
Release lynx into wild, says Natural England chief
Tony Juniper, who heads up the body responsible for conservation, said he would be 'absolutely delighted' if the animals could be rewilded in England before the end of his two year term.
He has previously said that the wildcats could help control deer populations but warned it was important to consider the science and current ecosystems.
Farmers and landowners fear the wildcats will attack livestock, game and walkers, but some campaigners claim they can help keep deer and rabbit numbers under control.
His intervention comes as The Lynx UK Trust has drawn up an initial application asking for the animals to be returned to Kielder Forest in Northumberland.
Mr Juniper, who was reappointed as chair of Natural England for the third time in March, told The Guardian rewilding the animals 'should be looked at and I know people are looking at it.
'It is still quite polarised and some of these things will remain divided no matter how much effort you put in, but we need more engagement to understand how communities that would be living with these animals would be able to continue with what they do.
'There are in some places still serious doubts about that.'
Several groups are campaigning to bring back the animals to help keep deer and rabbit numbers under control, but farmers and landowners are worried that the wildcats will attack livestock, game and walkers.
'Significant challenges'
Lynx are currently listed on the Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976, which means they cannot be released unless in a secure enclosure.
The government said it was aware of projects to assess the feasibility of lynx reintroduction in England but warned that the predators present 'significant challenges' and that there was currently not enough evidence to support a release.
The application to rewild the lynx in Kielder is currently not being considered by Natural England, the government said.
A spokesperson for the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs said: 'This government is absolutely committed to restoring and protecting nature and we support species reintroductions where there are clear benefits for nature, people and the environment.
'We will continue to work with Natural England on species reintroductions in England.'
Mr Juniper said Natural England was working with communities who would be affected by the introduction.
Campaigners are also hoping to rewild lynx in the Cairngorms in Scotland and have been consulting with farmers about the plan.
In January, four lynx were illegally released into the Cairngorms, which led to the death of one of the animals during the operation to recapture the creatures.
It is not clear where the lynx came from, although some have suggested that rewilding groups may have attempted to introduce the animals by stealth.
Damage they cause
At the time, the National Farmers Union Scotland (NFUS) said those who released the animals had given no thought to the welfare of the lynx or the wider rural community.
The lynx was once native to the British Isles but the last British lynx was hunted to extinction for its fur around 700AD.
The European lynx also disappeared from the UK around 1,000 years ago and by the 1950s there were only 700 left in Europe.
Calls for the introduction of lynx follow successful breeding programmes in countries such as Germany, France and Switzerland which have seen numbers rise to around 18,000.
However, in Sweden, the government recently introduced a cull of lynx to limit the damage they cause. The Lynx UK Trust is hoping that rescued animals from the cull could be rewilded in England.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I can't stop my neighbour felling this glorious tree - BECAUSE it's in an area of outstanding natural beauty
The blackbird who has made his home in my garden has become something of a friend. He potters about on the grass in search of worms immediately after I've finished mowing and takes a keen interest whenever the compost heap is turned over to reveal all kinds of nutritional goodies.


The Sun
8 hours ago
- The Sun
Number of babies born in Britain last year with at least one foreign-born parent hits shock new high
FOUR in ten babies born in Britain last year had at least one foreign-born parent, shock new figures reveal. The share of births to families with at least one parent from overseas jumped to 40.4 per cent in 2024, up from 35.1 per cent just three years earlier. 1 More than half of all babies had a foreign-born mum or dad in 17 per cent of English council areas, according to the Office for National Statistics. The capital is leading the change. The City of London topped the table at 84.4 per cent. This was followed by Brent on 83.9 per cent and Newham 82.4 per cent. Then came Harrow on 82.2 per cent, Ealing on 81.4 per cent and Westminster on 80 per cent. Migration expert Nuni Jorgensen, from Oxford University's Migration Observatory, told The Telegraph: 'The rise in births to migrant parents is largely due to more people moving to the UK. 'Since most new arrivals are young adults, more births to migrants are expected. 'Areas with a high share of births to foreign-born people tend to have larger migrant populations.' ONS data also shows 33 per cent of all births last year were to foreign-born mothers, with Indian mums making up 4.4 per cent. This was followed by Pakistan on 3.6 per cent, Nigeria 2.5 per cent and Romania 2 per cent.


