UAE mandates Arabic, Islamic, and Social Studies in private kindergartens
These new requirements will take effect starting the 2025/2026 academic year across all private schools and curricula.
Under the new policy, all students will learn Arabic daily for 200 minutes per week, increasing to 300 minutes weekly by 2027/2028. The subject must be taught by qualified early childhood teachers using approved materials for both native and non-native Arabic speakers.
Islamic Studies will also become mandatory for all Muslim kindergarten students in private schools, with 90 minutes of instruction each week. Schools can schedule this as three 30-minute sessions or two 45-minute sessions.
For Social Studies, private schools are required to teach key topics about UAE family life, geography, environment, and social values. These lessons will be delivered through play-based learning activities as part of the children's daily routine.
To ensure these new standards are followed, the Ministry will provide schools with teaching frameworks and expected learning outcomes before the changes begin. Inspections to monitor compliance will start in the 2026/2027 academic year, with advisory visits beginning earlier.
This is the first time these subjects have been made mandatory at the kindergarten level in private schools, reflecting the government's focus on strengthening national identity and values from a young age.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
14 hours ago
- The National
UAE and Jordan lead 59th aid airdrop into Gaza
The UAE and Jordan carried out the 59th airdrop operation of humanitarian aid into Gaza on Friday, alongside seven aircraft from France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. The efforts were part of Operation Chivalrous Knight 3, which aims to deliver food and relief supplies to the most affected areas in the strip. Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, spoke by phone with Ayman Safadi, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. The two sides discussed the latest developments of the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip, and ways to enhance joint co-ordination in relief efforts. UAE aid to Gaza The UAE has provided more than $1.5 billion in humanitarian support to Gaza since the start of the war with Israel, authorities revealed on Friday. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs set out the scale of the country's commitment to the enclave and pledged to continue to deliver support amid 'continuing catastrophic conditions'. According to the UN's financial tracking Service, the Emirates has delivered more aid to Gaza than any other country. The assistance includes providing medical support to 72,280 patients at hospitals in the UAE and the floating hospital in Al Arish, Egypt. In addition, over 78,000 tonnes od food, medicine, and emergency supplies have been distributed in co-ordination with international humanitarian organisations. At least 60,249 Palestinians have been killed and 147,089 wounded since the war with Israel began in October 2023, according to the Hamas-run Gazan health ministry.
The National
a day ago
- The National
The Khor Abdullah waterway: Navigation deal or border surrender?
A 2012 agreement between Iraq and Kuwait regulating navigation in the shared Khor Abdullah waterway has triggered intense debate inside Iraq ever since, with critics warning it blurs maritime boundaries and threatens national sovereignty. Some opponents are calling to annul the deal, while others support renegotiation to safeguard Iraq's rights. Meanwhile, Kuwait maintains that its maritime boundary with Iraq, including navigation rights in Khor Abdullah, is firmly grounded in international law. Kuwaiti officials have repeatedly stressed that any attempt to revoke this agreement unilaterally is invalid and unacceptable. The Kuwaiti Ministry of Foreign Affairs has lodged formal protests and called on Iraq to honour its commitments under binding international treaties, reaffirming Kuwait's sovereignty over its territorial waters and its right to shared navigation in Khor Abdullah. The issue of land and maritime borders between Iraq and Kuwait is highly sensitive among Iraqis with many viewing the border demarcation unfairly imposed by the US Security Council after driving Saddam Hussein 's army out of its neighbour in 1991 and say the country's weakened state at the time was exploited. It is equally sensitive from the Kuwaiti point of view due to the 1990 invasion, with concerns about Iraqi over-reach. The controversy has pitted Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani against the public, with critics accusing him of compromising the country's rights to Kuwait to secure regional support as he eyes a second term in office in November's national election. Some have gone as far as accusing Iraqi officials involved in the border negotiations of receiving bribes from Kuwait, without providing substantial evidence. Both Iraq and Kuwait claim exclusive ownership of the narrow canal, which curves around Kuwait's Bubiyan and Warba islands on one side and Iraq's Al Faw Peninsula on the other. Iraqis say it is named after a famous Basra fisherman, Abdullah Al Timimi, while Kuwaitis say its name derives from the second ruler of Kuwait, Abdullah bin Sabah, who ruled from 1762 to 1814. In early 2022, Iraq closed off the chapter of Kuwait compensation, paying its final war reparations, settling the $52.4 billion of claims made for damage inflicted during the 1990 invasion. What is the agreement and