Proposed federal funding cuts to tribal colleges spark fear
Kaiya Brown was at work last week when she started getting the texts. Her friends were asking if she'd seen the news: The Trump administration wants to cut funding for tribal colleges by nearly 90%.
Brown (Diné) is in her first year at Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute in northwest Albuquerque, one of 37 tribal colleges and universities in the country and four in New Mexico, many of which offer free tuition to tribal citizens.
If Congress approves the administration's budget request released last Monday, funding for the schools will drop from over $183 million to about $22 million in the next fiscal year, starting in October. Federal funding makes up 74% of total revenue for tribal colleges and universities, ICT reported in January.
This story was originally published by New Mexico In Depth.
'It's really scary,' Brown said. 'I don't think enough people understand the importance of tribal colleges and what they do for our communities. They provide opportunities that many students would have never had. It makes me really emotional, honestly, because they don't understand how this would impact so many lives.'
Brown is studying early childhood education with hopes of going into social work to advocate for Native children.
Part of why she chose a tribal college was because she didn't feel safe or supported at her Rio Rancho high school. In one instance, Brown wore her regalia, including moccasins and jewelry, to school, and a teacher asked, 'Where's your feathers?' Another time, she and a couple other Native students were carrying frybread for a sale, and a group of their peers started mocking them. One of the students told them, 'I thought we killed all your people.'
Her experience so far at college, Brown said, couldn't be more different.
'We're all so close to one another. We all want to see each other succeed,' she said. 'And I truly feel that from the staff and from my instructors. These are Native instructors, people that look like me and know my ways.'
She's also enjoyed the small class sizes. Last fall, 215 students were enrolled, according to data from the college, which was founded in 1971. The largest class Brown is in right now has five students total. Instead of getting lost in a lecture hall with a hundred other people, she's able to get more hands-on help from instructors.
But the mood on campus hasn't been the same lately, Brown said. The community has been reeling from a round of layoffs earlier this year.
The institute, along with Haskell Indian Nations University in Kansas, is federally operated. In February, the Bureau of Indian Education laid off dozens of faculty and staff members at the two institutions in response to Trump's directives to reduce the federal workforce. Many classes were left without instructors, and a power outage in Brown's dorm lasted 13 hours because there weren't enough maintenance workers available to fix it. A few weeks later, some employees were re-hired, but it was unclear whether the hirings were permanent or temporary.
That's according to a lawsuit against the federal government brought by the Native American Rights Fund in March. Brown is a plaintiff, along with four Haskell students and three tribal nations, including Isleta Pueblo.
'Tribal nations and the federal government should be working together to best serve our Native students,' Isleta Pueblo Gov. Eugene Jiron said in a statement. 'Instead, the administration is randomly, without preparation and in violation of their federal trust responsibility, taking away teachers and staff from already-underserved facilities. Our students deserve better.'
The layoffs worsened problems caused by chronic understaffing at the schools, the lawsuit argues. Congress has underfunded tribal colleges by $250 million a year, ProPublica reported in 2024.
The re-hirings brought some relief, Brown said, but the proposed cuts have stirred up fear among students and employees again.
'These schools have done so much for our people,' she said. 'So many passionate people and talented artists have come from these schools. They give us the tools to pursue our dreams. It's like our stepping stone into the world. And taking that away will be devastating to a lot of students, including myself.'
New Mexico is home to three other tribal colleges: Diné College, which has campuses in Shiprock and Crownpoint, as well as in Arizona; the Institute of American Indian Arts in Santa Fe; and Navajo Technical University, with a main campus in Crownpoint. In fall 2024, an estimated 3,378 students were enrolled at the schools, according to the state Higher Education Department.
