Panasonic S1 II review: A near-perfect creator's camera if money is no object
After a six-year wait, Panasonic's S1 II is finally here and there's a lot to unpack. As you'd expect from this company, it's creator-centric with up to 5.8K ProRes RAW internal video recording. At the same time, it's Panasonic's fastest full-frame photo camera ever with 70 fps burst speeds and reduced rolling shutter distortion thanks to the new partially stacked 24-megapixel sensor. And with an AI-powered hybrid phase detect system, autofocus is no longer a weak point as it was with the original S1.
There is one issue though, and a surprising one for Panasonic: the price. The $3,200 S1 II is similar to Nikon's Z6 III, right down to the partially stacked sensor and internal RAW video. However, the latter is some $700 cheaper and can often be found on sale for even less. Since Panasonic often undercuts rivals, that puts the S1 II in the unusual position of being overpriced next to the competition. After testing it for the last month, I've found that whether it's worth it depends on your priorities.
The S1 II is Panasonic's best creator camera thanks to features like 6K RAW video and outstanding stabilization, but it's expensive compared to the competition. $3,200 at Amazon
The S1 II shares its excellent body design with the higher-resolution S1R II and the cheaper, non-stacked S1 IIe. It's considerably lighter than the original S1 at 1.76 pounds and much smaller as well, both of which make it less burdensome. It's also easy to hold thanks to the big ridged grip. However, it's more angular and has a harder rubber skin than Canon's rival EOS R6 II, so it's not quite as comfortable over long shooting sessions.
The excellent control layout makes the S1 II a breeze to use. It has all the buttons and dials you need and they're well located — particularly the joystick and control dials. There's a dedicated switch for photos, video and slow and quick (S&Q) modes, and each has separate adjustments so you won't mix them up. It also has a dedicated autofocus switch, two video record buttons (top and front), 10 other programmable buttons and a tally light.
I rarely needed to search for settings thanks to the logical color-coded tabs and easy-to-use quick menu, both accessible by touch or the joystick. Panasonic also made it simple to program buttons, dials and the quick menu to your personal preferences and it allows you to save them to a memory card as a backup.
The S1 II's electronic viewfinder is bright and sharp, matching the Z6 III with a resolution of 5.76 million dots and 0.78x magnification. The rear display not only swivels out but also tilts up and down for overhead or hip-level photography. In comparison, Nikon's Z6 III screen doesn't tilt, so it's not as versatile.
As with the S1R II, battery life isn't a strong point here, with only 360 shots on a charge or 320 when using the EVF. To be fair, that matches the Z6 III exactly (and Panasonic's non-stacked S1 II is only slightly better at 380 shots), but Canon's cheaper R6 II has more than twice the battery life at 760 shots.
In order to capture RAW video, the S1 II has a CFexpress Type B card slot along with a slower SDXC UHS-II slot. Like the S5 IIx and GH7 (and several Fujifilm models), it also supports high-bandwidth RAW video capture to an SSD via the USB-C port.
The S1 II comes with a full-sized HDMI port that supports Blackmagic and ProRes RAW capture. You also get mic and headphone ports, and you can capture 32-bit float audio via the optional XLR2 accessory to reduce the possibility of clipping. Finally, the S1 II has a carbon fiber curtain that comes down to protect the sensor like recent Canon and Sony models.
The S1 II can fire bursts at a pedestrian 10 fps in mechanical shutter mode, but supports a superb 70 RAW images per second with the electronic shutter. And if you're worried about skewed images, don't fret. Distortion is minimal in electronic mode thanks to the partially-stacked sensor that has a rapid readout speed of around 12 milliseconds. That's fast enough for sports or wildlife photography, unless the subject moves very rapidly.
Pre-burst capture, which starts when you half-press the shutter, is also available at the highest speeds. That lets you save up to 1.5 seconds of photos you might have otherwise missed once you fully press the shutter button. The buffer is a bit small, though, so you can only capture about three seconds (220 shots) at the 70 fps speed.
The hybrid phase-detect autofocus is the best of any Panasonic camera I've tested to date. However, it's not yet up to Sony and Canon's standards for speed and accuracy, and falls a bit short of Nikon's Z6 III. If you're shooting a fast-moving subject at the maximum burst rate of 70 fps, you may see more than a few out-of-focus photos.
The S1 II supports multiple AI modes — including animals, birds and vehicles — on top of human eye-tracking modes. I had mixed success with those as the camera had trouble locking onto the eyes of some birds and marine mammals I shot at the Vancouver Aquarium. However, it was better with more typical animal subjects like dogs, cats, horses and geese. Panasonic also introduced an AF mode called Urban Sports that improves tracking for breakdancing, skateboarding and parkour. I tested that mode with some skateboarders at the highest burst settings and saw a high percentage (90-plus) of in-focus shots.
