logo
Supreme Court Gives Big Verdict In Forgery Case Involving Badminton Star Lakshya Sen

Supreme Court Gives Big Verdict In Forgery Case Involving Badminton Star Lakshya Sen

NDTV28-07-2025
The Supreme Court on Monday quashed an FIR against badminton player Lakshya Sen, his family members and coach in the birth certificate forgery case. A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Aravind Kumar said the continuation of criminal proceedings against Sen was an abuse of the process of court. The top court observed the very allegations that were examined and debunked by competent authorities were now being sought to be revived as it ruled out any fresh evidence meriting reopening of the inquiry. "The appellants, particularly appellant 1 and 3, are sportspersons of national standing, having represented India in international badminton tournaments and having earned multiple accolades, including medals at the Commonwealth Games and BWF international events," the court said.
The top court went on, "To compel such individuals who have maintained an unblemished record and brought distinction to the country through sustained excellence,to undergo the ordeal of a criminal trial in the absence of prima facie material would not subserve the ends of justice." The invocation of criminal law in such circumstances, the bench held, would amount to an abuse of process, which this court cannot countenance.
The top court observed the Sports Authority of India (SAI), upon receiving complaints, initiated a verification process in 2016, which included medical testing and factual inquiries.
The players were stated to have undergone bone ossification and dental tests at government-run hospitals including AIIMS, Delhi.
"The findings of these tests supported the birth years as recorded in official documents. On that basis, the SAI closed the matter. The CVC, an independent oversight body, was also seized of the issue and recommended no disciplinary proceedings against D K Sen. These findings were accepted by the relevant authorities and have not been set aside or reopened," the bench said.
Complainant M G Nagaraj alleged birth certificates of Sen and his brother Chirag Sen were forged.
The top court was hearing a plea against a February 19 Karnataka High Court order rejecting the petitions filed by Sen, his family members, and his coach U Vimal Kumar.
The high court found prima facie evidence, warranting an investigation into the case.
Nagaraj alleged Sen's parents Dhirendra and Nirmala Sen, along with his brother, coach, and an employee of the Karnataka Badminton Association were involved in falsifying the birth records.
According to the complaint, the accused allegedly manipulated the birth certificates of the Sen brothers, reducing their age by approximately two-and-a-half years.
The alleged forgery was intended to allow them to participate in age-restricted badminton tournaments and avail government benefits.
Nagaraj supported his claims with documents obtained under RTI Act and requested the court to summon original records from SAI and the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports in New Delhi.
Based on the evidence, the court directed the High Grounds police station to conduct an investigation.
The police subsequently lodged an FIR under Sections 420 (cheating), 468 (forgery), and 471 (using forged documents as genuine) of IPC.
The petitioners moved the Karnataka High Court in 2022, securing an interim order, which stalled the investigation.
They argued the complaint and subsequent FIR were baseless, motivated, and intended to harass them.
Nagaraj was alleged to have acted out of personal vendetta, after his daughter applied to join the Prakash Padukone Badminton Academy in 2020 but was not selected after the evaluation process.
Kumar, a coach at the academy, was named in the complaint.
The high court, while dismissing the petitions, observed the petitioners' counsel did not present arguments despite being given sufficient opportunities.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In motor accidents, claims not restricted to third party in Supreme Court
In motor accidents, claims not restricted to third party in Supreme Court

Time of India

time24 minutes ago

  • Time of India

In motor accidents, claims not restricted to third party in Supreme Court

Motor vehicle insurance protects a policyholder against claims made by a third party for damages due to the policyholder's actions, but what about a claim against injury/death of policyholder in an accident? Holding that family members of such a policyholder can also claim compensation, the Supreme Court has referred the issue to a larger bench given contradictory prior judgments on the matter. While hearing the compensation plea of a minor girl who lost both parents in a car accident, the SC said section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act could be invoked for such a claim, as it is a special provision which overrides not only the rest of the Act but also any other law in force. The minor had been awarded payout by the insurance company for the death of her mother but not for her father as he was himself the insured party. The insurance company held that the petitioner, legal heir of deceased vehicle owner, cannot at the same time be the liability holder and recipient of compensation. The bench said: '… Section 163A is not restricted to third party claim; without any requirement of establishing negligence, if death or permanent disability is caused by reason of motor accident'. 'It would override Sections 147 & 149 along with other provisions of the Act and the law regulating insurance as also the terms of the policy. This according to us is the intention of incorporating the non-obstante clause under Section 163A providing for no-fault liability claims '.

