
Trump says he'll withhold money from New York if Mamdani becomes mayor
Trump called Mamdani, a self-described democratic socialist, a 'pure communist.'
'I think he admits it ... If he does get in, I'm gonna be president and he's gonna have to do the right thing or they're not getting any money. He's gotta do the right thing,' the president added.
Trump claimed that Mamdani would be 'very bad for New York.'
'I used to say, we will never have a socialist in this country, no, but we'll have a communist. I mean, he's a communist and going to be mayor of New York,' he said.
Mamdani appeared on NBC 's Meet the Press on Sunday morning, where moderator Kristen Welker gave him the chance to respond to Trump's comments.
'He's had a lot to say about your campaign. He called you a communist. Because he's the president, I want to give you a chance to respond directly to him. How do you respond? Are you a communist?' Welker asked.
'No, I am not. And I have already had to start to get used to the fact that the president will talk about how I look, how I sound, where I'm from, who I am, ultimately, because he wants to distract from what I'm fighting for,' said Mamdani. 'And I'm fighting for the very working people that he ran a campaign to empower, that he has since then betrayed.
'And when we talk about my politics, I call myself a Democrat socialist in many ways inspired by the words of Dr. King from decades ago, who said, 'Call it democracy or call it democratic socialism. There has to be a better distribution of wealth for all of God's children in this country,'' he added. 'And as income inequality has declined nationwide, it has increased in New York City. And ultimately, what we need, is a city where every single person can thrive.'
Welker also grilled Mamdani on the phrase 'globalize the intifada.' She noted that he was recently asked about it, and he didn't 'condemn the phrase.'
'It's a phrase that many people hear as a call to violence against Jews,' said Welker. 'There's been a lot of attention on this issue, so I want to give you an opportunity to respond here and now. Do you condemn that phrase 'globalize the intifada?''
'That's not language that I use,' said Mamdani. 'The language that I use and the language that I will continue to use to lead this city is that which speaks clearly to my intent, which is an intent grounded in a belief in universal human rights.'
'And ultimately, that's what is the foundation of so much of my politics, the belief that freedom and justice and safety are things that, to have meaning, have to be applied to all people, and that includes Israelis and Palestinians as well,' he added.
Welker pressed on, asking again if Mamdani condemns the phrase.
He said he has heard from Jewish New Yorkers who have shared their concerns with him amid recent attacks in Washington, D.C., and Boulder, Colorado.
'I've heard those fears, and I've had those conversations, and ultimately, they are part and parcel of why in my campaign, I've put forward a commitment to increase funding for anti-hate crime programming by 800 percent,' he said. 'I don't believe that the role of the mayor is to police speech in the manner, especially of that of Donald Trump, who has put one New Yorker in jail who has just returned to his family, Mahmoud Khalil, for that very supposed crime of speech.'
'Ultimately, what I think I need to show is the ability to not only talk about something but to tackle it and to make clear that there's no room for antisemitism in this city,' he added. 'And we have to root out that bigotry, and ultimately, we do that through ... actions. And that is the mayor I will be, one that protects Jewish New Yorkers and lives up to that commitment through the work that I do.'
Welker went on to ask Mamdani if, as a self-described democratic socialist, he believes that billionaires have a right to exist.
'I don't think that we should have billionaires, because, frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality, and ultimately, what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country,' he said. 'And I look forward to work with everyone, including billionaires, to make a city that is fairer for all of them.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Trans swimmer Lia Thomas' wins will be WIPED and runners-up moved to first place after Penn bowed to Trump crackdown
The University of Pennsylvania has backed down to Donald Trump 's Department of Education by agreeing to resolve Title IX violations over transgender former Quakers swimmer Lia Thomas. Penn will now adopt strict definitions for male and female competitors under White House guidelines and erase Thomas from the school's history books. Furthermore, the school will restore records to swimmers impacted by Thomas' inclusion in women's NCAA competitions and issue an apology to those parties. The Ivy League school's decision comes after the Trump administration suspended $175 million in federal funding to Penn – money that had been earmarked and funded by the Defense Department and the Department of Health and Human Services. In 2022, the NCAA used a sport-by-sport approach to allowing transgender athletes to participate, deferring to an individual sport's national governing organization, international federation or prior established International Olympic Committee criteria. Thomas competed under those guidelines, which allowed female transgender swimmers who had completed one year of hormone replacement therapy to compete. The NCAA changed its policy the day after Trump signed an executive order on February 5 that was intended to ban transgender athletes from competing in girls and women's sports. That ended its sport-by-sport practice in favor of a blanket policy that only allows athletes assigned female at birth to participate in women's sports.


