Missouri repeals voter-approved paid sick leave law
In a news release, the governor's office described the voter-initiated paid sick leave law as 'onerous' and harmful to small businesses because it dictates 'when and how paid leave must be provided' and requires 'burdensome record keeping and compliance obligations.'
'Today, we are protecting the people who make Missouri work — families, job creators, and small business owners — by cutting taxes, rolling back overreach, and eliminating costly mandates,' Kehoe said in a statement.
Kehoe was elected governor last fall, receiving nearly the same number of votes (about 1.7 million) as those in favor of the paid sick leave measure on the same ballot.
The legislation Kehoe signed this week also ends automatic Consumer Price Index adjustments to the state's $15-an-hour minimum wage, another component of the ballot initiative voters overwhelmingly approved in November.
'The governor's action today demonstrates the absolute disdain Republicans have for working Missourians,' Missouri House Democratic Leader Ashley Aune said in a news release. 'But in stripping workers of their legal right to earned sick leave, the governor and his allies have probably guaranteed this issue will be back on the ballot next year as a constitutional amendment that will place worker protections beyond their reach.'
Voters approved the ballot initiative known as Proposition A as a new state statute, which has a lower signature threshold for ballot submission and approval but can be repealed by state lawmakers, rather than as a constitutional amendment, which can only be reversed through another statewide vote.
Missouri's GOP-controlled legislature approved the repeal of the components of Prop A during its session earlier this year, voting 133-17 in the House and 22-11 in the Senate.
The paid sick leave law, which went into effect May 1, allows employees to earn an hour of time off for every 30 hours worked. The new law Kehoe signed doesn't provide for workers to keep time that they accrued during the nearly four months that it will have been effect when it ends next month.
An independent poll of Missouri voters in April found 75 percent opposed efforts to repeal the measure, but pro-business groups lobbied heavily for its repeal, describing it as burdensome for employers.
'Business owners were clear: Proposition A's paid leave and minimum wage policies were a job killer,' Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry (MCCI) President and CEO Kara Corches said in a statement. 'Missouri employers value their employees and recognize the importance of offering competitive wages and benefits, but one-size-fits-all mandates threaten growth.'
Missouri Jobs with Justice, a worker advocacy group that advocated for the paid sick leave law, had urged Kehoe to veto the legislation to repeal it.
'Missouri workers and their families do not deserve to see their newly earned paid sick leave stripped away,' the group wrote in a letter to Kehoe last month. 'So many workers are for the first time experiencing the relief of paid sick leave.'
'If Proposition A is repealed, workers will again face increased economic insecurity when balancing being sick with maintaining their job,' it added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Jeffries touts ‘constructive' meeting with Mamdani, says they will ‘reconvene'
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said he had a ' constructive meeting ' with Democratic New York City mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani in Brooklyn on Friday. The meeting, which took place in Jeffries' home district, last an hour, according to Jeffries' spokesperson Justin Chermol. 'The meeting between Leader Jeffries and Assemblyman Mamdani was constructive, candid and community-centered, with a particular focus on affordability,' Chermol said, adding that the two also discussed public safety, rising antisemitism, gentrification and the importance of Democrats taking back the House majority in 2026. 'They agreed to reconvene shortly, alongside other members of the New York City congressional delegation and a few high-level community leaders,' he added. Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) have not yet endorsed Mamdani following his primary win last month. While the New York State Assembly member enjoys support among the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, he has faced skepticism from moderate members of the party. Mamdani has been working to consolidate support from Democrats ahead of the general election, where he will run against sitting Mayor Eric Adams and former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who are both running as independents. Republican Curtis Silwa is also in the race. The Democratic nominee was in Washington on Wednesday for a closed-door breakfast hosted by progressive Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). A number of House Democrats in attendance praised the state lawmaker following the event including Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) and Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.). Meanwhile Republicans have sought to tie Democrats to Mamdani. On Friday, the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) rolled out a digital ad campaign tying Mamdani to New York Reps. Josh Riley (D), Laura Gillen (D), Tom Suozzi (D), and New Jersey Rep. Nellie Pou (D). All four members potentially face competitive reelection bids next year.
