logo
Queen doubted Meghan long before Megxit & palace feared she ‘engineered' marriage & was NOT in love, says expert

Queen doubted Meghan long before Megxit & palace feared she ‘engineered' marriage & was NOT in love, says expert

The Sun16 hours ago
FIVE years have passed since Megxit tore apart the Royal Family.
It gave Queen Elizabeth II undue stress and upset in the last few years of her life.
4
4
But according to royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith, the late monarch and her innermost circle had had their doubts about Prince Harry's marriage to Meghan Markle long before they dropped the proverbial bomb and quit royal life in 2020.
In fact, the Queen feared her grandson was 'besotted and weak' and said he had been 'rude' to her in the lead-up to his and Meghan's wedding at St George's Chapel in Windsor in 2018.
She also worried that his bride-to-be had manipulated the prince, while getting away with a raft of bad behaviour.
Now, for the first time, the Queen's private concerns have been made public in heartbreaking detail — showing just how perceptive she proved to be.
This week Sally published 'explosive' revelations made to her by one of Her Majesty's closest confidantes, her first cousin once removed, Lady Elizabeth Anson, in several conversations in 2018 and 2019.
Lady Elizabeth claimed there were serious concerns in the upper echelons of the Palace, long before Harry and Meghan made themselves royal pariahs.
In fact, just days before the wedding, she told Sally: 'We hope but don't quite think [Meghan] is in love.
'We think she engineered it all.'
She added: 'It's worrying that so many people are questioning whether Meghan is right for Harry.
'The problem, bless his heart, is that Harry is neither bright nor strong, and she is both.'
It's unforgivable what Meghan did to the Queen - she's caused a bigger crisis than the death of Diana, says expert
In another exchange, Lady Elizabeth said: 'I don't trust Meghan an inch.
'Meghan could turn into nothing but trouble.'
Musty smell
The shock revelations were released this week in Sally's Royals Extra feature on publishing platform Substack.
The observations by Lady Elizabeth, who died from lung cancer in November 2020 aged 79, show the warning signs were there from the start — and proved well-founded.
She said Meghan had initially appeared 'natural, intelligent and thoughtful' after getting engaged to Harry in 2017.
But as their wedding approached, they both caused a stir with their poor behaviour — and blatant disrespect for the Queen.
Harry was reportedly 'rude to her for ten minutes' in one meeting and upset her by asking the Archbishop of Canterbury to perform the wedding service in May 2018, without first seeking permission from the Dean of Windsor.
As a high-society event planner herself, Lady Elizabeth — who was born at Windsor Castle in 1941 and was also King George VI's goddaughter — understood all too well just what an embarrassing situation this put the Queen in.
She said at the time: 'Harry seems to think the Queen can do what she wants, but she can't.
'On the religious side, it is the Dean of Windsor's jurisdiction.'
She added that as a result, 'Harry has blown his relationship with his grandmother.'
They did later 'patch things up' — but the hurt remained.
As for Meghan, allegations of her 'diva-like' behaviour in the run-up to her big day is nothing new.
Indeed, at the time, it was rumoured that she had been nicknamed 'Me-gain' by Palace courtiers, thanks to her extensive demands, and among her many complaints, had moaned about the 'musty' smell in the chapel.
Nicknamed 'Me-gain' by Palace courtiers
She had even allegedly ordered staff to 'go around with these atomisers, like spritzer guns, and spray the chapel with scent before anyone arrived.'
This follows years of allegations about Meghan's 'bullying' behaviour — something that even sparked an internal investigation at Buckingham Palace.
However, this is the first time we have heard about the Queen's thoughts on the matter — and they were not good, according to Lady Elizabeth, who was a great-niece of the Queen Mother and a goddaughter of King George VI.
In 2018 she told Sally that Meghan had rattled the Queen days before the wedding, revealing: 'They had tea with her the day before yesterday.
'She was trying to find out about the wedding dress, and Meghan wouldn't tell her.'
This was enough to spark concern in the Palace, with hushed fears brewing that Meghan could 'turn into nothing but trouble' and that — despite royal protocol — 'she sees things in a different way'.
As Sally revealed this week, 'I asked her if Meghan was being bossy. 'So I gather,' Lady Elizabeth replied. 'Very much so.''
What's more, the Queen is said to have worried about Meghan's infamously frosty relationship with her soon to be sister-in-law, Kate Middleton — telling her confidante that Meghan and Kate were 'not working well'.
As history's proven, the Queen was right again.