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump ally and mega investor launches PAC to go against Musk's political ambitions - and takes jab at Tesla in its name
A mega investor and ally of President Donald Trump has launched a super PAC to challenge Elon Musk's political ambitions. James Fishback, a former Department of Government Efficiency adviser, launched the FSD PAC Tuesday to counter Musk's 'antics.' FSD, a swipe at Tesla's 'Full Self Driving,' stands for 'Full Support for Donald', and its goal is to ensure that Musk doesn't undermine or weaken Trump's hold over the Republican party, according to Politico. 'There's real frustration in our movement with Elon and his antics,' Fishback told the outlet. 'I'm a big believer in what he's doing in the private sector. But when it comes to politics, he's dead wrong on this.' Fishback, 30, stepped back from DOGE after Musk's outbursts on X about the president, where the Tesla CEO claimed Trump is in the Epstein files and attacked the Big, Beautiful Bill. Musk threatened to create his own political party as the feud between him and Trump reignited this week over the spending bill. 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' Musk wrote on X. Where Musk follows through on plans to fund third-party hopefuls to challenge Trump-endorsed candidates, FSD will step in to counter the world's richest man, Fishback said. 'If Elon actually launches a new party to take down Trump, I'm starting a Super PAC to defend the MAGA candidates he targets,' Fishback wrote in a post on X. 'I'll need your help to stop this sabotage of President Trump's winning agenda.' The investor is putting $1 million of his own money into FSD in a display of loyalty to Trump, he said on X. Fishback is the founder of investment firm Azoria Partners, which launched at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. He was the mastermind behind plans to deliver DOGE dividends, where some savings gleaned from cuts would be given back to the taxpayer. Uncertainty surrounds the proposal now that Musk and Fishback have stepped away from DOGE. In an interview last year, Fishback told MarketWatch his success grew from his humble beginnings as the son of a bus driver and a Colombian immigrant. 'In ten years, I went from helping my dad sell watermelons on the side of the road to generating over $100 million in trading profits,' he told the outlet. Still, despite Fishback's efforts, GOP insiders aren't too worried about Musk's potential meddling in races, given his failed attempt to influence the outcome of the Wisconsin Supreme Court race in April. 'He's finished, done, gone. He polls terribly. People hate him,' an anonymous GOP operative previously told Politico before Musk officially exited the White House. 'He'd go to Wisconsin thinking he can buy people's votes, wear the cheese hat, act like a 9-year-old. ... It doesn't work. It's offensive to people.'


Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The British political class have shown themselves at their worst
The result should never have been in doubt. That whips and ministers were nervous at all should be testament enough as to how badly this government is being run. The welfare reform Bill was finally passed with a majority of 75, about 100 less than Labour's notional majority. But there is something missing from ministers' and MPs' reactions to this 'victory': the cheers, such as they were, sounded forced. The smiles were wan. The congratulations looked half-hearted. Because this is a Bill whose passage means many losers and zero winners – a rare achievement in parliamentary politics. Of course, the real losers are those future claimants of Personal Independence Payments (PIP) who, depending on the detail of the latest concessions granted by Keir Starmer, will find it much more difficult to have their claims approved. But there are many more political losers. There are the rebels themselves, at least some of whom might have hoped for personal advancement in their political careers and who must now face years of being nominated for the crummiest, dullest standing committees – the traditional punishment for those who won't take their whips' advice. Then there are the Conservatives, who voted against a measure many of them clearly supported. There was even a shadow cabinet meeting last week at which Kemi Badenoch asked each member how the party should vote. That such a question even needs to be asked suggests there was at least some support for a more principled, less cynical stance. Then of course there is the Government, which, before this debate and vote, was in a slightly stronger, slightly more popular position than this evening and which now has achieved the passing of a measure that even ministers can no longer see the point of. It has spent a lot of its political credibility in securing a Bill that was originally sold as a genuinely reformist measure (it is not) and which would save the Treasury billions (it will not). Not the Commons' finest moment. A damaged legislature, a damaged government and, most importantly, a damaged prime minister. Happy anniversary, Sir Keir.