One area where Panasonic tops its rivals is stabilization. That's been boosted to eight stops (slightly short of the R6 II's eight and a half stops), which allowed me to shoot at shutter speeds down to a half second and still get sharp shots. And as I'll explain shortly, the S1 II is peerless when it comes to video stabilization.
I've been impressed with Panasonic's color science of late, finding that it matches Nikon in delivering some of the most color-accurate images of any system. By comparison, Canon's images skew warmer, and I feel that Sony models like the A7 IV lack some accuracy, particularly with blue-green colors.
The S1 II delivers pleasing JPEGs with a nice balance between sharpness and noise reduction, though the latter can get overly aggressive at high ISO levels. RAW images offer plenty of detail in light and dark areas of the image, letting you tweak and correct to a fine degree. Keep in mind that using the electronic shutter in burst modes reduces RAW bit depth from 14 to 12.
The downside of any stacked sensor is additional noise, and the S1 II is no exception. This is most apparent at higher ISO levels where the camera exhibits a bit more grain than Panasonic's S5, which has the same resolution but isn't stacked. That said, the S1 II has about the same low-light prowess as the Z6 III and beats most fully stacked cameras.
The S1 II is Panasonic's best creator camera thanks to features like 6K RAW video and outstanding stabilization, but it's expensive compared to the competition.
If the native 24MP resolution isn't enough, the S1 II offers a high-resolution mode that captures eight images with a slightly offset sensor position and composes them into a single 96-megapixel file (either RAW or JPEG). I was able to take sharp images in that mode without the use of a tripod thanks to the S1 II's excellent in-body stabilization system.
The S1 II doesn't shoot 8K RAW like the 44MP S1R II due to its lower resolution. However, it does support 5.8K 30 fps ProRes RAW, open gate full sensor video and super slow-mo (4K 120p) — all with far less rolling shutter distortion. Because of that, I think this is a better camera overall for creators.
Of course, the S1 II offers 10-bit video in both MP4 and Quicktime formats on top of RAW. Panasonic's V-Log is also on tap to boost dynamic range, and thanks to a recent firmware update, you can pay $200 to get ARRI LogC3 to match that company's pro digital cinema cameras.
With that same firmware update, the S1 II now supports 17 frame aspect ratios (up from 10), and enables simultaneous display of up to three frames at once (unlike the LogC3 update, these are free). That will let you shoot open gate, for instance, while seeing how the image will look in both vertical and horizontal aspect ratios.
Overall, video quality is outstanding with sharp oversampling, excellent color accuracy and decent dynamic range. The latter can be increased using Panasonic's dynamic range boost option, although that effectively doubles rolling shutter distortion. Without the setting enabled, skew from rolling shutter is only an issue with whip pans or very fast-moving subjects.
Video AF is solid, keeping subjects in focus as long as they don't move too quickly. Face, eye, animal, urban sports and vehicle detection work well, though you'll see a bit more accuracy and speed on Canon and Sony's latest models.
The S1 II offers better video stabilization than its rivals, though. Optical stabilization provides good results for handheld video, while electronic stabilization (EIS) provides gimbal-like smoothness at the cost of a significant crop. As with other recent Panasonic models, the S1 II also offers 'cropless' EIS that corrects corner distortion when using wide lenses, while also reducing rolling shutter.
Thanks to a built-in fan, overheating is rarely an issue with the S1 II. The only time I ever saw a problem was with 5.8K at 60 fps and 5.1K open gate recording, when the camera shut down after 50 minutes and 40 minutes respectively. That's still excellent for a small mirrorless camera. Those limits are eliminated, by the way, if you record to an SSD via the USB-C port.
Creators may wonder how the S1 II compares to Nikon's Z6 III. The latter offers more RAW options, with the choice of 5.8K Nikon RAW (N-RAW) at up to 60 fps rather than just 30 fps. Both offer similar video quality as they use the same sensor. The Z6 III has slightly better autofocus, but the S5 II has superior stabilization and handling. Finally, the S1 II has some nice pro features like timecode, waveform monitoring and pro audio. I'd say the S1 II is slightly better for video shooters, but the Z6 III is significantly cheaper.
Panasonic's S1 II is a powerful hybrid camera, and if it wasn't so expensive, it would be a no-brainer for creators. However, Nikon's Z6 III has nearly the same video capabilities, is a better camera for photography and costs at least $600 less, so I'm inclined to recommend that model for most users.