The Sun
8 hours ago
- The Sun
Queen doubted Meghan long before Megxit & palace feared she ‘engineered' marriage & was NOT in love, says expert
FIVE years have passed since Megxit tore apart the Royal Family. It gave Queen Elizabeth II undue stress and upset in the last few years of her life. 4 4 But according to royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith, the late monarch and her innermost circle had had their doubts about Prince Harry's marriage to Meghan Markle long before they dropped the proverbial bomb and quit royal life in 2020. In fact, the Queen feared her grandson was 'besotted and weak' and said he had been 'rude' to her in the lead-up to his and Meghan's wedding at St George's Chapel in Windsor in 2018. She also worried that his bride-to-be had manipulated the prince, while getting away with a raft of bad behaviour. Now, for the first time, the Queen's private concerns have been made public in heartbreaking detail — showing just how perceptive she proved to be. This week Sally published 'explosive' revelations made to her by one of Her Majesty's closest confidantes, her first cousin once removed, Lady Elizabeth Anson, in several conversations in 2018 and 2019. Lady Elizabeth claimed there were serious concerns in the upper echelons of the Palace, long before Harry and Meghan made themselves royal pariahs. In fact, just days before the wedding, she told Sally: 'We hope but don't quite think [Meghan] is in love. 'We think she engineered it all.' She added: 'It's worrying that so many people are questioning whether Meghan is right for Harry. 'The problem, bless his heart, is that Harry is neither bright nor strong, and she is both.' It's unforgivable what Meghan did to the Queen - she's caused a bigger crisis than the death of Diana, says expert In another exchange, Lady Elizabeth said: 'I don't trust Meghan an inch. 'Meghan could turn into nothing but trouble.' Musty smell The shock revelations were released this week in Sally's Royals Extra feature on publishing platform Substack. The observations by Lady Elizabeth, who died from lung cancer in November 2020 aged 79, show the warning signs were there from the start — and proved well-founded. She said Meghan had initially appeared 'natural, intelligent and thoughtful' after getting engaged to Harry in 2017. But as their wedding approached, they both caused a stir with their poor behaviour — and blatant disrespect for the Queen. Harry was reportedly 'rude to her for ten minutes' in one meeting and upset her by asking the Archbishop of Canterbury to perform the wedding service in May 2018, without first seeking permission from the Dean of Windsor. As a high-society event planner herself, Lady Elizabeth — who was born at Windsor Castle in 1941 and was also King George VI's goddaughter — understood all too well just what an embarrassing situation this put the Queen in. She said at the time: 'Harry seems to think the Queen can do what she wants, but she can't. 'On the religious side, it is the Dean of Windsor's jurisdiction.' She added that as a result, 'Harry has blown his relationship with his grandmother.' They did later 'patch things up' — but the hurt remained. As for Meghan, allegations of her 'diva-like' behaviour in the run-up to her big day is nothing new. Indeed, at the time, it was rumoured that she had been nicknamed 'Me-gain' by Palace courtiers, thanks to her extensive demands, and among her many complaints, had moaned about the 'musty' smell in the chapel. Nicknamed 'Me-gain' by Palace courtiers She had even allegedly ordered staff to 'go around with these atomisers, like spritzer guns, and spray the chapel with scent before anyone arrived.' This follows years of allegations about Meghan's 'bullying' behaviour — something that even sparked an internal investigation at Buckingham Palace. However, this is the first time we have heard about the Queen's thoughts on the matter — and they were not good, according to Lady Elizabeth, who was a great-niece of the Queen Mother and a goddaughter of King George VI. In 2018 she told Sally that Meghan had rattled the Queen days before the wedding, revealing: 'They had tea with her the day before yesterday. 'She was trying to find out about the wedding dress, and Meghan wouldn't tell her.' This was enough to spark concern in the Palace, with hushed fears brewing that Meghan could 'turn into nothing but trouble' and that — despite royal protocol — 'she sees things in a different way'. As Sally revealed this week, 'I asked her if Meghan was being bossy. 'So I gather,' Lady Elizabeth replied. 