Huawei's AI lab denies that one of its Pangu models copied Alibaba's Qwen
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
Huawei's artificial intelligence research division has rejected claims that a version of its Pangu Pro large language model has copied elements from an Alibaba model, saying that it was independently developed and trained.The division, called Noah Ark Lab , issued the statement on Saturday, a day after an entity called HonestAGI posted an English-language paper on code-sharing platform Github, saying Huawei's Pangu Pro Moe (Mixture of Experts) model showed "extraordinary correlation" with Alibaba's Qwen 2.5 14B.This suggests that Huawei's model was derived through "upcycling" and was not trained from scratch, the paper said, prompting widespread discussion in AI circles online and in Chinese tech-focused media.The paper added that its findings indicated potential copyright violation, the fabrication of information in technical reports and false claims about Huawei's investment in training the model.Noah Ark Lab said in its statement that the model was "not based on incremental training of other manufacturers' models" and that it had "made key innovations in architecture design and technical features." It is the first large-scale model built entirely on Huawei's Ascend chips, it added.It also said that its development team had strictly adhered to open-source license requirements for any third-party code used, without elaborating which open-source models it took reference from.Alibaba did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Reuters was unable to contact HonestAGI or learn who is behind the entity.The release of Chinese startup DeepSeek's open-source model R1 in January this year shocked Silicon Valley with its low cost and sparked intense competition between China's tech giants to offer competitive products.Qwen 2.5-14B was released in May 2024 and is one of Alibaba's small-sized Qwen 2.5 model family which can be deployed on PC and smartphones.While Huawei entered the large language model arena early with its original Pangu release in 2021, it has since been perceived as lagging behind rivals. It open-sourced its Pangu Pro Moe models on Chinese developer platform GitCode in late June, seeking to boost the adoption of its AI tech by providing free access to developers.While Qwen is more consumer-facing and has chatbot services like ChatGPT, Huawei's Pangu models tend to be more used in government as well as the finance and manufacturing sectors.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump administration seeks to ban China from buying US farms
The Trump administration has a message for China: Keep off the farm. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said Tuesday the administration will work with state lawmakers to ban sales of U.S. farmland to buyers from China and other countries of concern, citing national-security interests. Rollins, joined by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, said the government is ratcheting up scrutiny on existing land owned by Chinese buyers and is looking at ways to potentially claw back past purchases. 'We'll never let foreign adversaries control our land," said Rollins. State and federal lawmakers for years have warned that China and other countries could use U.S. farmland to facilitate spying or wield influence over the U.S. food supply chain. Chinese-owned entities hold nearly 300,000 acres—roughly 0.02%—of U.S. farmland, according to Agriculture Department data, an area about the size of Los Angeles. Republicans and Democrats alike have sought to curb foreign ownership of American farmland, at times seeking to increase government scrutiny of purchases and investments. Critics have raised fears that foreign owners could drive up land prices or sidestep environmental rules. China's government has played down such concerns as overblown. Representatives of China's embassy in Washington, D.C., had no immediate comment. Rollins said on Tuesday that U.S. farms are under threat from China and other countries that are trying to infiltrate American agricultural research and steal technology. 'No longer can foreign adversaries assume we aren't watching," Hegseth said. Some state and municipal lawmakers have taken steps in recent years to block China-backed investment or ownership in U.S. agriculture. The city of Grand Forks, N.D., in 2023 halted the construction of a Chinese-owned corn mill after a U.S. Air Force official said the planned $700 million facility could represent a national-security risk because of its proximity to a nearby base. Some China-based ownership of U.S. farmland involves prominent U.S. agriculture companies. Pork giant Smithfield Foods and seed and pesticide supplier Syngenta have both faced criticism from government officials and lawmakers because of their Chinese owners. Smithfield is majority-owned by Chinese pork company WH Group and Syngenta is a subsidiary of China National Chemical. The companies' American leaders have pushed back, saying their China-based owners have helped them invest in U.S. farmers and create jobs. Smithfield in the past represented roughly half of the U.S. farmland owned by Chinese entities, via its Hong Kong-based parent. Much of that had been tied up in hundreds of company-owned hog farms and processing plants, according to federal data. WH Group acquired Smithfield in 2013, aiming to harness its technology and expertise to boost WH's operations in China. Smithfield returned to the U.S. public markets earlier this year, raising roughly $500 million after listing its shares on the Nasdaq Stock Market. WH Group owns about 93% of Smithfield's shares. 