Common breast cancer treatment could reduce risk of developing Alzheimer's, research suggests
The neurodegenerative disorder – which affects memory, thinking and behaviour – impacts more than 900,000 people in the UK.
There is currently no cure and most cases of the condition are not linked to genetics.
But scientists in South Korea have found that breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy were significantly less likely to go on to develop Alzheimer's than women who hadn't received the treatment.
Around one in seven women in the UK will be diagnosed with breast cancer during their lifetime.
More than 70 per cent will be treated with radiotherapy, which uses high-energy radiation to kill cancer cells and shrink tumours.
To investigate whether cancer treatment affects Alzheimer's risk, researchers at Samsung University analysed health records of more than 250,000 women.
Around 70,000 were breast cancer survivors who had undergone surgery and treatment between 2010 and 2016.
They found those who received radiotherapy were 8 per cent less likely to develop Alzheimer's than women who either hadn't had the treatment or had never had breast cancer.
'Based on these findings, we hypothesise that the risk of Alzheimer's dementia could be lowered shortly after cancer treatment,' said lead author Dr Su-Min Jeong.
However, he added that this apparent protective effect faded with time. 'It may equalise as the survival period increases,' he said.
Researchers believe radiotherapy may have anti-inflammatory or neuroprotective effects. It's also been shown to reduce levels of two types of brain cells linked to inflammation in Alzheimer's.
Other theories suggest radiation may interfere with the formation of amyloid plaques – abnormal protein clumps found in the brains of Alzheimer's patients – or influence the immune system.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
11 minutes ago
- Sky News
Wes Streeting says doctors' strikes 'a gift to Nigel Farage'
Wes Streeting has stepped up his war of words with junior doctors by telling Labour MPs that strikes would be "a gift to Nigel Farage". In a hard-hitting speech to the Parliamentary Labour Party, the health secretary claimed ministers were "in the fight for the survival of the NHS". And he said that if Labour failed in its fight, the Reform UK leader would campaign for the health service to be replaced by an insurance-style system. Mr Streeting 's tough warning to Labour MPs came ahead of a showdown with the British Medical Association (BMA) this week in which he will call on the doctors to call off the strikes. The BMA has announced plans for five days of strikes by resident doctors - formerly known as junior doctors - in England, which are due to begin on 25 July. At a meeting in parliament at which he received a warm reception from Labour MPs, Mr Streeting said: "The BMA's threats are unnecessary, unreasonable, and unfair. "More than that, these strikes would be a gift to Nigel Farage, just as we are beginning to cut waiting lists and get the NHS moving in the right direction. "What better recruitment agent could there be for his right-wing populist attacks on the very existence of a publicly funded, free at the point of need, universal health service? He is praying that we fail on the NHS. "If Labour fail, he will point to that as proof that the NHS has failed and must now be replaced by an insurance-style system. So we are in the fight for the survival of the NHS, and it is a fight I have no intention of losing." 2:27 The threatened strikes are in pursuit of a 29% pay rise that the BMA is demanding to replace what it claims is lost pay in recent years. The government has awarded a 5.4% pay increase this year after a 22% rise for the previous two years. Earlier, appearing before the all-party health and social care committee of MPs, Mr Streeting said the strike would be a "catastrophic mistake" and not telling employers about their intention to strike would be "shockingly irresponsible". He said BMA leaders seemed to be telling their members "not to inform their trusts or their employers if they're going out on strike" and that he could not fathom "how any doctor in good conscience would make it harder for managers to make sure we have safe staffing levels". He said: "Going on strike having received a 28.9% pay increase is not only unreasonable and unnecessary, given the progress that we've been making on pay and other issues, it's also self-defeating." He said he accepted doctors' right to strike, but added: "The idea that doctors would go on strike without informing their employer, not allowing planning for safe staffing, I think, is unconscionable, and I would urge resident doctors who are taking part in strike actions to do the right thing." Mr Streeting warned the strike would lead to cancellations and delays in patient treatment and spoke of a family member who was waiting for the "inevitable" phone call informing them that their procedure would be postponed. "We can mitigate against the impact of strikes, and we will, but what we cannot do is promise that there will be no consequence and no delay, no further suffering, because there are lots of people whose procedures are scheduled over that weekend period and in the period subsequently, where the NHS has to recover from the industrial action, who will see their operations and appointments delayed," he said. "I have a relative in that position. My family are currently dreading what I fear is an inevitable phone call saying that there is going to be a delay to this procedure. And I just think this is an unconscionable thing to do to the public, not least given the 28.9% pay rise."
