Queensland's shark control plan facing court challenge and federal intervention, experts say
The Queensland government announced plans to pump $88m over four years into the state's shark management plan, which would see shark nets and baited drumlines rolled out at more beaches, as well as the expanded use of non-lethal technology such as drone surveillance.
The Crissafuli government announced its plan was one that 'prioritised beach goers' safety' which it said was 'put at risk' by the previous government to 'appease radical agendas'.
'It's clear the program had lost its way under previous Labor governments who failed to act and put people after the demands of environmental activists,' primary industries minister Tony Perrett said in a statement.
But Humane World for Animals marine biologist Lawrence Chlebeck said the LNP was 'simply playing politics' with a highly emotive issue, describing their shark policy as a 'thinly veiled ruse' to appear supportive of the fishing industry by picking a legal fight 'they know they'll lose'.
Many commercial anglers are clamouring for more sharks to be culled amid rising rates of depredation of their catch.
Chlebeck confirmed HWA was already looking into a legal challenge – but federal intervention could mean that it 'may not even come to that'.
As well as catching and culling target sharks, Queensland's shark nets and drumlines kill, injure and entangle non-target species. Chlebeck said public data showed that last year 1,639 animals were caught in the program – fewer than half of which were targeted sharks – including 22 whales and dolphins, 37 turtles and 46 rays. More than 980 animals were killed.
Queensland's shark control program has been running since 1962 and is grandfathered into the federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, designed to protect threatened species.
But Chlebeck said that exemption comes with a clause that the shark control program be assessed if it is expanded and shown to have a significant impact on threatened species
'The catch of protected species like whales and dolphins, the catch of threatened species like marine turtles and a number of shark species, including the critically endangered grey nurse, that could and most likely will open it up to review under the EPBC Act,' he said.
'The Queensland state government, they know all of this, so if they really want to push forward with these plans, they're going to come into conflict with the federal government and the new federal environment minister – which may or may not have been their plan all along.'
But Chlebeck said the state's 'bluster' would end up 'opening up their own program to a scrutiny it has never before faced'.
And the marine biologist has form when it comes to lethal shark control in Queensland.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
In 2019 the then Humane Society International had the state's plans for the lethal use of nets and drumlines in the Great Barrier Reef quashed by the federal court of Australia, with a judge ruling the scientific evidence presented was 'overwhelming' that the program's culling of sharks did 'not reduce the risk of unprovoked shark interactions'.
University of Sydney associate professor of public policy and expert in the politics of shark attacks, Chris Pepin-Neff, agreed the Queensland government's announcement was more about taking culture wars to the open water than implementing evidence-backed policy.
'I think there's no doubt that the Queensland government believes that this is kind of a war on woke,' Pepin-Neff said. 'This is definitely a tough-on-sharks kind of policy decision and it includes killing sharks – and making sure everyone knows that they're killing sharks – as a way to provide political cover.'
'There's no real way to interpret this other than that the politicians have decided that they are going to win elections by killing sharks'.
A spokesperson for the federal environment department confirmed the Queensland shark control program was exempt from the EPBC Act 'in its current form … as it was in operation prior to commencement of the act'.
'It is the responsibility of the Queensland Government to ensure any changes to its program are still covered by the exemption and refer any action that requires an approval under the EPBC Act,' the spokesperson said.
