Little-known UK driving law that changed in 2022 still catches out millions & breaking it could land you HUGE fine
Worse still, breaking this newish rule could result in hefty penalties - including up to nine points on a driving licence and, in extreme cases, a £5,000 fine.
3
3
3
In early 2022, the Highway Code was tweaked and saw motorists forced to give priority to pedestrians waiting to cross at junctions, not just those already crossing.
This means that every junction with a pavement is effectively a pedestrian crossing.
But it seems many drivers remain unaware of this rule and often ignore waiting pedestrians - which, in turn, leaves them at risk of being charged with careless driving if an accident occurs.
Indeed, the maximum penalty for careless driving is nine points on a driving licence and an eye-watering £5,000 fine.
Careless driving not only carries the punishment of points and a fine, it's very likely a driver's insurance premium will go up as a result
Gerry Bucke, Adrian Flux
Gerry Bucke, general manager of specialist motor insurance brokers Adrian Flux, told Sun Motors: 'We all know that there is a huge percentage of drivers on the road who have passed their theory test and never looked at the Highway Code since.
'We know that there are a lot of people that are not going to be aware of subtle changes to the wording of driving laws so to them this still feels like a secret pedestrian rule.
'The fact it was introduced in January 2022 will be of little comfort to them should they be charged for breaking it.
'Careless driving not only carries the punishment of points and a fine, it's very likely a driver's insurance premium will go up as a result.
'We all need to make sure we're doing our bit to better educate drivers and, of course, help provide a safer environment for both pedestrians and drivers.'
For those caught breaking the rule, they'll most likely be slapped with a fixed penalty notice - which carries a £100 on-the-spot fine and the potential of three penalty points.
EV6 Kia EV6 GT is a ridiculously fast SUV that even boils your kettle - but can it beat £158k Porsche 911 in drag race
The updated Highway Code, part of eight changes that came into effect in January, 2022, states 'other traffic should give way' to pedestrians 'when people are crossing or waiting to cross at a junction' and 'if people have started crossing and traffic wants to turn into the road'.
Of course, motorists must also give way to 'people on a zebra crossing and people walking and cycling on a parallel crossing'.
BLISSFULLY UNAWARE
For many, the change to the rules really did seem to pass them by.
Online discussions on places like X or Reddit reveal wide-reaching confusion and frustration around the rule.
Some drivers have pointed out that the term "should" in the Highway Code's wording has created ambiguity - compared to the more definitive "must."
As Bucke highlighted, many drivers are seemingly unaware of these changes because they haven't revisited the Highway Code since passing their theory tests.
He also warns that careless driving offences could lead to increased insurance premiums.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
‘Council wants to charge us to park outside our own homes'
Residents have criticised their council's plans to bring in parking restrictions. Dartford council has claimed a 'majority of residents' are concerned about commuters using their streets as 'free car parks'. But hundreds of people living in the Newtown ward of Dartford have signed a petition against the plans, accusing the council of a 'money-grabbing' ploy. Three proposals put forward in a consultation include time restrictions, yellow lines, parking bays and permits. Or they can choose none of the above. Kelum Alahakoon said commuters forced him to park up to three streets away on weekdays. 'In the mornings, you cannot get parked at all. If you go out, there will be no spaces when you come back,' he said. 'It is just a money-grabber' But Theresa Attwood, 53, who lives in St Vincent Road, said the problem was residents owning more cars, rather than commuters taking advantage of the lack of restrictions. She told Kent Online restrictions would 'just move the problem on'. She added: 'There are other ways to ease the issues. It is just a money-grabber.' She suggested bays could be installed along her road instead of yellow lines and the current white boxes, to free up space. Paul and Mary Stearn need car spaces for the two carers who visit each day. Mrs Stearn called the plan 'another tax' and a 'money-making scheme'. Mr Stearn added: 'The roads by the station do get a lot of commuters parking there as it is nearer to the station, but we do not have that here.' Ward councillor Laura Edie described the parking situation as 'challenging', adding that streets in the area were built during the Victorian era, when homeowners did not need space for cars. 'Although I think the most challenging time to park in this area is during the evenings, weekends and school holidays, the point of this study was to ease issues caused by commuter parking.' A design is expected to be completed in October, and, if agreed, will see parking controls brought in early next year. 'Parking is uncontrolled' The Conservative-run local authority said: 'Parking on many residential streets close to the town centre is uncontrolled, and effectively provides free parking for long-stay users. 'Residents living close to the town centre have asked us to find a solution.' But residents have taken to social media to oppose the plans. Kevin Jarl Dell said: 'Vote against it when asked. Permits are not the answer. What happens to visitors to your house?' Pam Cave wrote: 'There is no solution to the parking in the Newtown area simply because there are more cars than parking spaces. If this goes ahead, we will be paying for the privilege of maybe getting a parking space, probably not outside your own house, and not even necessarily in your own road.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
More than 23m Britons think they may be due compensation for mis-sold car loans, UK poll finds
More than 23 million people believe they could be due compensation for a mis-sold car loan, according to a poll before this month's supreme court decision. Borrowers, banks and the government are anxiously awaiting the ruling, which could trigger one of the biggest redress schemes since the £50bn payment protection insurance (PPI). The PPI saga forced UK banks to compensate people who had bought often worthless insurance cover. The survey, conducted for the consumer law firm Slater and Gordon, found that 45% of people think they might be entitled to a payout over a car finance plan taken out between 2007 and 2021. The car loans scandal has been rumbling on for more than a year, but ballooned in October when a court of appeal judgment vastly expanded a Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) investigation into potentially harmful commission arrangements. It determined that paying a secret commission to car dealers, which had arranged the loans without disclosing the sum and terms of the commission to borrowers, was unlawful. Lenders including Santander UK, Close Brothers, Barclays and Lloyds are potentially on the hook for up to £44bn, according to some analysts. The FCA is working on a potential compensation scheme under which lenders that mis-sold loans would check their records and decide who gets compensation. The public's expectations of compensation are high, according to the survey. Of the 4,000 people surveyed, 45% believed they were likely to be eligible for money back, which equates to more than 23 million adults across the UK. Forty per cent said they would consider a legal challenge if dissatisfied with the outcome of their claim. Consumers also showed little trust in the ability of banks and lenders to check records and distribute compensation. There are also concerns that some consumers could miss out because most banks purge customer data after six years. The FCA ordered lenders to cease doing so in January 2024, when it launched the investigation, but files relating to customers with contracts that ended more than six years earlier may have already been lost. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The chief operating officer of Slater and Gordon, Elizabeth Comley, said the public rightly expected to be compensated for their losses. 'The FCA is trying put things right, but there's a risk that a redress scheme leaves many people disappointed and keen to challenge the process,' she said. 'That sort of backlash would be bad for everyone – the scandal would drag on for years, the courts would be inundated with challenges and the public would be denied the clear resolution they want.'
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Major motorway shut after ‘multi-vehicle crash' as drivers urged to check their journey and allow extra time
A MAJOR motorway has shut following a "multi-vehicle crash" as drivers are urged to check their journey and plan ahead. All traffic has been stopped between two junctions on the M62 with police at the scene. 1 Emergency services have shut off traffic on the Greater Manchester motorway on the westbound carriageway between junction 22 and junction 21. National Highways said: "The M62 westbound is closed between J22 (Denshaw) and J21 (Milnrow, Rochdale) following a multi-vehicle collision. "Emergency services and Traffic Officers on scene. "Allow extra journey time if in the area this evening." Travel service Inrix has confirmed emergency services have stopped traffic.