'We're an American company, American management team and made in America," Smithfield Chief Executive Shane Smith said in an interview earlier this year. Smithfield last year sold more than 40,000 acres of its U.S. farmland, leaving it with roughly 85,000 acres. Shares of Smithfield fell about 1% on Tuesday. Syngenta, the largest pesticide seller in the U.S., has said it owns a small amount of land for research, development and regulatory trials. The company, which employs about 4,000 people in the U.S., has previously faced calls to sell its farmland holdings. Two years ago, Arkansas ordered Syngenta to sell about 160 acres in the state, where it maintained an agricultural research facility with a few dozen employees. Syngenta at the time called the state's decision shortsighted. A Syngenta spokesman said Tuesday that the company is in the process of selling its remaining U.S. farmland and currently owns less than 1,000 acres in the country. Write to Patrick Thomas at
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Beyond the glitch: How China's Foxconn executive recall could reshape India's electronics future
New Delhi: Foxconn's recent recalls of key Chinese technology specialists from its Indian arm may hurt Apple's capacity to scale up the production of iPhones in India, hampering the country's ability to quickly boost its net earnings by churning out these high-end smartphones, government officials, industry executives, and analysts told Mint. Four people that Mint spoke with said that while the withdrawals may not lead to a major disruption of operations for Apple or Bharat Foxconn International Holdings Limited (FIH), at stake is India's ability to expand its assembly lines without oversight from China-based technology experts, partners and stakeholders. For now, China's move appears to be restricted largely to Rising Stars Hi tech—a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foxconn's India unit, Bharat FIH, a senior government official said. Also read | Land, power, skill: Inside the high-stakes battle to build the next Foxconn City The 'net' earnings from India's electronics industry, commonly referred to as 'domestic value addition', refers to the industry's total contribution to India's economy—after paying all due royalties to foreign entities supplying the requisite infrastructure. It is this that came under the scanner after Bloomberg reported on 2 July about China urging Taiwan's Foxconn to strategically recall key executives—thus halting localization of technologies critical to expanding the electronics manufacturing ecosystem in India. Foxconn has pulled over 100 key Chinese tech leaders, who were deputed to the company's India operations, in phases over the past six months. The Centre is not too worried at the moment—underlining that India's electronics economy should 'find a way to chart its own growth path in the long run, and some disruptions are a part of the usual process." 'Whenever there is a significant geographical shift of an established supply chain—such as that we're seeing Apple undertake—there is some amount of disruption and adjustments that happen as part of the technology transfer process. The government, as part of the established process under Press Note 3 (of 2020), issues visas to visiting delegations of foreign nations based on their applications. Even as some Chinese nationals are being withdrawn, there are executives from the US, Taiwan and Vietnam who have replaced them. Any impact on the Indian electronics ecosystem is thus likely to be limited, and short-term," the government official cited earlier added, requesting anonymity. The Press Note 3 in question was a special-provision move by the Centre made in 2020, restricting foreign investment and executive movements from 'nations that share a land border with India"—notably including China, in light of the clash between the two nations in Ladakh's Galwan Valley. Source of issue To be sure, the key point of the current issue stems from Rising Stars Hi Tech, alongside Tata Electronics, being involved significantly in ramping up Apple's electronics supply chain in India. With US president Donald Trump's trade pressures, Apple sought to shift its US supply chain from China to India for iPhones. However, this requires India to significantly expand its own assembly line capacities to produce '80-90 million iPhones per year", said Navkendar Singh, associate vice-president at market research and consultancy firm International Data Corp (IDC) India. 'To execute this expansion phase—without even taking the question of value addition into account, technology specialists from China make for a crucial resource in terms of establishing the local infrastructure, localizing the machineries, and training senior executives within India to retrain other executives to take over. This process is still an ongoing one, and is what will likely be hit in the long run as a result of China's silent strictures," Singh said. Also read | Mint Quick Edit | Foxconn's India plans should cheer us up The training and domestic value addition factors, however, are of utmost importance for India's electronics goals. India aims to scale its electronics economy to $500 billion by 2030, from $150 billion currently. By this time, with Apple picking India as an assembly destination of choice, iPhones could single-handedly and directly contribute up to $80 billion to this economy, significantly higher than the current $20-25 billion. Indirectly, Apple's impact is significantly higher. The company is the world's single-largest smartphone maker, and sells at 3x the average selling price of smartphones in most markets. As a result, Apple choosing India as a source of assembly is set to bring more supply chain and