Around the time of the wedding, it was widely reported that Meghan had made Kate cry over a disagreement about Princess Charlotte's bridesmaid dress.
Then, in their explosive sit-down with Oprah Winfrey in 2021, Harry and Meghan claimed the 'reverse' was true.
Meghan said that she was in fact the one in tears, adding, 'I don't say that to be disparaging to anyone, because it was a really hard week of the wedding and she was upset about something, but she owned it, and she apologized.'
Two years later, in his 2023 memoir Spare, Harry doubled down on Kate's allegedly 'icy' behaviour towards Meghan, claiming she'd made a 'grimace' when the latter had borrowed her lipgloss.
Clearly, as the Queen and Lady Elizabeth foretold, that bad blood between Kate and Meghan and their warring husbands only worsened.
Despite their concerns, there was — of course — hope that Harry and Meghan would take the mantle as loyal and popular senior members of the royal family.
Harry seems to think the Queen can do what she wants, but Her Majesty can't... Harry has blown relationship with his grandmother
And, initially, at least, they showed some promise.
Just weeks after they got married, they proudly stood on the balcony at Buckingham Palace alongside Harry's family for Meghan's first Trooping the Colour.
But by February, a then pregnant Meghan was sparking concern yet again.
Writing on her recent Substack, Sally revealed, 'By late February 2019 when Liza [Lady Elizabeth's nickname] and I spoke on the phone, she said, 'I don't trust Meghan an inch.
'To begin with, she was not bad — a straightforward starlet, used to public speaking and charity work.
'The wedge between the brothers is really too bad.''
Sadly, the wedge only widened.
In January 2020, Harry and Meghan announced they'd chosen to 'transition this year in starting to carve out a progressive new role within this institution'.
At first, it seemed they wanted to keep one foot in the royal fold, while pursuing financial and commercial opportunities on the outside — but, after months of negotiations, the Queen and the then Prince Charles laid down the law: they were either fully in or fully out.
There was no in-between.
They opted for the latter and moved to the US later that year, infamously launching a crusade of palace-bashing and complaints against the royals in the aftermath.
Their first attack came in 2021 when, as mentioned, they sat down with Oprah Winfrey, and claimed — among several accusations — that the palace hadn't protected Meghan when negative stories circulated about her, and hadn't supported her during a mental health crisis.
They also claimed there had been racially-charged speculation over the colour of their future child's skin.
In response, the Queen — who lived by her mantra to 'Never complain, never explain' — made the unprecedented move to respond to their attacks.
The Queen and Meghan had tea days before the wedding. Her Majesty was trying to find out about the wedding dress, and Meghan wouldn't tell her
A palace statement said on her behalf: 'The whole family is saddened to learn the full extent of how challenging the last few years have been for Harry and Meghan.
'The issues raised, particularly that of race, are concerning.
'Whilst some recollections may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be addressed by the family privately.
'Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be much loved family members.'
As we all know by now, the schism has only grown.
The Queen died in September 2022 at the age of 96 — before Harry and Meghan upped their outbursts against the royals.
Thankfully, she didn't live to read his memoir, which made pointed attacks against his father and brother, accusing the latter of physically attacking him amid their Megxit negotiations.
She also didn't live to see his legal battle against the UK government over the removal of his publicly funded police protection — an issue which, Harry says, has alienated his father for good.
Over the past year, both Kate Middleton and King Charles have fought respective cancer battles — yet even poor health hasn't helped to bridge the divide between the royal family and the estranged Sussexes.
As things stand, Harry and Meghan have fully severed every royal tie — though Meghan did recently refer to herself as HRH The Duchess of Sussex (despite previously promising the Queen they would not use their royal titles).
In the wake of Sally's revelations, neither the Palace nor the Sussexes' team have responded.
But her unearthed conversations with Lady Elizabeth, who was made a Commander of the Royal Victorian Order shortly before she died, came at a momentous time for Meghan — on the same day she launched her lifestyle brand's new rose wine.
Whether she will be raising a toast this week — despite the fresh allegations stacked against her and Harry — remains to be seen.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fans confused as Bradley Walsh accepts ‘wrong' answer on The Chase
Fans confused as Bradley Walsh accepts ‘wrong' answer on The Chase

