
Some airlines checking Boeing fuel switches after Air India crash
The precautionary moves by India, South Korea and some airlines in other countries came despite the plane-maker and the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration telling airlines and regulators in recent days that the fuel switch locks on Boeing jets are safe.
The locks have come under scrutiny following last month's crash of an Air India jet, which killed 260 people.
A preliminary report found that the switches had almost simultaneously flipped from run position to cutoff shortly after takeoff. One pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel. "The other pilot responded that he did not do so," the report said.
The report noted a 2018 advisory from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which recommended, but did not mandate, operators of several Boeing models including the 787 to inspect the locking feature of fuel cutoff switches to ensure they could not be moved accidentally.
India's Directorate General of Civil Aviation said it had issued an order to investigate locks on several Boeing models including 787s and 737s, after several Indian and international airlines began making their own inspections of fuel switches.
The regulator oversees the world's third-largest and fastest-growing aviation market. Boeing planes are used by three of the country's four largest airlines.
Some airlines around the world said they had been checking relevant switches since 2018 in accordance with the FAA advisory, including Australia's Qantas Airways and Japan's ANA.
Others said they had been making additional or new checks since the release of the preliminary report into the Air India crash.
Singapore Airlines said on Tuesday it had carried out and completed precautionary checks on the fuel switches of its 787 fleet, including planes used by its low-cost subsidiary Scoot.
A spokesperson for the South Korean transport ministry said checks there would be in line with the 2018 advisory from the FAA but did not give a timeline for them.
Flag carrier Korean Air Lines said on Tuesday it had proactively begun inspecting fuel control switches and would implement any additional requirements the transport ministry may have.
Boeing referred questions to the FAA, which did not respond to a request for comment. Boeing shares closed 1.6% higher on Monday after there were no recommended actions in the report aimed at operators of 787 jets or the GE engines.
Japan Airlines (JAL) said it was conducting inspections but had also been doing so since the 2018 advisory came out.
"Any issues detected were repaired on the ground, and therefore did not occur during flight," JAL said in a statement on Tuesday.
Over the weekend, Air India Group started checking the locking mechanism on the fuel switches of its 787 and 737 fleets and has discovered no problems yet, a source familiar with the matter said on Monday.
About half the group's 787s have been inspected and nearly all its 737s, the source added, speaking on condition of anonymity. Inspections were set to be completed in the next day or two.
The Air India crash preliminary report said the airline had not carried out the FAA's suggested inspections as the FAA's 2018 advisory was not a mandate.
But it also said maintenance records showed that the throttle control module, which includes the fuel switches, was replaced in 2019 and 2023 on the plane involved in the crash.
In an internal memo on Monday, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson said the preliminary report found no mechanical or maintenance faults and that all required maintenance had been carried out.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Times
8 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Couche-Tard's failed bid for Seven & I sparks debate over foreign acquisitions
Alimentation Couche-Tard's decision to walk away in frustration from an attempted acquisition of Seven & I Holdings set off a debate in Tokyo as to what lessons foreign companies with ambitions for mergers and acquisitions should draw. The bid was audacious from the start. 7-Eleven convenience stores operated by Seven & I have one of Japan's most recognizable brands, and a takeover would have been the largest by a foreign entity in the country's history. Moreover, the founding Ito family were so opposed to the deal that they turned to one of their archrivals to try and block it. Still, the government, which has been pushing for companies to take a more investor-friendly approach, did not raise strong political opposition, even though Seven & I had sought greater protection under a law that could have scuttled a deal. While Couche-Tard placed the blame squarely on intransigence from Seven & I's management, the failure of the deal runs counter to the broader trend in the investing landscape, according to Nicholas Smith, a strategist at CLSA. "Seven & I