its purpose? Three years after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 833, which determined the land border between the two. However, the delineation of the maritime border was left to the countries themselves. In 2012, Baghdad and Kuwait signed the agreement and it was ratified in 2013 by the parliament in Baghdad. It aimed to regulate maritime traffic, environmental protection and safety within the estuary that forms Iraq's only gateway to the Arabian Gulf. The deal gives each country the right to control navigation and safety enforcement. It stipulates that the agreement 'shall remain in effect indefinitely' but can be mutually terminated with six months' notice. This also applies to amending it. Critics' arguments Critics – mainly legislators, independent politician and experts – argue that the terms of the accord implicitly draw a boundary, warning it could prejudice future maritime border negotiations and impose access controls on Iraqi ships, requiring Kuwaiti approval and fees. Amir Abdul Jabar, who served as transport minister from 2008 to 2010 and is one of the strongest opponents of the agreement, argues it is meant to delineate a maritime border rather than regulate navigation. Although the accord states that the agreement 'shall have no effect upon the boundary' between Iraq and Kuwait as demarcated pursuant to the UN Security Council Resolution 833 in 1993 at the creek, it gives Kuwait more control beyond that deep in the Gulf, Mr Abdul Jabar said. Article 2 of the agreement explains the term 'waterway' as the area from the point where the maritime channel at Khor Abdullah meets the international boundary between the points 156 and 157 heading south to the point 162 set by the Resolution 833 'thence to the beginning of the maritime channel at the entrance to Khor Abdullah'. 'So, the definition of the waterway in the agreement didn't stop at the 162 point – the one set by the UN Security General resolution,' Mr Abdul Jabar said. Article 4 stipulates that 'each party shall exercise its sovereignty over that part of the waterway which lies within its territorial water'. The essence of the objection, Mr Abdul Jabar said, is that it must not be applied on the area beyond the point 162 as Article 2 stipulates. 'How is it possible to divide the area beyond the point 162?' Mr Abdul Jabar said. 'We are not objecting to the [833] resolution even though it's unfair, but the government and parliament of 2012-2013 brought a new disaster [in signing this deal],' he added, warning that Iraq could lose future maritime entitlement to deeper Gulf waters and its natural resources known as the Exclusive Economic Zone. Mr Abdul Jabar had filed a lawsuit against Mr Al Sudani for 'blocking the court's ruling', by refusing to have copies of it deposited to the UN and the International Maritime Organisation. Ruling and controversy In September 2023, Iraq's Federal Supreme Court invalidated the law ratifying the agreement, ruling that it violated the Iraqi Constitution by lacking the required two thirds parliamentary majority for international treaties. Parliament had passed it by simple majority only. Shortly after the ruling, the GCC and US issued a joint statement in which they called on the Iraqi government to 'ensure that the agreement remains in force'. The Iraqi government has assured Kuwait that Iraq is committed to all its international agreements. Afterwards, Mr Al Sudani and President Abdul Latif Rashid have independently sought to reverse the ruling. These requests were withdrawn early this month and the agreement was sent back to parliament to approve in a two-thirds majority. It was a sigh of relief for the opponents. Many of them are now asking to annul the agreement by rejecting it inside parliament, while others are seeking to renegotiate it with an Iraqi team including experts, not only politicians. Protests across Iraq have continued, to reject the agreement in its current form. A public campaign is also set to be launched to collect signatures for a petition for the UN Security Council. Fadi Al Shammari, a political adviser to Mr Al Sudani, confirmed the Khor Abdullah agreement aims to regulate navigation and has nothing to do with border demarcation. 'Iraqi land is sacred, and there will be no leniency or compromise over any inch of it under any pretext,' Mr Al Shammari said, claiming that campaigns opposing the agreement are 'driven by political and electoral agendas'. Iraqis are divided about the agreement, although many of the Iran-backed political parties and armed groups are echoing the government stance. In an interview with a local satellite channel in May, the leader of the Asaib Ahl Al Haq group, Qais Al Khazali, blamed Saddam Hussein's banned Baath party for seeking to discredit the agreement by portraying it as 'giving up Iraq's borders with Kuwait'. 'Saddam was the one who sold it [the border] when he recognised resolution 833", a UN motion which set the land and maritime borders, he said. It is still unclear if the parliament will ratify the agreement or whether it will be left to the next parliament after national elections in November national elections. Kuwait is also in dispute with Iran over their maritime border and Al Durra offshore gasfield in the Arabian Gulf. Kuwait and Saudi Arabia say they have 'exclusive rights' to Al Durra and called on Iran to validate its claim by demarcating its maritime borders. Iran previously claimed a stake in the field and said a Kuwaiti-Saudi agreement signed last year to develop the field was illegal.
Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
Reform UK candidate descended from top Muslim scholar rues racist abuse in campaign
A Muslim candidate in Nigel Farage's Reform UK who came second in a recent local election has revealed to Middle East Eye that he faced a storm of Islamophobic and racist abuse during his campaign - and that he wished the party had addressed it publicly. Siddiq Mahmood Malik, widely known as "Sidney", stood in the 24 July byelection in Llanrumney, a predominantly working-class ward in Cardiff in Wales. Malik, a Cardiff resident and descendant of the renowned 19th-century Indian Muslim thinker Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, received 630 votes and lost to a Labour incumbent who received 755. This week, Malik told MEE he faced a barrage of online abuse over his 'Muslim identity' during the campaign. On 6 July, an anonymous X account with over 100,000 followers posted a photo of Malik with the caption: 'Why do Reform keep choosing Muslims for candidates?' New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The post had received over 600,000 views and over 800 comments at the time of writing, many of which were racist and Islamophobic in nature. Malik is descended from the famous Aligarh founder Sir Syed Ahmed Khan Far-right activist Tommy Robinson's X account shared the post and commented 'I hope people can see it now' in a post that received over 500 comments. Numerous comments also directed anti-Muslim abuse at Reform's former chairman and current head of the its department of government efficiency, Zia Yusuf. 'During my candidacy, I encountered significant challenges, primarily related to my Muslim identity,' Malik told MEE. 'Reform UK was supportive throughout my campaign, and I'm grateful for that,' he added. 'However, I did hope there would be some public acknowledgement of the negative commentary directed at me online - particularly from figures like Tommy Robinson.' MEE asked Reform UK for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication. Malik added that his ethnic background was 'clearly a point of contention, even among some within the online Reform UK community". "I'm still a member of Reform UK and may remain involved in the future," he said. But, he added: 'I found Reform UK still faces serious challenges with its relationship with Muslim communities and other minority communities. All communities play a role in British national cohesion, our great multiculturalism and contribute to how we're perceived globally.' Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's legacy During the campaign, a spokesperson for Reform UK Wales said that Malik 'is passionate about Reform. It runs in his family as he is a descendant of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, the 19th-century Muslim reformer and scholar'. Khan was an Indian modernist thinker and Anglophile who founded the Aligarh Mohamedan Anglo-Oriental College, modelled on Oxford and Cambridge, after the fall of the Mughal Empire. Khan was an Indian modernist thinker and Anglophile who founded the Aligarh Mohamedan Anglo-Oriental College (Wikimedia Commons) He was avowedly loyal to the British empire and was revered by later generations of Indian Muslim thinkers. Renowned 20th-century philosopher Sir Muhammad Iqbal said of Khan: "The real greatness of the man consists in the fact that he was the first Indian Muslim who felt the need of a fresh orientation of Islam and worked for it." Khan's university exists today in India as the Aligarh Muslim University and has produced many of the subcontinent's most famous politicians. In the early 20th century, it was considered the main recruiting ground for the All-India Muslim League, the party which would found Pakistan in 1947. 'I'm deeply proud of my heritage and of Sir Syed,' Malik told MEE, describing him as 'the first British Muslim knight, and a reformer of education, science, and integration during a time of deep division'. 'In many ways, he inspired me to stand,' he said. Reform's complex relationship with Muslims Opinion polls consistently indicate that Reform, which advocates for the mass deportation of illegal immigrants and has four MPs in parliament, is the most popular party in Britain. It has often been accused of stoking bigotry against Muslims and other minorities, which the party strenuously denies. On the other hand, far-right activists, including Tommy Robinson, have often accused the party of being too pro-Muslim. UK: Nigel Farage blames riots on Andrew Tate and online misinformation Read More » In June Zia Yusuf, who describes himself as a 'British Muslim patriot', resigned as the party's chairman in a shock move following a public row with Reform MP Sarah Pochin after she urged a ban on women wearing the burqa in a parliamentary debate. Party leader Nigel Farage suggested Yusuf quit because he received relentless abuse online from the 'very hard extreme right'. 'When Zia says anything you cannot believe the absolute tirade of personal racist abuse that he gets,' Farage said. 'And I just think he snapped.' But Yusuf rejoined the party just days later, saying his resignation had been a mistake. Malik, while disheartened at the abuse he faced during his own campaign, said he was 'proud to have come a very close second to Labour' in the recent byelection. He said the result signalled that 'many are ready, open-minded, and willing to support my candidacy and hope to one day lead meaningful change on the national stage'. He also said he is working on 'the first British VR [virtual reality] feature film', entitled Once Upon a Time In Britain. 'I aim to empower underrepresented voices and foster understanding through storytelling.'
