Luton's £136m stage project delayed by building safety regulator
A £136m town centre regeneration project has been delayed by a building safety regulator as the plans did not meet the required standard.The Stage flagship mixed-use development in Luton is due to be built on the site of the former Bute Street railway station - which was replaced by a bus station and later demolished in 2008.The Building Safety Regulator (BSR) said there had been several applications "one of which was rejected as it failed to demonstrate that the buildings, if constructed as designed, would meet legal requirements".Luton Borough Council said it was committed to ensuring "our application for the Stage development fully meets the required standards".
A spokesperson for the Health and Safety Executive, the umbrella organisation for BSR, said: "The building control processes introduced following the Grenfell Tower tragedy are a vital safeguard, aimed at raising fire and structural safety standards across the built environment."They added that detailed plans submitted by the applicant for the Stage development around fire and emergency safety matters were not adequate or clear and there were a number of concerns over structural issues.A spokesperson for Luton Borough Council said: "We have consistently provided comprehensive information to support our application, responded promptly to any requests for clarification, and made adjustments where required."The development, which is underpinned by £20m of levelling up funding, includes flats, a multi-purpose performance and community area, a food court and commercial space, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
Luton Borough Council's director of property and infrastructure Roger Kirk told the scrutiny finance review group on Tuesday that the delay in approving the project was costing the authority £100,000 a month.He said the application was submitted in July 2024 and the council's "best guess at present is that the negative impact, in terms of the capital project, is less than £1m."He said the regulator had requested a third extension until July 11 and added he was confident of a positive outcome.A spokesperson for the authority said: "We appreciate the pressures faced by the BSR as a newly established regulator and remain committed to working constructively with them to ensure our application fully meets the new standards."
Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
10 minutes ago
- The Sun
Aldi confirms ‘addictive' discontinued crisps will return in months after shopper fury
ALDI is bringing back "addictive" crisps in a matter of months after they were axed. Shoppers were left distraught after spotting the Specially Selected Prawn Cocktail Crisps missing from shelves earlier this year. The 150g bag cost £1.09 and came as part of the discounter's premium range. But the picky bits are set to make a comeback later this year, Aldi has confirmed, following customer fury. Julie Ashfield, chief commercial officer at Aldi UK, said: 'We always do our best to listen and meet our customers' requests. "These crisps are clearly a fan favourite, so we are excited to bring the flavour back — watch this space." Aldi has not revealed an exact date the crisps will be available but is urging customers to keep an eye on its website and store shelves. It comes after eagle-eyed customers took to social media earlier this month to ask where the crisps, based on the classic British starter, had gone. One, posting on X, said: "What's happened to the prawn cocktail crisps? Bring them back please!" Shoppers who can't wait for the Specially Selected Prawn Cocktail crisps, branded "addictive" and "amazing", to be reintroduced to shelves can buy one alternative. Aldi also sells the more budget Snackrite Prawn Cocktail crisps, with packs of six smaller bags costing 89p. It is not the first time Aldi has axed a product customers love. It recently quietly removed the Specially Selected Caramel Layered Yogurt from its shelves. Shoppers only discovered the yogurt was discontinued after struggling to find it in their local shop. The German discounter has dropped Deli Smoked Pork Sausage and Deli Smoked Reduced Fat Pork Sausage 160g packs from many of its shelves as well. ITEMS MAKING A COMEBACK Retailers often bring back nostalgic and previously discontinued items, based on customer demand and appetite. Discos, owned by KP Snacks, is bringing back its beloved pickled onion flavour that was last seen on shelves in the noughties. The savoury bites will be sold in convenience shops across the UK from August 27. The 70g bag costs £1.35. Meanwhile, White chocolate Maltesers made a grand return to shelves earlier this year after a 10-year hiatus. A 30g bag is currently available to buy in Morrisons for £1.05, while a larger 74g pouch costs £1.75. Elsewhere, Opal Fruits, which were rebranded as Starburst in 1998, are available from Sainsbury's for £1.25. Why are products axed or recipes changed? ANALYSIS by chief consumer reporter James Flanders. Food and drinks makers have been known to tweak their recipes or axe items altogether. They often say that this is down to the changing tastes of customers. There are several reasons why this could be done. For example, government regulation, like the "sugar tax," forces firms to change their recipes. Some manufacturers might choose to tweak ingredients to cut costs. They may opt for a cheaper alternative, especially when costs are rising to keep prices stable. For example, Tango Cherry disappeared from shelves in 2018. It has recently returned after six years away but as a sugar-free version. Fanta removed sweetener from its sugar-free alternative earlier this year. Suntory tweaked the flavour of its flagship Lucozade Original and Orange energy drinks. While the amount of sugar in every bottle remains unchanged, the supplier swapped out the sweetener aspartame for sucralose.
