Amazon shoppers are raving about these whitening strips that leave teeth eight shades whiter in ONE week - and you can now get them for 23% off
As little as 30 minutes of wear of the DrDent Premium Teeth Whitening Strips leaves teeth significantly brighter and whiter, helping to remove stains from common teeth-staining activities such as smoking and drinking coffee.
DrDent Premium Teeth Whitening Strips
Formulated with non-toxic ingredients such as coconut and mint oil, these powerful strips can whiten teeth by as much as one shade in just one week.
An affordable alternative to in-salon whitening sessions, the non-slip design makes DIY whitening a breeze, while the formula quickly gets to work to reduce stains left behind from caffeine and smoking.
You can save an additional five per cent by applying coupon before heading to checkout.
£19.95 (save £6.04) Shop
With over 2,500 four and five-star reviews, shoppers have praised the purse-friendly whitening strips as a 'great alternative to in-salon whitening' - and for a fraction of the cost.
Smokers and coffee drinkers have been blown away by the results of the DIY strips, with one customer writing: 'I didn't think it would be possible to lift coffee stains but I saw an immediate lift. 100 per cent will be buying again.'
Using a unique PAP (phthalimide peroxy caproic acid) formula, the DrDent Premium Teeth Whitening Strips have been specifically formulated to be gentle on teeth, for a pain-free whitening experience every time.
Made with natural ingredients and infused with the likes of coconut and mint oil, the peroxide-free strips offer a safer at-home whitening experience compared to others at a similar price point on the market.
The non-slip design ensures the whitening strips are easy to use - simply dry teeth, pop the bottom strip on first, followed by the top one, and leave to work their magic for up to 60 minutes. Afterwards, rinse any remaining gel and enjoy your new, brighter smile.
Ideal for those who may be trying to achieve their best smile yet in time for summer, DrDent promises a visibly brighter smile in as little as seven days following 30 to 60 minutes of wear per day.
Several customers, however, have noticed the benefits with as little as one treatment, with one customer even stating: 'They are super easy to apply, especially with the mouth opening tool, and leave lasting results very quickly. I noticed a difference even after one use!'.
The DrDent Professional Teeth Whitening Strips have gained over 9,900 five-star reviews from Amazon shoppers, while customer before and after's speak for themselves.
One impressed user raved: 'From the first time I've used it, my teeth were whiter, and more importantly, the strips didn't make my teeth feel sensitive. I've been using them once a week to help keep my teeth whiter as I do drink a lot of coffee - I would definitely recommend them!'.
Another agreed, adding: 'Been using these for just over a week now and have noticed a difference in the colour of my teeth. The strips don't leave your teeth feeling overly sticky upon removal, are easy to use and you can cut to size if you have a smaller mouth. I've had no sensitivity using these, and no awful taste in my mouth. Will definitely purchase again!'.
A third penned: 'OMG, I can't recommend these more. This is my first time using them and they have turned my teeth from yellow to white after one use - will definitely be buying again if needs be. They really have brought back my self confidence!'.
Each kit contains 42 whitening strips per box, as well as a mouth opener, instructions, and a guide to check your whitening progress. Plus, if you're not 100 per cent satisfied with the results, you can get a full refund.
Ready to start your whitening journey? You can buy the strips here - but be quick, as these savings won't be around for long.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
20 minutes ago
- BBC News
Mum of woman who refused chemo accuses paramedics of killing her
A high-profile conspiracy theorist has told an inquest she believes paramedics killed her daughter and doctors used experimental drugs on her without Shemirani, 23, died in July last year seven months after receiving a cancer diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. She had refused chemotherapy mother Kate, a former nurse who rose to prominence on social media sharing Covid conspiracy theories, accused the emergency team who treated Paloma when she collapsed at home of gross negligence manslaughter. She also denied influencing Paloma's refusal of conventional treatment, saying: "I cared for her like any loving mother would, but I did not make her decisions." Ms Shemirani was struck off as a nurse in 2021, having qualified in the 1980s and a Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) committee found she had spread Covid-19 misinformation that "put the public at a significant risk of harm".Giving a statement via video link to Thursday's hearing in Maidstone, Mrs Shemirani said that when her daughter was first diagnosed in December 2024 she was given "experimental" medication without her agreement. She added: "I was gravely concerned my daughter may have been enrolled in a drug trial without her knowledge."She said Paloma, a Cambridge graduate from Uckfield in East Sussex, had felt bullied and pressured by doctors while considering chemotherapy, adding: "I told her not to sign the consent form. "I was concerned she was being deceived and they'd already started her treatment without her authorisation."Mrs Shemirani described suggestions she had coerced Paloma into refusing chemotherapy as "false and deeply offensive" and said her daughter was "fully competent" to make up her own mind. The inquest was also played the 999 call made by Mrs Shemirani on the night Paloma collapsed, during which she can be overheard shouting that her daughter is dying. But now she states that it was only when paramedics arrived that "everything went horribly wrong", blaming them for administering "a massive overdose of drugs too quickly to a petit woman".Describing the months leading up to her daughter's death Mrs Shemirani said Paloma had chosen treatment which included nutrition, juices and spiritual support, claiming that many of her symptoms had disappeared. Coroner Catherine Wood also heard from intensive care consultant Dr Peter Anderson who saw Paloma at the Royal Sussex County Hospital when paramedics brought her in. He said a scan showed a large mass in her chest and neck which was compressing her airways and affecting major blood vessels. Either could have caused the cardiac arrest she suffered, he inquest continues.