'Very much so.'' What's more, the Queen is said to have worried about Meghan's infamously frosty relationship with her soon to be sister-in-law, Kate Middleton — telling her confidante that Meghan and Kate were 'not working well'. As history's proven, the Queen was right again. Around the time of the wedding, it was widely reported that Meghan had made Kate cry over a disagreement about Princess Charlotte's bridesmaid dress. Then, in their explosive sit-down with Oprah Winfrey in 2021, Harry and Meghan claimed the 'reverse' was true. Meghan said that she was in fact the one in tears, adding, 'I don't say that to be disparaging to anyone, because it was a really hard week of the wedding and she was upset about something, but she owned it, and she apologized.' Two years later, in his 2023 memoir Spare, Harry doubled down on Kate's allegedly 'icy' behaviour towards Meghan, claiming she'd made a 'grimace' when the latter had borrowed her lipgloss. Clearly, as the Queen and Lady Elizabeth foretold, that bad blood between Kate and Meghan and their warring husbands only worsened. Despite their concerns, there was — of course — hope that Harry and Meghan would take the mantle as loyal and popular senior members of the royal family. Harry seems to think the Queen can do what she wants, but Her Majesty can't... Harry has blown relationship with his grandmother And, initially, at least, they showed some promise. Just weeks after they got married, they proudly stood on the balcony at Buckingham Palace alongside Harry's family for Meghan's first Trooping the Colour. But by February, a then pregnant Meghan was sparking concern yet again. Writing on her recent Substack, Sally revealed, 'By late February 2019 when Liza [Lady Elizabeth's nickname] and I spoke on the phone, she said, 'I don't trust Meghan an inch. 'To begin with, she was not bad — a straightforward starlet, used to public speaking and charity work. 'The wedge between the brothers is really too bad.'' Sadly, the wedge only widened. In January 2020, Harry and Meghan announced they'd chosen to 'transition this year in starting to carve out a progressive new role within this institution'. At first, it seemed they wanted to keep one foot in the royal fold, while pursuing financial and commercial opportunities on the outside — but, after months of negotiations, the Queen and the then Prince Charles laid down the law: they were either fully in or fully out. There was no in-between. They opted for the latter and moved to the US later that year, infamously launching a crusade of palace-bashing and complaints against the royals in the aftermath. Their first attack came in 2021 when, as mentioned, they sat down with Oprah Winfrey, and claimed — among several accusations — that the palace hadn't protected Meghan when negative stories circulated about her, and hadn't supported her during a mental health crisis. They also claimed there had been racially-charged speculation over the colour of their future child's skin. In response, the Queen — who lived by her mantra to 'Never complain, never explain' — made the unprecedented move to respond to their attacks. The Queen and Meghan had tea days before the wedding. Her Majesty was trying to find out about the wedding dress, and Meghan wouldn't tell her A palace statement said on her behalf: 'The whole family is saddened to learn the full extent of how challenging the last few years have been for Harry and Meghan. 'The issues raised, particularly that of race, are concerning. 'Whilst some recollections may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be addressed by the family privately. 'Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be much loved family members.' As we all know by now, the schism has only grown. The Queen died in September 2022 at the age of 96 — before Harry and Meghan upped their outbursts against the royals. Thankfully, she didn't live to read his memoir, which made pointed attacks against his father and brother, accusing the latter of physically attacking him amid their Megxit negotiations. She also didn't live to see his legal battle against the UK government over the removal of his publicly funded police protection — an issue which, Harry says, has alienated his father for good. Over the past year, both Kate Middleton and King Charles have fought respective cancer battles — yet even poor health hasn't helped to bridge the divide between the royal family and the estranged Sussexes. As things stand, Harry and Meghan have fully severed every royal tie — though Meghan did recently refer to herself as HRH The Duchess of Sussex (despite previously promising the Queen they would not use their royal titles). In the wake of Sally's revelations, neither the Palace nor the Sussexes' team have responded. But her unearthed conversations with Lady Elizabeth, who was made a Commander of the Royal Victorian Order shortly before she died, came at a momentous time for Meghan — on the same day she launched her lifestyle brand's new rose wine. Whether she will be raising a toast this week — despite the fresh allegations stacked against her and Harry — remains to be seen.