Longest lightning bolt on record stretches 515 miles across US
It extended 515 miles from eastern Texas to near Kansas City – 38 miles longer than the previous record. To put that into perspective, that's about twice the length of the Grand Canyon, or the equivalent of the distance between Paris and Venice. If you were to cover 515 miles in a car, you'd be facing a nine-hour drive, while a flight would take at least 90 minutes, experts say.
Researchers from the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) hope the discovery will highlight just how far lightning can reach from its parent storm. 'Lightning is a source of wonder but also a major hazard that claims many lives around the world every year and is therefore one of the priorities for the international Early Warnings for All initiative,' said Celeste Saulo, WMO Secretary-General. 'These new findings highlight important public safety concerns about electrified clouds which can produce flashes which travel extremely large distances and have a major impact on the aviation sector and can spark wildfires.'
For years, lightning detection and measurement has relied on ground-based stations. However, satellite-borne lightning detectors in orbit since 2017 have now made it possible to continuously detect and measure lightning at continental-scale distances. 'The extremes of what lightning is capable of is difficult to study because it pushes the boundaries of what we can practically observe,' said Michael J. Peterson, lead author from the Georgia Institute of Technology.
'Adding continuous measurements from geostationary orbit was a major advance. 'We are now at a point where most of the global megaflash hotspots are covered by a geostationary satellite, and data processing techniques have improved to properly represent flashes in the vast quantity of observational data at all scales. 'Over time as the data record continues to expand, we will be able to observe even the rarest types of extreme lightning on Earth and investigate the broad impacts of lightning on society.'
The record-breaking megaflash surpasses the previous record set by a lightning strike during an April 2020 storm , which reached 477 miles across the southern US. 'This new record clearly demonstrates the incredible power of the natural environment,' said Professor Randall Cerveny, rapporteur of Weather and Climate Extremes for WMO. 'Additionally, WMO assessment of environmental extremes such as this lightning distance record testify to the significant scientific progress in observing, documenting and evaluating such events.
'It is likely that even greater extremes still exist, and that we will be able to observe them as additional high-quality lightning measurements accumulate over time.' Most lightning flashes reach less than 10-miles long. However, anything longer than 60 miles is considered a 'megaflash'. Megaflashes arise from long-lasting storms, which typically brew for 14 hours or more, and cover an enormous area.
Beyond the October 2017 megaflash, several other record-breaking lightning strikes have hit the headlines over the years. The greatest duration for a single lightning flash of 17.1 seconds was set during a thunderstorm over Uruguay and northern Argentina on 18 June 2020. Meanwhile, the worst direct strike saw 21 people killed by a single flash of lightning in Zimbabwe in 1975.
What's more, a staggering 469 people were in killed by an indirect strike in Dronka, Egypt, in 1994, when lightning struck a set of oil tanks, causing burning oil to flood the town. The researchers hope the findings will highlight the fact that lightning is capable of travelling many hundreds of miles from the source. 'The only lightning-safe locations are substantial buildings that have wiring and plumbing; not structures such as at a beach or bus stop,' said lightning specialist, Walt Lyons.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Fragmented and febrile - is threat of nuclear war worse than ever?
Why you can trust Sky News Eighty years ago today, an American B-29 bomber dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. It was the dawn of the atomic age, but the birth of the bomb can be traced beyond the deserts of New Mexico to Britain, five years earlier. A copy of a hand-typed document, now in the Bodleian library in Oxford, is the first description of an atom bomb small enough to use as a weapon. The Frisch-Peierls Memorandum was written by two nuclear physicists at the University of Birmingham in 1940. Otto Frisch and Rudolf Peierls don't feature in the film Oppenheimer, but their paper is credited with jump-starting the Manhattan Project that ultimately built the bomb. Both Jewish scientists who had both fled Nazi Germany, they built on the latest understanding of uranium fission and nuclear chain reactions, to propose a bomb made from enriched uranium that was compact enough to be carried by an aircraft. The document, so secret at the time only one copy was made, makes for chilling reading. Not only does it detail how to build a bomb, but foretells the previously unimaginable power of its blast. "Such an explosion would destroy life in a wide area," they wrote. "The size of this area is difficult to estimate, but it will probably cover the centre of a big city." Radioactive fallout would be inevitable "and even for days after the explosion any person entering the affected area will be killed". Both lethal properties of the bombs that would subsequently fall on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing around 100,000 instantly and more than 100,000 others in the years that followed - most of them civilians. 