Sky News
11 minutes ago
- Sky News
Wes Streeting says doctor strikes 'a gift to Nigel Farage'
Wes Streeting has stepped up his war of words with junior doctors by telling Labour MPs that strikes would be "a gift to Nigel Farage". In a hard-hitting speech to the Parliamentary Labour Party, the health secretary claimed ministers were "in the fight for the survival of the NHS". And he said that if Labour failed in its fight, the Reform UK leader would campaign for the health service to be replaced by an insurance-style system. Mr Streeting 's tough warning to Labour MPs came ahead of a showdown with the British Medical Association (BMA) this week in which he will call on the doctors to call off the strikes. The BMA has announced plans for five days of strikes by resident doctors - formerly known as junior doctors - in England, which are due to begin on 25 July. At a meeting in parliament at which he received a warm reception from Labour MPs, Mr Streeting said: "The BMA's threats are unnecessary, unreasonable, and unfair. "More than that, these strikes would be a gift to Nigel Farage, just as we are beginning to cut waiting lists and get the NHS moving in the right direction. "What better recruitment agent could there be for his right-wing populist attacks on the very existence of a publicly funded, free at the point of need, universal health service? He is praying that we fail on the NHS. "If Labour fail, he will point to that as proof that the NHS has failed and must now be replaced by an insurance-style system. So we are in the fight for the survival of the NHS, and it is a fight I have no intention of losing." 2:27 The threatened strikes are in pursuit of a 29% pay rise that the BMA is demanding to replace what it claims is lost pay in recent years. The government has awarded a 5.4% pay increase this year after a 22% rise for the previous two years. Earlier, appearing before the all-party health and social care committee of MPs, Mr Streeting said the strike would be a "catastrophic mistake" and not telling employers about their intention to strike would be "shockingly irresponsible". He said BMA leaders seemed to be telling their members "not to inform their trusts or their employers if they're going out on strike" and that he could not fathom "how any doctor in good conscience would make it harder for managers to make sure we have safe staffing levels". He said: "Going on strike having received a 28.9% pay increase is not only unreasonable and unnecessary, given the progress that we've been making on pay and other issues, it's also self-defeating." He said he accepted doctors' right to strike, but added: "The idea that doctors would go on strike without informing their employer, not allowing planning for safe staffing, I think, is unconscionable, and I would urge resident doctors who are taking part in strike actions to do the right thing." Mr Streeting warned the strike would lead to cancellations and delays in patient treatment and spoke of a family member who was waiting for the "inevitable" phone call informing them that their procedure would be postponed. "We can mitigate against the impact of strikes, and we will, but what we cannot do is promise that there will be no consequence and no delay, no further suffering, because there are lots of people whose procedures are scheduled over that weekend period and in the period subsequently, where the NHS has to recover from the industrial action, who will see their operations and appointments delayed," he said. "I have a relative in that position. My family are currently dreading what I fear is an inevitable phone call saying that there is going to be a delay to this procedure. And I just think this is an unconscionable thing to do to the public, not least given the 28.9% pay rise."
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Charge £20 for GP appointments, says former health secretary
Patients should pay £20 for a GP appointment as part of an insurance-based NHS, a report backed by a former health secretary has said. Sir Sajid Javid said Britain was 'long overdue' a 'serious conversation' about how the NHS was funded in the introduction to the report by Policy Exchange, the London think tank. The paper advocates a Dutch-style social insurance model that would provide universal care to all who need it, but without the foibles of the US private healthcare system. It claims switching to a largely insurance-funded NHS would halve the tax burden needed to pay for healthcare in the UK from 9 per cent of GDP to 4 per cent, saving about £128 billion per year. This could reduce the average amount of tax paid by the public by around £2,400 a year, the paper argues. Some of which would then be used to pay a health insurance premium for those who could afford to do so, with wider taxation covering the rest. The authors of the report also argue that additional charges such as £20 for a GP appointment, scrapping free prescriptions for over-60s and introducing fines for missed appointments, would further raise funds – as well as incentivise a reduction in the wasteful use of the NHS and further limit the tax burden. They also advocate charges for 'more luxurious hospital accommodation', which they say could raise £700 million. Sir Sajid said the NHS spent its 'original yearly budget every month' and its funding was 'the size of the GDP of Portugal', accounting for 18 per cent of day-to-day government spending. He wrote: 'We've come to a crossroads. A serious conversation with taxpayers about how we continue funding their favourite national institution is long overdue. 'We have two options. The first is to make an active choice to continue putting more and more money into healthcare, funded by yearly tax rises and by diverting essential investment into everything from education to defence towards the NHS. 'The second is reforming how we do healthcare. What we cannot afford to do is to bury our heads in the sand.' The report says that 'under no circumstances should the UK consider moving towards the US model ', which is the only developed country with worse health outcomes than Britain, it says. It notes that other countries 'with some sort of insurance-based model do much better', such as France, Germany and Singapore. It spotlights the Netherlands model as one to which the UK could aspire. The Netherlands' 2006 health insurance Act merged a national health system with private insurance markets to create a universal social health insurance program. It continues to provide universal coverage but has integrated a competitive, market-based insurance system. Waiting times were shorter for the majority of treatments and procedures in the Netherlands while the country recovered from the Covid pandemic than they were in the UK before it hit. The Dutch offered faster access in 2023 for various surgeries as well as hip and knee replacements than the NHS did in 2019. Since then, waiting times have soared in Britain. The report says: 'We believe that better quality healthcare with universal coverage and improved long-term funding sustainability could be secured by moving from our present entirely socialised model to a hybrid model with a significant social insurance component.' 'An economic drag' Policy Exchange advocates a system in which universal healthcare coverage is available and a basic model can be supplemented by other policies. Outlining how the reform to the NHS would work in the UK, the report says the Government would regulate insurers and healthcare providers. The think tank says the system should still be called the NHS – with the main change being 'about the way the system is financed'. Roger Bootle, the head of Policy Exchange's policy programme for prosperity, and lead author of the report, said the 'NHS's economic drag is plain for all to see'. He said: 'Waiting lists are longer, productivity is lower, and the burden on taxpayers has become intolerable. 'Worse still, UK health outcomes continue to stagnate, despite pouring billions more into the system, and are generally worse than other developed nations. 'We need a serious debate about not only the structure but also the funding of the NHS. Social insurance offers the only realistic way forward: a fairer, more sustainable system that delivers better outcomes for less money.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said: 'We remain absolutely committed to ensuring the NHS remains a publicly funded service, free at the point of use. 'We are taking bold action now to reform the health service to get it back on its feet and to make it fit for the future through our 10 Year Health Plan. 'We will seize the opportunities provided by new technology, medicines and innovation to deliver better care for all patients – no matter where they live or how much they earn – and better value for taxpayers.'