The state government was contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Britain is ready to fight if conflict breaks out over Taiwan, says Defence Secretary John Healey
Defence Secretary John Healey has said Britain is ready to fight if conflict breaks out over Taiwan. The island nation has long been at loggerheads with China, strongly rejecting Beijing 's claim to sovereignty over it after the countries separated in the late forties. China's president Xi Jinping has previously said he would not rule out using force in the 'reunification of the motherland'. And now Mr Healey, when asked what the UK is doing to help countries like Taiwan prepare for potential Chinese escalation, has said Britain would fight in the Pacific. He was speaking on a visit to the HMS Prince of Wales, docked in the Australian city of Darwin, with the country's deputy prime minister and defence minister Richard Marles. He told The Telegraph, during the carrier group's nine-month Pacific deployment: 'If we have to fight, as we have done in the past, Australia and the UK are nations that will fight together. 'We exercise together and by exercising together and being more ready to fight, we deter better together.' These are some of the strongest words ever issued by the British government on the topic of potential engagement in any conflict in the region. The island nation has long been at loggerheads with China, strongly rejecting Beijing's claim to sovereignty over it after the countries separated in the late forties. Pictured: From second left, Mr Healey, Australian deputy prime minister and minister for defence Richard Marles, British foreign secretary David Lammy and Australian foreign minster Penny Wong on the visit to the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carrier today But the minister emphasised he was talking in 'general terms' - and the UK would prefer any disputes there were resolved 'peacefully' and 'diplomatically'. 'We secure peace through strength, and our strength comes from our allies', he added. Experts have previously warned an invasion of Taiwan could cause a large-scale conflict, pulling in nations from across the world. It is because the country manufactures most advanced computer chips. Mr Healey said 'threats' in the Indo-Pacific region are on the rise. It follows the Chinese military taking control of contentious reefs - and was accused of intimidating its neighbours there. The Defence Secretary's remarks also come as the HMS Prince of Wales carrier group sails with advanced F-35 fighter jets from Singapore to northern Australia for the first time in nearly 40 years. The fleet will continue on to Japan, likely coming close to Taiwan. The Defence Secretary's remarks also come as the HMS Prince of Wales carrier group (pictured on the visit today) sails with advanced F-35 fighter jets from Singapore to northern Australia for the first time in nearly 40 years Deploying the strike carrier group, which is the UK's largest of its kind, in the Pacific for nine-months shows Britain is aware of increasing threats in the region. Sending it to Darwin in particular indicates close ties between the UK and Australia - key to any potential conflict in the Indo-Pacific. Indeed, Mr Healey noted such a partnership was especially important currently, as threats in the region increase. The defence secretary emphasised the UK's interest in international rules, stability and security, as well as both freedom of the seas and navigation in the area. British officials have previously not commented on whether the UK would intervene in any conflict in the region. This is in line with the United States' stance, which has been dubbed 'strategic ambiguity' - and most other nations follow it too. Two Royal Navy patrol vessels are stationed permanently in the region. The UK government recognised, in its National Security Strategy published earlier this year: 'There is a particular risk of escalation around Taiwan.' Former defence secretary Gavin Williamson (pictured in 2019) said the UK is probably becoming more candid on its stance on the matter as threats in the Indo-Pacific increase. Former defence secretary Gavin Williamson said the UK is probably becoming more candid on its stance on the matter as threats in the Indo-Pacific increase. 'I think there's a realisation that by being completely silent it doesn't make it more or less likely', he explained. Deterrence, he added, involves making clear the consequences that will come if others act dangerously or maliciously. Mr Williamson, who led the MoD from 2017 to 2019, added it is important someone as prominent as the British defence secretary is clear actions have consequences. Former US president Joe Biden has previously broken strategic ambiguity on several occasions, saying the US would support Taiwan against China. His successor Donald Trump has not done this - but Pentagon officials are said to be preparing for conflict. His government has said it will review its membership of the AUKUS security agreement, between the US, Australia and the UK. It comes as part of Mr Trump's 'America first' approach. Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese has also not spoken out whether the nation would join the US and other allies to fight China in any conflict in the region. He refused to comment on the matter last week. The UK and Australia have made a renewed commitment to each other in recent times. The two nations signed the Geelong Treaty this weekend - a 50-year agreement cementing their commitment to the AUKUS pact. It also commits them to building a new fleet of nuclear-powered submarines. The HMS Prince of Wales anchoring in Darwin marks the first time a British carrier strike group has docked in Australia. It is also the first time a non-US carrier has taken part in Australia's annual military drills, the so-called Talisman Sabre. The event this year was the largest it has ever been. While the UK is turning more of its attention to the Indo-Pacific, Mr Healey (pictured on the visit today) confirmed there would be no change to its level of engagement with Taiwan Foreign secretary David Lammy also boarded the HMS Prince of Wales, on the same day as and just before his colleague Mr Healey. He has previously said Britain plans to undertake more freedom of navigation operations in the Taiwan Strait. Last month, a Royal Navy patrol ship, the HMS Spey, moved through the strait - which was praised by Taiwan but frowned upon by China. Britain does not comment on the future movements of its vessels. But it is thought the HMS Prince of Wales will soon also travel through the strait on its way to South Korea and Japan. While the UK is turning more of its attention to the Indo-Pacific, Mr Healey confirmed there would be no change to its level of engagement with Taiwan. Mr Williamson said Britain would likely only alter this stance if China got increasingly aggressive.
