Covestro sticks to ADNOC deal timeline as sales miss expectations
Covestro, whose products include foam chemicals used in mattresses, car seats and insulation for buildings, said the prospect of U.S. higher tariffs had led to a huge oversupply of products to the market there, particularly from the Asia-Pacific region, which had then caused by a big drop in prices.
The company's revenues fell 8.4% to 3.38 billion euros ($3.86 billion) in April-June, missing analysts' average estimate of 3.55 billion euros in a company-provided consensus.
"At the moment, demand is too weak to absorb the partial oversupply," Chief Financial Officer Christian Baier told Reuters in an interview.
Earlier this month, Covestro cut its full-year earnings forecast for the second time this year. It now sees earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation within a range of 700 million euros to 1.1 billion euros, down from a previously expected 1 billion euros to 1.4 billion euros.
ADNOC EXPECTATIONS UNCHANGED
Baier said Covestro's 14.7-billion-euro takeover by Abu Dhabi state oil giant ADNOC should be finalised in the second half of the year, despite European Union regulators saying on Monday that they had opened an investigation into potential market distortions from the deal due to foreign subsidies.
"We are very confident that we will implement the transaction in the second half of the year," Baier said.
At 0835 GMT, Covestro shares were up 0.5% at 60.56 euros.
ADNOC struck the deal last October, marking its biggest ever acquisition and one of the largest foreign takeovers of an EU company by a Gulf state.
($1 = 0.8751 euros) (Reporting by Bartosz Dabrowski and Patricia Weiss. Editing by Mrigank Dhaniwala and Mark Potter)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
US could require bonds of up to $15,000 for some tourist visas under pilot scheme
The US could require bonds of up to $15,000 for some tourist and business visas under a pilot programme being launched in two weeks, a government notice said on Monday. The programme is aimed to crack down on visitors who overstay their visas. The move may make an already expensive process unaffordable for many. 'Aliens applying for visas as temporary visitors for business or pleasure and who are nationals of countries identified by the department as having high visa overstay rates, where screening and vetting information is deemed deficient, or offering citizenship by investment, if the alien obtained citizenship with no residency requirement, may be subject to the pilot programme,' said a preview of a notice to be posted in the Federal Register on Tuesday. It was not clear what countries would be affected but the notice said the list would be made public when the programme takes effect. The bond would not apply to citizens of countries enrolled in the Visa Waiver Programme, which enables travel for business or tourism for up to 90 days. The State Department said that under the 12-month pilot programme, people could be required to post bonds of $5,000, $10,000 or $15,000 when they apply for a visa. The funds will be returned to travellers if they depart within the terms of their visas, the notice said. It said the pilot programme is aimed at ensuring the US government does not become financially liable if a visitor fails to comply with the terms of their visa. President Donald Trump has made cracking down on illegal immigration a focus of his presidency, boosting resources to secure the border and arresting people who are illegally in the US. Last week, the State Department announced that many visa renewal applicants would have to submit to an in-person interview, something that was not required in the past. And the administration issued a travel ban in June that fully or partly blocks citizens of 19 nations from entering the US on national security grounds. While the notice singles out countries offering citizenship through investment, the administration introduced the Trump Gold Card in recent months, which provides a path to residency and citizenship if a person commits to investing at least $5 million in the US. A similar pilot programme was launched in November 2020 during the last months of Mr Trump's first term in office, but it was not fully implemented due to the drop in global travel associated with the pandemic. It also comes as the Trump administration continues to revoke the visas of international students who have Taken part in pro-Palestine activism, and as the US says it will screen applicants' social media presence for anti-Semitic content.
Al Etihad
4 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Early wins for US, but dynamics of EU alliance is changing
4 Aug 2025 23:55 SULTAN KHALIFA AL RUBAEI*Tariffs have once again taken centre stage in US and international trade, following the August deadline set by United States President Donald Trump for countries to present trade agreement proposals or face steep tariffs. The US administration secured deals with several of its trading partners, most notably the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom. However, the global trade landscape now appears to be bracing for profound changes in trade rules that go beyond the post-World War II US agreement with the EU included a 15% tariff on European goods (significantly lower than the 30% previously threatened by the US president), an exemption for pharmaceutical products, and limited exceptions for aircraft and medical equipment. In return, the EU committed to purchasing $750 billion worth of US energy products and investing approximately $600 billion in the US. This agreement secured substantial additional revenue for the American 'America First' policy pursued by the United States in its dealings with both partners and non-partners pushes it toward manoeuvring economic policies. But beyond the deals and manoeuvres lies US-European relations, particularly with the EU, the foundation of which is no longer only partnership, but also competition, or rather, the partnership is taking a backseat in the face of competition. This shift may be attributed to internal divisions among the EU's 27 member states, the multiple challenges facing the ageing continent, and the heavy reliance on the United States when it comes to defence forces. At this time, none of the EU countries can afford the economic strain of a trade the American side, the current administration has shown little regard for the mutual trust in the transatlantic free trade relations, nor for the existing rules of international trade. As a result, there is a possibility that other global actors may adopt similar protectionist policies, posing a threat to the stability of international markets, particularly in light of the tensions that the current environment may create at the level of international trade the changes and uncertainty, the EU chose to stay aligned with America, albeit at a high cost. The newly imposed tariffs place a heavy financial burden on EU-based companies, forcing them to bear additional billions in expenses. While EU member states acknowledge the agreement's potential harm to their economies, they have viewed it as the best possible option under the current circumstances. It may mark the beginning of a longer negotiation process rather than the end, given the limited options available. Without formal trade agreements with Washington, the EU risks being subjected to US terms, leading to imbalanced deals or potential trade United States emerged as the winner in the agreement with the EU. However, the outcome also places a burden on American consumers, who are likely to face higher prices for imported goods as companies pass on the additional costs. This is particularly significant given that Germany is one of the largest exporters to the US, with exports exceeding €161 billion in 2024. Ireland's exports to the US reached €72 billion and Italy's €64 billion in the same year, according to Eurostat, the EU's statistical office. In total, 20% of the EU's goods exports are directed to the United States. This makes the agreement the least damaging option for Europe to avoid a trade confrontation between two allies who together account for nearly one-third of global trade. The effects of this deal may become visible in the US market in the coming this agreement, the US aims to achieve economic balance and address its trade deficit with the EU, which reached $235.6 billion in 2024. Although the deal helps avoid a trade war, it shows that the dynamics of old alliances are shifting, international trade is being reshaped amid global economic uncertainty, and competition for each country to achieve huge gains has become a defining feature of today's international economic and trade relations. *The columnist is a researcher with the think-tank firm, TRENDS Research & Advisory
Khaleej Times
6 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
India says US, EU 'targeting' nation over Russian oil imports
India said on Monday that US and EU "targeting" of the nation for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict is "unjustified and unreasonable." "Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security," the Foreign Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in a statement. US President Donald Trump earlier said he would "substantially" increase tariffs on India. "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine," Trump said in a post on Truth Social.
