committee in recent weeks.
[
Is RTÉ really in a worse position than any other media company?
Opens in new window
]
SPI put a finer point on the matter in its submission. The industry body queried whether this aspect of the Bill actually meets the requirements of the European Media Freedom Act around the predictability of funding. Simply, it said there is 'no obligation' on the Minister's part to accept Coimisiún na Meán's recommendations. In other words, funding for RTÉ and public service media more broadly will remain a political football. Government officials, however, are confident the new system will represent a sea change in the funding of public service broadcasting.
If there is a certain degree of scepticism about this aspect of the legislation, it has been at least somewhat influenced by O'Donovan's decision to effectively scrap the so-called Netflix levy. Recommended by Coimisiún na Meán and supported by the broadcasters and screen producers, the levy was supposed to raise funds for independent productions and Irish language programming.
The levy is now in limbo after the Minister said in April that the Government would not introduce it without his approval, citing concerns around the additional cost burden on Irish subscribers. With the Trump administration heavily criticising foreign countries for putting up trade barriers to large US multinationals, some in Ireland believe the Coalition's change of tack on the levy is at least partially a case of not wanting to poke the bear.
Still, not everyone is enamoured of the idea. Last week, representatives of the
League of Ireland
's streaming platform LOITV and GAA+ expressed concern that the levy could massively heighten their operating costs. They asked that any levy be progressively tiered, taking in more from larger streamers than smaller ones. LOITV operates on a 'break-even basis', League of Ireland director Mark Scanlon told the committee last week, and all of the revenues from subscriptions are ploughed back into the participating clubs. 'So all the costs are being covered at this moment in time, production costs and then also costs [of hiring] commentators. Any levy would impact our ability to deliver the service.'
Those concerns may be moot if the levy is the dead letter that many believe it to be. Asked for comment this week, a spokesman for the Minister said his position on the charge has 'not changed' in recent months. However, he said: 'The Minister recognises the detailed scrutiny of the general scheme is being undertaken by the committee and will review any recommendations made by the committee in the context of the pre-legislative scrutiny report that will be submitted to him.'
Scrutiny of the Bill is set to continue when the Dáil sits again after the summer recess, after the committee requested additional time, and industry stakeholders will be closely following the remainder of the process and the committee's report. In the meantime, after an avalanche of headlines related to his brief in recent weeks, the break is coming at a good time for O'Donovan and his department.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
23 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Call for Government to urgently support Irish businesses most at risk from US tariffs
Social Democrats finance spokesman Cian O'Callaghan says the Government must publish an updated summer economic statement to account for the EU 's tariff agreement with the US . In a statement on Sunday evening, Mr O'Callaghan welcomed a deal that 'avoids a catastrophic trade war', but said it is 'beyond doubt . . . that a 15 per cent tariff rate will be very damaging for many Irish businesses'. 'It is less than a week since the Government published its summer economic statement, using an assumption of no tariffs,' he added. 'This was despite the dogs on the street being aware that a 10 per cent tariff rate was the best possible outcome.' Mr O'Callaghan was one of a number of figures in Irish politics to publish statements regarding the trade deal on Sunday evening. Labour leader Ivana Bacik called on the Government to engage with Irish businesses, warning that continued uncertainty around pharmaceutical exports is evidence of 'just how difficult it is to engage constructively with the Trump administration'. READ MORE 'We in Labour are calling on the Government to fast-track the development of a new, modernised short-time work scheme to ensure that skilled jobs are not lost in sectors under pressure,' Ms Bacik said. 'Other EU countries have long-standing schemes that help employers retain staff during economic shocks. We need a system in place in Ireland that can respond to future volatility or sectoral downturns quickly and effectively.' Taoiseach Micheál Martin welcomed the agreement, saying it 'will help to protect many jobs in Ireland'. He added that it 'brings clarity and predictability to the trading relationship between the EU and the US – the biggest in the world". Mr Martin acknowledged that higher tariffs will make trade 'more expensive and more challenging' but said that the agreement 'creates a new era of stability that can hopefully contribute to a growing and deepening relationship between the EU and the US'. [ EU-US deal good for Ireland as it averts trade war but vital details remain unclear Opens in new window ] The Taoiseach pledged to study the details of the agreement, including its implications for Irish businesses exporting to the US and for other sectors operating here. 'Given the very real risk that existed for escalation and for the imposition of punitively high tariffs, this news will be welcomed by many,' his statement concluded. There were further calls to support Irish businesses from Sinn Féin spokesperson on foreign affairs and trade, Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire. 'Ultimately, while a deal is preferable to tit-for-tat tariffs, the reality is, tariffs of this kind are bad for businesses, consumers and workers,' he said. 'We need to take the necessary steps to support our indigenous businesses, to increase exports to new markets, to grow talent across the island and to trade across the island and internationally." Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris echoed the Taoiseach in welcoming the transatlantic trade agreement, noting that European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen described the 15 per cent tariff rate as 'all-inclusive'. 'While Ireland regrets that the baseline tariff of 15 per cent is included in the agreement, it is important that we now have more certainty on the foundations of the EU-US trade relationship, which is essential for jobs, growth and investment,' Mr Harris said. Finally, Danny McCoy, CEO of business lobby Ibec, said the trade agreement represents a 'substantial burden for many industries', particularly those relying heavily on the US market to operate. 'Our message to the Government, as it was with the 10 per cent tariff, is that the most exposed sectors will require support similar to the interventions provided as a response to Brexit,' Mr McCoy said.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the EU/US trade deal: a step towards economic stability