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Major pledge on Britain being 'ready to fight' in face of China threats
Defence Secretary John Healey was challenged over threats to Taiwan as he visited HMS Prince of Wales, which is docked in Australia as part of a rare Indo-Pacific deployment Britain is ready to fight in the face of escalation from China, the Defence Secretary has said. John Healey was challenged over threats to Taiwan as he visited the British aircraft carrier, HMS Prince of Wales, which is docked in Australia as part of a rare Indo-Pacific deployment. Asked about what the UK is doing to support countries like Taiwan amid potential escalation from China, Mr Healey told The Telegraph: 'If we have to fight, as we have done in the past, Australia and the UK are nations that will fight together. 'We exercise together and by exercising together and being more ready to fight, we deter better together.' But the Cabinet minister insisted he would rather see any disputes in the Indo-Pacific resolved 'peacefully' and 'diplomatically', clarifying that he was speaking about preparation to fight in 'general terms'. Mr Healey was joined by Richard Marles, Australia's deputy prime minister, on HMS Prince of Wales, as the ship docked in Darwin to take part in war games with allies, including the US. The British aircraft carrier, which is roughly the size of three football pitches, is on an eight-month deployment, known as Operation Highmast. In April, Keir Starmer met the crew onboard HMS Prince of Wales during an overnight stay ahead of their voyage. The PM said the mission showed the UK's "leadership on global issues and security and defence". "We all know that the world is more uncertain than it felt a few months or years before - we're in a new era," Mr Starmer said at the time. "We are sending a clear message of strength to our adversaries, and a message of unity and purpose to our allies." Tensions in the Indo-pacific region have been increasing for some time, with fears mounting that China will invade Taiwan, a self-governing island. China's leader Xi Jinping has eyed forcibly incorporating Taiwan into the country. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned in May of China posing an "imminent" threat to Taiwan during a high-level Asia defence summit. In the UK's Strategic Defence Review, published in June, it said: "China is increasingly leveraging its economic , technological and military capabilities.. This includes: a vast increase in advanced platforms and weapons systems such as space warfare capabilities, an unprecedented diversification and growth of its conventional and nuclear missile forces with missiles that can reach the UK and Europe.' And on the China threat the SDR warns of: 'More types and greater numbers of nuclear weapons than ever before with its arsenal expected to double to 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030.'
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Images of children starving in Gaza have shaken some world leaders out of inertia – but what will Labor do?