Boston Globe
5 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Under pressure, House Republicans consider vote on Epstein files
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Yet the House resolution was the latest demonstration of how practically no one is moving on from Attorney General Pam Bondi's promises to publicly release documents related to Epstein. Since he was found dead in his New York jail cell in August 2019 following his arrest on sex trafficking charges, the well-connected financier has loomed large among conservatives and conspiracy theorists who have now lashed out at Trump and Bondi for declining to release more files in the case. Advertisement 'The House Republicans are for transparency, and they're looking for a way to say that they agree with the White House. We agree with the president. Everything he said about that, all the credible evidence should come out,' House Speaker Mike Johnson said Thursday afternoon. Advertisement Democrats vehemently decried the resolution's lack of force. They have advanced their own legislation, with support from nine Republicans, that would require the Justice Department to release more information on the case. Rep. Jim McGovern, who led the Democrats' debate against the Republican resolution Thursday night, called it a 'glorified press release' and 'a fig leaf so they can move on from this issue.' Under pressure from his own GOP members, Johnson had to demonstrate action on the Epstein files or risk having Republicans support the Democratic measures that would force the release of nearly all documents. 'The American people simply need to know the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth,' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said at a news conference. 'Democrats didn't put this into the public domain. The conspiracy theory provocateur-in-chief Donald Trump is the one, along with his extreme MAGA Republican associates, who put this whole thing into the public domain for years. And now they are reaping what they have sown.' Still, Democrats, who hold minorities in both chambers, have relished the opportunity to make Republicans repeatedly block their attempts to force the Justice Department to release the documents. Trump in recent years has suggested he would release more information about the investigation into Epstein, especially amid speculation over a supposed list of Epstein's clients. In February, the Justice Department released some government documents regarding the case, but there were no new revelations. After a months-long review of additional evidence, the department earlier this month released a video meant to prove that Epstein killed himself, but said no other files related to the case would be made public. Advertisement A White House spokeswoman said Thursday that Trump would not recommend a special counsel in the case. But later Thursday, the president said he had asked Bondi to seek the release of testimony from grand jury proceedings in the case. Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, said that process would likely only produce limited information, but added that it showed that 'the president is hearing the American people.'
Axios
5 minutes ago
- Axios
Inside the GOP-led plot to defy Trump on the Epstein files
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) is moving forward with plans to force a vote on requiring the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files, despite attempts by President Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) to take steam out of his efforts. Why it matters: The push by Massie and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) has proven popular in Congress, with most Democrats and some on the GOP's right flank supporting it. Democrats spent the week repeatedly trying to force a vote on Khanna's measure to force the Justice Department to place the Epstein files on a publicly accessible website within 30 days. Nearly a dozen House Republicans were co-sponsoring a similar bill introduced by Massie and sponsored by Khanna as of early Friday morning. Driving the news: After numerous unsuccessful efforts to swat away the Epstein issue, President Trump announced Thursday that he had directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to release grand jury transcripts in the Epstein case. Johnson, meanwhile, had the House Rules Committee prepare a non-binding resolution that calls on the Justice Department to release all information pertaining to Epstein — a way to address the issue while minimizing backlash from Trump. But the House speaker hasn't committed to holding a vote on that measure, telling reporters: "We'll determine what happens with all that. There's a lot developing." What they're saying: Massie told Axios those concessions aren't sufficient and that he still plans to move forward with his discharge petition, which forces a House vote on his binding bill if it is signed by 218 members. As with his 2015 push to depose then-House Speaker John Boehner, Massie said he intentionally timed it so that the vote can be forced shortly after the lengthy August recess. Massie said of his colleagues: "You're going to fundraisers, you're going to town halls, you're going to the grocery store, you're going to the beach — you're going to hear from people." "When they come back, I think there will be a big appetite for signing the discharge petition, which is why I have encouraged people to co-sponsor it before they go on recess," he added. "Otherwise they're going to get the question, 'Why haven't you supported this already?'" Between the lines: With most if not all Democrats and at least 10 Republicans expected to sign, the discharge petition will likely obtain the necessary signatures to force a vote. The real question is whether Johnson will once again employ the procedural maneuver he used in April to kill a discharge petition allowing House members who are new parents to vote by proxy for several months. In that case, Republicans eventually folded and reached a compromise with Johnson. Massie said he is not worried, however, because "that affected 435 people ... and the Epstein sex trafficking ring is a lot bigger than that." Similarly, Khanna told Axios: "Being allowed to vote in the House is important. But the release of the Epstein files, to the MAGA base, matters 100 times more to them. So I think it's a totally different situation." Yes, but: Some Republicans who signed onto the discharge petition demurred on the question of whether they would agree to a compromise. "I'll just have to strategize with Thomas and Marjorie [Taylor Greene]," said Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.). Said Rep. Eli Crane (R-Ariz.): "I haven't thought that far through the strategy piece yet. I just wanted to get on that resolution because I do believe transparency is important." Other right-wing hardliners are using GOP leadership's non-binding resolution as cover not to sign, arguing that Trump won't sign a bill with the actual force of law like the Massie-Khanna measure. Said Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas): "If you're the president of the United States, and you're trying to, I don't know, enforce separation of powers, and then you go, 'Well, I'm not going to sign this.'" What's next: GOP leadership is considering cancelling votes next week, in part to delay Massie's efforts.