is just an obstructive character in an ongoing success story,' said Smith. "Activist trades and shareholder proposals are on fire. Private equity sees Japan as one of the most attractive markets in the world and is hiring aggressively. Management can't afford to relax one bit.' Stephen Dacus, the new chief executive officer of Seven & I, now has to prove that the Japanese retailer can grow and boost its efficiency on its own. The shares fell 9% on Thursday after Couche-Tard walked away from its bid. The company plans to sell its superstore business for $5.4 billion and is proposing a ¥2 trillion share buyback and a listing of its U.S. business. Seven & I's rejection of the deal is a sign of more aggressiveness in Japanese firms, according to Jesper Koll, expert director at Monex Group. "The issue is not that this is old-style Japan protectionism, quite the opposite,' said Koll. "This is actually an injection of energy and competitive spirits into a Japan-led management team that is actually very international.' The history of attempted takeovers of marquee Japanese companies by outsiders is mixed. KKR, CVC Capital Partners and Blackstone walked away from a buyout of Toshiba after meeting stiff resistance from management. Concerns about the valuation, complexity and political nature of the deal were all headwinds that eventually resulted in a consortium led by a domestic fund prevailing. Hon Hai Precision Industry, better known as Foxconn, pulled off a deal in 2016 to take a controlling stake in Japanese electronics maker Sharp for ¥389 billion. The Taiwanese electronics contract manufacturer had pursued the Japanese company for years. Foxconn founder Terry Gou had lobbied Japanese lawmakers, co-opted banks and sweetened its offer to outmaneuver a Japanese government-backed bidder. "The implications of today's news will only be understood a year from now, and will hinge on whether management succeeds in accelerating group reforms and turning around the situation in both Japan and the U.S.,' said Michael Jacobs, an investment analyst at T. Rowe Price Japan on Thursday. Unsolicited offers have quite often met strong resistance regardless of where the prospective buyers come from. Japanese motor maker Nidec made an unsolicited bid for Makino Milling Machine, shocking many Japanese companies that had never imagined they could become a takeover target by a Japanese firm. Nidec, like Couche-Tard, withdrew the bid earlier this year due to strong opposition. In another closely watched case, Taiwan's Yageo made a takeover bid for Shibaura Electronics, prompting a counter bid from Japanese rival Mineba Mitsumi. Others argued that the failure of the Couche-Tard deal had nothing to do with the nationalities or cultures of the companies involved. The issue was simply money and Couche-Tard's ¥6.77 trillion ($45.8 billion) bid simply wasn't enough. "Seven & I did what any U.S. company would do,' said Jamie Halse, CEO & CIO at Senjin Capital. "It was up to Couche-Tard to put in a knockout offer.'


NHK
6 hours ago
- NHK
Japan's top negotiator, US Commerce chief hold phone talks
Japanese Economic Revitalization Minister Akazawa Ryosei and US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick have agreed to continue deep discussions of US tariff measures. The Japanese government said the two officials talked over the phone for about 45 minutes on Thursday morning Japan time. The talks came after US President Donald Trump indicated that Washington will start imposing a 25-percent tariff on Japanese imports starting August 1 as notified in his letter, unless Japan opens up its market. Both sides reaffirmed their respective positions on US tariff measures and agreed to continue dialogue. On Thursday evening, Akazawa reported the progress of tariff negotiations with the US to Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru and Chief Cabinet Secretary Hayashi Yoshimasa at the Prime Minister's Office. Akazawa told reporters after the meeting that he had received various instructions from Ishiba, but he declined to provide details. Regarding the August 1 deadline for what Trump calls "reciprocal" tariffs, Akazawa said Japan has national interests that cannot be compromised and that no concessions will be made even though a specific deadline has been set. He went on to say that Japan will continue efforts to find common ground, on which both countries will be able to agree. Meanwhile, Japanese government officials said the prime minister is expected to meet US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Friday. Bessent will visit Japan as part of a US delegation visiting the 2025 World Expo in Osaka.


NHK
14 hours ago
- NHK
July 17 NEWSROOM TOKYO Bangkok Live
Lineup: 1. Philippines, US hold maritime drills in South China Sea 2. Tesla enters India market with Mumbai showroom 3. UNHCR: 150,000 Rohingya fled to Bangladesh in last 18 months