BBC News
13 minutes ago
- BBC News
Teachers at closing Fulneck School in dispute over pay
Members of a teachers' union at an independent school due to close next month have declared an industrial dispute, claiming they have been told they would not be paid for the second half of the final School, in Pudsey, Leeds, announced in March that it would close on 8 July due to a decline in enrolment and rising costs. The NASUWT said its members had been informed after the May half term that the school could no longer afford to pay them, but they must continue working until the the school said staff would be paid up until 8 July, with a spokesperson for the school's trustees adding that they remained committed to a "regular and open" dialogue with staff. The independent day and boarding school, founded by the Moravian church, has been teaching for more than 270 years. Announcing the closure earlier this year, the school blamed "a continued decline in enrolment, combined with rising operational costs" for making it "increasingly challenging to maintain financial viability". 'Kick in the teeth' Announcing the dispute, a spokesperson for the NASUWT said many of its members at the school had had long careers there, often "making sacrifices" to keep it running, such as forgoing pay increases."As a result of the school's decision not to pay them for the last half term, Fulneck teachers stand to lose 14% of their annual salary," a union spokesperson said. "Even if they are able to secure positions at other schools, they will go from July to the end of September with no pay – despite the fact they have earned that money."Matt Wrack, acting general secretary of the NASUWT, said union members at the school had "pulled out the stops to support their struggling pupils this term, and it has come – quite literally – at their own expense"."After years of sacrifice for the good of the school, losing months of pay is a real kick in the teeth," he Toepritz, the union's national executive member for Leeds, said the school's teachers had undergone a "collective trauma"."They have spent the last term supporting panicking pupils through exams and school transitions, all the while frantically searching for new roles themselves," he said."On top of that, they now face unpaid bills over the summer."But Fulneck teachers are strong, and they won't go down without a fight. The school needs to abide by its church's mission statement and pay up." 'Ongoing support' However, according to the school, staff would be paid up until 8 July – the proposed date of the school's closure and planned insolvency - and in line with the school's legal obligations as an percentage calculated by the NASUWT did not reflect the entitlements for staff through redundancy and notice pay, which would be processed through the government's Redundancy Payment Service and triggered following the school's planned liquidation, it said.A spokesperson for the school's trustees said their priority was to ensure a "fair and transparent process" for everyone affected."The trustees have provided ongoing support throughout the school's operation and closure process," they added. "Communication channels remain open for staff to raise concerns, and the trustees are committed to ensuring all legal obligations are met."No further comments can be made while the formal consultation process is ongoing." Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer issues fresh pledge to shake up ‘broken' welfare system
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has defended his plans to reform the welfare system after a revolt from Labour backbenchers led to a U-turn on planned cuts. The Labour leader pledged to main a 'safety net' for vulnerable people, but said the welfare system should not hinder those who can and want to work. He said the welfare system is 'broken' and 'failing people every day'. It still needs reform, he said, but 'we need to do it in a Labour way'. Economists warn that the U-turn, which protects existing disability and health benefits, will create a multibillion-pound hole in public finances. This financial shortfall is expected to be covered by tax rises, potentially through measures like freezing income tax thresholds.
