Five minute full charging is here as Fiat trials battery swapping tech with its 500e supermini
If successful, the group said, this could eliminate one of the biggest barriers to EV ownership: charging time.
Currently taking place in Madrid, the trial involves a small fleet of 40 500e cars that have been adapted to use a pack (of unspecified size) from battery swapping firm Ample. The fleet are all operated by Stellantis-owned car-sharing firm Free2move and are being driven by users in the city.
The cars are currently serviced by a single swapping station in Madrid, but more are planned to be created in the city as part of the trial, which has been supported by a €9.8 million (£8.2m) grant from the Spanish government.
What's more, Stellantis plans to expand the fleet to 100 in the coming months.
If successful, the technology will be rolled out to private customers, said Fiat CEO Olivier Francois. 'We are dedicated to thoroughly testing and analysing this concept in real-world conditions and aiming to expand it to private customers soon.
'That is why we believe deeply in this project and have chosen our iconic Fiat 500 to spearhead the initiative. It will provide invaluable insights for both our brandand the Group as we shape the future of mobility.'
It is unclear if the Stellantis trial will be expanded to other models, given the 500e is currently based on a bespoke platform and not the e-CMP architecture used by the likes of the Vauxhall Cross and Peugeot e-208.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Zelensky blasts NATO members' 'slow' spending increase
Volodymyr Zelensky warned that Vladimir Putin could attack a NATO country within the next five years, as he criticised the alliance for a slow spending ramp up. Speaking to Sky News about the proposed NATO spending target of 5 percent of GDP by 2035, the Ukrainian leader said: 'In my view, this is slow because we believe that starting from 2030 Putin can have significantly greater capabilities.' Zelensky said that although Putin's soldiers 'are all getting annihilated and wiped out at the battlefield' and that the Russian leader 'needs a pause', he said '10 years is a very long time. 'He will have a new army ready [by then].' Zelensky's remarks come after NATO members agreed on Sunday to a big increase in their defence spending target to 5 percent of GDP, as demanded by US President Donald Trump. The UK was among the 32 member countries to agree to the goal, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer vowing to commit Britain to spending 3.5 percent of GDP on core defence spending, plus a further 1.5 per cent on security-related domestic infrastructure. Starmer's pledge came as he welcomed Zelensky to Downing Street over the weekend ahead of the NATO summit on Tuesday. Sir Keir also announced plans for a new agreement with Ukraine. 'I'm really proud that this afternoon we are able to announce an industrial military co-production agreement, the first of its kind so far as Ukraine and the UK are concerned, which will be a massive step forward now in the contribution that we can continue to make, and is really a symbol of not only our joint work in this conflict, but the 100-year agreement that we've put in place', the prime minister said. It also comes as the Ukrainian leader and Trump are set to meet on Wednesday on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague, a senior source in the Ukrainian presidency told AFP. The war-time leader has been a central figure at recent summits but given his fractious relationship with Trump, Zelensky has not been invited to the main working session with NATO members. 'The teams are finalising the details' of the meeting, the source told AFP, adding that the talks were scheduled for the 'early afternoon' in the Netherlands. The source added that the discussion would focus on Ukraine's 'purchase of a defence package, a large part of which consists of air defence systems'. The leaders would also discuss more 'sanctions against Russia, and a price cap on oil', the source added. Ukraine and its allies have sought to lower an existing oil cap imposed on Russia after it invaded Ukraine more than three years ago, from $60 to $45, to dent the Kremlin war chest. Trump so far has frustrated Western allies by refusing to impose new sanctions on Russia despite President Vladimir Putin's refusal to agree to a Ukraine ceasefire. Trump and his NATO counterparts are due to gather today for a summit that could unite the world's biggest security organisation around a new defense spending pledge or widen divisions among the 32 allies. Last week, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte was optimistic the European members and Canada would commit to invest at least as much of their economic growth on defense as the United States does for the first time. Then Spain rejected the new NATO target for each country to spend 5 percent of its gross domestic product on defense needs, calling it 'unreasonable.' Trump also insists on that figure. The alliance operates on a consensus that requires the backing of all 32 members. The following day, Trump said the U.S. should not have to respect the goal. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' he said. Trump lashed out at Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez's government, saying: 'NATO is going to have to deal with Spain. Spain's been a very low payer.' He also criticized Canada as 'a low payer.' Spain was the lowest spender in the alliance last year, directing less than 2% of its GDP on defense expenditure, while Canada was spending 1.45%, according to NATO figures. The two-day summit in The Hague involves an informal dinner Tuesday and one working session Wednesday morning. A very short summit statement has been drafted to ensure the meeting is not derailed by fights over details and wording. Founded in 1949, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formed by 12 nations to counter the threat to security in Europe posed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, notably via a strong U.S. presence on the continent. NATO's ranks have grown to 32 countries since the Washington Treaty was signed 75 years ago. Sweden joined last year, worried by an increasingly aggressive Russia.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Plan to scrap two-child benefit cap ‘dead in the water' after welfare U-turn