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Farmers and scientists join forces in Cornwall to vaccinate badgers against TB
The first farmer-led programme to vaccinate badgers against tuberculosis is beginning in Cornwall with an aim to prevent transmission of the disease to cattle. The programme is significant because farmers and scientists have long been at loggerheads over the culling of badgers as a way to control TB. The three-year trial will start with 70 farms and involve farmers trapping, testing and vaccinating badgers, with training provided by scientists. An earlier pilot study of the approach showed TB rates in badgers fell from 16% to zero in four years. TB can devastate cattle herds and more than 20,000 infected cattle were slaughtered in the last year in England. The badger cull started in 2013 and has killed about 250,000 badgers but has been highly controversial. Most scientists have argued since the start that culling can make no meaningful contribution to TB control in cattle, based on a large-scale trial from 1998 to 2005. They say most cattle are infected by other cattle and that controlling livestock movements are key. Most farmers argue that badgers are a dangerous reservoir for the disease and must be controlled. The results of the culling to date are contested. Badger culling is due to end in 2029. The £1.4m project is the first time the National Farmers' Union has led a badger vaccination programme. Previous badger vaccination trials have been conducted by wildlife groups. Prof Rosie Woodroffe, at the Institute of Zoology in London, said: 'For half a century, wildlife advocates and farmers have argued about the best way to manage the risk of TB transmission between badgers and cattle. Ultimately, we all want the same thing: to see TB eliminated so that farmers, their livestock, and wildlife can all thrive. 'By working together to compare different approaches, we can develop a shared understanding of the evidence and use it to identify TB control solutions which are effective and sustainable.' Bridget Whell, a farmer and the NFU's Cornwall chair, is taking part in the project and has 1,200 cattle serving two dairies. She has lost half the cattle from one of the dairies in the past and her farm has spent most of the last 15 years under government restrictions due to TB infections. 'It was really devastating,' she said. There have been six years of badger culling on Whell's farm but that have now ended due to the government's decision to end culling. 'It does seem now that in terms of the tools available, aside from biosecurity and [cattle] testing, [badger vaccination] is the future,' she said. Cattle vaccines for TB are being developed but have been complicated by the need to be able to distinguish between infected and vaccinated animals when they are tested. 'There's been a lack of confidence [about badger vaccination] because there's been no information,' Whell said. 'What we hope to ultimately get out of [the project] is whether [badger vaccination] affects the cattle levels of TB – that remains to be seen, but I think it's well worth doing.' 'My scepticism, if any, is whether this is as a policy is sustainable, financially and practically.' The project will begin with 70 farmers over 80km2 in Cornwall, and expand over three years to cover 400 to 500km2. It will assess the impact of badger vaccination on TB control and examine how vaccination can be scaled up and delivered in the most cost-efficient way. The project will assess three vaccination approaches to determine which works best: annual vaccination over four years, vaccination every other year or reactive vaccination based on TB infection on farms.
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Staff fearful of reprisals if they speak up amid hospital investigation, report finds
Staff at a hospital trust where police are investigating at least 90 deaths say they face reprisals and ridicule from bosses if they raise concerns, according to a damning report. Asked to review University Hospitals Sussex, the report's authors said they 'repeatedly heard concerning examples of staff, often at a senior level, being ignored, dismissed and sometimes ridiculed when speaking up.' The report by Niche Health and Social Care Consulting said this fear of reprisals from whistleblowing could be harming patient safety. It also highlighted complaints of misogyny and failures to deal with 'unwanted romantic advances'. The review team noted a number of challenges facing the trust, including an investigation by Sussex police into possible corporate and individual manslaughter charges over allegations of medical negligence and cover-up in the general surgery and neurosurgery departments. Operation Bramber is focused on the deaths of more than 90 patients, and serious harm suffered by more than 100 others. It was sparked by the concerns of two consultant whislteblowers who lost their jobs at the trust after speaking up, first revealed in the Guardian in June 2023. The report found staff feared their careers could be hindered if they raised concerns. One said they had been told not to share data that made the trust look bad. Another said when they did raise concerns they were 'gaslit' and targeted by management. The report identified 'significant issues with psychological safety at every [staff] level' and noted that the fear of speaking up had worsened in the last year. It said staff identified as having the potential to disagree with management said they were deliberately ignored in meetings. A staff survey conducted for the review received 376 responses of which more than 300 were negative or very negative on the issue of speaking up. The responses often cited a 'fear of reprisals'. One said: 'There could be comeback which will affect your career in [a] negative manner.' Another said: 'I raised concerns. It put a target on my back. Management lied, gaslit me, would circumvent the issue, would dismiss my concerns.' A third said: 'I feel no one listens.' Staff complained that the executive team discouraged bad news and different opinions. The review identified a 'predominance of direct and authoritative leadership styles'. It added: 'We heard repeatedly that 'there is a parent-child dynamic in this organisation'.' It also found that 'incivility and poor behaviours appear to be pervasive' and there was a strong view that these were tolerated by leaders. The report did not give details of these behaviours. Last year the Guardian revealed that a consultant surgeon was promoted after allegedly assaulting resident doctors during surgery. Six senior women at the trust complained to the reviewers of misogyny, which was felt to be prevalent among consultants. Female staff said they faced eye rolling and other signs of dismissiveness from male colleagues when they spoke at meetings. They also faced pejorative references to sexuality when they took the lead. One woman claimed she 'experienced unwanted romantic advances and inappropriate comments, with no actions taken months after reporting this to various senior leaders.' Earlier this month the trust chief executive, George Findlay, announced his departure. Andy Heeps, the acting chief executive, said the trust accepted all the report's recommendations for improvement and its 'valuable insight into what we do well, where we are improving, and where there is clearly more to do'. He said: 'The authors recognise the scale of the task in completing such a huge trust merger during the Covid pandemic, and highlight a number of key improvements such as our big reductions in waiting lists and key service quality improvements. 'But they also draw attention to some fundamental issues which we've not yet succeeded in tackling – and all of these things need to change, and change quickly.'