Another option at a lower price is Panasonic's new $2,500 S1 IIe, which was announced at the same time as the S1 II. It has the same body and mostly the same feature set, but uses the non-stacked sensor from the S5 II, so rolling shutter is more of an issue.
If you favor photography, the higher-resolution S1R II is a better option and costs just $100 more. However, if you're a video pro who needs features like time code, ARRI LogC3 and advanced monitoring or audio features, the S1 II is a solid choice. Those folks might want to wait for a sale though.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Digital Trends
5 hours ago
- Digital Trends
You Asked: Budget Sony OLED? Does TV Tech Surpass Human Perception?
On today's episode of You Asked: Panasonic Mini LED or LG QNED? What's the best Sony OLED to get that won't cost you as much as the A95L? And with such good sound and picture quality from the latest TVs and speakers, how much more can they even improve? Panasonic W95A vs. LG QNED80T Steve Beaty asks: I've been trying to decide between the 85-inch Panasonic W95A and 86-inch LG QNED80T. I found them both for the same price. Which would be the best for my money? Or do you know of something better in the same size and price? Thanks for sending in the question, Steve. We've also noticed that the Panasonic W95A has been seriously discounted lately. It's easily one of the best deals available right now, especially considering it was one of the best Mini LED TVs of 2024. And that is where my answer begins. The W95A has Mini LED backlighting, which is a notable upgrade over the QNED80T's edge-lit capabilities. With the Panasonic, you'll see much better contrast and local dimming. This is particularly true when viewing HDR content, where your highlights will really pop and stand out. In terms of viewing popular shows and movies, the QNED80T is also lacking HDR10+ and Dolby Vision. So you won't be getting the best out of many of the shows and movies available to stream. And overall, it's not nearly as bright as the W95A. And again, not that brightness is the end-all be-all, but for viewing in daylight or brighter rooms—and for some of the reasons I just mentioned—you're going to want that extra juice sometimes. As far as any other options, for that price and size, the W95A is going to be hard to beat. In our review last year, we tested it alongside the Sony Bravia 7. So check that video out if you want further details. But that Bravia 7 does cost a good bit more than the Panasonic right now. Even comparable options from Hisense and TCL are currently priced higher than the W95A. So I'd go for the Panasonic and don't look back. What's the best Sony OLED that isn't the A95L? @rikram33 asks: Is there a Sony OLED recommendation? Preferably 65 inches? I'd love the A95L, but need something less than that price-wise. Appreciate the question. And in this case, Sony's TV lineup actually makes the answer a little easier if you're set on that brand. The Bravia 8 (2024 model) is probably going to be your best bet. Unlike brands that offer three or four different levels of OLED TVs, Sony keeps their offerings pretty simple. Currently, you have the Bravia 8 Mark 2 (their latest and greatest QD-OLED), the A95L (their QD-OLED from 2023, which is still highly competitive with 2025 offerings), and the Bravia 8 Mark 1, a W-RGB OLED. Right now, that Bravia 8 Mark 1 is going for about $1,200 less than the A95L at the 65-inch size—and that's a pretty solid deal. While you do miss out on the color and brightness advantages of QD-OLED, it's still OLED. And with Sony's picture processing, it still looks gorgeous. Plus, the discounted price makes it easier to stomach those differences. Compared to the A95L, you're getting the same inputs (two HDMI 2.1 and two HDMI 2.0), the same game mode features and refresh rates, the same supported HDR formats like HDR10 and Dolby Vision—and overall, when you're watching the Bravia 8, I don't think you're going to be disappointed at all. Keep in mind, reviewers bring up performance differences between TVs because it's their job. But as a viewer, these differences aren't nearly as magnified—especially if you're not watching the TVs side by side. All that said, here are a few more options outside the Sony family that sit just below and just above the Bravia 8 price-wise: LG C4 (2024): A bit less expensive than the Bravia 8 (around $400 less), with more brightness and four HDMI 2.1 ports. LG G4: A few hundred dollars more than the Bravia 8, but still less than the A95L. Objectively, it's a better TV in terms of brightness and color with its MLA panel. Both LG models support faster refresh rates in game mode and Dolby Vision. There are also Samsung OLED options, though that's a bit of a rabbit hole. We did a buying guide on that recently if you're interested. But since you asked about Sony, I assume you have your reasons. So do with that what you will. If you're set on Sony, I love the Bravia 8 for you. Can you even hear or see the difference anymore? @lilyharyett353 asks: Have we gotten to a point where picture and sound quality surpass the ability of the human eyes and ears to take in? And if so, why try to improve anymore? What's funny is, I often think about this myself. Don't get me wrong—I love seeing new TVs and tech in general—but when you see as many good ones as we do, you start to realize, 'Yeah, this one looks great. So does this one. Wow, I love how this one looks too.' So you do have to ask: what is there left to achieve? In my opinion, the answer is twofold. One side is technological. The