components ecosystem vendors to the country—thereby building a circular electronics economy within India in the long run. It is this localization that would further enhance domestic value-addition, which, as per Tarun Pathak, director and partner at market researcher and consultant Counterpoint India, is at 16% currently. This means that for every iPhone assembled in and shipped from India, 16% of the total manufacturing cost goes towards boosting the country's gross domestic product (GDP). By 2030, India hopes to double the domestic value addition, as per Singh, Pathak, and the Centre's own estimates. Doing so will double the net domestic revenue that is added to India's GDP from iPhone assembling. However, stalling the arrival of key executives could present a considerable near-term threat to the doubling of local earnings. Critical for expansion A senior industry executive familiar with the current movements said, requesting anonymity, that 'the involvement of senior technology specialists from China is critical to expand manufacturing supply chains, since India has not upskilled enough engineers at scale to fully replace the need for foreign partners within the electronics engineering firms." A second industry executive who works with a rival of Rising Stars Hi Tech in India, requesting anonymity, added that 'a lot of specialized machinery that is set up for the first time requires senior executives with technical knowhow from China, since the machine operation interfaces are often proprietary—and also in Chinese." 'This requires specialized training for Indian tech executives to undertake—and subsequently localize these processes to ensure that the licensing fees paid to foreign entities go down each year. But, without hand-holding right now, the localization process will face a significant slowdown," the second executive added. Read more | Dixon is becoming India's Foxconn For the long run, the Centre has rolled out a $2.7-billion components localization incentives scheme for vendors to enter India. Last week, a $12-billion research, development and innovation (RDI) scheme under the Department of Science and Technology (DST) also sought to provide critical electronics makers with long-term concessional loans to build their own machinery and other processes. 'Threats such as giving in to China's pressure of withdrawing technology executives will happen even more frequently, if India does not start ramping-up its licensed technologies and its own patents in the electronics industry. It will also be left open to losing business because of foreign disruptions, and that should be avoided at all costs," said Ajai Chowdhry, industry veteran, and co-founder of HCL and electronics body Epic Foundation.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Rare earths emerge as a geopolitical lynchpin in the rising China-U.S. rivalry
'They're going to deliver rare earths to us,' U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in an interview on June 27. 'And once they do that, we'll take down our countermeasures.' Mr. Lutnick's remarks came just a day after a White House official confirmed that the U.S. and China had reached 'an additional understanding' to implement the Geneva agreement — a deal reached on May 12 that had paused new tariffs for 90 days and set a mid-August deadline for further talks. Soon after, U.S. President Donald Trump announced that Washington had signed an agreement with Beijing. He offered few details but hinted at a possible deal with India in the near future. China also confirmed the agreement. These announcements were the first formal confirmation of a partial breakthrough after months of escalating trade and technology tensions between the world's two biggest economies. The recent developments came after high-level delegations from both countries met in London on June 9 and 10 for two days of negotiations. The talks, which lasted for more than 20 hours, were led on the American side by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Lutnick, and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, while the Chinese delegation included Vice Premier He Lifeng, Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, and chief trade negotiator Li Chenggang. The focal point of the talks was one mineral group: rare earth elements (REEs) — a strategic mineral group critical to both economies. The 17 rare elements Often described as the 'vitamins of the modern economy,' it is a group of 17 chemically similar metallic elements. These include 15 silvery-white metals called lanthanides, or lanthanoids, plus scandium and yttrium, which are indispensable to a range of civilian and military applications, from electric vehicles and wind turbines to radar systems, precision-guided weapons, and stealth aircraft. REEs are not finished magnets or minerals, but raw elements extracted from complex ores and later processed into specialised materials. Despite their name, REEs are not geologically scarce, rather, their extraction and processing is expensive, complex, and hazardous to the environment. The 15 lanthanide elements include lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium (atomic numbers 57–71). Scandium and yttrium, though not lanthanides, are often grouped with REEs due to their similar properties. Neodymium and praseodymium are used in powerful magnets that run electric vehicle motors and wind turbines. Europium is used in LED displays. While cerium and lanthanum are employed in catalytic converters, glass polishing, and camera lenses, samarium and dysprosium are essential in high-performance magnets and defence systems. Gadolinium has applications in MRI machines, while other REEs play a role in lasers, batteries, and