Something stinks in Philadelphia – and it's not just the uncollected garbage
Until recently, that is. Now every single resident of Philadelphia, my home town, is talking trash. Almost 10,000 city workers, members of the city's largest blue-collar union, have been on strike since last Tuesday, affecting everything from libraries to public swimming pools. But the most visible signs of the strike are the huge piles of trash that are accumulating (nicknamed 'Parker Piles' after mayor Cherelle Parker) because there is no garbage pickup. Did I mention it's boiling hot? You can imagine the situation. The rats are in heaven; I am in hell.
While I may be a woman on the verge of a nervous breakdown, the stinky trash piles are obviously doing exactly what they are meant to be doing: reminding everyone that the people who keep society running are underpaid and overworked. The world had a brief moment of appreciation for essential workers during the pandemic, but, after everyone finished their nightly clapping, nothing changed, did it? The rich just got richer.
The mayor has said there simply isn't enough money in the city's budget to give the union what it wants, which is better benefits and a 5% wage increase a year for three years. Sanitation workers in Philadelphia make $39,000 to $42,000 (£29,000 to £31,000) a year. I am obviously no expert in the city's budget, but it's funny what there is money for. There is a cool $877m (£645m) for the Philadelphia police department. Which, by the way, is now spending $1.3m on a new uniform that is a slightly darker shade of blue. There is enough money to pay Parker the same sort of salary (about $270,000) as the mayor of the significantly larger New York City. There is enough money, according to analysis by the Philadelphia Inquirer last year, for 16 of Parker's closest cabinet members to collectively earn $3.5m – $1m more than their peers earned under the previous mayor.
'Don't tell me what you value,' Joe Biden used to say. 'Show me your budget and I'll tell you what you value.' I hope Philadelphia starts valuing clean streets soon, because the current situation stinks.
Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Texas's redistricting is a Republican power grab at the hands of Trump
When Texas Republicans redrew their congressional map this month at the urging of Donald Trump, they faced a difficult task. They needed to find a way to pick up five seats that the president wanted ahead of the midterm elections next year without spreading their voters too thin and jeopardizing the 25 seats they already held. Republicans unveiled their plan to pick up the seats on Wednesday, revealing a map that could dilute Hispanic voting power. Under the new proposed districts, they would be favored in five new seats, giving them a hold on 30 of Texas's 38 congressional districts. Had the district been in place for the 2024 election, Trump would have won all 30 by at least 10 points. Republicans accomplished their goal by shifting district boundaries in three different parts of the state. In south Texas, they shifted boundaries of congressional districts where Trump performed well in the 2024 elections, but are held by two Democrats, Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez. Trump won Cuellar's district by seven points and Gonzalez's districts by about four points in 2024. Had the proposed districts been in place in 2024, he would have won each by about 10 points. In central Texas, the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex, and Houston, Republicans eliminated three separate Democratic congressional districts with a similar approach. They packed Democratic voters into one or two districts and then attached the rest to newly drawn, heavily Republican areas. It's an aggressive approach that gives Republicans a shot at picking up five seats, but doesn't necessarily guarantee they will get all five. Analysts believe that Cuellar – who faces federal bribery charges – and Gonzalez, are established enough incumbents that they could win in the new configurations of their districts. 'They didn't make the newly targeted, or the new seats targeted for pickups, as red as they could have,' said David Wasserman, a well-respected analyst at the Cook Political Report. 'Had Republicans drawn an uglier map, they could have basically guaranteed themselves five [seats].' Here are the results of the 2024 presidential race in south-central Texas. The circles represent results by precinct – the bigger the circle, the bigger the margin of victory for either Democrats or Republicans. Here are two of the congressional seats Democrats hold in the area. Kamala Harris easily carried both of them in November. Republicans' new map packs Democrats into district 37 in Austin and another heavily Democratic district in San Antonio. It cracks the remaining Democrats in San Antonio into new GOP-friendly district 35 that Donald Trump would have won in November by 12 points. Democrats hold three congressional districts in Dallas Fort Worth, here are two of them. The proposed map packs Democratic voters into district 33 and another heavily Democratic district in Dallas. The remaining democrats are cracked into rural far-flung district 32 that Trump would have won by nearly 18 pts. Guardian graphic. Sources: Redistricting Data Hub, Texas Legislative Council. Republicans are redrawing the map amid a four-year legal battle over the districts that are already in place. That suit, filed by a coalition of Latino voting organizations, advocacy groups and voters, argues that Texas's current congressional map diminishes the influence of non-white voters, who accounted for 95% of the state's population growth. 'The current map is already egregiously gerrymandered,' said Marina Jenkins, the executive director of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, which opposes the redraw in Texas. 'The proposed new gerrymander, and even more extreme gerrymander, adds even more insult to that injury, Black voters and Latino voters will have even less opportunity to have their political will considered on an equal basis.' The new map replaces several districts where Hispanic and other non-white voters had been electing Democrats with majority-Hispanic districts that favor Republicans. It would increase the number of districts where white people comprise a majority from 22 to 24, according to an analysis by the Texas Tribune. It would also create an additional Hispanic-majority district, and two new Black-majority districts. 'The gambit by Republicans here is to actually increase the number of Hispanic majority districts in terms of population share, but to diminish the opportunities of Hispanic voters to elect their candidates of choice,' Wasserman said. 'Because there are a number of Hispanic majority districts where Democratic-leaning Hispanic voters will be outnumbered by a coalition of conservative Hispanic voters and white voters.' Simply adding additional majority-Hispanic districts isn't enough to evade scrutiny under the Voting Rights Act, said Thomas A Saenz, the president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which is representing plaintiffs challenging the existing maps. If certain conditions are met, the Voting Rights Act requires states to draw districts that give minority groups the chance to elect their preferred candidates. 'When a line drawer draws majority Latino district but in such a way that it knows will not actually elect the candidates of choice of the Latino community that may be a violation of the Voting Rights Act,' he said, speaking generally about the map. 'You can do that by picking areas with large Latino voting population but that historically has a lower voter turnout right others with large Latino population.' 'Pointing to the number of quote unquote majority Latino district does not remotely answer the question of whether you have violated the Voting Rights Act.'
Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JD Vance offers hot take on Sydney Sweeney's 'attractiveness' amid woke jeans ad drama
Vice President JD Vance chimed in on the furious debate over an American Eagle ad campaign featuring actress Sydney Sweeney. 'My political advice to the Democrats is continue to tell everybody who thinks Sydney Sweeney is attractive is a Nazi. That appears to be their actual strategy,' Vance joked in an interview published Friday. Speaking on The Ruthless Podcast, the vice president ridiculed the left and Democrats for their reaction to the ad campaign that featured Sweeney and the slogan 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.' Critics on the left accused the ad's message as racist and compared it to 'Nazi propaganda' because of the pun using jeans with genes. One MSNBC producer wrote that the ad showed 'an unbridled cultural shift toward whiteness.' Vance joked that the Democrats had not learned anything from the previous election in their loss to Donald Trump. 'It actually reveals something pretty interesting about the Dems, though, which is that you have like a normal, all-American beautiful girl doing like a normal jeans ad, right?' he said. 'To try to sell, you know, sell jeans to kids in America, and they have managed to so unhinge themselves over this thing,' he added. In the ad, Sweeney wears all denim and says, 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color.' 'My jeans are blue,' she adds in the viral ad campaign. Vance said he thought Democrats would try to be 'less crazy' in the future. 'The lesson they have apparently taken is we're going to attack people as Nazis for thinking Sydney Sweeney is beautiful. Great strategy, guys,' he joked. 'That's how you're going to win the midterms.' Especially young American men.' The White House also criticized the left's backlash to the ad, describing it as 'cancel culture run amok.' 'This warped, moronic and dense liberal thinking is a big reason why Americans voted the way they did in 2024. They're tired of this bullshit,' wrote White House communications manager Steven Cheung on social media earlier in the week. Ashley Schapiro, Vice President of marketing at American Eagle revealed on LinkedIn after the ad campaign went viral that Sweeney was 'game' to 'push' the campaign into controversial territory. 'Syd's sentiment guided every frame, every stitch and every unexpected twist of The 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' campaign,' Schapiro revealed, ' Infusing our own personal cheeky energy and making us laugh as we envisioned how the world would experience the launch,' she said. Schapiro heralded the team behind the spot for creating 'a moment in culture ... a wink.'
Times
32 minutes ago
- Times
Has Trump pulled off an amazing deal, or is the worst yet to come?
