Community conversations on justice and accountability brings hope to women in Kuajiena
On a quiet sunny day in the village of Kuajiena Payam in Jur River, community members gather under the shade of a Morula tree to reflect on peace, security, justice, and the path ahead during an open dialogue focused on accountability through the military court system.
This engagement was conducted under the project, Advancing Accountability for Sexual and Gender-Based Violence and Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Crimes in South Sudan: Achieving Impact through a Victim-Centered Approach, facilitated by the United Nations Misison in South Sudan and funded by the Government of Norway.
Attending was Peter Madut, a civil society representative working with the Kuajiena Community Development Program, a grassroots initiative supporting women's groups. The program also has a dedicated initiative focusing on gender-based violence, empowering women through counselling services, and working alongside law enforcement to support victims with care and discretion.
'When women come to our office for support, we can either provide counselling or refer them to our gender office," said Peter. "We also work with community-based counsellors and engage local partners to ensure victims receive information and support appropriate for their needs.'
Complementing these efforts, military officials also urged locals to report crimes and speak out against human rights violations in the community.
'If anything happens to you, like rape, fighting and intimidation by the soldiers, do not fear report your complaints and we shall take it to our command and the Governor,' reassured Director of Moral Orientation, Brigadier General Awan Deng.
"This initiative reflects UNMISS' commitment to promoting inclusive and accountable governance by supporting access to justice for all regardless of status," said Moonlight Augustine Bahemuka, UNMISS Rule of Law Officer in Wau. "By sharing this space with local authorities and communities, we are creating a platform for knowledge-sharing, increased understanding of your rights and the steps available to seek legal redress.'
This message of protection and accountability resonated deeply with community members like Rose, a young woman of Kuajiena, who felt she better understood the role of court martials in promoting justice following the discussion.
As the workshop ended, she sat quietly, enjoying a meal with other women.
'For a long time, we lived in fear' she shared.
'But today's meeting gave me hope that our voices are being heard. I want to share what I've learned with other women so they can feel strong enough to speak out.'
Her words reflected the growing trust and determination among women in Kuajiena to build a safer, stronger community.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
13 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Top US court evades issue of birthright citizenship
The United States Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling, which denied the federal courts the right to block executive orders nationwide. The US Federal Government of President Donald Trump too sought a limited ruling from the Supreme Court. The government challenged the federal courts' authority to issue orders blocking the executive directives nationwide that a baby born in the United States does not automatically gain the US citizenship. This is part of Trump's agenda to restrict immigration. Three federal courts in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state have issued orders that the presidential order should be blocked nationwide. That is, the President's order cannot be implemented anywhere in the country and against nobody. The question before the Supreme Court was whether the federal courts have the authority to issue orders blocking nationwide the implementation of executive directive. The majority of the Supreme Court, the conservative six, have ruled that the federal courts do not have the right to issue orders blocking executive directives nationwide. The majority opinion written Justice Amy Cony Barrett had however said that the government cannot implement its orders for 30 days, and the federal courts have been asked to look to give specific remedies to those who have appealed, and not provide relief to everyone across the country. President Trump had of course claimed victory. The Supreme Court was not into playing the political game. The dissident opinion was written by Justice Sotomayor along with Justice Kagan and Justice Jackson. The dissenting judges argued that the federal courts had the right to stop a law that is patently unconstitutional – the President's order saying that anyone born in the United States does not become a citizen – because there is no other alternative. The two sides are arguing slightly different positions. The majority opinion as written by Justice Barrett recognizes the issue whether the President order reversing what is guaranteed by the 14th Constitutional Amendment stands the test of law. Justice Barrett says, '…the principal dissent (Justice Sotomayor) argues because the Executive Order is unconstitutional…' the Executive Branch has no right to impose [it] against anyone. The principal dissent's analysis of the Executive Order is premature because the birthright citizenship issue is not before us. And because the birthright citizenship issue is not before us, we take no position on whether the dissent's analysis is right.' It is clear that Justice Barrett is taking technically right and narrow view of the case before the court. But Justice Mayor in her dissent opinion has laid out the case clearly and in a straightforward manner. She wrote: 'Children born in the United States and subject to its laws are United States citizens. That has been the legal rule since the founding, and it was the English rule well before then. This Court once attempted to repudiate it, holding in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) that the children of enslaved black Americans were not citizens. To remedy that grievous error, the States passed in 1866 and Congress ratified in 1868 the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause, which enshrined birthright citizenship in the Constitution. There it has remained, accepted and respected by Congress, by the Executive, and by this Court. Until today.' Justice Barrett and Justice Sotomayor are arguing along different lines. Justice Barrett will find it hard to wriggle out of the implications of the Fourteenth Amendment. She found an easy way out by saying that the issue was not before the Court. The issue will come up before the Court quite soon, and she and the majority conservatives in the Court will have to take a position.
Zawya
a day ago
- Zawya
UAE, Iraqi Presidents discuss bilateral relations, regional developments in phone call
UAE President His Highness Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan today received a phone call from His Excellency Dr Abdul Latif Jamal Rashid, President of the Republic of Iraq. During the call, the two leaders discussed the latest developments in the Middle East, with both sides underscoring the importance of promoting dialogue and diplomacy as a means to foster peace, safeguard regional security, and fulfil the aspirations of all for development and prosperity. The call also explored opportunities to further strengthen the close ties between the UAE and Iraq, in a way that advances progress and prosperity for both nations and their peoples. His Highness and the Iraqi President exchanged greetings on the occasion of the Hijri New Year, expressing their hopes that it brings peace, security, and stability to the region and the wider world.
Khaleej Times
a day ago
- Khaleej Times
UAE, Iraqi Presidents discuss regional tensions, exchange Hijri New Year greetings
UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan today received a phone call from Dr Abdul Latif Jamal Rashid, President of the Republic of Iraq. During the call, the two leaders discussed the latest developments in the Middle East, with both sides underscoring the importance of promoting dialogue and diplomacy as a means to foster peace, safeguard regional security, and fulfil the aspirations of all for development and prosperity. The call also explored opportunities to further strengthen the close ties between the UAE and Iraq, in a way that advances progress and prosperity for both nations and their peoples. Hijri New Year, expressing their hopes that it brings peace, security, and stability to the region and the wider world.