In a statement last week, Robert Martin, president of the Institute of American Indian Arts, said, 'I know that we will prevail in the end, but we can't take that for granted. We have strong Congressional support but they need to hear from all of our constituents.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump slams Musk's third party as ‘ridiculous'
President Trump on Sunday slammed billionaire Elon Musk's announcement that he was starting a third party, the latest in a back-and-forth between the two men. 'I think it's ridiculous to start a third party,' the president responded when asked about Musk's recent announcement. 'We have a tremendous success with the Republican Party. The Democrats have lost their way. But it's always been a two-party system. And I think starting a third party just adds to confusion. It really seems to have been developed for two parties. Third parties have never worked.' 'So he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous,' Trump added. Musk on Saturday announced that he was launching the 'America Party' after repeated threats to create a third party in response to the passage of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which Musk opposed. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!,' Musk wrote on X. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' It's not yet clear if Musk will follow through with the party in the wake of his announcement. But the move comes after the two men's once close relationship devolved into backbiting for the second time in a matter of months as Republicans in Congress worked to pass the megabill, which Trump signed into law on Friday. In addition to the formation of the 'America Party,' Musk has also vowed to use his considerable fortune to back primary challengers against Republicans who voted for the bill. He has also said he will work to defend Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who ran afoul of Trump after opposing the spending package. Musk and Trump have had a fraught relationship over the last couple months despite the SpaceX founder emerging as one of the president's closest allies in last year's election. After feuding last month over the bill, the two men seemingly reached a detente — only to once again start sniping at each other over the past week. Some Republicans have expressed concern that Musk could distract Republicans from unifying as they look to hold onto their slim House majority in a challenging election environment next year. 'One of the most destructive behaviors that we've had in cycles where we've been unsuccessful in Senate races … are those in which we have expended massive resources in intraparty warfare,' one Republican consultant told The Hill regarding Musk's primary threats.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hassett on healthcare coverage cuts: ‘Best way to get insurance is to get a job'
National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said the best way for people to get health insurance is to get a job while discussing the massive tax cut legislation, which dramatically upends health care, signed into law by President Trump. During an appearance on CBS News's 'Face The Nation,' Hasset was asked about Americans' concerns that about 12 million Americans could lose Medicaid coverage, according to a report by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). However, Hasset said that the CBO made a similar claim when the Trump administration aimed to add work requirement waivers to Obamacare in 2017, stating that the number of insured people increased instead. 'The bottom line is, the best way to get insurance is to get a job,' he said. 'And we've got a 'big, beautiful bill' that's going to create a lot of job creation and a lot of insurance, and the CBO is just not accounting for that.' The bill enacts the country's first-ever requirement for adults under the age of 65 — including low-income parents of children older than 14 — to prove they work, volunteer or attend school at least 80 hours per month. 'The idea that that's going to cause a massive hemorrhaging in availability of insurance doesn't make a lot of sense to us,' he said. Hassett also claimed that 5 million of those who are losing insurance have other insurance, which he says the CBO did not take into account 'They're people who have two types of insurance,' he added. 'And so therefore, if they lose one, they're still insured.' Hassett insisted that no one will lose their insurance. 'It's sound budgetary politics. And I think that nobody's going to lose their insurance,' he said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Boston Globe
5 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Harvard professor union will ‘strongly' oppose any deal between school and Trump, members say
Now, with the university in secretive negotiations as it seeks to stave off Already, the group is pursuing multiple legal challenges to the Trump administration. Members have held rallies, signed petitions, and published op-eds decrying Trump's attacks on institutional independence. 'I expect that the AAUP and the faculty will react very strongly against any sort of deal, precisely because the independence of the university is vital to everything we do,' said classics professor Richard Thomas, an at-large member of Harvard's AAUP chapter. Union members say they're concerned about the university's approach to its talks with Trump. Though the president has said Harvard has Advertisement Harvard officials did not respond to a request for comment for this article. Harvard's faculty cannot support any deal made without their input, the university's AAUP president Kirsten Weld told the Globe. She argues that Harvard administrators never should have entered Trump's negotiations in the first place, because no private university should take orders from the government or make sacrifices to appease it. 'The red line of academic freedom — the university has already crossed that by allowing what is happening now to happen," said Weld, a history professor. 'The federal government has put a gun to the head of the university and is demanding an ever shifting set of changes, some of which are baldly illegal.' Harvard professors don't have the right to collective bargaining because a Professors would 'strongly' protest deal In April, universities nationwide celebrated Harvard President Alan Garber for refusing to agree to an Advertisement But Garber may have to make some concessions in order to get a deal with Trump, who has called for drastic reforms. Over the past several months, his administration has slashed around $2.8 billion in federal funding from Harvard, and prevented international students from traveling to the United States to study at the school. Vincent Brown, an at-large member of Harvard's AAUP chapter, said that if a deal is announced, members will likely call an emergency meeting to discuss potential next steps. The AAUP chapter would take a vote on any sort of collective action in response to a Trump deal, Brown said. A walkout is not off the table, but it's too soon to predict how professors will want to respond, he said. The timing of the negotiations and subsequent deal, which come when most professors are on summer break, is making organizing challenging, members told the Globe. 'Everybody is very keen to maintain our ability to teach our students, conduct our research, and run our university without government interference,' Brown said. No matter what kind of deal emerges, Harvard's AAUP chapter can count on the unwavering support of the national AAUP, president Todd Wolfson told the Globe. 'I one hundred percent support faculty taking collective action to respond to what they think are fundamental threats to Harvard, to their own work, or to higher education at large — period, end of sentence," Wolfson said last week. Crimson Courage, a Harvard alumni group advocating for institutional independence in the face of Trump's threats, also said they support faculty opposition to a deal with the White House. 'We have the backs of the professors because they should be able to conduct research without having any restrictions on their topics,' said Evelyn Kim, a Harvard alumna who studied sociology. Advertisement Professors not involved in negotiations Harvard AAUP members said they've had to receive news of closed-door negotiations in Washington, D.C. through reporting in national media outlets, as opposed to receiving updates from university officials. Top Harvard officials are setting an alarming precent by not including faculty and students in negotiations over how the university operates, Wolfson said. 'One would assume they're in advanced negotiations with the Trump administration, and the fact they have not talked to their faculty about it is alarming,' Wolfson said. Most Harvard professors oppose negotiating with Trump on university policies, Brown said, citing a 'The most important thing that we can say is that 70-plus percent of the faculty do not want to strike a deal that they don't think the Trump administration will respect anyway,' Brown said. 'So we're going to start from that position of plurality and then figure out what we're going to do.' Claire Thornton can be reached at