The Trump administration's flurry of eleventh-hour tariff agreements will raise US protectionism to the highest level in a century. The effective tariff applied on goods entering America will jump from an average of just above 2 per cent at the start of the year to around 18 per cent, according to the Yale Budget Lab. Before its August 1 deadline, the White House signed off tariff agreements that will apply a basic 15 per cent tariffs on goods from the European Union, Japan and South Korea, a higher 35 per cent rate on some Canadian goods, and 39 per cent rate on Switzerland. The UK will be subject to a 10 per cent minimum, while scores of other countries — around 70 — that failed to agree new terms will fall back on the 'reciprocal' levies announced in April. • FTSE 100 slides as markets retreat on new Trump tariffs The expiry of President Trump's deadline marks an unprecedented four months of upheaval in the global economy, where the world's economic superpower has picked apart the rules of globalisation through daily threats of punishing import taxes, de facto capital controls, and financial sanctions on its trading partners. Yet for all the noise about what Trump will announce or un-announce on the rest of the world, the US and global economy enter August in a position not too dissimilar from where they started before Trump's 'liberation day' taxes were unleashed in April. The US economy and labour market have not been plunged into recession, interest rates continue to fall in most advanced economies, and equity markets have reversed their April wobbles to touch record highs in the US, UK, and Europe. This relatively benign outcome has led some to conclude that Trump has won the first battle in his trade war: the US is dismantling the global trading system and dictating humiliating terms to its erstwhile allies with minimum damage to its economy or financial stability so far. • Investors fleeing US equities boost unloved London market To add to the euphoria, the effective 18 per cent tariff rate on the rest of the world will generate around $450-500 billion in federal tax revenues for Trump — worth more than 1.25 per cent of the US economy and significant source of fiscal relief in a country where the budget deficit was on course to stick at 7 per cent of GDP. 'The US has emerged as a clear winner in the trade war at this juncture,' Mark Dowding, chief investment officer at RBC BlueBay Asset Management, said. 'There is a feeling that Trump has extracted pretty much every concession he would have hoped for in the trade negotiations conducted to date. In the absence of material retaliatory tariffs, this has been viewed as a great result for the US.' Dowding added that then 'worries that Trump was undermining US policy credibility have been replaced by a grudging sense of respect for the negotiator-in-chief'. This reassessment is best reflected in the value of the dollar which is heading for its strongest week in three years. The US currency, which has been the chosen market proxy for worries about US policy credibility, has recovered 1.5 per cent from the trough hit at the end of June. The greenback remains around 9 per cent weaker against major currencies this year and is still having its worst year since the dollar became a free-floating currency liberated from gold in 1972. • Copper price drops a fifth after Trump waters down tariff The performance of the US stock market has been even more striking. After the worst start to a new presidency in a century, US equities have outperformed all main peers since April 21, reflecting the 'Goldilocks' state of an economy that is 'not too hot, and not too cold', Will Denyer at Gavekal Research said. Trump's tariffs strategy has been emboldened by 'hard' economic data this week which showed the US the economy bounced back strongly with a 3 per cent annualised GDP expansion in the second quarter, after a 0.5 per cent contraction at the start of the year. Signs of tariff-induced inflation are also scarcely showing up in monthly price data, and while the labour market is slowing, demand for workers remains far above historical averages. The tariffs deadline also coincided with another bumper week of corporate earnings for American tech and AI giants that has charged up US market bulls. It's not just investors who are relieved at the state of the world at the start of August. The International Monetary Fund this week gave modest growth upgrades to most developing world economies, including the US, acknowledging that after the burst of tariff fears, the probable landing spot for American protectionism is likely to be lower than first feared. Even the US Federal Reserve, the country's beleaguered central bank, is inclined to think that tariffs are likely to have a one-time impact on raising American consumer prices, rather than marking the start of a new burst of inflation that triggers higher wages. • How Trump is delivering his pledges after 200 days Outside the US, growth forecasts for big economies that capitulated to Trump's demands are not being revised down drastically. The EU economy could still outperform forecasts as Germany's mass spending counteracts part of the hit from Trump's trade war. Goldman Sachs this week revised up Europe's GDP projections by 0.1 percentage points to 1.2 per cent this year and 1.3 per cent in 2025, after the bloc agreed to a broad 15 per cent tariff rate that will initially cover pharmaceuticals. Economists, however, are still divided over whether the resilience of the US and world economy means the tariff pain has simply been delayed, or whether there are other factors at play that will lead to an altogether more benign outcome for America and its trading partners. The widely held assumption among most forecasters is still that American households and businesses will suffer the brunt of higher import taxes, supply chain disruption, and the frozen investment as a result of the barrage of protectionism. On the flip side, the White House points to the 2018 tariffs episode as 'proof' that levies have no lasting effect on consumer prices and they did not prevent the US becoming the fastest growing economy in the G7 for the past two years. Freya Beamish, chief economist at TS Lombard, thinks market exuberance will come to a halt as US 'data over the next six months will be a rude awakening'. • Trump announces 90-day pause to higher tariffs on Mexico 'Inflation dynamics are deteriorating. Right now, it's as if the market actually believes that tariffs are going to be paid by the rest of the world and that Trump has pulled off some amazing deal. We've heard hitherto serious economists making such claims and can only assume they have taken leave of their senses. Unfortunately, the stock market reaction is likely to embolden the administration into further damaging policy moves,' she said. Looking ahead, few trade experts or diplomats expect Trump to stick to his word on his set tariff rates as the likes of the EU and Japan have been bounced into making investment pledges — like buying fanciful amounts of US energy — that they simply cannot meet. Even more worryingly, the president has shown he is willing to use the tariff stick against countries over any policy disagreements — over security, foreign policy, and in the case of Brazil, domestic court procedures against a former president. 'These are very high level deals that have been announced. A lot of work is going to have to go into filling the blanks,' Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, chief economist at the IMF, warned.