fibre-optic cables. REEs are divided into two categories: light rare earths (from lanthanum to gadolinium) and heavy rare earths (from terbium to lutetium). Light REEs are widely used in consumer electronics, batteries, and industrial applications, while heavy REEs are more valuable due to their specialised uses, limited supply, and crucial role in military, nuclear, and high-performance magnet applications. What sets REEs apart are their unique magnetic, luminescent, and chemical properties. Origin, process of refining REEs are not found in pure form like gold or copper. Instead, they are typically dispersed in mineral ores, such as bastnäsite and monazite. Once mined, they undergo a complex, multi-step process: the ore is crushed, chemically leached, and then separated through solvent extraction to isolate individual elements. These are then refined into metals or oxides used in high-performance magnets, batteries, and defence systems. While deposits exist in many parts of the world, China dominates the rare earth supply chain — not because it holds the most reserves, but because it invested early in large-scale refining infrastructure. According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), China accounts for nearly 70% of global REE mining and more than 90% of refining capacity. The country's rare-earth journey dates back to 1927, when scientists discovered major deposits in Bayan Obo in Inner Mongolia. Production began in 1957, and over time, deposits have been located across 21 provinces and autonomous regions, from Fujian and Guangdong to Jiangxi and Sichuan. The choke point While rare earths are often discussed in terms of green energy and electronics, their military importance is equally, if not more, critical. Samarium-cobalt magnets, for instance, remain stable at high temperatures and are vital to precision weapons. Dysprosium strengthens magnets used in stealth aircraft. Yttrium and terbium enhance night vision and targeting systems. This military dependence is precisely why recent export curbs by Beijing rattled Washington. The London talks resulted in limited but noteworthy progress. China agreed to expedite the review and approval of thousands of export applications from manufacturers in the U.S. and to create a 'green channel' for trusted American firms. However, the deal did not cover military-grade materials, which are a key concern for the U.S. According to a Reuters report, Beijing has not committed to grant export clearance for some specialised rare-earth magnets that U.S. military suppliers need for fighter jets and missile systems. Beyond China Hence, the U.S. is actively seeking alternative resources for rare earth elements. The Mountain Pass mine in California currently supplies over 10% of the world's rare-earth raw materials. However, much of the ore still has to be sent to China for processing, due to the lack of domestic refining infrastructure. This has prompted a broader outreach beyond U.S. borders. In Greenland, the vast Kvanefjeld deposit, ranked among the world's top three rare earth sites outside China, could alone supply up to 15% of global demand for REEs. Though part of the Kingdom of Denmark, Greenland is self-governing and controls its own natural resources, including some of the world's largest reserves of rare earth, lithium, cobalt, and uranium — all critical to the clean energy transition and modern defence technology. However, Greenland lacks processing infrastructure. Greenland's Minister for Business, Trade and Raw Materials, Naaja Nathanielsen, in a BBC report, said that interest in the territory's minerals has 'absolutely increased within the last five years or so.' Meanwhile, Mr. Trump even floated the idea of acquiring Greenland, calling it essential 'for national security and international security.' During a joint session in Congress in March, he said, 'We strongly support your right to determine your own future, and if you choose, we welcome you into the United States of America. We will make you rich.' Ukraine, too, holds enormous potential. According to USGS, the country has 5,00,000 tonnes of lithium in its reserves, 20% of global graphite reserves, and significant supplies of neodymium and other high-tech metals. As part of ceasefire negotiations, Russian President Vladimir Putin had hinted that rare earth reserves in the territories Russia captured during the war could be opened to global markets. However, a source who spoke to the South China Morning Post remains sceptical, citing damage on the ground and Ukraine's lack of refining capacity as major hurdles to replacing China's dominance. 'Even if Washington manages to strike a deal, war damage and population displacement from the war would make extraction tough,' he said. He also expressed doubts over how reliance on Ukraine would dislodge China's place from that global supply chain, given that the processing capabilities in any market are going to struggle to match what China currently offers. Other possible locations, according to USGS are: Australia, Brazil, Russia, India, Vietnam, and Canada, as well as African nations like Madagascar, Tanzania, South Africa, and Burundi. Parallel to these efforts, the U.S. is also investing in recycling rare earths from used electronics and magnets. For now, all the talk and frameworks offer a temporary easing of tensions — a narrow civilian corridor in a broader landscape of unresolved disputes. With military-grade materials still off the table, the deal falls short of a reset. And unless the U.S. and its allies significantly ramp up investments in rare earth processing infrastructure, China's dominance will remain not just an economic asset but a powerful geopolitical lever.