Sir Keir Starmer will not scrap the two-child benefit cap after his U-turn on welfare cuts left a £5bn hole in Labour 's spending plans. Senior Labour figures have reportedly warned that tax hikes are on the horizon after the benefits climbdown, with a change in the controversial cap, introduced when George Osborne was chancellor, now thought to be off the table. 'My assessment is that is now dead in the water,' a No 10 source told The Sunday Times. A source close to the chancellor added: 'MPs will need to acknowledge that there is a financial cost to not approving the welfare changes, whether that's tax rises or not scrapping the two-child benefit cap. They need to understand the trade-offs.' The prospect of Labour keeping the two-child benefit cap in place will provoke fresh unrest among Labour backbenchers, who have a taste for rebellion after forcing Sir Keir's hand on cuts to the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability benefit. Sir Keir is believed to have told his cabinet he wants to scrap the two-child cap - first imposed by Osborne in 2015. Critics of the policy, which restricts parents from claiming certain benefits for more than two of their children, say it pushes children into poverty. Charities frequently cite the £3.4bn move as one of the most cost effective ways of alleviating child poverty. Asked on Thursday whether he still wanted to scrap the two-child cap, Sir Keir said: 'The last Labour government drove down child poverty and it's one of the proudest things that we did. 'Sadly, the last government allowed child poverty to go back up again. 'I'm determined that this government will drive it down, just as the last Labour government did. 'We've got a strategy and a task force working on this and will lay out the details of that. I personally don't think there's a silver bullet that if you do this one thing, it will deal with child poverty.' Pressure on the PM over the two-child benefit cap will likely increase in the run up to this autumn's Budget, in which Rachel Reeves has been warned she must raise taxes or put Labour's agenda at risk. Jim O'Neill, a former Goldman Sachs chief turned Treasury minister who quit the Conservatives and later advised Ms Reeves, said she faces no choice but to abandon key parts of her economic policy – including her commitment not to raise income tax, national insurance contributions for employees or VAT. 'Without changing some of the big taxes, welfare and pensions, they [Labour] can't commit to things like Northern Powerhouse Rail, small modular nuclear reactors, and various other things that will make an investment and growth difference,' he told The Independent.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Little-known UK driving law that changed in 2022 still catches out millions & breaking it could land you HUGE fine
A CHANGE to the Highway Code that came into effect some three years ago is still catching out millions of drivers. Worse still, breaking this newish rule could result in hefty penalties - including up to nine points on a driving licence and, in extreme cases, a £5,000 fine. 3 3 3 In early 2022, the Highway Code was tweaked and saw motorists forced to give priority to pedestrians waiting to cross at junctions, not just those already crossing. This means that every junction with a pavement is effectively a pedestrian crossing. But it seems many drivers remain unaware of this rule and often ignore waiting pedestrians - which, in turn, leaves them at risk of being charged with careless driving if an accident occurs. Indeed, the maximum penalty for careless driving is nine points on a driving licence and an eye-watering £5,000 fine. Careless driving not only carries the punishment of points and a fine, it's very likely a driver's insurance premium will go up as a result Gerry Bucke, Adrian Flux Gerry Bucke, general manager of specialist motor insurance brokers Adrian Flux, told Sun Motors: 'We all know that there is a huge percentage of drivers on the road who have passed their theory test and never looked at the Highway Code since. 'We know that there are a lot of people that are not going to be aware of subtle changes to the wording of driving laws so to them this still feels like a secret pedestrian rule. 'The fact it was introduced in January 2022 will be of little comfort to them should they be charged for breaking it. 'Careless driving not only carries the punishment of points and a fine, it's very likely a driver's insurance premium will go up as a result. 'We all need to make sure we're doing our bit to better educate drivers and, of course, help provide a safer environment for both pedestrians and drivers.' For those caught breaking the rule, they'll most likely be slapped with a fixed penalty notice - which carries a £100 on-the-spot fine and the potential of three penalty points. EV6 Kia EV6 GT is a ridiculously fast SUV that even boils your kettle - but can it beat £158k Porsche 911 in drag race The updated Highway Code, part of eight changes that came into effect in January, 2022, states 'other traffic should give way' to pedestrians 'when people are crossing or waiting to cross at a junction' and 'if people have started crossing and traffic wants to turn into the road'. Of course, motorists must also give way to 'people on a zebra crossing and people walking and cycling on a parallel crossing'. BLISSFULLY UNAWARE For many, the change to the rules really did seem to pass them by. Online discussions on places like X or Reddit reveal wide-reaching confusion and frustration around the rule. Some drivers have pointed out that the term "should" in the Highway Code's wording has created ambiguity - compared to the more definitive "must." As Bucke highlighted, many drivers are seemingly unaware of these changes because they haven't revisited the Highway Code since passing their theory tests. He also warns that careless driving offences could lead to increased insurance premiums.