Traders begin protest against illegal encroachments in Chandni Chowk
Traders begin protest against illegal encroachments in Chandni Chowk

New Indian Express

time39 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Traders begin protest against illegal encroachments in Chandni Chowk

NEW DELHI: Traders in Chandni Chowk began a week-long silent protest on Monday, accusing civic agencies and the police of ignoring court orders and allowing illegal encroachments to return to the redeveloped stretch of the historic market. Led by the Chandni Chowk Sarv Vyapar Mandal, the protest began at 3 pm from Sunheri Masjid at Fountain Chowk, with participants marching silently towards Red Fort holding placards with excerpts from orders of the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court. The demonstrators sat near Red Fort for 30 minutes before returning to the starting point. 'This is a protest to uphold the dignity of our courts and demand that their orders be implemented,' said Sanjay Bhargava, president of the association. 'We have been doing the rounds of the Supreme Court, High Court and the National Green Tribunal for years regarding these matters. Despite strict orders, the situation has worsened,' he further said. The protestors allege that hawkers and squatters have been allowed to encroach upon the 1.3 km stretch redeveloped under court supervision at a cost of Rs 140 crore. The traders also claimed that the Delhi Police and the MCD have 'willfully ignored' court orders prohibiting hawking and squatting in certain areas. Bhargava said the group has made repeated complaints to the MCD and Delhi Police but no action has been taken. 'Even Member of Parliament for Chandni Chowk, Praveen Khandelwal has visited four times, but no one listens,' he added. The protest will continue till August 14, with a march each day to different parts of the area, including Town Hall and Fatehpuri Masjid. The traders say they want to 'name and shame' those responsible for the deterioration of the redeveloped area and seek freedom from the 'corruption that has hijacked public land and defied court directions.'

Former Brazilian President Bolsonaro faces house arrest after defying court orders
Former Brazilian President Bolsonaro faces house arrest after defying court orders

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Former Brazilian President Bolsonaro faces house arrest after defying court orders

Troubled former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro has been placed under house arrest for his role in the country's attempted coup. This comes after he broke a social media ban, escalating a dramatic standoff between the court and the far-right politician accused of plotting a coup. The beleaguered politician has said that he will appeal the house arrest order and expressed surprise since he did not breach any terms. To be sure, it was Bolsonaro's supporters who broadcasted a live call with the leader, breaking the court's imposed social media ban on the former army captain. Bolsonaro, a close ally of US President Donald Trump, is currently facing trial in the Supreme Court over allegations that he attempted to remain in power following his defeat in the 2022 presidential election to Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Just last month, the court ordered him to wear an ankle monitor and imposed a ban on social media use after claims emerged that he sought to interfere with the trial through provocative online statements, which were amplified by his sons and supporters. Under the ban, third parties are barred from sharing his public remarks. On Sunday, allies of Bolsonaro, 70, defied the court order by broadcasting a live call between the former army captain and his son at a solidarity rally in Rio de Janeiro, one of several held across Brazil. Bolsonaro himself did not attend the rallies, having been ordered by the Supreme Court to stay home at night and at weekends throughout the trial. He faces a heavy prison sentence in the trial, which is expected to be concluded in the coming weeks. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes reacted furiously, declaring Monday that the judiciary would not allow a defendant to "treat it like a fool" because of his "political and economic power." Criticizing Bolsonaro's "repeated failure" to comply with the court's restrictions, he ordered him placed under house arrest at his home in the capital Brasilia. He also barred the country's former leader (2019-2022) from receiving visitors, apart from his lawyers, and from using any mobile phones.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store