other is about convenience. From a tech perspective, I'd say OLED still sets the bar for best-looking mainstream TVs. So now we're seeing a race between QD-OLED panels (from Sony and Samsung), MLA panels (from LG), and the new four-stack OLED panels from LG and Panasonic. Each year brings slightly brighter colors and better HDR performance. Will you notice the difference year over year? Sometimes—like with the LG G4 versus G5. But most of the time, it takes a bigger leap to see improvements that are worth spending money to upgrade for. Then you've got Mini LED tech trying to catch up to OLED. Picture quality is getting better every year—deeper blacks, richer colors. RGB Mini LED backlight tech from Sony and Hisense is a good example of that. And because not everyone can afford OLED, there's real value in Mini LED competition. Then there's the convenience side. Think Samsung's One Connect Box, The Frame Pro, LG's OLED M Series with Zero Connect. These don't boost picture or sound quality directly, but they make the whole setup experience easier and cleaner. Same goes for audio. Not everyone has space for a soundbar or full speaker setup. But now we have things like Sony's Bravia Theater Quad, which simplifies surround sound without much space or hassle. The bottom line? Yes, we're spoiled with incredible home theater quality—but there's still room to innovate. Not just in making things look or sound better, but in how we experience it all.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
No, you're not dreaming: the Venus Optics Laowa 12mm f/2.8 FF II C&D Dreamer is coming next week
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Lens-maker Venus Optics has officially announced that it will be releasing a new 12mm f/2.8 full-frame autofocus lens on June 25, 2025. The Laowa 12mm f/2.8 FF II C&D Dreamer will be available in Sony E and Nikon Z mounts with full autofocus, and there will also be Canon RF and L-mount Alliance versions, although these will be manual-focus only. While Venus Optics has garnered a stellar reputation for producing innovative and often unusual manual focus lenses with remarkably low distortion, this new lens is only the second from the brand to have autofocus, joining the recently released Laowa 10mm f/2.8 FF II C&D Dreamer, which again offers autofocus in its Nikon and Sony versions, with other mounts only having manual focus. According to Venus Optics, the 'C&D Dreamer' designation in its Laowa lens range is broken down as follows. The 'C' signifies a compact build, the 'D' means minimum distortion, and the 'Dreamer' bit is reserved for lenses that exhibit soft, artistic image rendering. Indeed, it is compact and light, weighing around 377 grams, depending on the lens mount, and has a reasonably svelte 72mm filter thread. And Venus Optics claims that it produces images with a near-zero distortion. We'll see if our tests bear this out when we get our hands on a review sample. It's not the first 12mm f/2.8 Laowa lens – that honor goes to the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Zero-D, which was released back in 2016. But while this 'Zero-D' model signifies a 'close-to-zero distortion' design, it is a significantly heftier lens, weighing in at around 609 grams, and is only available in manual focus, whatever the mount. While pricing details are expected to be officially released at the time of the announcement on June 25, I expect the lens will be competitively priced. As a rough guide, the autofocus versions of the Laowa 10mm f/2.8 lens cost £799 / £849 / AU$1,449.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Panasonic Adopts CyberArk for Enhanced Identity Security
CyberArk Software Ltd. (NASDAQ:CYBR) is one of the best software infrastructure stocks to invest in. On June 24, CyberArk announced that Panasonic Information Systems Co. Ltd., which is the IT strategy arm of the Panasonic Group, has successfully implemented the CyberArk Identity Security Platform. The deployment is a part of Panasonic's broader digital transition initiative, known as Panasonic Transformation/PX, which commenced earlier in May 2021. The primary goal of this implementation is to secure privileged access to thousands of servers, which include both Windows and Linux, across the entire Panasonic Group. Before this, Panasonic Information Systems relied on a manual approach to privileged access management, which led to inefficiencies and limited visibility into access requests and approvals. A data center with a repetetive design of computer servers, showing the companies' efficient and secure IT infrastructure. With the adoption of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, a component of the CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Panasonic has now established a modern, automated, and centralized environment for managing privileged access. This system provides visibility into server access and details who accessed which server, when, and what actions were performed. Thereby creating an audit trail for improved post-incident investigations. Additionally, credentials and passwords are now automatically granted, hidden from users, and rotated within the CyberArk platform. CyberArk Software Ltd. (NASDAQ:CYBR) develops, markets, and sells software-based identity security solutions and services internationally. Panasonic Holdings Corporation researches, develops, manufactures, sells, and services various electrical and electronic products worldwide. While we acknowledge the potential of CYBR as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data