Images of emaciated, skeletal children in Gaza landed on news outlets' front pages last week. It seemed to shake some world leaders and ordinary citizens out of a stupor. It's a year and nine months since Israel began laying siege and raining devastation on Gaza, after the slaughter of Hamas' 7 October terror attacks. After 21 months of bombing and civilian death tolls now reported in the tens of thousands, a new word has begun appearing ever more prominently in media coverage. Famine. Not a famine driven by extreme weather, crop failure or pest infestation, but an entirely human-made famine. The type that could be fixed with the stroke of a pen, a bureaucratic shift, a political agreement. Sign up: AU Breaking News email It's why, half a world away in Australia, Anthony Albanese's government will enter its first full week of federal parliament under pressure, facing calls from outside and inside its ranks to do more. My colleague Benita Kolovos' exclusive on Monday, that Victorian Labor's state conference will probably back a series of motions urging the federal government to immediately recognise a Palestinian state and sanction Israel – expanding existing sanctions on two Israeli ministers – is the latest pressure point on Albanese and the foreign minister, Penny Wong, to do more, and faster. It's also a demonstration of the emotion of the party's rank-and-file members. The intervention of former Labor foreign minister Bob Carr on Friday, calling for immediate recognition of Palestine and sanctions against Israel's leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, was significant. Former cabinet minister Ed Husic, Labor's most publicly thoughtful and compassionate voice on Gaza, said 'the time is now'. Their comments came two days after Labor condemned Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi for holding a sign reading 'sanction Israel now' during the opening of parliament. Albanese, Wong and the government say Australia is not a major player in the Middle East, that they have consistently called for adherence to international law, and have contributed large sums in aid – $100m, Wong said on Friday. All true. But according to Palestine supporters inside Labor, there is 'near unanimous' sentiment in party ranks for the government to move beyond statements to concrete actions of the kind it has so far downplayed. Even if it means leading or moving ahead of global sentiment. Wong joined more than two dozen countries last week, expressing horror at hundreds of Palestinians' deaths at aid sites. It was notable, then, that Albanese still felt the need to put out an extra statement, with stronger language, days later. On Sunday, Albanese went further again, explicitly accused Israel of breaching international law. That's not nothing. Noting those 'heartbreaking' pictures of starving children, he told Insiders: 'A one-year-old boy is not a Hamas fighter'. In the same breath, Albanese rejected 'imminently' recognising Palestine, placing conditions on such a shift – including US support – that seem months, if not years, away. But wheels are turning. There is growing outrage in Labor ranks about Gaza. The Victorian Labor motion is the latest of many, with more to come. The motion comes from Labor Friends of Palestine, an internal campaign group. It has circulated similar motions, supported by 80 (and climbing) local ALP branches, according to Peter Moss, a national co-convener. One of the latest, he tells me, is the Wentworth branch, the eastern Sydney electorate with one of Australia's highest concentrations of Jewish voters. Moss maintains there has 'never been a more urgent time to assert the rights of the Palestinian people'. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Wong has said for some time Australia no longer sees Palestine's statehood as coming necessarily at the end of the peace process, which leaves open the door to recognition at any time. Albanese on Sunday, however, cautioned that US involvement 'is critical.' Still, backers say Australia wouldn't even be an outlier if it made recognition moves today. Carr said the French president, Emmanuel Macron's pledge to recognise Palestine should be enough for Australia, with no need to move in concert with the UK or US. He told me such a shift would win Albanese credit for foreign policy, for 'having a mind of our own'. It is true Albanese, Wong and Labor have spoken strongly in support of Palestinian civilians and international law, and given harsher criticism of Israel than many governments before. This has opened them to criticism from the opposition, Israel's own government and the screeching outrage machine of the right-wing press. Equally, for some, Labor haven't gone far enough. The Greens leader, Larissa Waters, said: 'Words, while welcome, won't feed starving kids.' But sentiment has seemed to shift, albeit glacially, even inside the Coalition. After Wong's statement on Tuesday, the opposition could barely muster a word for the plight of starving Palestinians in Gaza. The shadow foreign minister, Michaelia Cash, took five paragraphs to mention the 'suffering of the people of Gaza', and another two before adding 'it is important that aid flows', in a statement otherwise nearly entirely devoted to criticising Hamas – a terrorist group Labor has condemned, said can have no role in the future governance of Gaza, and must return Israeli hostages. By Friday, Cash's statement at least opened with a concession of 'strong concerns about the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza'. Some in the Coalition are uneasy their positioning in recent days has not paid enough heed to the human-made catastrophe. But chalk that up to another issue where the opposition finds itself at a loss, dealing itself into irrelevancy. The greater issue is for Labor. On the back of a thumping election win and an energised party base, its members want the government to stand up, be bold and help set a global example. Albanese says Palestinian statehood won't come as a 'gesture', but on this issue, the party faithful have made it clear: words aren't enough.