The agreement of an outline trade deal between the EU and the US is positive, to the extent that it avoids the risk of a full-scale tariffs war between the two sides. For Ireland, the EU state most exposed to US trade and investment, this could have been particularly damaging. What the EU has been dealing with here is damage limitation. Average tariffs of 15 per cent on EU imports into the US - a central part of the deal - are roughly three times the rate that applied when Donald Trump came to office. This will cause economic damage on both sides of the Atlantic. Whatever Trump's objections are to the way the EU treats US imports, dealing with them this way ensures US consumers will pay more for their goods, as well as damaging Europe. Trump is claiming the deal, which also includes promises of EU purchases of US energy and military equipment, as a triumph. And he did get a lot of what he wanted. Perhaps driven in large part by the desire to see continued US support for Nato and Ukraine, the EU has been on the back foot. It has been faced by a US president pursuing a relentless tariff agenda, partly driven by economic nationalism and partly by the need to raise cash for the US exchequer. The main gain for the EU – and for Ireland - of the outline deal is that it avoids the risk of a trade war, which would have had unpredictable and dangerous consequences. Trump had threatened a general tariff level of 30 per cent to apply from next week on EU imports and, had there not been a deal, the EU had a list of US goods ready on which it planned to impose tariffs. This could have escalated quickly, potentially drawing in US digital tech companies, many with international bases in Ireland. READ MORE Details have still to be spelled out on how the 15 per cent tariffs will be applied and these will be important. The impact will vary across different sectors of exporters from Ireland to the US and will be difficult in some areas. It may be some weeks before this is clear. Importantly for Ireland, Trump has said a separate process examining what should happen to the pharma sector will continue and he again underlined that he wanted key drugs and ingredients made in the US. While there was some uncertainty on this in the immediate wake of the deal, the risk of higher tariffs in this area, or other action to try to get pharma companies to relocate production to the US, appears to remain. And while European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said that in general the deal would bring 'stability', the final details have still to be agreed and published. With Trump in office, uncertainty will remain. However, it is still better to have a basic deal which, provided it holds, will now start to restore some level of certainty to trade between the US and EU.
Irish Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Taoiseach welcomes trade deal between EU and US
Taoiseach Micheál Martin has welcomed a deal between the European Union and the United States, which will see a 15% tariff on most EU imports to the US. The deal was reached during a meeting between Donald Trump and the president of the European Commission on Sunday. The US president met European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to hammer out the final details on the trading relationship between Europe and the US. Reacting to the deal, Mr Martin said the agreement was very welcome. 'It brings clarity and predictability to the trading relationship between the EU and the US – the biggest in the world,' the Fianna Fail leader said. 'That is good for businesses, investors and consumers. It will help protect many jobs in Ireland. 'The negotiations to get us to this point have been long and complex, and I would like to thank both teams for their patient work. 'We will now study the detail of what has been agreed, including its implications for businesses exporting from Ireland to the US, and for different sectors operating here. 'The agreement is a framework and there will be more detail to be fleshed out in the weeks and months ahead.' Mr Martin said the higher tariffs will have an impact on trade between the EU and the US, which will make it more expensive and more challenging. US President Donald Trump enjoyed a round of golf before his meeting with Ursula von der Leyen 'However, it also creates a new era of stability that can hopefully contribute to a growing and deepening relationship between the EU and the US, which is important not just for the EU and the US, but for the global economy,' he added. 'Given the very real risk that existed for escalation and for the imposition of punitively high tariffs, this news will be welcomed by many.' The deal was also welcomed by deputy Irish premier and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris, who said it brings clarity to businesses. 'While we have yet to see the detail, I welcome that an agreement has been announced by Commission President von der Leyen and US President Trump,' Mr Harris said in a statement. 'A deal provides a measure of much-needed certainty for Irish, European and American businesses who together represent the most integrated trading relationship in the world. Ireland makes a key contribution to this with the Ireland-US economic relationship valued at more than one trillion euros. 'The US had made clear, and this has been replicated in other recent agreements, which the US has reached with other countries, that a baseline tariff was always going to be part of the outcome. 'I have always stressed that tariffs are damaging and will have a negative impact on companies exporting to the US. 'While Ireland regrets that the baseline tariff of 15% is included in the agreement, it is important that we now have more certainty on the foundations for the EU-US trade relationship, which is essential for jobs, growth and investment. 'President von der Leyen described this as 15% tariffs across the board, all-inclusive.' He said further detail is needed around pharma, aviation and other sectors. Mr Harris said he will examine the details of the agreement over the coming days to establish the effect on Irish businesses and the economy. Earlier, EU commissioner Michael McGrath said the meeting was a 'significant and decisive moment'. Mr McGrath, EU Commissioner for Democracy, Justice, the Rule of Law and Consumer Protection, said it would involve substantive negotiations between both sides. 'It's a significant moment, we hope a decisive moment, and it builds on an enormous amount of work that has been done over quite a period of time,' Mr McGrath said ahead of the meeting. 'President Trump invited President von der Leyen to Scotland for a meeting. 'This follows on the back of intensive negotiations over a number of months. He added: 'It is not a case of turning up and signing on the dotted line. There will be a real discussion that will happen, and it will take on a dynamic of its own, and let's see what happens over the course of the afternoon. 'But from the EU's point of view, we are determined to do all that we can to get a deal for European businesses, because we recognise the cost of uncertainty. 'It manifests in trade and in investment decisions and ultimately in employment and of course tariffs can cost consumers at the end of the day. 'We want a good deal. We have negotiated hard, and we're at a point now where hopefully the two leaders can today bring it to a concluding phase.' Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