The Independent

time28 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Fans confused as Bradley Walsh accepts ‘wrong' answer on The Chase

Bradley Walsh accepted an answer from Jenny Ryan on The Chase that viewers deemed incorrect during a repeat episode on Monday. The question asked for the colour indicating semi-skimmed milk on bottles, to which Ryan replied "red and silver", an answer Walsh accepted. Fans expressed confusion and frustration on social media, noting that semi-skimmed milk cartons are typically green. However, some viewers clarified that Ryan's answer might refer to less common glass bottles, which often feature red lids for semi-skimmed milk. Watch the video in full above.

National Grid's maintenance the damning failure identified by report into fire that sparked Heathrow chaos
National Grid's maintenance the damning failure identified by report into fire that sparked Heathrow chaos

Sky News

time29 minutes ago

  • Sky News

National Grid's maintenance the damning failure identified by report into fire that sparked Heathrow chaos

The reliability of our grid is, it turns out, paper thin. A fire at the National Grid substation at North Hyde, which supplies Heathrow Airport, was caused by the "catastrophic failure" of a bushing in a high-voltage transformer at the site. A bushing is made of paper and foil, soaked in oil. The resulting fire, which knocked out the substation and in turn, power to more than 70,000 customers, including the west London airport, led to 1,300 flight cancellations affecting nearly 300,000 travellers. 0:51 The bushing on which the blame falls is the insulated wire that at North Hyde was one of three carrying a whopping 275kV of electricity into the transformer. In many transformers - especially older ones like this installed in 1968 - bushings are insulated by several layers of paper wrapped around alternating layers of metal foil, all soaked in a special insulating "bushing oil". But if air bubbles or moisture get into the absorbent paper, it loses its insulating power. As the report found, the most likely cause of the fire at North Hyde was "moisture entering the bushing causing a short circuit." That short circuit caused a spark that ignited the oil in the bushing, and in turn, the 150 litres of oil that insulates and cools the transformer, resulting in an inferno. 0:49 The result was a fire so catastrophic, it took out not just one transformer at the site but also its sister transformer next to it. Oil and paper insulators date back to the turn of the last century, and they work perfectly well if properly maintained. And it is National Grid's maintenance that is the damning failure identified by this report. The report finds that the highest "category 1" moisture reading was identified during inspection of the doomed bushing in 2018. According to National Grid's procedures, that reading should have resulted in its immediate replacement. Yet, for some reason, no action was taken. In fact, the report finds, routine maintenance of the failing transformer was deferred in 2022 - potentially another missed chance to rectify the fault. National Grid said in response to the report that it has already carried out an "end-to-end review" of its relevant inspection and maintenance processes. The review also found that no other maintenance red flags have been missed. It's nonetheless a serious failing and explains why Ofgem, the energy regulator, has now ordered an enforcement investigation into our largest grid operator. It raises questions, too, about the level of investment made by privatised network companies in maintaining or replacing ageing infrastructure. Recent analysis by Common Wealth found that all our electricity network operators have underspent their budgets for replacing grid hardware. This is money they are allowed by Ofgem to add to customers' bills as part of "network charges". Those charges are set to rise again in Ofgem's latest review. Other infrastructure companies, our water firms in particular, stand accused of "sweating" ageing assets to increase their profits. A key question for Ofgem's investigation into National Grid is whether money for maintenance and replacement was instead going toward their profits, at the expense of customers and ultimately the resilience of our electricity supply.

‘Being fit at 50 is about making the most of every moment'
‘Being fit at 50 is about making the most of every moment'

Telegraph

time33 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

‘Being fit at 50 is about making the most of every moment'

Can you shift your thinking to be more positive as you aim to make the most of every waking moment? Anita Rani is finding out on her new podcast, Bright Ideas with Anita Rani – in partnership with EE – and TV presenter Ben Shephard is convinced it can be done. He says he's much more body conscious now that he's 50 – 'My knee's bad, my back's bad' – but that it inspired him to get fit, and as soon as he put it out on Instagram the responses, and the challenges, started flooding in. Throughout the episode, Anita and Ben discuss thriving on consistency, manifesting, cosmic reading and picking yourself up and staying the course when life doesn't go according to plan. The This Morning presenter also shares the joy he gets from family life and the pleasure he takes from watching his boys grow up and inspiring them to embrace new experiences. Ben also takes time out to recommend some more practical tips for living your best life, such as the technology which makes life easier, including the Diary App, Notes, a health app and even an Aura ring. For all of Ben's tips, life hacks, insights and stories, catch the latest episode of Bright Ideas with Anita Rani on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts. Episodes are released weekly on Wednesdays. Visit for more about EE. There's loads of smart advice, from setting up parental controls and keeping your kids safe online to making sure you never run out of data when you need it most.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store