'The most terrifying weapons ever created' Those bombs had the explosive power of around 16 and 20 kilotonnes of TNT respectively - a force great enough to end the Second World War. But compared to nuclear weapons of today, they were tiny. "What we would now term as low yield nuclear weapons," said Alexandra Bell, president of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, which campaigns for nuclear disarmament. "We're talking about city destroyers…these really are the most terrifying weapons ever created." Many of these "high yield" nuclear weapons are thermonuclear designs first tested in the 1950s. They use the power of nuclear fission that destroyed Hiroshima to harness yet more energy by fusing other atoms together. Codenamed "Mike", the first test of a fusion bomb in 1952 yielded at least 500 times more energy than those dropped on Japan. Impractically devastating, but proof of lethal principle. Variants of the W76 thermonuclear warhead currently deployed by the US and UK are around 100Kt, six times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb. Just one dropped on a city the size of London would result in more than a quarter of a million deaths. The largest warhead in America's current arsenal, the B83 has the explosive equivalent of 1.2 megatonnes (1.2 million tonnes of TNT) and would kill well over a million instantly. But modern intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) are designed to carry multiple warheads. Russia's Sarmat 2, for example, is thought to be capable of carrying 10 megatonnes of nuclear payload. They're designed to strike multiple targets at once, but if all were dropped on a city like London most of its population of nine million would be killed or injured. If that kind of power is incomprehensible, consider how many nuclear warheads there now are in the world. Nine countries - the US, Russia, China, France, the UK, India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel - have nuclear weapons. Several others are interested in having them. The US and Russia have around 4,000 nuclear warheads each - 90% of the global nuclear arsenal and more than enough to destroy civilisation. According to analysis from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, China us thought to have around 600 warheads, but has indicated a desire to catch up. Beijing is believed to be building up to 100 new warheads a year and the ICBMs to deliver them. Five more nuclear powers, including the UK, plan to either increase or modernise their existing nuclear stockpiles. The nuclear arms race that created this situation was one imagined by Frisch and Peierls in their 1940 memorandum. Given the mass civilian casualties it would inevitably cause, the scientists questioned whether the bomb should ever be used by the Allies. They wrote, however: "If one works on the assumption that Germany is, or will be, in the possession of this weapon… the most effective reply would be a counter-threat with a similar bomb." What they didn't believe was that the bomb they proposed, and went on to help build at Los Alamos, would ever be used. Devastated by its use on Japan, Peierls disavowed the bomb and later campaigned for disarmament. But that work is now as unfinished as ever. Non-proliferation treaties helped reduce the expensive and excessive nuclear arsenals of Russia and the US, and prevent more countries from building nuclear bombs. 'Everything trending in the wrong direction' But progress ground to a halt with the invasion of Ukraine, as nuclear tensions continued elsewhere. "After all the extremely hard, tedious work that we did to reduce nuclear risks everything is now trending in the wrong direction," said Alexandra Bell. "The US and Russia refuse to talk to each other about strategic stability. "China is building up its nuclear arsenal in an unprecedented fashion and the structures that were keeping non-proliferation in place stemming the spread of nuclear weapons are crumbling around us." 'New risks increasing the threat' The world may have come closer to nuclear conflict during the Cuban missile crisis of 1963, but the fragmented and febrile state of geopolitics now is more dangerous, she argues. Conflict regularly flares between nuclear armed India and Pakistan; Donald Trump's foreign policy has sparked fears that South Korea might pursue the bomb to counter North Korea's nuclear threat; some states in the Middle East are eyeing a nuclear deterrent to either nuclear-wannabe Iran or nuclear armed Israel. Add to the mix the military use of AI and stressors like climate change, and the view of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists is the situation is more precarious than in 1963. "It's more dangerous, but in a different way," said Alexandra Bell. "The confluence of all these new existential risks are increasing the threat worldwide."
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
RFK Jr. pulls $500 million in funding for vaccine development
The Department of Health and Human Services will cancel contracts and pull funding for some vaccines that are being developed to fight respiratory viruses like COVID-19 and the flu. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health secretary and a longtime vaccine critic, announced in a statement Tuesday that $500 million worth of vaccine development projects, all using mRNA technology, will be halted. The projects — 22 of them — are being led by some of the nation's leading pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and Moderna to prevent flu, COVID-19 and H5N1 infections. The mRNA vaccines are credited with slowing the 2020 coronavirus pandemic. Kennedy said in the Tuesday statement that he wants the health department to move away from mRNA vaccines, calling on the department to start 'investing in better solutions.' He provided no details on what those technologies might be.
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
US health agency to wind down mRNA vaccine development
Aug 5 (Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said on Tuesday it would wind down mRNA vaccine development activities under its biomedical research unit. The unit, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, helps companies develop medical supplies to address public health threats, and had also provided billions of dollars for development of COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic. HHS said the wind down includes cancellation of a contract awarded to Moderna (MRNA.O), opens new tab for the late-stage development of its bird flu vaccine for humans and the right to purchase the shots, a move first reported in May. The U.S. health agency said it is also rejecting or canceling multiple pre-award solicitations, including proposals from Pfizer (PFE.N), opens new tab, Sanofi Pasteur ( opens new tab, CSL Seqirus ( opens new tab, Gritstone and others. In total, this affects 22 projects worth nearly $500 million, the agency said. HHS said the decision follows a comprehensive review of mRNA-related investments initiated during the COVID-19 public health emergency.
